Neutrons escaping to a parallel world?
-
:doh:
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
:thumbsup: I have done that myself before, usually when tired/distracted/etc.
Bill Gates is a very rich man today... and do you want to know why? The answer is one word: versions. Dave Barry Read more at [BrainyQuote](http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/topics topic_technology.html#yAfSEbrfumitrteO.99)[^]
-
I agree, there is a "if we can't currently explain it, parallel worlds are likely the cause" response that is annoying to see. I think your theology comment pissed off a few though.
-
-
I agree, there is a "if we can't currently explain it, parallel worlds are likely the cause" response that is annoying to see. I think your theology comment pissed off a few though.
-
If you were talking about Keanu Reeves the actor, I would think you were discussing neurons escaping to a parallel world...
Software Zen:
delete this; -
-
Been watching a lot of Perry Mason lately and am learning not to say anything that would incriminate myself therefore I can say "maybe"!
VS2010/Atmel Studio 6.0 ToDo Manager Extension
Version 3.0 now available. There is no place like 127.0.0.1 -
it's a hypothesis, not unquestioned dogma. two guys in Italy wrote a paper. it's not a Papal dictate.
-
I didn't care to continue the debate. I nearly pulled out my 'A' material which is so convincing that you would have lost your free will. ;P
-
There are a couple of possibilities: 1: The religious person perceives evidence of god - evidence that you do not perceive, thereby exposing a deficiency on your part. 2: The religious person perceives evidence which doesn't exist, thereby exposing a deficiency on his/her part. In short, you cannot be sure if you merely lack the ability to perceive a god or if others are delusional. I don't fault you for responding to the evidence that brings you to atheism but you aren't capable of knowing what others are experiencing and what evidence they have available to them. Your arrogant declarations about science vs. religion are hot air.
MehGerbil wrote:
In short, you cannot be sure if you merely lack the ability to perceive a god or if others are delusional
when you have to resort to "but really, what is knowledge" to support a position, that position is on very shaky ground.
-
it's a hypothesis, not unquestioned dogma. two guys in Italy wrote a paper. it's not a Papal dictate.
-
MehGerbil wrote:
In short, you cannot be sure if you merely lack the ability to perceive a god or if others are delusional
when you have to resort to "but really, what is knowledge" to support a position, that position is on very shaky ground.
-
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
Seriously, science has to start coming up with more concrete answers than "since we can't explain it, it must exist elsewhere", otherwise, it's no different than theology.
The foundation of logic, mathematics and science are all based on assumptions. A fundamental principle of that is that not everything can be proven - it must be assumed. And at least in mathematics it is possible to prove (to some extent) that not everything can be proven.
-
I've seen a couple interviews with him. I was left with the impression he's dumber than a box of hammers.
Software Zen:
delete this;
