Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Warp Drives Feasible in our life-time

Warp Drives Feasible in our life-time

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
combusinesscollaborationcode-review
111 Posts 37 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Its hard to say really. IMO Moores law has a greater affect on everything than most think and we are just getting the "snowball" rolling. What I mean by this is our focus for the last couple decades on computers had been namely "computers". But now that we are witnessing the power and getting haulted by the engineering constraints (i.e. Moores is not longer occurring), we are stepping back and actually using what we made. And what we made makes and engineers more ideas and has changed significantly how those ideas come to fruition. Its like the snowball of technology is just starting to get some momentum. So long as we can keep focused on technology and stop bombing the crap out of each other the snowball will grow and continually speed up... But then again, we do like to blow the crap out of each other.

    Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

    J Offline
    J Offline
    jeron1
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    BOCREO (BOmbing the CRap out of Each Other). or YOBO You Only Bomb Once, only if the bomb is large enough...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J jschell

      Err...

      Quote:

      "...you will only need 500 [exotic matter] kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."

      Pretty sure that no one is going to run down to Home Depot to pick that up.

      Quote:

      That means that we would be able to visit Gliese 581g—a planet similar to Earth 20 light years away from our planet—in two years. Two years is nothing. It took Magellan three years to circumnavigate around our home planet

      Realistically though that has about as much chance as us just waiting for some helpful aliens to show up with a ready made space craft. Not to mention that the analogy to Magellan demonstrates a complete lack of information in the comparison. For example it ignores that Magellan wasn't hauling his own atmosphere along and he made quite a few stops along the way.

      T Offline
      T Offline
      TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
      wrote on last edited by
      #24

      Most likely it would be unmanned probes for the longer trips, at least initially.

      If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
      You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        NASA starts development of real life star trek warp drive[^] Actually I Do have the power captain </ScottishAccent>

        Quote:

        The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimize the warp bubble thickness and "oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time," they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."

        Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

        E Offline
        E Offline
        Espen Harlinn
        wrote on last edited by
        #25

        Here is a bit more on this from Eagleworks Laboratories: Advanced Propulsion Physics Research[^] by Dr. Harold “Sonny” White, Paul March, Nehemiah Williams, William O’Neill NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX For those of us that enjoy this kind of stuff: Space Times[^] from American Astronautical Society

        Espen Harlinn Principal Architect, Software - Goodtech Projects & Services AS Projects promoting programming in "natural language" are intrinsically doomed to fail. Edsger W.Dijkstra

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          NASA starts development of real life star trek warp drive[^] Actually I Do have the power captain </ScottishAccent>

          Quote:

          The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimize the warp bubble thickness and "oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time," they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."

          Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #26

          Interesting, but I still see a couple of problems, even if it works as intended. Sending a signal back (and without doing that, what's the point?) will still either take 20 or 2 years, but in the 2 year case you'd need to send a warp ship back just to transmit the data. That's going to suck no matter what you do, unless subspace communication turns out to be a real thing. Also, from the moment we successfully test that warp drive, we'll have Vulcans looking over our shoulders while we get into all sorts of unlikely trouble.

          I L A R 4 Replies Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            NASA starts development of real life star trek warp drive[^] Actually I Do have the power captain </ScottishAccent>

            Quote:

            The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimize the warp bubble thickness and "oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time," they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."

            Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

            M Offline
            M Offline
            M dHatter
            wrote on last edited by
            #27

            Why do I picture the movie spaceballs with the warp speed. :)

            Scissors cuts paper, paper covers rock, rock crushes lizard, lizard poisons Spock, Spock smashes scissors, scissors decapitates lizard, lizard eats paper, paper disproves Spock, Spock vaporizes rock, and as it always has, rock crushes scissors. :)

            Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Interesting, but I still see a couple of problems, even if it works as intended. Sending a signal back (and without doing that, what's the point?) will still either take 20 or 2 years, but in the 2 year case you'd need to send a warp ship back just to transmit the data. That's going to suck no matter what you do, unless subspace communication turns out to be a real thing. Also, from the moment we successfully test that warp drive, we'll have Vulcans looking over our shoulders while we get into all sorts of unlikely trouble.

              I Offline
              I Offline
              ied
              wrote on last edited by
              #28

              For signals... How about a "warp" drone? If you can make a big 'ol spaceship for people w/life support, etc... making a tiny one to transport messages should be possible too. As for Vulcans, I'll welcome 'em if they can help stamp-out hunger & disease. The real problem is idiots declaring them evil incarnate (because, well... 'cause they say so) & and another tiresome excuse for violence... -- Ian

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Slacker007

                Somehow, I don't think it will be in my lifetime or my children's lifetime. Actually, if they run this like they did the space program, then it will never happen at all.

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Mycroft Holmes
                wrote on last edited by
                #29

                That deserves a down vote for being a depressing shit, accurate but depressing. I think my greatest disappointment in the last 40 years has been the US space program. I hope the Chinese get their finger out and start pushing forward with humans in space. They have a lower value on human life so they may get past some of the H&S limitations NASA has to work with!

                Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J jschell

                  Err...

                  Quote:

                  "...you will only need 500 [exotic matter] kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."

                  Pretty sure that no one is going to run down to Home Depot to pick that up.

                  Quote:

                  That means that we would be able to visit Gliese 581g—a planet similar to Earth 20 light years away from our planet—in two years. Two years is nothing. It took Magellan three years to circumnavigate around our home planet

                  Realistically though that has about as much chance as us just waiting for some helpful aliens to show up with a ready made space craft. Not to mention that the analogy to Magellan demonstrates a complete lack of information in the comparison. For example it ignores that Magellan wasn't hauling his own atmosphere along and he made quite a few stops along the way.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  GenJerDan
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #30

                  jschell wrote:

                  Realistically though that has about as much chance as us just waiting for some helpful aliens to show up with a ready made space craft.

                  And then they'll try to steal all our maple syrup.

                  No dogs or cats are in the classroom. My Mu[sic] My Films My Windows Programs, etc.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L lewax00

                    Here's one.[^] It hasn't been completely overcome, but we're able to get better resolution on things than we should be able (and if I remember correctly the transporters in Star Trek had a "Heisenberg Compensater", it might turn out such a device is possible or even unnecessary.)

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Andy Brummer
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #31

                    The uncertainty principle gets a bigger part of the popular press than it really deserves. It's a consequence of the measurement process, which is bolted on top of quantum mechanics with a big caveat which states: Nobody has a clue why this happens and nobody understands exactly when the measurement rules kick in, but they do sometimes. What they are exploring is the boundary between measurement or decoherence[^] and standard quantum time evolution.

                    Curvature of the Mind now with 3D

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      While you have valid points it seems you missed the point of the "article". First off generating 500Kg is actually realistic... Generating the amount of the size of Jupiter not so much. While my neighbor Bob will not be able to fly to Alpha Centari in the near future I think Bob is OK with that. I think Bob would rather NASA go there first. Second, the analogy does fail to mention those details but it is an analogy in an "article". Why do I keep quoting "article". Cause it is not intended to talk about the details. Its not a white paper or journal entry. If something like this you do not find exciting as you need solid experiment descriptions etc. I get that. But I think more a long the lines of what was said here:

                      Quote:

                      It may sound like a small thing now, but the implications of the research huge. In his own words: Although this is just a tiny instance of the phenomena, it will be existence proof for the idea of perturbing space time-a "Chicago pile" moment, as it were. Recall that December of 1942 saw the first demonstration of a controlled nuclear reaction that generated a whopping half watt. This existence proof was followed by the activation of a ~ four megawatt reactor in November of 1943. Existence proof for the practical application of a scientific idea can be a tipping point for technology development.

                      While we are not leaving for the stars tomorrow such research opens the door for the possibility. I personally find that quite intriguing enough to look more into it.

                      Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Andy Brummer
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #32

                      Collin Jasnoch wrote:

                      First off generating 500Kg is actually realistic...

                      I think what the article says is that carrying 500kg is realistic. We don't even know if the stuff exists so creating 500kg is just as hard as creating a planet of it is just as hard at this point. :laugh:

                      Curvature of the Mind now with 3D

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J jschell

                        Err...

                        Quote:

                        "...you will only need 500 [exotic matter] kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."

                        Pretty sure that no one is going to run down to Home Depot to pick that up.

                        Quote:

                        That means that we would be able to visit Gliese 581g—a planet similar to Earth 20 light years away from our planet—in two years. Two years is nothing. It took Magellan three years to circumnavigate around our home planet

                        Realistically though that has about as much chance as us just waiting for some helpful aliens to show up with a ready made space craft. Not to mention that the analogy to Magellan demonstrates a complete lack of information in the comparison. For example it ignores that Magellan wasn't hauling his own atmosphere along and he made quite a few stops along the way.

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        RyanEK
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #33

                        There was a time when people thought that it was impossible to cross the Atlantic ocean because a ship would need more coal than it could carry.

                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          NASA starts development of real life star trek warp drive[^] Actually I Do have the power captain </ScottishAccent>

                          Quote:

                          The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimize the warp bubble thickness and "oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time," they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."

                          Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mark_Wallace
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #34

                          So they haven't actually made a "warp bubble", they don't know how to make a warp bubble, and they're not sure what the "exotic matter" is or how to find or fabricate it... but they can talk about Star Trek? Sounds like someone is looking for funding, so that they don't have to go out into the real world and do real jobs.

                          I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            NASA starts development of real life star trek warp drive[^] Actually I Do have the power captain </ScottishAccent>

                            Quote:

                            The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimize the warp bubble thickness and "oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time," they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."

                            Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                            realJSOPR Offline
                            realJSOPR Offline
                            realJSOP
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #35

                            Bullshit - Zephram Cochran will invent the first warp drive, and it will launch from a missile complex in Montana.

                            ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                            -----
                            You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                            -----
                            "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              NASA starts development of real life star trek warp drive[^] Actually I Do have the power captain </ScottishAccent>

                              Quote:

                              The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimize the warp bubble thickness and "oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time," they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."

                              Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Super Lloyd
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #36

                              That' just conjecture so far..\ But even if it's only mathematical conjecture for a while, that's likely to be the most amazing mind warping exhilarating fucking unbelievable (not too mention blue sky thinking) science speculation of the last 100 years!!!

                              A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station.... _________________________________________________________ My programs never have bugs, they just develop random features.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Chris Meech

                                Funny, I searched but could not find any mention of di-lithium crystals. Thought they were a critical component. :)

                                Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Steve Mayfield
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #37

                                they've been replaced by Flux Capacitors :-D

                                Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

                                S 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E Espen Harlinn

                                  Here is a bit more on this from Eagleworks Laboratories: Advanced Propulsion Physics Research[^] by Dr. Harold “Sonny” White, Paul March, Nehemiah Williams, William O’Neill NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX For those of us that enjoy this kind of stuff: Space Times[^] from American Astronautical Society

                                  Espen Harlinn Principal Architect, Software - Goodtech Projects & Services AS Projects promoting programming in "natural language" are intrinsically doomed to fail. Edsger W.Dijkstra

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #38

                                  :thumbsup: Thank you :)

                                  Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Interesting, but I still see a couple of problems, even if it works as intended. Sending a signal back (and without doing that, what's the point?) will still either take 20 or 2 years, but in the 2 year case you'd need to send a warp ship back just to transmit the data. That's going to suck no matter what you do, unless subspace communication turns out to be a real thing. Also, from the moment we successfully test that warp drive, we'll have Vulcans looking over our shoulders while we get into all sorts of unlikely trouble.

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #39

                                    harold aptroot wrote:

                                    Also, from the moment we successfully test that warp drive, we'll have Vulcans looking over our shoulders while we get into all sorts of unlikely trouble.

                                    Isn't that what ended all of the wars on Earth?

                                    harold aptroot wrote:

                                    Sending a signal back (and without doing that, what's the point?) will still either take 20 or 2 years, but in the 2 year case you'd need to send a warp ship back just to transmit the data.

                                    Agree with the other post. Seems like at first you would just make warp drones.. Message in a bottle type thing that would go back and forth just for comm links.

                                    Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Steve Mayfield

                                      they've been replaced by Flux Capacitors :-D

                                      Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Stefan_Lang
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #40

                                      Not tea-bags? :java:

                                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Mark_Wallace

                                        So they haven't actually made a "warp bubble", they don't know how to make a warp bubble, and they're not sure what the "exotic matter" is or how to find or fabricate it... but they can talk about Star Trek? Sounds like someone is looking for funding, so that they don't have to go out into the real world and do real jobs.

                                        I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #41

                                        Mark Wallace wrote:

                                        they're not sure what the "exotic matter" is or how to find or fabricate it

                                        Haven't looked into the white papers yet but I would assume the exotic material is the "Dark Matter" that is also being researched. http://news.discovery.com/space/new-study-re-confirms-evidence-for-dark-energy-120912.html[^] As for the warp bubbles... http://dvice.com/archives/2012/09/nasa-warp-drive.php[^] It's not like they are just assuming they exist and will show up. It is also an active area. While I don't know the details nor pretend to think I can even understand most of it, I for one am glad there are such great scientists out there that can take theoretical science and turn it into solid fields of study. While your point is valid, if we all just went through the motions to cash a pay check we would not progress very fast.

                                        Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          harold aptroot wrote:

                                          Also, from the moment we successfully test that warp drive, we'll have Vulcans looking over our shoulders while we get into all sorts of unlikely trouble.

                                          Isn't that what ended all of the wars on Earth?

                                          harold aptroot wrote:

                                          Sending a signal back (and without doing that, what's the point?) will still either take 20 or 2 years, but in the 2 year case you'd need to send a warp ship back just to transmit the data.

                                          Agree with the other post. Seems like at first you would just make warp drones.. Message in a bottle type thing that would go back and forth just for comm links.

                                          Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #42

                                          Warp drones still suck IMO. While cheaper than a full ship with live support and such, they can't be cheap. And you'd have a limited number of them - producing more of them (forcing you to take a whole warp drive factory with you) does not seem realistic (yes I really just used that word) to me.

                                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups