Nostalgia
-
Even more hilarious is that I've never before seen anyone, here or anywhere else, use the word 'titbit' in my life. That despite being well-read, well-educated, and fairly old. Besides, anyone with a third grade education knows that 'tit' isn't a word - it's properly spelled "teat." ;P
Will Rogers never met me.
Roger Wright wrote:
Besides, anyone with a third grade education knows that 'tit' isn't a word - it's properly spelled "teat."
Wanna bet?[^] In fact this is where the Titbit comes from, it is the merest scrap of the tiniest scintilla of a crumb of a morsel that fits into the beak of such a small bird. You made a bit of a Booby[^] there, I suggest you go back to bed for a Shag[^].
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
-
Even more hilarious is that I've never before seen anyone, here or anywhere else, use the word 'titbit' in my life. That despite being well-read, well-educated, and fairly old. Besides, anyone with a third grade education knows that 'tit' isn't a word - it's properly spelled "teat." ;P
Will Rogers never met me.
Roger Wright wrote:
Besides, anyone with a third grade education knows that 'tit' isn't a word
Hmmm, it thought a tit was a bird:confused: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tit_(bird)[^]
Independent ACN Business Owner
- Check out the possibilities for your future!
- Financial independance
- Full time or Part time
- In more than 20 countries through North America, Europe, Asia and the Pacific
- Featuring the ACN IRIS 5000 video phone. See the person you are talking to.
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
-
Roger Wright wrote:
Besides, anyone with a third grade education knows that 'tit' isn't a word - it's properly spelled "teat."
Wanna bet?[^] In fact this is where the Titbit comes from, it is the merest scrap of the tiniest scintilla of a crumb of a morsel that fits into the beak of such a small bird. You made a bit of a Booby[^] there, I suggest you go back to bed for a Shag[^].
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
Thanks: I sort of knew what connection would be made! :-)
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
-
One of my favorite languages from the past was Hewlett Packard's hpl. It was developed to run on the HP9825A[^] desktop calculator, which was, in fact, as close to a real computer as one could buy that took less than a small room to hold it. The hpl language was a powerful, yet simple language which was well adapted to communicating with electronic measurement instruments via the HPIB parallel bus. It was dropped by HP because programmers hated the fact that it used lower case letters for keywords. :laugh: The coolest feature of hpl was that the Store key was also programmable, so that I could write a program that could write a program, append it to itself, and continue executing it. That may not seem a great advantage, but I loved it. One of my tasks was to measure, in-circuit, the operating characteristics of an extremely sensitive high-gain amplifier. This had to be accomplished in a high-noise environment, and the ambient noise varied from day to day. So as part of my testing program I wrote code to measure the ambient environment, characterize it using a FFT, then write a digital filtering program to remove these spurious signals from the measured values from the unit under test. That code was appended to each run of the program so that it could be called when the real part was being tested. It drove the configuration control weenies nuts, but it was one of the most reliable and accurate test routines used by the company. I pity the poor bastard who had to maintain my program after I left, though. If you're out there, I apologize! The question that drove me to post this tidbit is, is there any contemporary language which offers this same functionality, to save its own output as executable (okay, interpretable) code? If so, I think I'd like to learn it, just in case. If not, would somebody please add it to C#, since that's the language I currently enjoy?
Will Rogers never met me.
Tsk tsk! How can you possibly mention HPL without mentioning the wonders of 'gazinta'? Bring back the 'gazinta', I say! :) I worked extensively on the 9810, 9820, and a top of the range 9845 - two tape drives, built-in printer and a whopping 64K - wowee! :laugh: The 9845 was also my downfall though - BASIC in ROM, which I was told I had to use. :(( :laugh:
-
I do love that Americans say 'tidbit' rather than 'titbit' as if, somehow, the word 'tit' in this context somehow refers to the female mammary gland in a salacious manner. Hilarious.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
So as PJ and other pointed out, the Tit in titbit is actually a bird of diminutive stature, not a mammary of (hopefully) more statuesque dimensions. Realise now that your hilarity should now turn to red facedness. Besides your location is the US, what are you bitching about a bit of tid!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
One of my favorite languages from the past was Hewlett Packard's hpl. It was developed to run on the HP9825A[^] desktop calculator, which was, in fact, as close to a real computer as one could buy that took less than a small room to hold it. The hpl language was a powerful, yet simple language which was well adapted to communicating with electronic measurement instruments via the HPIB parallel bus. It was dropped by HP because programmers hated the fact that it used lower case letters for keywords. :laugh: The coolest feature of hpl was that the Store key was also programmable, so that I could write a program that could write a program, append it to itself, and continue executing it. That may not seem a great advantage, but I loved it. One of my tasks was to measure, in-circuit, the operating characteristics of an extremely sensitive high-gain amplifier. This had to be accomplished in a high-noise environment, and the ambient noise varied from day to day. So as part of my testing program I wrote code to measure the ambient environment, characterize it using a FFT, then write a digital filtering program to remove these spurious signals from the measured values from the unit under test. That code was appended to each run of the program so that it could be called when the real part was being tested. It drove the configuration control weenies nuts, but it was one of the most reliable and accurate test routines used by the company. I pity the poor bastard who had to maintain my program after I left, though. If you're out there, I apologize! The question that drove me to post this tidbit is, is there any contemporary language which offers this same functionality, to save its own output as executable (okay, interpretable) code? If so, I think I'd like to learn it, just in case. If not, would somebody please add it to C#, since that's the language I currently enjoy?
Will Rogers never met me.
Doesn't every scripting language allow that? If I'm correct (and also if I'm wrong) then have a look at Lua[^] (version 5.2 just relased!)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Tsk tsk! How can you possibly mention HPL without mentioning the wonders of 'gazinta'? Bring back the 'gazinta', I say! :) I worked extensively on the 9810, 9820, and a top of the range 9845 - two tape drives, built-in printer and a whopping 64K - wowee! :laugh: The 9845 was also my downfall though - BASIC in ROM, which I was told I had to use. :(( :laugh:
Is a gazinta related to a gazunder?
-
One of my favorite languages from the past was Hewlett Packard's hpl. It was developed to run on the HP9825A[^] desktop calculator, which was, in fact, as close to a real computer as one could buy that took less than a small room to hold it. The hpl language was a powerful, yet simple language which was well adapted to communicating with electronic measurement instruments via the HPIB parallel bus. It was dropped by HP because programmers hated the fact that it used lower case letters for keywords. :laugh: The coolest feature of hpl was that the Store key was also programmable, so that I could write a program that could write a program, append it to itself, and continue executing it. That may not seem a great advantage, but I loved it. One of my tasks was to measure, in-circuit, the operating characteristics of an extremely sensitive high-gain amplifier. This had to be accomplished in a high-noise environment, and the ambient noise varied from day to day. So as part of my testing program I wrote code to measure the ambient environment, characterize it using a FFT, then write a digital filtering program to remove these spurious signals from the measured values from the unit under test. That code was appended to each run of the program so that it could be called when the real part was being tested. It drove the configuration control weenies nuts, but it was one of the most reliable and accurate test routines used by the company. I pity the poor bastard who had to maintain my program after I left, though. If you're out there, I apologize! The question that drove me to post this tidbit is, is there any contemporary language which offers this same functionality, to save its own output as executable (okay, interpretable) code? If so, I think I'd like to learn it, just in case. If not, would somebody please add it to C#, since that's the language I currently enjoy?
Will Rogers never met me.
Roger Wright wrote:
The question that drove me to post this tidbit is, is there any contemporary language which offers this same functionality, to save its own output as executable (okay, interpretable) code? If so, I think I'd like to learn it, just in case. If not, would somebody please add it to C#, since that's the language I currently enjoy?
There's a number ways you can do something at least similar to that in C#:
- Mono.Cecil[^] - modify the IL (.NET byte instructions) in assemblies, then write them out to disk and load/run them
- Expression trees - generate code by building syntax trees (just about any code statement - not just expressions) and dynamically compiling it in memory. Might take a little getting used to because you work with syntax trees rather than code, but it is super fast because it doesn't have to parse anything and it does everything in-memory.
- CodeDOM - output actual C# code constructs using an object model, then send it to the C# compiler
- Write code to manually output C# code, then invoke the C# compiler (which is always installed with the .NET framework) and load/run the resulting assemblies
- Use the DynamicMethod class to output IL directly into memory and compile it
-
Even more hilarious is that I've never before seen anyone, here or anywhere else, use the word 'titbit' in my life. That despite being well-read, well-educated, and fairly old. Besides, anyone with a third grade education knows that 'tit' isn't a word - it's properly spelled "teat." ;P
Will Rogers never met me.
Never heard of it either and if I had to of guessed I would of said it was a woman that was mammory-ally challenged.
Visual Studio Task List on Steriods - VS2010/AVR Studio 5.0 ToDo Manager Extension
-
One of my favorite languages from the past was Hewlett Packard's hpl. It was developed to run on the HP9825A[^] desktop calculator, which was, in fact, as close to a real computer as one could buy that took less than a small room to hold it. The hpl language was a powerful, yet simple language which was well adapted to communicating with electronic measurement instruments via the HPIB parallel bus. It was dropped by HP because programmers hated the fact that it used lower case letters for keywords. :laugh: The coolest feature of hpl was that the Store key was also programmable, so that I could write a program that could write a program, append it to itself, and continue executing it. That may not seem a great advantage, but I loved it. One of my tasks was to measure, in-circuit, the operating characteristics of an extremely sensitive high-gain amplifier. This had to be accomplished in a high-noise environment, and the ambient noise varied from day to day. So as part of my testing program I wrote code to measure the ambient environment, characterize it using a FFT, then write a digital filtering program to remove these spurious signals from the measured values from the unit under test. That code was appended to each run of the program so that it could be called when the real part was being tested. It drove the configuration control weenies nuts, but it was one of the most reliable and accurate test routines used by the company. I pity the poor bastard who had to maintain my program after I left, though. If you're out there, I apologize! The question that drove me to post this tidbit is, is there any contemporary language which offers this same functionality, to save its own output as executable (okay, interpretable) code? If so, I think I'd like to learn it, just in case. If not, would somebody please add it to C#, since that's the language I currently enjoy?
Will Rogers never met me.
-
One of my favorite languages from the past was Hewlett Packard's hpl. It was developed to run on the HP9825A[^] desktop calculator, which was, in fact, as close to a real computer as one could buy that took less than a small room to hold it. The hpl language was a powerful, yet simple language which was well adapted to communicating with electronic measurement instruments via the HPIB parallel bus. It was dropped by HP because programmers hated the fact that it used lower case letters for keywords. :laugh: The coolest feature of hpl was that the Store key was also programmable, so that I could write a program that could write a program, append it to itself, and continue executing it. That may not seem a great advantage, but I loved it. One of my tasks was to measure, in-circuit, the operating characteristics of an extremely sensitive high-gain amplifier. This had to be accomplished in a high-noise environment, and the ambient noise varied from day to day. So as part of my testing program I wrote code to measure the ambient environment, characterize it using a FFT, then write a digital filtering program to remove these spurious signals from the measured values from the unit under test. That code was appended to each run of the program so that it could be called when the real part was being tested. It drove the configuration control weenies nuts, but it was one of the most reliable and accurate test routines used by the company. I pity the poor bastard who had to maintain my program after I left, though. If you're out there, I apologize! The question that drove me to post this tidbit is, is there any contemporary language which offers this same functionality, to save its own output as executable (okay, interpretable) code? If so, I think I'd like to learn it, just in case. If not, would somebody please add it to C#, since that's the language I currently enjoy?
Will Rogers never met me.
