Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C#
  4. How well do you know your TryParse()?

How well do you know your TryParse()?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C#
csharpcomtoolsquestion
22 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Alan N

    I did that test, only to get my wrist slapped too! Alan.

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Ravi Bhavnani
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Heh.  So this is what I ended up creating:

    public void SafeTryParse
    (string stringValue,
    Decimal? defaultValue,
    out Decimal value)
    {
    if (!Decimal.TryParse (stringValue, out value) && defaultValue.HasValue) {
    value = defaultValue.Value;
    }
    }

    /ravi

    My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Ravi Bhavnani

      Heh.  So this is what I ended up creating:

      public void SafeTryParse
      (string stringValue,
      Decimal? defaultValue,
      out Decimal value)
      {
      if (!Decimal.TryParse (stringValue, out value) && defaultValue.HasValue) {
      value = defaultValue.Value;
      }
      }

      /ravi

      My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Alan N
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Or change out to ref and do this:

      private bool SafeTryParse(string s, ref decimal result) {
        decimal temp;
        bool ok = Decimal.TryParse(s, out temp);
        if (ok) result = temp;
        return ok;
      }
      

      Alan

      R L 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • A Alan N

        Or change out to ref and do this:

        private bool SafeTryParse(string s, ref decimal result) {
          decimal temp;
          bool ok = Decimal.TryParse(s, out temp);
          if (ok) result = temp;
          return ok;
        }
        

        Alan

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Ravi Bhavnani
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Great minds think alike. :) /ravi

        My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Alan N

          Or change out to ref and do this:

          private bool SafeTryParse(string s, ref decimal result) {
            decimal temp;
            bool ok = Decimal.TryParse(s, out temp);
            if (ok) result = temp;
            return ok;
          }
          

          Alan

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Luc Pattyn
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          Hmm. That isn't very safe, result could contain an unintended value:

          decimal val;
          // now first use of val, not meant to provide the default value
          val=some_garbage;
          someOperations(val);
          // now second use, forgetting to set the actual default value
          bool OK=SafeTryParse("foo", ref val);
          // val still contains garbage

          One shouldn't give two roles to a single variable, so I'd rather have two overloads both using the out keyword:

          // result is zero when parse fails
          private bool SafeTryParse(string s, out decimal result);

          // result is dflt when parse fails
          private bool SafeTryParse(string s, out decimal result, decimal dflt);

          You can still get the "overwrite when parse succeeds" effect by passing val twice to the latter. :)

          Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Luc Pattyn

            Hmm. That isn't very safe, result could contain an unintended value:

            decimal val;
            // now first use of val, not meant to provide the default value
            val=some_garbage;
            someOperations(val);
            // now second use, forgetting to set the actual default value
            bool OK=SafeTryParse("foo", ref val);
            // val still contains garbage

            One shouldn't give two roles to a single variable, so I'd rather have two overloads both using the out keyword:

            // result is zero when parse fails
            private bool SafeTryParse(string s, out decimal result);

            // result is dflt when parse fails
            private bool SafeTryParse(string s, out decimal result, decimal dflt);

            You can still get the "overwrite when parse succeeds" effect by passing val twice to the latter. :)

            Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Ravi Bhavnani
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            I would argue that forgetting to set a valid initial value is programmer error, however I now like the idea of an explicit default.  That's what I initially implemented (link[^]), but like Alan, switched to the 2 parameter ref version.  I'm going to switch back. Thanks, /ravi

            My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Ravi Bhavnani

              What would you expect foo to be after this code fragment runs?  Post your answer without first peeking at the docs! :-D

              string badNumericString = "Bogus";
              Decimal foo = Decimal.MinValue;
              bool status = Decimal.TryParse (badNumericString, out foo); // status is false, as expected

              Answer:

              • Decimal.MinValue (since the parse failed)
              • Something else (if so, what?)

              /ravi

              My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

              P Offline
              P Offline
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              Well it's zero, right?

              L L R 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • P PIEBALDconsult

                Well it's zero, right?

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Do we actually care, if the value isn't being used?

                string badNumericString = "Bogus";
                Decimal foo; // will be initialized to 0 by the runtime
                if (!Decimal.TryParse (badNumericString, out foo)) foo = 1; // default value here

                ..and if the TryParse don't use the value, it'll probably initialize it with the same value it initializes an empty variable. Since the variable hasn't been set (according to application logic), we can't be sure about the value unless we explicitly set it. (Future versions of .NET might display other behavior)

                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                D P R 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Do we actually care, if the value isn't being used?

                  string badNumericString = "Bogus";
                  Decimal foo; // will be initialized to 0 by the runtime
                  if (!Decimal.TryParse (badNumericString, out foo)) foo = 1; // default value here

                  ..and if the TryParse don't use the value, it'll probably initialize it with the same value it initializes an empty variable. Since the variable hasn't been set (according to application logic), we can't be sure about the value unless we explicitly set it. (Future versions of .NET might display other behavior)

                  Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  DaveyM69
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                  it'll probably initialize it with the same value it initializes an empty variable

                  Double checked using Reflector...

                  public static bool TryParse(string s, out decimal result)
                  {
                  return Number.TryParseDecimal(s, NumberStyles.Number, NumberFormatInfo.CurrentInfo, out result);
                  }

                  internal static unsafe bool TryParseDecimal(string value, NumberStyles options, NumberFormatInfo numfmt, out decimal result)
                  {
                  byte* stackBuffer = stackalloc byte[0x72];
                  NumberBuffer number = new NumberBuffer(stackBuffer);
                  result = 0M; // result is set to zero here!
                  if (!TryStringToNumber(value, options, ref number, numfmt, true))
                  {
                  return false;
                  }
                  if (!NumberBufferToDecimal(number.PackForNative(), ref result))
                  {
                  return false;
                  }
                  return true;
                  }

                  ... so it WILL be zero.

                  Dave
                  Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum. Astonish us. Be exceptional. (Pete O'Hanlon)
                  BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P PIEBALDconsult

                    Well it's zero, right?

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Luc Pattyn
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    That is what the doc[^] says. This entire thread seams to suggest no-one reads or beliefs it. :)

                    Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

                    P R 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • L Luc Pattyn

                      That is what the doc[^] says. This entire thread seams to suggest no-one reads or beliefs it. :)

                      Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      PIEBALDconsult
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      Luc Pattyn wrote:

                      no-one reads or beliefs it

                      Maybe I'm a one-percenter. :-D My understanding is that all TryParse methods are expected to set the value to zero/null/default(T) when they fail -- so that's what I do when I write a Tryxxx method.

                          public bool
                          TryParse
                          (
                              string Name
                          ,
                              out T  Value
                          )
                          {
                              bool result = true ;
                      
                              Value = default(T) ;
                      

                      public static bool
                      TryGetValue<T>
                      (
                      this object Source
                      ,
                      out T Value
                      )
                      {
                      bool result = false ;

                      Value = default(T) ;

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Ravi Bhavnani

                        I would argue that forgetting to set a valid initial value is programmer error, however I now like the idea of an explicit default.  That's what I initially implemented (link[^]), but like Alan, switched to the 2 parameter ref version.  I'm going to switch back. Thanks, /ravi

                        My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        PIEBALDconsult
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        Then I prefer to provide a value; something like this:

                            public virtual T
                            ExecuteScalar<T>
                            (
                                T IfNull
                            )
                            {
                        

                        you could do similar for TryParse.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Do we actually care, if the value isn't being used?

                          string badNumericString = "Bogus";
                          Decimal foo; // will be initialized to 0 by the runtime
                          if (!Decimal.TryParse (badNumericString, out foo)) foo = 1; // default value here

                          ..and if the TryParse don't use the value, it'll probably initialize it with the same value it initializes an empty variable. Since the variable hasn't been set (according to application logic), we can't be sure about the value unless we explicitly set it. (Future versions of .NET might display other behavior)

                          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          PIEBALDconsult
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                          Do we actually care

                          Not particularly, but we care whether or not it does what the documentation says.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P PIEBALDconsult

                            Luc Pattyn wrote:

                            no-one reads or beliefs it

                            Maybe I'm a one-percenter. :-D My understanding is that all TryParse methods are expected to set the value to zero/null/default(T) when they fail -- so that's what I do when I write a Tryxxx method.

                                public bool
                                TryParse
                                (
                                    string Name
                                ,
                                    out T  Value
                                )
                                {
                                    bool result = true ;
                            
                                    Value = default(T) ;
                            

                            public static bool
                            TryGetValue<T>
                            (
                            this object Source
                            ,
                            out T Value
                            )
                            {
                            bool result = false ;

                            Value = default(T) ;

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Luc Pattyn
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            I agree. :)

                            Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P PIEBALDconsult

                              Well it's zero, right?

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Ravi Bhavnani
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              Yessir, it is. /ravi

                              My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Do we actually care, if the value isn't being used?

                                string badNumericString = "Bogus";
                                Decimal foo; // will be initialized to 0 by the runtime
                                if (!Decimal.TryParse (badNumericString, out foo)) foo = 1; // default value here

                                ..and if the TryParse don't use the value, it'll probably initialize it with the same value it initializes an empty variable. Since the variable hasn't been set (according to application logic), we can't be sure about the value unless we explicitly set it. (Future versions of .NET might display other behavior)

                                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                Ravi Bhavnani
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                                Do we actually care, if the value isn't being used?

                                It is being used.  The example I gave was intentionally limited to focus on the question.  In my app, foo (not its real name) is used after the TryParse() executes.  Different things happen depending on whether foo is Decimal.MinValue. /ravi

                                My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Luc Pattyn

                                  That is what the doc[^] says. This entire thread seams to suggest no-one reads or beliefs it. :)

                                  Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Ravi Bhavnani
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  You are right in assuming I didn't read the doc. :) /ravi

                                  My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R Ravi Bhavnani

                                    What would you expect foo to be after this code fragment runs?  Post your answer without first peeking at the docs! :-D

                                    string badNumericString = "Bogus";
                                    Decimal foo = Decimal.MinValue;
                                    bool status = Decimal.TryParse (badNumericString, out foo); // status is false, as expected

                                    Answer:

                                    • Decimal.MinValue (since the parse failed)
                                    • Something else (if so, what?)

                                    /ravi

                                    My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                                    D Offline
                                    D Offline
                                    dybs
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    I think foo would be zero, but that's just a guess. I think Int32.TryParse and Double.TryParse set the out parameter to zero if the parse fails, but I don't recall. If TryParse fails, I usually set the value to some known default that I can handle - I don't care what TryParse sets it to, especially is MS decides to change it down the road.

                                    The shout of progress is not "Eureka!" it's "Strange... that's not what i expected". - peterchen

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D dybs

                                      I think foo would be zero, but that's just a guess. I think Int32.TryParse and Double.TryParse set the out parameter to zero if the parse fails, but I don't recall. If TryParse fails, I usually set the value to some known default that I can handle - I don't care what TryParse sets it to, especially is MS decides to change it down the road.

                                      The shout of progress is not "Eureka!" it's "Strange... that's not what i expected". - peterchen

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      Ravi Bhavnani
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      You're absolutely correct.

                                      dybs wrote:

                                      If TryParse fails, I usually set the value to some known default that I can handle

                                      I agree that's the advisable thing to do. /ravi

                                      My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups