Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Abortion

Abortion

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
176 Posts 19 Posters 9 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z ZurdoDev

    You're right. It is "hideous behavior" to try and prevent unwed sex, incest, rape, abuse, etc. How dare religious people do that. Thanks.

    F Offline
    F Offline
    fjdiewornncalwe
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    ryanb31 wrote:

    You're right. It is "hideous behavior" to try and prevent unwed sex, incest, rape, abuse, etc. How dare religious people do that.

    It is hideous, yes. How dare religious people do that! 1) According to the bible, rape is something god demands that his followers do when he wants them to. 2) According to the bible, the rape victim along with the rapist should be taken outside the city gates and stoned to death. 3) According to the bible, you can sell your daughter into slavery where she is to "please the man who bought her". 4) According to the bible, a rapist must marry the woman if he gets caught.

    I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

    Z 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Z ZurdoDev

      Answering to yourself is the same as answering to no one.

      F Offline
      F Offline
      fjdiewornncalwe
      wrote on last edited by
      #59

      At least the one we answer to can be proven to exist.

      I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

      Z 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Single Step Debugger

        I will go even further. I say let that unwanted children been taken from their irresponsible and immoral mothers (who will be obligated to give birth from the law) and raised from the society in a specialized facilities. Then they will have to work on behalf of that very society. The boys will become soldiers and the girls pole-dancers. The girls who don’t have looks for a pole-dancer and the boys who are too weak for soldiers will be forced to be software developers. Problem solved! Simples. On a more serious note, the human relationships are too complicated and dynamic to fit in the narrow frame you’re trying to put them. The society has to discourage the abortion in any possible reasonable way (financial stimulus, moral norms etc.), but never takes the choice from the parents, ever.

        There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

        S Offline
        S Offline
        shreekar
        wrote on last edited by
        #60

        Deyan Georgiev wrote:

        but never takes the choice from the parents, ever.

        What about teen pregnancies - cases where the 'parents' are mentally and financially able to raise a child are quite rare. Of course, the other extreme to force abortions in such cases is just that - an extreme. But the problem of teenage pregnancies is one which really messes up lives of at least three people - parents and the child. Further complication is the lone mother issue. Sure, there are organisations trying to educate about bringing up children etc - but they are reactionary. I have not seen/heard aggressive programs/lectures about how to PREVENT teen pregnancies. As to the original post, the sentiment is correct, but humans have rarely understood appeal to morality en masse. Shreekar

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Z ZurdoDev

          Enlighten us oh wise one. What is the point of me adding to something you don't even get?

          F Offline
          F Offline
          fjdiewornncalwe
          wrote on last edited by
          #61

          ryanb31 wrote:

          What is the point of me adding to something you don't even get?

          If I am missing the point then perhaps you could in your pansophical wisdom explain it to my obviously inferior mind so that I may share in your blissful countenance.

          I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

            Yes really. You're saying it's unrealistic. I say it's eminently realistic. I have greater faith in human behavior (in general).

            mark merrens wrote:

            Simply making laws has not stopped the behaviour

            True, but my point is that laws are made all the time governing human behavior. It's really more of a break this rule, here's the consequence sort of thing.

            mark merrens wrote:

            Now you're talking like an evangelist

            I suppose, since evangelist is just another way of saying teacher. Of course, evangelism has a religious aspect to it. Parent is another way of saying teacher too.

            mark merrens wrote:

            a human being somewhat lower on the hate scale than a lawyer

            That's really sad. Of course, given what some "evangelists" in certain circles have done (Catholic Priests, for example), it's understandable.

            If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
            You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun

            R Offline
            R Offline
            R Giskard Reventlov
            wrote on last edited by
            #62

            The last was a joke!

            "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

              Sadly, what you say is true. But I think most rapists were screwed-up by their parenting or other sad happenings in their lives. If we were to stop that, then most rapists wouldn't be rapists.

              If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
              You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #63

              But it can not be stopped. Even if there existed a plan to have it stopped someday, crime exists. Some people just do 'bad' things. The reason is irrelevant, and also very often a 'theory' or opinion. Saying "If we had no crime" is like saying "if everyone loved one another" or "if we had unlimited resources", or "if compilers output bacon" It is hypothetical and will not likely occur. I am fine with hypothetical context's, but now you are assuming that you have eliminated the need for something because of your hypothetical context (no rape etc.). The major problem with that argument is multiple crimes removed hypothetically are not all ecomposing for ones reason to have an abortion. Do not pretend you have the thoughts of every woman that has had an abortion in your mind.

              Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Z ZurdoDev

                "Simply making laws has not stopped the behaviour." So, you really believe that if rape were legal it would not happen anymore than it does now? Of course those laws help. Legalizing drugs? Caffeine is the most widely used drug in the world. Imagine what would happen if you legalized all drugs.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                R Giskard Reventlov
                wrote on last edited by
                #64

                Blimey! Way to read what you want to read from what I said!

                ryanb31 wrote:

                So, you really believe that if rape were legal it would not happen anymore than it does now?

                Show me where I said that!

                ryanb31 wrote:

                Legalizing drugs?

                I can't abide people that split hairs and are deliberately pedantic to make a point at the expense of the original point. Not surprised you got downvoted for it though not by me.

                "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                Z F 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • R R Giskard Reventlov

                  The last was a joke!

                  "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #65

                  oops, ok. my bad.

                  If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
                  You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    But it can not be stopped. Even if there existed a plan to have it stopped someday, crime exists. Some people just do 'bad' things. The reason is irrelevant, and also very often a 'theory' or opinion. Saying "If we had no crime" is like saying "if everyone loved one another" or "if we had unlimited resources", or "if compilers output bacon" It is hypothetical and will not likely occur. I am fine with hypothetical context's, but now you are assuming that you have eliminated the need for something because of your hypothetical context (no rape etc.). The major problem with that argument is multiple crimes removed hypothetically are not all ecomposing for ones reason to have an abortion. Do not pretend you have the thoughts of every woman that has had an abortion in your mind.

                    Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #66

                    Regardless, my point is to reduce abortions, reduce the need. To reduce the need, change peoples behavior. To change peoples behavior, teach them to be responsible and unselfish. The reality is that most abortions are not because of rape, or incest, or life of the mother. Most abortions are for birth control[^] reasons[^]. While we may not be able to significantly impact the instances of rape, we can and should try remove the need for "abortions of convenience".

                    Collin Jasnoch wrote:

                    Do not pretend you have the thoughts of every woman that has had an abortion in your mind.

                    Certainly not! I don't have the thoughts of even a single woman one in my mind. I'm grateful that I'll never have to be in such a circumstance. My heart goes out to those who find themselves in such a situation. [Edited to add source for reasons for abortions]

                    If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
                    You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun

                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Z ZurdoDev

                      Answering to yourself is the same as answering to no one.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #67

                      Wrong. Answering to yourself is just as important (if not more IMO) than anyone (or any"thing" else) If you can not forgive yourself, how do you expect your god to?

                      Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                      Z 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K Keith Barrow

                        ryanb31 wrote:

                        All you godless people ever say is god doesn't exist so that you can justify your actions

                        Actually, I didn't say god doesn't exist.You assumed that I said that. I said that God as a moral authority to justify restrictions on society was a non-starter, because many people do not believe. I don't need to justify anything, these are debating points.

                        ryanb31 wrote:

                        If you don't have to answer to anyone then you can't be wrong.

                        Again, you make the assumption I'm an atheist. Even people who are have to answer to themselves. If the fear Hell/Jahanam is the only thing keeping you on a straight and narrow path, I'd argue you are less moral than someone who does lead a good life and doesn't have this fear. Oh and I'm often wrong.

                        ryanb31 wrote:

                        Just because you do not believe in Him, does not mean He does not exist.

                        And just because you do, doesn't mean he does. See how that cuts both ways.

                        Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
                        -Or-
                        A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #68

                        Keith Barrow wrote:

                        I'd argue you are less moral than someone who does lead a good life and doesn't have this fear.

                        This has often been what I have thought. Someone that does 'good' only because they believe some super natural being will punish them for all eternity give false morality. Where as those that do 'good' because they know it is 'good' understand human morality. Quite simple it seems, but yet so many fanatics preach aetheists are so immoral, yet often it is the opposite.

                        Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          I'm so sorry, it's the liberal in me:)

                          Z Offline
                          Z Offline
                          ZurdoDev
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #69

                          I wouldn't admit that in public. :)

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R R Giskard Reventlov

                            Blimey! Way to read what you want to read from what I said!

                            ryanb31 wrote:

                            So, you really believe that if rape were legal it would not happen anymore than it does now?

                            Show me where I said that!

                            ryanb31 wrote:

                            Legalizing drugs?

                            I can't abide people that split hairs and are deliberately pedantic to make a point at the expense of the original point. Not surprised you got downvoted for it though not by me.

                            "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                            Z Offline
                            Z Offline
                            ZurdoDev
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #70

                            I quoted what you said so why are you questioning? You said "Simply making laws has not stopped the behaviour." So, should we take the laws away? What was your point? Please explain.

                            R 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R R Giskard Reventlov

                              Blimey! Way to read what you want to read from what I said!

                              ryanb31 wrote:

                              So, you really believe that if rape were legal it would not happen anymore than it does now?

                              Show me where I said that!

                              ryanb31 wrote:

                              Legalizing drugs?

                              I can't abide people that split hairs and are deliberately pedantic to make a point at the expense of the original point. Not surprised you got downvoted for it though not by me.

                              "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                              F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fjdiewornncalwe
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #71

                              I believe this[^] may be in order.

                              I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Wrong. Answering to yourself is just as important (if not more IMO) than anyone (or any"thing" else) If you can not forgive yourself, how do you expect your god to?

                                Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                                Z Offline
                                Z Offline
                                ZurdoDev
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #72

                                "

                                Quote:

                                Answering to yourself is just as important (if not more IMO) than anyone (or any"thing" else)

                                " So, you are the supreme being? How nice not to have to answer to anyone else. You can make up your own rules and whatever you do is right because there is no one and nothing higher? Wish I could convince myself to think that way.

                                L L 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • F fjdiewornncalwe

                                  ryanb31 wrote:

                                  You're right. It is "hideous behavior" to try and prevent unwed sex, incest, rape, abuse, etc. How dare religious people do that.

                                  It is hideous, yes. How dare religious people do that! 1) According to the bible, rape is something god demands that his followers do when he wants them to. 2) According to the bible, the rape victim along with the rapist should be taken outside the city gates and stoned to death. 3) According to the bible, you can sell your daughter into slavery where she is to "please the man who bought her". 4) According to the bible, a rapist must marry the woman if he gets caught.

                                  I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                                  Z Offline
                                  Z Offline
                                  ZurdoDev
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #73

                                  So, to be clear, you ARE saying it is wrong for people to try and prevent rape? And by the way, you do not know how to interpret the Bible.

                                  F L 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F fjdiewornncalwe

                                    At least the one we answer to can be proven to exist.

                                    I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                                    Z Offline
                                    Z Offline
                                    ZurdoDev
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #74

                                    You have proof everywhere that God exists, you just ignore it. Also, what proof is there that you exist? How do we know it is not a matrix situation and you are merely a program? Just saying.

                                    F L 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • T TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

                                      Regardless, my point is to reduce abortions, reduce the need. To reduce the need, change peoples behavior. To change peoples behavior, teach them to be responsible and unselfish. The reality is that most abortions are not because of rape, or incest, or life of the mother. Most abortions are for birth control[^] reasons[^]. While we may not be able to significantly impact the instances of rape, we can and should try remove the need for "abortions of convenience".

                                      Collin Jasnoch wrote:

                                      Do not pretend you have the thoughts of every woman that has had an abortion in your mind.

                                      Certainly not! I don't have the thoughts of even a single woman one in my mind. I'm grateful that I'll never have to be in such a circumstance. My heart goes out to those who find themselves in such a situation. [Edited to add source for reasons for abortions]

                                      If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
                                      You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun

                                      F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      fjdiewornncalwe
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #75

                                      ahmed zahmed wrote:

                                      Most abortions are for birth control reasons.

                                      Unfortunately, I suspect you are correct on this, but I would suggest you cite a source when you make a statement like that or you may get hammered on the post. (I, for one, will not downvote this post)

                                      I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Z ZurdoDev

                                        I quoted what you said so why are you questioning? You said "Simply making laws has not stopped the behaviour." So, should we take the laws away? What was your point? Please explain.

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        R Giskard Reventlov
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #76

                                        Learn to read what was said without automatically adding your own spin to it. I said "Simply making laws has not stopped the behaviour" - a valid observation. Where you get from that that I think all laws are useless and should be scrapped is way beyond me. It's you that need to explain how you made that leap.

                                        "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                                        Z 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F fjdiewornncalwe

                                          ahmed zahmed wrote:

                                          Most abortions are for birth control reasons.

                                          Unfortunately, I suspect you are correct on this, but I would suggest you cite a source when you make a statement like that or you may get hammered on the post. (I, for one, will not downvote this post)

                                          I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                                          T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #77

                                          Thanks for your suggestion. Point taken.

                                          If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
                                          You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups