IQ / Programming Quiz (Cannon-Ball Stacks)

[el_vez]

Haskell answer:

layers = scanl1 (+) [1..]
sizes = scanl1 (+) layers
combinedSizes = [(s1, s2, s1 + s2) | s1 <- sizes, s2 <- takeWhile (< s1) sizes]
newPyramids = filter combinesToPyramid combinedSizes
where combinesToPyramid (s1, s2, sum) = sum `elem` (takeWhile (sum >=) sizes)

answer = head newPyramids

-------- SPOILER ------------ this gives the answer as "(560, 120, 680)", (if you load it up in GHCI and type "answer"). If you want the n first solutions, just type "take n newPyramids":

take 3 newPyramids
[(560,120,680),(27720,1540,29260),(29260,4960,34220)]

[YvesDaoust]

Brute force:

def T(n):
return n * (n + 1) * (n + 2) / 6

r= 1
while True:
q= 1
while q < r:
p= 1
while T(p) + T(q) < T(r):
p+= 1
if T(p) + T(q) == T(r):
print T(p), '+', T(q), '=', T(r)
q+= 1
r+= 1

Yields:

10 + 10 = 20
560 + 120 = 680
120 + 560 = 680
27720 + 1540 = 29260
1540 + 27720 = 29260
29260 + 4960 = 34220
4960 + 29260 = 34220
59640 + 10660 = 70300
10660 + 59640 = 70300
182104 + 39711 = 221815
39711 + 182104 = 221815
...

[YvesDaoust]

Even bruter force:

def T(n):
return n * (n + 1) * (n + 2) / 6

for r in range (1, 1000):
for q in range(1, r):
for p in range(1, q):
if T(p) + T(q) == T(r):
print T(p), '+', T(q), '=', T(r)

Yields:

120 + 560 = 680
1540 + 27720 = 29260
4960 + 29260 = 34220
10660 + 59640 = 70300
39711 + 182104 = 221815
102340 + 125580 = 227920
7140 + 280840 = 287980
19600 + 447580 = 467180
...

[PhilLenoir]

Sorry, 6 on the bottom, 3 next then 1 = total 10 for a 3x3x3 pyramid!

Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.

[AspDotNetDev]

Nope, 20 + 54 is not 55.

Thou mewling ill-breeding pignut!

[PhilLenoir]

Maybe not the most elegant solution but might possibly be the fastest way to come up with the answer!: 1 Using Excel I created 3 columns: column 1 being a linear sequence (1,2,3 ....100); column 2 representing each layer (B1=1,B2=A1+A2); the third representing the pyramid (C1=1,C2=B1+B2) 2 I pasted these into an Access table 3 I cross joined the table to itself and added the two columns 3 4 I inner joined the query to the table on sum = column 3 Answer 120 (8 layers) + 560 (14 layers) = 680 (15 layers)

Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.

[RolfReden]

got one, just by accident :) 560 + 120 = 680, which are an 8-layered and a 14-layered pyramid combined to a 15-layered pyramid. still thinking of an smart search or algebraic solution tho [edit for some code] clear clc lines(0) n = 30 m(1) = 1 k(1) = 1 for i = 1:n m(i+1) = m(i) + 1 + (i) k(i+1) = k(i) + m(i+1) end [/edit]

[Stephen Dycus]

Wow such complicated answers.... the answer is 4. The question is If the two smaller pyramids are different sizes, however, what would be the minimum number of cannon-balls he could use to make one large tetrahedral pyramid? ... but the thing is, there are still only 20 cannonballs to use to build the pyramid and he never said you had to use all the cannonballs. It asks the MINIMUM... which is 3 on the bottom + 1 on top.

[PhilLenoir]

How do 3 cannonballs make a tetrahedral pyramid? :P

Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.

[Stephen Dycus]

I didn't say 3 I said 4 :P

[PhilLenoir]

... but the source has to be two tetrahedral pyramids ...

Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.

[Stephen Dycus]

but not all of them: The smallest number of cannon-balls he can have if the two pyramids are the same size is twenty (assuming he uses every cannon-ball in both pyramids). That's an assumption, not a requirement :)

[PhilLenoir]

Using that logic I think that your answer might be one :cool:

Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.

[Stephen Dycus]

Otherwise you would have to form two different sized pyramids who could form one larger pyramid without any left overs. That would require a Calculus 1 concept called optimization, which isn't too mard but more work than I want to do.

[AspDotNetDev]

You missed this bit from the problem: "assuming he uses every cannon-ball in both pyramids". But nice try. :)

Thou mewling ill-breeding pignut!

[AspDotNetDev]

PhilLenoir wrote:

Using Excel I created 3 columns: column 1 being a linear sequence (1,2,3 ....100); column 2 representing each layer (B1=1,B2=A1+A2); the third representing the pyramid (C1=1,C2=B1+B2)

That's how I started out on paper, then converted that to C#.

PhilLenoir wrote:

I inner joined the query to the table on sum = column 3

I hadn't considered using a database. Points for innovation. :thumbsup:

PhilLenoir wrote:

680

That's the answer I got. :)

Thou mewling ill-breeding pignut!

[AspDotNetDev]

Points for compact code. :thumbsup:

Thou mewling ill-breeding pignut!

[AspDotNetDev]

I don't know Haskell, but that looks pretty elegant. Points awarded. :)

Thou mewling ill-breeding pignut!

[Stephen Dycus]

That's an assumption though, not a requirement. A requirement would be worded something like: (as he must use every cannonball from both pyramids) The fact that the problem states exactly how many cannon balls there are should tell you something. With 20 cannonballs the best you could do with 2 pyramids is a 3+1 pyramid and a 6+3+1 pyramid with 6 left over. The question asks if the pyramids are not the same size, what would be the minimum. This doesn't magically give you permission to *add* more cannonballs to the equation :P So if it *is* a poorly worded requirement then the answer is 20. Otherwise, it's 4.

[AspDotNetDev]

Points awarded for getting as close as possible to cheating without fully qualifying as cheating. ;P

Thou mewling ill-breeding pignut!