Why I don't use Apple products
-
I think the article makes a great point, amidst the usual post-mortem media frenzy, but if you don't specify which part of the article you're referring to, it doesn't give an obvious reason to avoid Apple products. You could say: "I avoid Apple products because Apple is the only giant-pile-of-cash-owning company that doesn't give a dime to charities". That would state a reason. I doubt you'd say: "I avoid Apple products because Apple's CEO was overrated".
'As programmers go, I'm fairly social. Which still means I'm a borderline sociopath by normal standards.' Jeff Atwood 'I'm French! Where do you think I've gotten such an outrrrrageous accent?' Monty Python and the Holy Grail
-
I have a 27" iMac at home. I don't use it for what I had in mind when I bought it but I've got some books on Objective-C, Cocoa, and XCode which I'm going to look at when I get the time. For now, it's an expensive browser and Safari isn't that good compared to Firefox. One day it will justify its price. One day...
-
That article is badly reasoned. The writer is obviously trying to gain notoriety with a contrarian view, it is a pity that he needs to stoop to such ghoulish tactics just to get noticed, obviously coming up with something coherent and clever is never going to work for him. Describing Indian politicians as successful is just plain odd - they get elected because there is no real choice, the whole world knows what a bunch of theives and crooks most of them are.Was the iPhone revolutionary? Possibly, but probably not (all the tech was there beforehand). Was it a success? Certainly. Did he invent the things that he sold? No. Did he get those things sold? Definitely. Before anyone shouts fanboy I suggest they take a look at this[^] post. I'm anti (but not rabidly) Apple, even I can see Steve Jobs was a success by most reasonable measures. My main problem with this article is the way it cherry-picks from someone's life to paint them as either successful or a failure. This is especially easy with high-profile people. The lack of apparent philanthropy is largely irrelevant, this is a matter of individual conscience, it is also an argument that has been rehearsed previously, by better writers. It is also possible that Steve Jobs donated anonymously - I doubt this personally, but it is still possible, something the author never mentions. If he did he surely deserves more kudos for not making a big show about it. So what will history make of Steve Jobs? Only time will tell. My guess is a mixture of top-grade CEO mixed with some dubious business practises. The only thing I know for certain is neither mine nor the Journo's opinion will matter.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
I think the article makes a great point, amidst the usual post-mortem media frenzy, but if you don't specify which part of the article you're referring to, it doesn't give an obvious reason to avoid Apple products. You could say: "I avoid Apple products because Apple is the only giant-pile-of-cash-owning company that doesn't give a dime to charities". That would state a reason. I doubt you'd say: "I avoid Apple products because Apple's CEO was overrated".
'As programmers go, I'm fairly social. Which still means I'm a borderline sociopath by normal standards.' Jeff Atwood 'I'm French! Where do you think I've gotten such an outrrrrageous accent?' Monty Python and the Holy Grail
In your sig:
Julien Villers wrote:
'I'm French! Where do you think I've gotten such an outrrrrageous accent?' Monty Python and the Holy Grail
I've often wondered, how did they deal with this in the French version (assuming there is one)? Did they make them German or something?
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
harold aptroot wrote:
Do you have a back account?
Is there where you save your vertebrae in case they get damaged in later life? Can you earn interest? :-D
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
-
I have a 27" iMac at home. I don't use it for what I had in mind when I bought it but I've got some books on Objective-C, Cocoa, and XCode which I'm going to look at when I get the time. For now, it's an expensive browser and Safari isn't that good compared to Firefox. One day it will justify its price. One day...
No, because by then it's value will be as near to nothing as makes no difference...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
-
harold aptroot wrote:
Do you have a back account?
Is there where you save your vertebrae in case they get damaged in later life? Can you earn interest? :-D
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
:rolleyes: No, it is where you keep your bacon[^]!:cool:
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
harold aptroot wrote:
Do you have a back account?
Is there where you save your vertebrae in case they get damaged in later life? Can you earn interest? :-D
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
-
No, because by then it's value will be as near to nothing as makes no difference...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
That's bad news. I bought my iMac as a long-term financial investment. I thought they had excellent rock-solid resale values and that iMac values consistently outperformed the stock markets. Please don't tell me it ain't so... :(
-
Simple reason, there overpriced.
Software Kinetics Wear a hard hat it's under construction
Metro RSSexactly! I don't understand it at all! Why would you want to spend 1/3 more or in the majority of cases even more than that for the same machine but in a white case and a different OS?! I just don't understand it! I know they are now a fashion icon and its "cool" to have a mac but in my opinion it's better to have better insides at a cheaper price than an apple logo on my machine!
-
I thought you knew: I'm a spineless wimp!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
-
exactly! I don't understand it at all! Why would you want to spend 1/3 more or in the majority of cases even more than that for the same machine but in a white case and a different OS?! I just don't understand it! I know they are now a fashion icon and its "cool" to have a mac but in my opinion it's better to have better insides at a cheaper price than an apple logo on my machine!
-
I think the article makes a great point, amidst the usual post-mortem media frenzy, but if you don't specify which part of the article you're referring to, it doesn't give an obvious reason to avoid Apple products. You could say: "I avoid Apple products because Apple is the only giant-pile-of-cash-owning company that doesn't give a dime to charities". That would state a reason. I doubt you'd say: "I avoid Apple products because Apple's CEO was overrated".
'As programmers go, I'm fairly social. Which still means I'm a borderline sociopath by normal standards.' Jeff Atwood 'I'm French! Where do you think I've gotten such an outrrrrageous accent?' Monty Python and the Holy Grail
I feel that Apple products are not really great and don't really deserve the attention and hype they're given. I really have a good laugh when I read about people waiting in long queues all night to buy these so-called great products on the day they're lanuched. They're really just a repackaged version of products already in the market. MP3 players, touch screen mobiles, etc. were already there before iPhone. I don't see anything "revolutionary", "unique" or "exceptional" to call them great products and buy them at such senseless prices.
-
I have a 27" iMac at home. I don't use it for what I had in mind when I bought it but I've got some books on Objective-C, Cocoa, and XCode which I'm going to look at when I get the time. For now, it's an expensive browser and Safari isn't that good compared to Firefox. One day it will justify its price. One day...
-
That article is badly reasoned. The writer is obviously trying to gain notoriety with a contrarian view, it is a pity that he needs to stoop to such ghoulish tactics just to get noticed, obviously coming up with something coherent and clever is never going to work for him. Describing Indian politicians as successful is just plain odd - they get elected because there is no real choice, the whole world knows what a bunch of theives and crooks most of them are.Was the iPhone revolutionary? Possibly, but probably not (all the tech was there beforehand). Was it a success? Certainly. Did he invent the things that he sold? No. Did he get those things sold? Definitely. Before anyone shouts fanboy I suggest they take a look at this[^] post. I'm anti (but not rabidly) Apple, even I can see Steve Jobs was a success by most reasonable measures. My main problem with this article is the way it cherry-picks from someone's life to paint them as either successful or a failure. This is especially easy with high-profile people. The lack of apparent philanthropy is largely irrelevant, this is a matter of individual conscience, it is also an argument that has been rehearsed previously, by better writers. It is also possible that Steve Jobs donated anonymously - I doubt this personally, but it is still possible, something the author never mentions. If he did he surely deserves more kudos for not making a big show about it. So what will history make of Steve Jobs? Only time will tell. My guess is a mixture of top-grade CEO mixed with some dubious business practises. The only thing I know for certain is neither mine nor the Journo's opinion will matter.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]One of the reasons I made this post is to educate some people out there who compare Jobs to the likes of Superman and Chuck Norris and call him a great man who invented iPhone and iPad. This article makes a nice point that there are far more important inventions in the history of mankind than iPhones and iPads and there are far more (really) great personalities in the world than some businessmen who knew how to build a fortune by robbing people with their shrewd marketing practise. I even remember someone asking in the Lounge why he didn't invent a medicine to cure cancer, it made me furious and also chuckle at the same time. :-) I was just wondering if inventing a cure for cancer was as simple as repackaging an MP3 player in a shiny & sleek box.
-
In your sig:
Julien Villers wrote:
'I'm French! Where do you think I've gotten such an outrrrrageous accent?' Monty Python and the Holy Grail
I've often wondered, how did they deal with this in the French version (assuming there is one)? Did they make them German or something?
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]
