Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Weird and The Wonderful
  4. What a gem.

What a gem.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Weird and The Wonderful
rubycom
37 Posts 27 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A AspDotNetDev

    Nope, not joking. Not everybody who goes through college is a better programmer than a non-college programmer. Though I'd say more college grads have better sense. Of course, that's from my anecdotal experience*, so YMMV. *For example, I wrote my 558 Lines of QuickBasic Glory before I went to college. Relying on file IO, "unnecessary" optimizations, and third party libraries seemed like too much work at the time.

    Somebody in an online forum wrote:

    INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Julien Villers
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    I guess if you take a statistical sample of graduates vs non-graduates, the average is better, and the deviation lower. I was worried that you'd equate degree with competence ;)

    'As programmers go, I'm fairly social. Which still means I'm a borderline sociopath by normal standards.' Jeff Atwood 'I'm French! Why do you think I've got this outrrrrageous accent?' Monty Python and the Holy Grail

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Mark AJA

      Don't know what language this is, but I'm sure you could use the following to reduce the code length:

      ' ...
      Return (SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString *100) & "%"
      ' . End of function.

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Paladin2000
      wrote on last edited by
      #28

      Actually, it's:

      Return (SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent * 100).ToString() + "%"

      You did the ToString before the multiplication. Note that this:

      SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString("p")

      ...does create a percentage conversion, but since it has decimals and a space it is not equivalent.

      M B 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • P Paladin2000

        Actually, it's:

        Return (SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent * 100).ToString() + "%"

        You did the ToString before the multiplication. Note that this:

        SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString("p")

        ...does create a percentage conversion, but since it has decimals and a space it is not equivalent.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mark AJA
        wrote on last edited by
        #29

        I used & and not + as & can join a string and a number. + will only add two nunbers or attach two strings. I would usually use CStr$() but as I was not to sure what language this was, used & as it's used in a number of languages.

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Julien Villers

          It couldn't have been done with a generic approach, look at the last line:

          Else
          Return "NA"

          That required a custom solution! Just kidding ;) BTW, shouldn't that be 'N/A'?

          'As programmers go, I'm fairly social. Which still means I'm a borderline sociopath by normal standards.' Jeff Atwood 'I'm French! Why do you think I've got this outrrrrageous accent?' Monty Python and the Holy Grail

          G Offline
          G Offline
          GBSC
          wrote on last edited by
          #30

          NA is correct because if you can't determine the battery percentage you must be dealing with sodium :)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Fabio Franco

            Wow! This is only not worse than what I've seen, because the DB field length related to what I found is small:

            public string GetStringToDatabase(int value)
            {
            if (value > 99999999)
            return "0" + value.ToString();
            else if (value > 9999999)
            return "00" + value.ToString();
            else if (value > 999999)
            return "000" + value.ToString();
            .
            .
            .
            }

            "To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems" - Homer Simpson

            J Offline
            J Offline
            James Lonero
            wrote on last edited by
            #31

            I did something like this when I was programming in assembly language back in college. I was making a way to get a value out of a register out to the terminal in an integer form. Then, we only had 16 bit registers and could only output -32738 to 32737. But, there was no library routines to output to the terminal.

            F 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J James Lonero

              I did something like this when I was programming in assembly language back in college. I was making a way to get a value out of a register out to the terminal in an integer form. Then, we only had 16 bit registers and could only output -32738 to 32737. But, there was no library routines to output to the terminal.

              F Offline
              F Offline
              Fabio Franco
              wrote on last edited by
              #32

              Well, although in assembly one can develop a routine for that, it's forgivable if you don't, specially in college while learning. What's unforgivable is having this in a high level language in production code for a mission critical application.

              "To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems" - Homer Simpson

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Mark AJA

                I used & and not + as & can join a string and a number. + will only add two nunbers or attach two strings. I would usually use CStr$() but as I was not to sure what language this was, used & as it's used in a number of languages.

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Paladin2000
                wrote on last edited by
                #33

                The "+" operator does work here, it implicitly converts the number to a string and concatenates it to the other. But yes, the "&" operator is for concatenation explicitly. However, in your example, my key point was that you used the "*" operator between a number and a string...

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Paladin2000

                  The "+" operator does work here, it implicitly converts the number to a string and concatenates it to the other. But yes, the "&" operator is for concatenation explicitly. However, in your example, my key point was that you used the "*" operator between a number and a string...

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mark AJA
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #34

                  I don't know what language uses a * between two strings. * is usually used to multiply two numbers. EG 123*4 = 492 + is used to add two numbers. EG 123+4 = 127. 123+"4" = error & is used to join two numbers, strings or a number and a string. EG 123 & 4 = "1234" If a language returns 492 or "492" from 123*"4" then in my opinion the language needs an update. The following Visual Basic 5 code:

                  Private Sub Form_Load()
                  Dim a As Integer ' or as Long or Double
                  Dim b As String
                  a = 123
                  b = "4"
                  MsgBox a * b
                  End Sub

                  displays 492, but should display an error acording to other versions of Basic.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Paladin2000

                    Actually, it's:

                    Return (SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent * 100).ToString() + "%"

                    You did the ToString before the multiplication. Note that this:

                    SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString("p")

                    ...does create a percentage conversion, but since it has decimals and a space it is not equivalent.

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    bbirajdar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #35

                    excellent observation

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A AaronM_NZ

                      Stumbled across this gem today. http://pastebin.com/4Nx8yggU[^] For preservation sake, here is a snippet, but you get the idea:

                      Public ReadOnly Property BatteryPercent()
                      ' This code will retrieve the BatteryLifePercent property and convert it to a percent.
                      Get
                      If SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "1" Then
                      Return "100%"
                      ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "0.99" Then
                      Return "99%"
                      ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "0.98" Then
                      Return "98%"
                      ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "0.97" Then
                      Return "97%"
                      ... etc

                      Wow is all I can say.

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mohibur Rashid
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #36

                      Well, I can see he has time to do code :))))))))))

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A AaronM_NZ

                        Stumbled across this gem today. http://pastebin.com/4Nx8yggU[^] For preservation sake, here is a snippet, but you get the idea:

                        Public ReadOnly Property BatteryPercent()
                        ' This code will retrieve the BatteryLifePercent property and convert it to a percent.
                        Get
                        If SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "1" Then
                        Return "100%"
                        ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "0.99" Then
                        Return "99%"
                        ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "0.98" Then
                        Return "98%"
                        ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "0.97" Then
                        Return "97%"
                        ... etc

                        Wow is all I can say.

                        K Offline
                        K Offline
                        krumia
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #37

                        Quote:

                        ' This code will retrieve the BatteryLifePercent property and convert it to a percent.

                        Really? Why would someone convert something to percent which is already in percent?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups