Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Code Comment of the Week

Code Comment of the Week

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
c++javascriptarchitecturequestion
9 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Chris Maunder
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    (at least for me)

    // It seems that even for selection of type "None",
    // there _is_ a parent element and it's value is not
    // only correct, but very important to us. MSIE is
    // certainly the buggiest browser in the world and I
    // wonder, God, how can Earth stand it?

    Source: htmlArea.js[^]

    cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Chris Maunder

      (at least for me)

      // It seems that even for selection of type "None",
      // there _is_ a parent element and it's value is not
      // only correct, but very important to us. MSIE is
      // certainly the buggiest browser in the world and I
      // wonder, God, how can Earth stand it?

      Source: htmlArea.js[^]

      cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Ravi Bhavnani
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Next to "gotten", it seems most native English speaking adults have yet to grasp the difference between "its" and "it's".  Isn't this taught in like... 3rd grade!? /ravi

      My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

      R L H 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • R Ravi Bhavnani

        Next to "gotten", it seems most native English speaking adults have yet to grasp the difference between "its" and "it's".  Isn't this taught in like... 3rd grade!? /ravi

        My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rajesh R Subramanian
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Its a good observation that you made. :)

        "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Ravi Bhavnani

          Next to "gotten", it seems most native English speaking adults have yet to grasp the difference between "its" and "it's".  Isn't this taught in like... 3rd grade!? /ravi

          My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Ravi Bhavnani wrote:

          Isn't this taught in like... 3rd grade!?

          Unfortunately not any more. Education these days is more an experience that must be felt deep in the psyche, at the end of which everyone gets lots of A*'s and goes off to University to drink and have fun. Teach them to spell? Life is far too short ...

          Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Ravi Bhavnani

            Next to "gotten", it seems most native English speaking adults have yet to grasp the difference between "its" and "it's".  Isn't this taught in like... 3rd grade!? /ravi

            My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

            H Offline
            H Offline
            hairy_hats
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Using 'like' in that way is about as grammatical as using the wrong form of its/it's. :-D

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H hairy_hats

              Using 'like' in that way is about as grammatical as using the wrong form of its/it's. :-D

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Ravi Bhavnani
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              viaducting wrote:

              Using 'like' in that way is about as grammatical as using the wrong form of its/it's.

              Well... like, yeah that's fer sure man! :) /ravi

              My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Ravi Bhavnani

                viaducting wrote:

                Using 'like' in that way is about as grammatical as using the wrong form of its/it's.

                Well... like, yeah that's fer sure man! :) /ravi

                My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                S Offline
                S Offline
                sydneydavey
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Actually, if you read Jane Austen (written early 1800's) you'll find she mixes up it's, its, her's and so on. The present day apostrophe-for-ownership conventions are merely that. Not to say I like it much when they are ignored in such cavalier fashion, but at least one can say there's precedent.

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S sydneydavey

                  Actually, if you read Jane Austen (written early 1800's) you'll find she mixes up it's, its, her's and so on. The present day apostrophe-for-ownership conventions are merely that. Not to say I like it much when they are ignored in such cavalier fashion, but at least one can say there's precedent.

                  B Offline
                  B Offline
                  BobJanova
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Or maybe Austen just didn't know how to write either ;)

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B BobJanova

                    Or maybe Austen just didn't know how to write either ;)

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    RedDk
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    "Or maybe Austen just didn't know how to write either" Oh, I would even venture to say that what you meant to type was: Or maybe Austen just don't know how to write either Yes?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups