Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. New York City's Inconsistent Obesity Policy

New York City's Inconsistent Obesity Policy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmlcom
62 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.

    J L S I Mike HankeyM 12 Replies Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Johnny J
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      They're not really banning sugary drinks, only limiting the size of the drinks you can buy at McDo. That's gonna help a friggin' lot. What they ought to do - if that's what they really want - is to ban every drink, no matter the size, in all outlets, that contain more than a certain amount of sugar. But I can't really see that happening.

      Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
      -----
      Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
      -----
      Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
      -----
      Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932

      M R 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Why would they even care? Do obese people pay less local taxes?

        L L B 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          MehGerbil wrote:

          these policies seem to be at odds with each other

          ..seems, as those munchies aren't enough to make one obese. You can buy pot legally in the Netherlands, and there aren't that many fat people in the coffeeshop.

          MehGerbil wrote:

          My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.

          They're usually paying to be super-sized :)

          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

          OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Slacker007
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            The real argument here is that they want to reduce the soft drink size but they leave the real killer in place...gigantic heart attack burgers. [tags]retards, NYC, New York City

            "the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
            "No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "But you probably have the smoothest scrotum of any grown man" - Pete O'Hanlon (2012)

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              MehGerbil wrote:

              these policies seem to be at odds with each other

              ..seems, as those munchies aren't enough to make one obese. You can buy pot legally in the Netherlands, and there aren't that many fat people in the coffeeshop.

              MehGerbil wrote:

              My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.

              They're usually paying to be super-sized :)

              Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

              OriginalGriffO Offline
              OriginalGriffO Offline
              OriginalGriff
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Eddy Vluggen wrote:

              They're usually paying to be super-sized

              Coffee! Monitor! Wipe! :laugh:

              Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water

              "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
              "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Why would they even care? Do obese people pay less local taxes?

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                harold aptroot wrote:

                Why would they even care? Do obese people pay less local taxes?

                Yes. They die too early.

                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.

                  I Offline
                  I Offline
                  Ian Shlasko
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Yes, this is Mayor Bloomberg at his finest... In other words, he's in his last term and no longer cares if everyone hates him... How I regret voting for him last election... Yes, I was fooled, like so many others. So, as someone who actually lives in NYC, I think this soda idea of his is completely stupid and unnecessary. If anything, NYC probably has a lower percentage of obese people than most of the rest of the country, simply because we drive less and walk more. If he wants to start another advertising campaign to ask people to cut down, that's just fine... But forcing places to stop serving large drinks? Ya know, I may not be a card-carrying Libertarian, but things like this definitely push me in that direction. And I don't know where you're getting the rest of your info, but the drug war is alive and well... And as foolish as ever (I've never touched the stuff, but I'm all for weed legalization)... I think Connecticut just did the medical legalization, but not NYC.

                  Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                  Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                  W L 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.

                    Mike HankeyM Offline
                    Mike HankeyM Offline
                    Mike Hankey
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Similar to an obese person ordering large order of fries and a diet drink at McD's.

                    VS2010/Atmel Studio 6.0 ToDo Manager Extension
                    Version 3.0 now available. There is no place like 127.0.0.1

                    C W J 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • Mike HankeyM Mike Hankey

                      Similar to an obese person ordering large order of fries and a diet drink at McD's.

                      VS2010/Atmel Studio 6.0 ToDo Manager Extension
                      Version 3.0 now available. There is no place like 127.0.0.1

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Corporal Agarn
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      I resemble that statement. :)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mark_Wallace
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Discussing it keeps you too busy to look at Bloomberg's real agenda.

                        I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          dexterama
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Legislation intended to dictate common sense doesn't make sense.

                          Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that. - George Carlin

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.

                            K Offline
                            K Offline
                            Karl Sanford
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            I don't think I've ever seen a fat hippie... too busy playing disc golf...

                            Be The Noise

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Johnny J

                              They're not really banning sugary drinks, only limiting the size of the drinks you can buy at McDo. That's gonna help a friggin' lot. What they ought to do - if that's what they really want - is to ban every drink, no matter the size, in all outlets, that contain more than a certain amount of sugar. But I can't really see that happening.

                              Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
                              -----
                              Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
                              -----
                              Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
                              -----
                              Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Marc Clifton
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Johnny J. wrote:

                              is to ban every drink

                              It would be nice if consumers themselves made healthy choices instead of gov't having to step in to force those choices on people lacking the intelligence or will or desire to moderate their own behaviors. Marc

                              My Blog
                              The Relationship Oriented Programming IDE
                              Melody's Amazon Herb Site

                              J M 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • J Johnny J

                                They're not really banning sugary drinks, only limiting the size of the drinks you can buy at McDo. That's gonna help a friggin' lot. What they ought to do - if that's what they really want - is to ban every drink, no matter the size, in all outlets, that contain more than a certain amount of sugar. But I can't really see that happening.

                                Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
                                -----
                                Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
                                -----
                                Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
                                -----
                                Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                Rage
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Johnny J. wrote:

                                is to ban every drink, no matter the size, in all outlets, that contain more than a certain amount of sugar alcohol.

                                Wasn't that named prohibition ? Did not turn out well.

                                J 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Marc Clifton

                                  Johnny J. wrote:

                                  is to ban every drink

                                  It would be nice if consumers themselves made healthy choices instead of gov't having to step in to force those choices on people lacking the intelligence or will or desire to moderate their own behaviors. Marc

                                  My Blog
                                  The Relationship Oriented Programming IDE
                                  Melody's Amazon Herb Site

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Johnny J
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  That shouldn't really be necessary in my opinion. It would be better if the stuff you could buy WAS a healthy product to start with. But manufacturers manufacture what the consumers want (or what they THINK the consumer wants) - and if people are not clever enough to deselect the stuff that's not healthy for them, the market is flooded by crap. By forcing consumers to buy healthy products you could actually force the manufactuers to produce healthy products as well. You could of course also try to persuade the manufacturers directly, but they're more concerned about money than they are concerned about the people... :sigh:

                                  Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
                                  -----
                                  Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
                                  -----
                                  Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
                                  -----
                                  Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932

                                  W M 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    harold aptroot wrote:

                                    Why would they even care? Do obese people pay less local taxes?

                                    Yes. They die too early.

                                    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    Rage
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    But then also cost less in health care. Pure Darwinism.

                                    L M 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Rage

                                      Johnny J. wrote:

                                      is to ban every drink, no matter the size, in all outlets, that contain more than a certain amount of sugar alcohol.

                                      Wasn't that named prohibition ? Did not turn out well.

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Johnny J
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      As mentioned, I don't actually think it's doable, and in an ideal world it wouldn't be necessary either. :sigh:

                                      Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
                                      -----
                                      Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
                                      -----
                                      Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
                                      -----
                                      Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932

                                      L T 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Mark_Wallace

                                        Discussing it keeps you too busy to look at Bloomberg's real agenda.

                                        I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Slacker007
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Mark Wallace wrote:

                                        Bloomberg's real agenda.

                                        Which is???

                                        "the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
                                        "No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "But you probably have the smoothest scrotum of any grown man" - Pete O'Hanlon (2012)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Rage

                                          But then also cost less in health care. Pure Darwinism.

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Rage wrote:

                                          But then also cost less in health care. Pure Darwinism.

                                          Rather lousy math. There's a whole plethora of related diseases that bring the industry millions in revenue :)

                                          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups