A rant about job interviews...
-
SledgeHammer01 wrote:
This is where interviews fall apart. You are asking a "stock question" and expecting a "stock answer".
No, the probing section is opened ended questions with no set answer. I pick a selection most suitable for the role / candidate. It's completely up to the candidate to impress or hang themselves.
SledgeHammer01 wrote:
Sorry, I gotta disagree here. This is a value-add / bang for the buck situation. ... I think you'll find that you'd get in trouble with most managers for not having your priorities straight if you spent 4hrs shaving 1minute off a 60min process :) .
Ha, but remember I am the technical screener. I think it's a tell as I'm wary of people who cut corners. So your response might impress my boss but won't impress me.
OK, are you a technical screener in the sense of working for a recruiting agency, or are you a software engineer working on the same team? There is a time and place for optimization. If you think saving a 60m to 59m optimization for later (or not doing it at all) is "cutting corners", I dunno what else to say :). Honestly, I would probably *NEVER* bother with a 60m -> 59m optimization. Just not worth the effort vs. the end result (especially for managers that want a recording of your time spent). If it was 60m to 50m, then I'd probably try to squeeze that in at some point. If it was 60m to 30m, then yeah, I'd definitely do that. I once optimized an 8hr process down to 1 minute. THAT is bang for the buck. 60m to 59m is just not for most people :). So you would disqualify me based on ignoring that optimization? LOL... thats exactly what this thread is about :).
-
I disagree. People hiring software engineers are obsessively focused on detecting posers. There is no reason for five hours of coding tests, it shows an embarrassing lack of coordination on the part of the interview process. One test is usually enough to find out if you can code. These days, by the time you arrive at the in-house, you've probably already been subjected to one or more coding tests. Yeah, if you make the in-house, it means they didn't find a reason to reject you. But most interviews are still more focused on coding skills than on human skills. They are more focused on weeding out than on hiring. This seems very broken to me. It seems to me that the software world is becoming stratified into managers who want to keep all power and creativity, and coding monkeys, expected to keep their heads down doing just exactly what they're told. I don't want to believe this is down to the declining average I.Q. of managers. I want to think that something about the world has changed so that this is a successful management technique. But I can't think of any good reason that explains it.
When I started at my current place, I was very gung ho... contributed ideas, etc... when it became obvious that the mgr didn't really want to hear it, I gave up.
-
Am I the only one who is annoyed by techie interviews? If you are in sales / marketing, your job interview is basically one where they see if your personality will mesh with the manager / team / company. If you don't make quota they get rid of you. If you are a manager / project manager / program manager / scrum master / human resources, etc. those too are generally personality fit questions. If you are in IT (network admin, desktop support, tech support, etc), they might ask you a few technical questions, or put you on a "test call". So why is it that software engineer interviews are "brutal"? I've been on some where you have a gang of 5+ people just hurling questions at you non stop til you are forced into the fetal position sucking your thumb and crying. I've been a software engineer for 17 yrs and have worked at several jobs for 4 or 5 yrs, so obviously I know what I'm doing, but I just had a phone screen where I was ridiculously hammered with big O questions and low level data structure questions. Ridiculous. When was the last time I wrote my own data structure and didn't use one provided by .NET? Probably 6 to 10yrs ago!! When was the last time I cared about big O notation? Probably 20 yrs ago in school! Big O notation doesn't have much use in the real world. I can easily write O(n ^ 3) that runs in 1ms vs. O(1) that takes an hour. Me personally, I generally write code using my first approach and then test it with real data... if it runs too slow, I'll optimize it. The process of optimizing is almost NEVER calculating the big O and unwinding complexity... its usually moving expensive calls out of the loop or fixing a stored proc or something of that nature. How about asking questions that are actually relevant to the job??? I had one guy turn me down because I couldn't go on the white board and write a regex to validate an email address off the top of my head (and I don't mean just something simple like a@a.com, he wanted almost full RFC spec validation). Now I get it... maybe you want to make sure the guy has good designs, etc. Unless he's an architect or team lead, I've almost never seen a mid level or even a sr guy "design" anything important. Its always by the principal guys and the architects and the lower level guys are just coders. Ok, so you don't want crappy code written? Unless you don't outsource, that ain't gonna happen. I know a guy who is much better then me at coming up with off the top of his head algorithms, but you would never want to use his code in production becaus
Am I the only one here who's ever gotten the "How would you manufacture M&M candies?" question? Honest to God. It was an interview for a .NET position. I've been a full-time coder for longer than one of the interviewers has even been alive, and the kid asked me this. And he was apparently serious. I guess this was where I was supposed to show how innovative and spontaneous I can be. My answer: "I don't know. Isn't this a programming position?" Not going to play these wasteful little games...
-
Am I the only one here who's ever gotten the "How would you manufacture M&M candies?" question? Honest to God. It was an interview for a .NET position. I've been a full-time coder for longer than one of the interviewers has even been alive, and the kid asked me this. And he was apparently serious. I guess this was where I was supposed to show how innovative and spontaneous I can be. My answer: "I don't know. Isn't this a programming position?" Not going to play these wasteful little games...
Yeah, thats stupid. I went to interview at Western Dental once and the guy actually gave me a 1hr IQ test!!! The job only paid $65k/yr too... haha. I dunno, usually, I find that the algorithm / data structures stuff at "real" companies is rarely in C# anyways. Usually C++ on linux or Java.
-
I just want to say that it is just as hard if not harder for Finance or Accounting job interviews. I would assume other specific jobs will have brutal interviews as well, this is just one I am familiar with. I know for big corps finance or accounting job interviews you have to go through several mock sessions. Where they give you a problem then you have around 30 mins to get an answer. Most of these interviews don't even pull in main stream solutions, it requires you to use some obscure math formula to calculate some obscure number then use that as the base of your argument. I know for some of these similar type jobs they even have group interviews, meaning you are with a group of interviewees. You are all given a problem to solve as a team, and the sole thing they look for is if you try or actually take charge of your team. Even if you know how to solve the problem, if you didn't show leadership you don't make it to the next round. Of course all of these are after one and sometimes two phone interviews. Note when I mean "if not harder" sometimes there is a level of how well you play politics that gets measured in the interview. I think every job has its own special criteria. In my opinion, it is no different than passing an exam in college, or passing a standardized test. I wish it weren't this way but this is the way the world works. Become a manager and change it when you interview. EDIT: I also came across this article before and I just so happened to see it again today: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/02/why-cant-programmers-program.html[^] This probably goes to show why they have these sort of interview questions or problems.
Hmm... my sister works in internal auditing, I'll have to ask her how her interviews work. I do have a buddy who was set up on an interview... he was emailed an agenda meet with this guy, then this guy, then this one, etc. He got there and was thrown into a room with 4 other guys and told to deliver a working networked application as a team by the end of the day while 4 employees observed. Obviously it was a programming + team work test, but that is equally lame. You are prepared for a standard interview based on the agenda and then thrown for a loop when you get there.
-
Most technical individuals are introverts, so highly charged social situations like an interview typically don't bode well. I would just take it as a challenge to stretch myself, if I felt nervous in such a situation. You have the experience, so you shouldn't be doubting your expertise. So, then its just a matter of overcoming the jitters and having fun with it. Granted, if you're out of work, the 'jitters' may not fully encompass the gravity of the situation. Good luck though.
Could it be that the ones supporting the stress are the really good ones? How do you cope with code reviews, if you can't cope with a mild critique of some pseudo code in an interview? How do you respond to comments to your code if your communication skills are bad?
-
Am I the only one who is annoyed by techie interviews? If you are in sales / marketing, your job interview is basically one where they see if your personality will mesh with the manager / team / company. If you don't make quota they get rid of you. If you are a manager / project manager / program manager / scrum master / human resources, etc. those too are generally personality fit questions. If you are in IT (network admin, desktop support, tech support, etc), they might ask you a few technical questions, or put you on a "test call". So why is it that software engineer interviews are "brutal"? I've been on some where you have a gang of 5+ people just hurling questions at you non stop til you are forced into the fetal position sucking your thumb and crying. I've been a software engineer for 17 yrs and have worked at several jobs for 4 or 5 yrs, so obviously I know what I'm doing, but I just had a phone screen where I was ridiculously hammered with big O questions and low level data structure questions. Ridiculous. When was the last time I wrote my own data structure and didn't use one provided by .NET? Probably 6 to 10yrs ago!! When was the last time I cared about big O notation? Probably 20 yrs ago in school! Big O notation doesn't have much use in the real world. I can easily write O(n ^ 3) that runs in 1ms vs. O(1) that takes an hour. Me personally, I generally write code using my first approach and then test it with real data... if it runs too slow, I'll optimize it. The process of optimizing is almost NEVER calculating the big O and unwinding complexity... its usually moving expensive calls out of the loop or fixing a stored proc or something of that nature. How about asking questions that are actually relevant to the job??? I had one guy turn me down because I couldn't go on the white board and write a regex to validate an email address off the top of my head (and I don't mean just something simple like a@a.com, he wanted almost full RFC spec validation). Now I get it... maybe you want to make sure the guy has good designs, etc. Unless he's an architect or team lead, I've almost never seen a mid level or even a sr guy "design" anything important. Its always by the principal guys and the architects and the lower level guys are just coders. Ok, so you don't want crappy code written? Unless you don't outsource, that ain't gonna happen. I know a guy who is much better then me at coming up with off the top of his head algorithms, but you would never want to use his code in production becaus
Interviews like this make about as much sense as “closed-book” exams. Since when is one in “real life” not going to use reference materials (e.g. Regex “recipes”). No one rewards resourcefulness these days. Oh … and those 20+ skills with 3-5 years of experience they want you to have, you must have used them all within the last 6 months … It’s called “mental bullying”; to make up for all their weenie years.
-
Am I the only one here who's ever gotten the "How would you manufacture M&M candies?" question? Honest to God. It was an interview for a .NET position. I've been a full-time coder for longer than one of the interviewers has even been alive, and the kid asked me this. And he was apparently serious. I guess this was where I was supposed to show how innovative and spontaneous I can be. My answer: "I don't know. Isn't this a programming position?" Not going to play these wasteful little games...
Ryan Speakman wrote:
Not going to play these wasteful little games
Whatever. If you want to work for them, you have to play their games. You can blow off one company for being too funky, but you can't do that at every interview, so eventually you gotta play.
-
Could it be that the ones supporting the stress are the really good ones? How do you cope with code reviews, if you can't cope with a mild critique of some pseudo code in an interview? How do you respond to comments to your code if your communication skills are bad?
Did you mean to reply to someone else because I'm not following your train of thought?
-
Could it be that the ones supporting the stress are the really good ones? How do you cope with code reviews, if you can't cope with a mild critique of some pseudo code in an interview? How do you respond to comments to your code if your communication skills are bad?
I've never felt pressure on a code review. Its just explaining yourself. If the reviewer is being an a$$hole about it, then thats his deal. During an interview is different. A code review isn't all high pressure.
-
Ryan Speakman wrote:
Not going to play these wasteful little games
Whatever. If you want to work for them, you have to play their games. You can blow off one company for being too funky, but you can't do that at every interview, so eventually you gotta play.
^ this exactly. If you want the job, you gotta play the game. Had a co-worker tell me yesterday as I was discussing this with him, that he went to an interview for an IT position at a tile company and they asked him why he wants to work there. He basically told them he doesn't give a crap about tiles and IT is IT. Didn't get the job :). I told him, he should have made up some crap about how he LOVES tiles and has been collecting them since he was 6. He's got slates from around the world, some asphalt, some cedar shakes, a bunch of clay tiles and the prize of his collection is a hand made 1887 spanish terracotta tile and he should have said that crap like he was 100% serious. The interviewer would have probably thought, wtf?!?! he collects roof tiles???, but I bet he would have gotten the job. I interviewed at a couple of places where they asked me that and I gave them my REAL reasons, location, the environment, current company is going down, etc. that almost never got me past the phone screen. So I tell them over the phone I love their product. As long as I can say it with a straight face during the interview without a condecensing / sarcastic tone, it works great. I mean, if you were the manager at a roof tile company and some dude comes in and tells you about his roof tile collection and then busts out his iphone and shows you pics of his various tiles, wouldn't you hire him on the spot??? :).
-
Interviews like this make about as much sense as “closed-book” exams. Since when is one in “real life” not going to use reference materials (e.g. Regex “recipes”). No one rewards resourcefulness these days. Oh … and those 20+ skills with 3-5 years of experience they want you to have, you must have used them all within the last 6 months … It’s called “mental bullying”; to make up for all their weenie years.
Exactly. Most developers using google 1000 times a day.
-
^ this exactly. If you want the job, you gotta play the game. Had a co-worker tell me yesterday as I was discussing this with him, that he went to an interview for an IT position at a tile company and they asked him why he wants to work there. He basically told them he doesn't give a crap about tiles and IT is IT. Didn't get the job :). I told him, he should have made up some crap about how he LOVES tiles and has been collecting them since he was 6. He's got slates from around the world, some asphalt, some cedar shakes, a bunch of clay tiles and the prize of his collection is a hand made 1887 spanish terracotta tile and he should have said that crap like he was 100% serious. The interviewer would have probably thought, wtf?!?! he collects roof tiles???, but I bet he would have gotten the job. I interviewed at a couple of places where they asked me that and I gave them my REAL reasons, location, the environment, current company is going down, etc. that almost never got me past the phone screen. So I tell them over the phone I love their product. As long as I can say it with a straight face during the interview without a condecensing / sarcastic tone, it works great. I mean, if you were the manager at a roof tile company and some dude comes in and tells you about his roof tile collection and then busts out his iphone and shows you pics of his various tiles, wouldn't you hire him on the spot??? :).
Could it possibly be that your sour attitude, rather than the specific answers to their questions is what is holding you back? Location is a perfectly good reason to want a specific job. Having relevant experience in IT that you want to leverage is a perfectly good reason for taking an IT job in an industry you don't care about one way or another, because after all, IT is IT. You are neither making nor selling tiles. You are maintaining an IT shop. Telling an interviewer you don't give a crap about their company is not likely to get you anything. It gives the prospective employer a way-too-clear look at your personality. It's possible that what you meant was, "I don't really understand your question. I'm an IT guy and you have an IT need to fill. That's why I want to work for your company." If so, then you badly bungled the response. If you really meant to say, "I don't give a crap about your company." you should never have applied. You wasted your time and theirs. In this case, get some therapy and try again when you feel better.
-
Could it possibly be that your sour attitude, rather than the specific answers to their questions is what is holding you back? Location is a perfectly good reason to want a specific job. Having relevant experience in IT that you want to leverage is a perfectly good reason for taking an IT job in an industry you don't care about one way or another, because after all, IT is IT. You are neither making nor selling tiles. You are maintaining an IT shop. Telling an interviewer you don't give a crap about their company is not likely to get you anything. It gives the prospective employer a way-too-clear look at your personality. It's possible that what you meant was, "I don't really understand your question. I'm an IT guy and you have an IT need to fill. That's why I want to work for your company." If so, then you badly bungled the response. If you really meant to say, "I don't give a crap about your company." you should never have applied. You wasted your time and theirs. In this case, get some therapy and try again when you feel better.
Member 2941392 wrote:
Could it possibly be that your sour attitude, rather than the specific answers to their questions is what is holding you back?
I suggest you take an English reading comprehension course. Did you actually read and comprehend my post? I said my CO-WORKER said he said that during an interview. Since English is clearly not your first language, here, let me C&P it for you: "Had a co-worker tell me yesterday as I was discussing this with him, that he went to an interview..." See the 2nd and 3rd words there? "a co-worker"? that means a guy that works with me, not actually me. In the future, I highly suggest you brush up on your reading skills before you insult other posters.
-
Am I the only one who is annoyed by techie interviews? If you are in sales / marketing, your job interview is basically one where they see if your personality will mesh with the manager / team / company. If you don't make quota they get rid of you. If you are a manager / project manager / program manager / scrum master / human resources, etc. those too are generally personality fit questions. If you are in IT (network admin, desktop support, tech support, etc), they might ask you a few technical questions, or put you on a "test call". So why is it that software engineer interviews are "brutal"? I've been on some where you have a gang of 5+ people just hurling questions at you non stop til you are forced into the fetal position sucking your thumb and crying. I've been a software engineer for 17 yrs and have worked at several jobs for 4 or 5 yrs, so obviously I know what I'm doing, but I just had a phone screen where I was ridiculously hammered with big O questions and low level data structure questions. Ridiculous. When was the last time I wrote my own data structure and didn't use one provided by .NET? Probably 6 to 10yrs ago!! When was the last time I cared about big O notation? Probably 20 yrs ago in school! Big O notation doesn't have much use in the real world. I can easily write O(n ^ 3) that runs in 1ms vs. O(1) that takes an hour. Me personally, I generally write code using my first approach and then test it with real data... if it runs too slow, I'll optimize it. The process of optimizing is almost NEVER calculating the big O and unwinding complexity... its usually moving expensive calls out of the loop or fixing a stored proc or something of that nature. How about asking questions that are actually relevant to the job??? I had one guy turn me down because I couldn't go on the white board and write a regex to validate an email address off the top of my head (and I don't mean just something simple like a@a.com, he wanted almost full RFC spec validation). Now I get it... maybe you want to make sure the guy has good designs, etc. Unless he's an architect or team lead, I've almost never seen a mid level or even a sr guy "design" anything important. Its always by the principal guys and the architects and the lower level guys are just coders. Ok, so you don't want crappy code written? Unless you don't outsource, that ain't gonna happen. I know a guy who is much better then me at coming up with off the top of his head algorithms, but you would never want to use his code in production becaus
-
I "enjoyed" one phone interview with a drone from HR who was working through a series of screening questions. The fun started when the accepted answer they were looking for was wrong. Since it was HR, I couldn't give any argument as to why it was wrong. I was moderately happy I did not progress further within the interview process. But one really "fun" interview with an HR drone dealt with the question of "How many Z-80 programs have you written?" I had been programming in assembler languages for multiple CPUs for several years and had just finished a 9 month project on a monster embedded application written for the Z-80, so the truthful answer was "One." No matter how massive the application, no matter how much experience I had, "One" was not an acceptable answer. As I was leaving, I saw an acquaintance in the waiting room. I knew he also had written in Z-80, but his programs tended to be no more than 50 lines of code, so I knew then he would be hired because he would answer "Hundreds", even though they did very little and were written as hobby on his TRS-80. But the worst interview I had was one I didn't know was going to be the worst at the time. The interviewer was going to be my supervisor and was very attentive and respectful all during the interview. Once I was hired, that all vanished, she was the boss and was not going to let me forget it. She was respectful during the interview because we were basically peers and she had no authority over me at that time.
Psychosis at 10 Film at 11 Those who do not remember the past, are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember the past, cannot build upon it.
-
Those who do not remember the past, are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember the past, cannot build upon it. For efficiency, should not this read: Those who do not remember the past { are doomed to repeat it. cannot build upon it. } ;)
-
Hmm... I've never had HR ask me any serious questions. That would be very odd. Everything I'm usually asked by HR is stuff thats clearly on my resume or salary requirements. I've had quite a few HR people pressure me into interviewing for a job that I had no business interviewing for or had no interest in. One small company was writing a stock market analysis tool and wanted me to contract for 2 weeks. I basically said "no thanks". The HR guy wouldn't take no for answer. Kept begging with me, pleading with me to come in. Even became a bit beligerent. Finally I just went in. Didn't take the job and wasn't offered on either. Haha.
My encounters with HR appeared to be caused by the HR representatives needing to justify their existence by being gatekeepers wanting only the "best" be passed on to the department with an opening. I had one place that I had talked with the person who would be my supervisor and he was satisfied with my skills, but I had to go through the gauntlet of HR to get a job offer. The HR manager I ended up talking with, was a bit miffed that I had talked to the supervisor first. He declared all my skills "hearsay" and just as I was winding up for the punch, he realized his error and turned suddenly to pick up the phone and confront the supervisor about me. Listening to only his side of the call was amusing because it was obvious the supervisor was giving him an earful and demanding that I be able to put in an application. The HR manager relented by demanding I present an expanded T&E (Training and Experience) document to augment my resume. After doing so and meeting with a different HR drone, I saw they had taken a highlighter to my document and highlighted only the buzzwords. I was assigned a score of 27, meaning that HR had determined there were 26 people more qualified than me for the position. The policy was to take the top three and send them to be interviewed in the departments they had applied for and repeat as necessary. Two months later, I was called back. Seemed that the other 26 were not interested or qualified for the job. I was eventually hired. On the other hand, I've had headhunters try to present me for any and all openings, whether or not I was qualified or interested. After telling a headhunter I had no interest in working with Oracle databases, even though I had experience with them, they sent me to a place where they sacrificed a goat every morning on the altar of Oracle. When I complained about my wasted interview the headhunter said, "They do Unix as well." But the real prize was the interview I had at a company that at best offered a shorter commute. They wouldn't pay me any more than I was making at my current position, my vacation time would be reset to two weeks, down from my current four, but they promised to pay me a massive bonus at the end of the project they wanted me for. I asked for them to put it in writing. They refused and the headhunter couldn't understand why I passed on that excellent opportunity.
Psychosis at 10 Film at 11 Those who do not remember the past, are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember the past, cannot build upon it.<
-
My encounters with HR appeared to be caused by the HR representatives needing to justify their existence by being gatekeepers wanting only the "best" be passed on to the department with an opening. I had one place that I had talked with the person who would be my supervisor and he was satisfied with my skills, but I had to go through the gauntlet of HR to get a job offer. The HR manager I ended up talking with, was a bit miffed that I had talked to the supervisor first. He declared all my skills "hearsay" and just as I was winding up for the punch, he realized his error and turned suddenly to pick up the phone and confront the supervisor about me. Listening to only his side of the call was amusing because it was obvious the supervisor was giving him an earful and demanding that I be able to put in an application. The HR manager relented by demanding I present an expanded T&E (Training and Experience) document to augment my resume. After doing so and meeting with a different HR drone, I saw they had taken a highlighter to my document and highlighted only the buzzwords. I was assigned a score of 27, meaning that HR had determined there were 26 people more qualified than me for the position. The policy was to take the top three and send them to be interviewed in the departments they had applied for and repeat as necessary. Two months later, I was called back. Seemed that the other 26 were not interested or qualified for the job. I was eventually hired. On the other hand, I've had headhunters try to present me for any and all openings, whether or not I was qualified or interested. After telling a headhunter I had no interest in working with Oracle databases, even though I had experience with them, they sent me to a place where they sacrificed a goat every morning on the altar of Oracle. When I complained about my wasted interview the headhunter said, "They do Unix as well." But the real prize was the interview I had at a company that at best offered a shorter commute. They wouldn't pay me any more than I was making at my current position, my vacation time would be reset to two weeks, down from my current four, but they promised to pay me a massive bonus at the end of the project they wanted me for. I asked for them to put it in writing. They refused and the headhunter couldn't understand why I passed on that excellent opportunity.
Psychosis at 10 Film at 11 Those who do not remember the past, are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember the past, cannot build upon it.<
BrainiacV wrote:
My encounters with HR appeared to be caused by the HR representatives needing to justify their existence by being gatekeepers wanting only the "best" be passed on to the department with an opening. I had one place that I had talked with the person who would be my supervisor and he was satisfied with my skills, but I had to go through the gauntlet of HR to get a job offer.
The whole interview process is pretty broken IMO. To get a programming job, you often need to go through a few email communications back and forth, then a few phone calls back and forth, then at least one in-person (I don't mean speaking to one person, I mean, coming into the company -- sometimes you have to come in several times). There is often days or weeks in between contact, and it ends up taking 2 - 3 months to get through the process. Current company I'm interviewing with, I'm about a month into it and haven't even gotten to the in person yet.
BrainiacV wrote:
Two months later, I was called back. Seemed that the other 26 were not interested or qualified for the job. I was eventually hired.
And you took it? and are still there? I guess if I was out of work for a length of time and needed a job I would have taken it too :), but if I had a job and was trying to jump ship, I certainly would pass I think.
BrainiacV wrote:
On the other hand, I've had headhunters try to present me for any and all openings, whether or not I was qualified or interested.
Yeah, I get called for a lot of positions I'm not qualified for. I'm a Windows guy (C++, MFC, C#, WinForms, WPF, etc) and I get a lot of calls wanting me to do C++ on Linux or embedded and then they wonder why I fail the interview :).
-
BrainiacV wrote:
My encounters with HR appeared to be caused by the HR representatives needing to justify their existence by being gatekeepers wanting only the "best" be passed on to the department with an opening. I had one place that I had talked with the person who would be my supervisor and he was satisfied with my skills, but I had to go through the gauntlet of HR to get a job offer.
The whole interview process is pretty broken IMO. To get a programming job, you often need to go through a few email communications back and forth, then a few phone calls back and forth, then at least one in-person (I don't mean speaking to one person, I mean, coming into the company -- sometimes you have to come in several times). There is often days or weeks in between contact, and it ends up taking 2 - 3 months to get through the process. Current company I'm interviewing with, I'm about a month into it and haven't even gotten to the in person yet.
BrainiacV wrote:
Two months later, I was called back. Seemed that the other 26 were not interested or qualified for the job. I was eventually hired.
And you took it? and are still there? I guess if I was out of work for a length of time and needed a job I would have taken it too :), but if I had a job and was trying to jump ship, I certainly would pass I think.
BrainiacV wrote:
On the other hand, I've had headhunters try to present me for any and all openings, whether or not I was qualified or interested.
Yeah, I get called for a lot of positions I'm not qualified for. I'm a Windows guy (C++, MFC, C#, WinForms, WPF, etc) and I get a lot of calls wanting me to do C++ on Linux or embedded and then they wonder why I fail the interview :).
BrainiacV wrote:
Two months later, I was called back. Seemed that the other 26 were not interested or qualified for the job. I was eventually hired.
SledgeHammer01 wrote::
And you took it? and are still there? I guess if I was out of work for a length of time and needed a job I would have taken it too , but if I had a job and was trying to jump ship, I certainly would pass I think.
This is basically ancient history, I was applying for the job as a computer operator. In the interrum I took a job at another company that advertised the position as "computer operator", a better term would have been "data tech", it was running bursters, card sorters, duplicators and interpreters. They took me to the computer room door and let me peer in the tiny window and said if I was good, in two years they'd let me in. So when the other job finally was offered, I jumped at it. I got to run two computers during third shift (why nobody wanted it) and any time left over after running my assigned jobs, I could use as my own. I used to rewrite the programs to make them run faster and easier. The other operators loved me, the system programmers hated me because I made them look bad. I was trying to go through the backdoor to get a programming job. I learned a lot about usability and observed the effect of hardware on the software. Did a lot of time/motion studies to improve operations.
Psychosis at 10 Film at 11 Those who do not remember the past, are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember the past, cannot build upon it.