Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Weird and The Wonderful
  4. What a gem.

What a gem.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Weird and The Wonderful
rubycom
37 Posts 27 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S smcnulty2000

    And well commented. I think we can all appreciate the thoroughness of the approach.

    _____________________________ Give a man a mug, he drinks for a day. Teach a man to mug... The difference between an ostrich and the average voter is where they stick their heads.

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Mark AJA
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    Don't know what language this is, but I'm sure you could use the following to reduce the code length:

    ' ...
    Return (SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString *100) & "%"
    ' . End of function.

    S P 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • J Julien Villers

      You were joking right? I saw graduates that couldn't tell a variable from an array from a class from an object (etc...). Oh, and they weren't like barely getting their grades, in fact, they were top of the class (due to compensating programming with communication or economics, plus getting their projects done by others).

      'As programmers go, I'm fairly social. Which still means I'm a borderline sociopath by normal standards.' Jeff Atwood 'I'm French! Why do you think I've got this outrrrrageous accent?' Monty Python and the Holy Grail

      A Offline
      A Offline
      AspDotNetDev
      wrote on last edited by
      #25

      Nope, not joking. Not everybody who goes through college is a better programmer than a non-college programmer. Though I'd say more college grads have better sense. Of course, that's from my anecdotal experience*, so YMMV. *For example, I wrote my 558 Lines of QuickBasic Glory before I went to college. Relying on file IO, "unnecessary" optimizations, and third party libraries seemed like too much work at the time.

      Somebody in an online forum wrote:

      INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mark AJA

        Don't know what language this is, but I'm sure you could use the following to reduce the code length:

        ' ...
        Return (SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString *100) & "%"
        ' . End of function.

        S Offline
        S Offline
        smcnulty2000
        wrote on last edited by
        #26

        There you go, thinking like a programmer again. Where's that going to get ya? :)

        _____________________________ Give a man a mug, he drinks for a day. Teach a man to mug... The difference between an ostrich and the average voter is where they stick their heads.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A AspDotNetDev

          Nope, not joking. Not everybody who goes through college is a better programmer than a non-college programmer. Though I'd say more college grads have better sense. Of course, that's from my anecdotal experience*, so YMMV. *For example, I wrote my 558 Lines of QuickBasic Glory before I went to college. Relying on file IO, "unnecessary" optimizations, and third party libraries seemed like too much work at the time.

          Somebody in an online forum wrote:

          INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Julien Villers
          wrote on last edited by
          #27

          I guess if you take a statistical sample of graduates vs non-graduates, the average is better, and the deviation lower. I was worried that you'd equate degree with competence ;)

          'As programmers go, I'm fairly social. Which still means I'm a borderline sociopath by normal standards.' Jeff Atwood 'I'm French! Why do you think I've got this outrrrrageous accent?' Monty Python and the Holy Grail

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mark AJA

            Don't know what language this is, but I'm sure you could use the following to reduce the code length:

            ' ...
            Return (SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString *100) & "%"
            ' . End of function.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Paladin2000
            wrote on last edited by
            #28

            Actually, it's:

            Return (SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent * 100).ToString() + "%"

            You did the ToString before the multiplication. Note that this:

            SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString("p")

            ...does create a percentage conversion, but since it has decimals and a space it is not equivalent.

            M B 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • P Paladin2000

              Actually, it's:

              Return (SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent * 100).ToString() + "%"

              You did the ToString before the multiplication. Note that this:

              SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString("p")

              ...does create a percentage conversion, but since it has decimals and a space it is not equivalent.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mark AJA
              wrote on last edited by
              #29

              I used & and not + as & can join a string and a number. + will only add two nunbers or attach two strings. I would usually use CStr$() but as I was not to sure what language this was, used & as it's used in a number of languages.

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Julien Villers

                It couldn't have been done with a generic approach, look at the last line:

                Else
                Return "NA"

                That required a custom solution! Just kidding ;) BTW, shouldn't that be 'N/A'?

                'As programmers go, I'm fairly social. Which still means I'm a borderline sociopath by normal standards.' Jeff Atwood 'I'm French! Why do you think I've got this outrrrrageous accent?' Monty Python and the Holy Grail

                G Offline
                G Offline
                GBSC
                wrote on last edited by
                #30

                NA is correct because if you can't determine the battery percentage you must be dealing with sodium :)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Fabio Franco

                  Wow! This is only not worse than what I've seen, because the DB field length related to what I found is small:

                  public string GetStringToDatabase(int value)
                  {
                  if (value > 99999999)
                  return "0" + value.ToString();
                  else if (value > 9999999)
                  return "00" + value.ToString();
                  else if (value > 999999)
                  return "000" + value.ToString();
                  .
                  .
                  .
                  }

                  "To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems" - Homer Simpson

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  James Lonero
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #31

                  I did something like this when I was programming in assembly language back in college. I was making a way to get a value out of a register out to the terminal in an integer form. Then, we only had 16 bit registers and could only output -32738 to 32737. But, there was no library routines to output to the terminal.

                  F 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J James Lonero

                    I did something like this when I was programming in assembly language back in college. I was making a way to get a value out of a register out to the terminal in an integer form. Then, we only had 16 bit registers and could only output -32738 to 32737. But, there was no library routines to output to the terminal.

                    F Offline
                    F Offline
                    Fabio Franco
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #32

                    Well, although in assembly one can develop a routine for that, it's forgivable if you don't, specially in college while learning. What's unforgivable is having this in a high level language in production code for a mission critical application.

                    "To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems" - Homer Simpson

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Mark AJA

                      I used & and not + as & can join a string and a number. + will only add two nunbers or attach two strings. I would usually use CStr$() but as I was not to sure what language this was, used & as it's used in a number of languages.

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Paladin2000
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #33

                      The "+" operator does work here, it implicitly converts the number to a string and concatenates it to the other. But yes, the "&" operator is for concatenation explicitly. However, in your example, my key point was that you used the "*" operator between a number and a string...

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Paladin2000

                        The "+" operator does work here, it implicitly converts the number to a string and concatenates it to the other. But yes, the "&" operator is for concatenation explicitly. However, in your example, my key point was that you used the "*" operator between a number and a string...

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mark AJA
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #34

                        I don't know what language uses a * between two strings. * is usually used to multiply two numbers. EG 123*4 = 492 + is used to add two numbers. EG 123+4 = 127. 123+"4" = error & is used to join two numbers, strings or a number and a string. EG 123 & 4 = "1234" If a language returns 492 or "492" from 123*"4" then in my opinion the language needs an update. The following Visual Basic 5 code:

                        Private Sub Form_Load()
                        Dim a As Integer ' or as Long or Double
                        Dim b As String
                        a = 123
                        b = "4"
                        MsgBox a * b
                        End Sub

                        displays 492, but should display an error acording to other versions of Basic.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P Paladin2000

                          Actually, it's:

                          Return (SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent * 100).ToString() + "%"

                          You did the ToString before the multiplication. Note that this:

                          SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString("p")

                          ...does create a percentage conversion, but since it has decimals and a space it is not equivalent.

                          B Offline
                          B Offline
                          bbirajdar
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #35

                          excellent observation

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A AaronM_NZ

                            Stumbled across this gem today. http://pastebin.com/4Nx8yggU[^] For preservation sake, here is a snippet, but you get the idea:

                            Public ReadOnly Property BatteryPercent()
                            ' This code will retrieve the BatteryLifePercent property and convert it to a percent.
                            Get
                            If SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "1" Then
                            Return "100%"
                            ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "0.99" Then
                            Return "99%"
                            ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "0.98" Then
                            Return "98%"
                            ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "0.97" Then
                            Return "97%"
                            ... etc

                            Wow is all I can say.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mohibur Rashid
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #36

                            Well, I can see he has time to do code :))))))))))

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A AaronM_NZ

                              Stumbled across this gem today. http://pastebin.com/4Nx8yggU[^] For preservation sake, here is a snippet, but you get the idea:

                              Public ReadOnly Property BatteryPercent()
                              ' This code will retrieve the BatteryLifePercent property and convert it to a percent.
                              Get
                              If SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "1" Then
                              Return "100%"
                              ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "0.99" Then
                              Return "99%"
                              ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "0.98" Then
                              Return "98%"
                              ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "0.97" Then
                              Return "97%"
                              ... etc

                              Wow is all I can say.

                              K Offline
                              K Offline
                              krumia
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #37

                              Quote:

                              ' This code will retrieve the BatteryLifePercent property and convert it to a percent.

                              Really? Why would someone convert something to percent which is already in percent?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups