Warp Drives Feasible in our life-time
-
Here's one.[^] It hasn't been completely overcome, but we're able to get better resolution on things than we should be able (and if I remember correctly the transporters in Star Trek had a "Heisenberg Compensater", it might turn out such a device is possible or even unnecessary.)
Oh my God, now what's next? Will the cat be shown to be EITHER alive or dead, but not the two at the same time? We are truly doomed... :omg: No, I am not confusing Heisenberg with Schrodinger, I am just providing an alternate example as to how things are going downhill
Full-fledged Java/.NET lover, full-fledged PHP hater. Full-fledged Google/Microsoft lover, full-fledged Apple hater. Full-fledged Skype lover, full-fledged YM hater.
-
Here's one.[^] It hasn't been completely overcome, but we're able to get better resolution on things than we should be able (and if I remember correctly the transporters in Star Trek had a "Heisenberg Compensater", it might turn out such a device is possible or even unnecessary.)
I'm not so sure about that.
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image. Stephen Hawking
-
NASA starts development of real life star trek warp drive[^] Actually I Do have the power captain </ScottishAccent>
Quote:
The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimize the warp bubble thickness and "oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time," they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
Sign me up I'm ready to go!
VS2010/Atmel Studio 6.0 ToDo Manager Extension
Version 3.0 now available. There is no place like 127.0.0.1 -
NASA starts development of real life star trek warp drive[^] Actually I Do have the power captain </ScottishAccent>
Quote:
The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimize the warp bubble thickness and "oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time," they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
Somehow, I don't think it will be in my lifetime or my children's lifetime. Actually, if they run this like they did the space program, then it will never happen at all.
-
Err...
Quote:
"...you will only need 500 [exotic matter] kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."
Pretty sure that no one is going to run down to Home Depot to pick that up.
Quote:
That means that we would be able to visit Gliese 581g—a planet similar to Earth 20 light years away from our planet—in two years. Two years is nothing. It took Magellan three years to circumnavigate around our home planet
Realistically though that has about as much chance as us just waiting for some helpful aliens to show up with a ready made space craft. Not to mention that the analogy to Magellan demonstrates a complete lack of information in the comparison. For example it ignores that Magellan wasn't hauling his own atmosphere along and he made quite a few stops along the way.
jschell wrote:
he made quite a few stops along the way.
Mostly in the Carribean I'm sure, mon.
-
lewax00 wrote:
Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle isn't holding any more
:wtf: :omg: :~ Link please
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert EinsteinI have no idea why you've been downvoted on that one, the link request was valid and warranted. Countered
Full-fledged Java/.NET lover, full-fledged PHP hater. Full-fledged Google/Microsoft lover, full-fledged Apple hater. Full-fledged Skype lover, full-fledged YM hater.
-
I have no idea why you've been downvoted on that one, the link request was valid and warranted. Countered
Full-fledged Java/.NET lover, full-fledged PHP hater. Full-fledged Google/Microsoft lover, full-fledged Apple hater. Full-fledged Skype lover, full-fledged YM hater.
LOL. That's a curiosity. Thanks.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein -
Somehow, I don't think it will be in my lifetime or my children's lifetime. Actually, if they run this like they did the space program, then it will never happen at all.
Its hard to say really. IMO Moores law has a greater affect on everything than most think and we are just getting the "snowball" rolling. What I mean by this is our focus for the last couple decades on computers had been namely "computers". But now that we are witnessing the power and getting haulted by the engineering constraints (i.e. Moores is not longer occurring), we are stepping back and actually using what we made. And what we made makes and engineers more ideas and has changed significantly how those ideas come to fruition. Its like the snowball of technology is just starting to get some momentum. So long as we can keep focused on technology and stop bombing the crap out of each other the snowball will grow and continually speed up... But then again, we do like to blow the crap out of each other.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
-
Err...
Quote:
"...you will only need 500 [exotic matter] kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."
Pretty sure that no one is going to run down to Home Depot to pick that up.
Quote:
That means that we would be able to visit Gliese 581g—a planet similar to Earth 20 light years away from our planet—in two years. Two years is nothing. It took Magellan three years to circumnavigate around our home planet
Realistically though that has about as much chance as us just waiting for some helpful aliens to show up with a ready made space craft. Not to mention that the analogy to Magellan demonstrates a complete lack of information in the comparison. For example it ignores that Magellan wasn't hauling his own atmosphere along and he made quite a few stops along the way.
jschell wrote:
Not to mention that the analogy to Magellan demonstrates a complete lack of information in the comparison. For example it ignores that Magellan wasn't hauling his own atmosphere along and he made quite a few stops along the way.
On that point, the atmosphere isn't a big deal, we've done that (like in a space station). And we've become quite good at preserving food, not to mention the possibility of growing some food on the way (also helps with the limited oxygen issue), so I don't think not being able to resupply is a big issue either. Might have to deal with some psychological issues from being stuck in a relatively small space for so long though (I do believe NASA has been investigating this already in aims of a manned mission to Mars), and if we're only talking a 10-meter bubble you can't really send a large group of people, making colonization of other planets difficult. At the very least we could send probes and rovers to investigate the planet, which would still be very interesting (especially if we found life of any kind).
-
Its hard to say really. IMO Moores law has a greater affect on everything than most think and we are just getting the "snowball" rolling. What I mean by this is our focus for the last couple decades on computers had been namely "computers". But now that we are witnessing the power and getting haulted by the engineering constraints (i.e. Moores is not longer occurring), we are stepping back and actually using what we made. And what we made makes and engineers more ideas and has changed significantly how those ideas come to fruition. Its like the snowball of technology is just starting to get some momentum. So long as we can keep focused on technology and stop bombing the crap out of each other the snowball will grow and continually speed up... But then again, we do like to blow the crap out of each other.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
-
Err...
Quote:
"...you will only need 500 [exotic matter] kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."
Pretty sure that no one is going to run down to Home Depot to pick that up.
Quote:
That means that we would be able to visit Gliese 581g—a planet similar to Earth 20 light years away from our planet—in two years. Two years is nothing. It took Magellan three years to circumnavigate around our home planet
Realistically though that has about as much chance as us just waiting for some helpful aliens to show up with a ready made space craft. Not to mention that the analogy to Magellan demonstrates a complete lack of information in the comparison. For example it ignores that Magellan wasn't hauling his own atmosphere along and he made quite a few stops along the way.
Most likely it would be unmanned probes for the longer trips, at least initially.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein -
NASA starts development of real life star trek warp drive[^] Actually I Do have the power captain </ScottishAccent>
Quote:
The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimize the warp bubble thickness and "oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time," they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
Here is a bit more on this from Eagleworks Laboratories: Advanced Propulsion Physics Research[^] by Dr. Harold “Sonny” White, Paul March, Nehemiah Williams, William O’Neill NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX For those of us that enjoy this kind of stuff: Space Times[^] from American Astronautical Society
Espen Harlinn Principal Architect, Software - Goodtech Projects & Services AS Projects promoting programming in "natural language" are intrinsically doomed to fail. Edsger W.Dijkstra
-
NASA starts development of real life star trek warp drive[^] Actually I Do have the power captain </ScottishAccent>
Quote:
The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimize the warp bubble thickness and "oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time," they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
Interesting, but I still see a couple of problems, even if it works as intended. Sending a signal back (and without doing that, what's the point?) will still either take 20 or 2 years, but in the 2 year case you'd need to send a warp ship back just to transmit the data. That's going to suck no matter what you do, unless subspace communication turns out to be a real thing. Also, from the moment we successfully test that warp drive, we'll have Vulcans looking over our shoulders while we get into all sorts of unlikely trouble.
-
NASA starts development of real life star trek warp drive[^] Actually I Do have the power captain </ScottishAccent>
Quote:
The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimize the warp bubble thickness and "oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time," they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
Why do I picture the movie spaceballs with the warp speed. :)
Scissors cuts paper, paper covers rock, rock crushes lizard, lizard poisons Spock, Spock smashes scissors, scissors decapitates lizard, lizard eats paper, paper disproves Spock, Spock vaporizes rock, and as it always has, rock crushes scissors. :)
-
Interesting, but I still see a couple of problems, even if it works as intended. Sending a signal back (and without doing that, what's the point?) will still either take 20 or 2 years, but in the 2 year case you'd need to send a warp ship back just to transmit the data. That's going to suck no matter what you do, unless subspace communication turns out to be a real thing. Also, from the moment we successfully test that warp drive, we'll have Vulcans looking over our shoulders while we get into all sorts of unlikely trouble.
For signals... How about a "warp" drone? If you can make a big 'ol spaceship for people w/life support, etc... making a tiny one to transport messages should be possible too. As for Vulcans, I'll welcome 'em if they can help stamp-out hunger & disease. The real problem is idiots declaring them evil incarnate (because, well... 'cause they say so) & and another tiresome excuse for violence... -- Ian
-
Somehow, I don't think it will be in my lifetime or my children's lifetime. Actually, if they run this like they did the space program, then it will never happen at all.
That deserves a down vote for being a depressing shit, accurate but depressing. I think my greatest disappointment in the last 40 years has been the US space program. I hope the Chinese get their finger out and start pushing forward with humans in space. They have a lower value on human life so they may get past some of the H&S limitations NASA has to work with!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
Err...
Quote:
"...you will only need 500 [exotic matter] kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."
Pretty sure that no one is going to run down to Home Depot to pick that up.
Quote:
That means that we would be able to visit Gliese 581g—a planet similar to Earth 20 light years away from our planet—in two years. Two years is nothing. It took Magellan three years to circumnavigate around our home planet
Realistically though that has about as much chance as us just waiting for some helpful aliens to show up with a ready made space craft. Not to mention that the analogy to Magellan demonstrates a complete lack of information in the comparison. For example it ignores that Magellan wasn't hauling his own atmosphere along and he made quite a few stops along the way.
jschell wrote:
Realistically though that has about as much chance as us just waiting for some helpful aliens to show up with a ready made space craft.
And then they'll try to steal all our maple syrup.
No dogs or cats are in the classroom. My Mu[sic] My Films My Windows Programs, etc.
-
Here's one.[^] It hasn't been completely overcome, but we're able to get better resolution on things than we should be able (and if I remember correctly the transporters in Star Trek had a "Heisenberg Compensater", it might turn out such a device is possible or even unnecessary.)
The uncertainty principle gets a bigger part of the popular press than it really deserves. It's a consequence of the measurement process, which is bolted on top of quantum mechanics with a big caveat which states: Nobody has a clue why this happens and nobody understands exactly when the measurement rules kick in, but they do sometimes. What they are exploring is the boundary between measurement or decoherence[^] and standard quantum time evolution.
Curvature of the Mind now with 3D
-
While you have valid points it seems you missed the point of the "article". First off generating 500Kg is actually realistic... Generating the amount of the size of Jupiter not so much. While my neighbor Bob will not be able to fly to Alpha Centari in the near future I think Bob is OK with that. I think Bob would rather NASA go there first. Second, the analogy does fail to mention those details but it is an analogy in an "article". Why do I keep quoting "article". Cause it is not intended to talk about the details. Its not a white paper or journal entry. If something like this you do not find exciting as you need solid experiment descriptions etc. I get that. But I think more a long the lines of what was said here:
Quote:
It may sound like a small thing now, but the implications of the research huge. In his own words: Although this is just a tiny instance of the phenomena, it will be existence proof for the idea of perturbing space time-a "Chicago pile" moment, as it were. Recall that December of 1942 saw the first demonstration of a controlled nuclear reaction that generated a whopping half watt. This existence proof was followed by the activation of a ~ four megawatt reactor in November of 1943. Existence proof for the practical application of a scientific idea can be a tipping point for technology development.
While we are not leaving for the stars tomorrow such research opens the door for the possibility. I personally find that quite intriguing enough to look more into it.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
Collin Jasnoch wrote:
First off generating 500Kg is actually realistic...
I think what the article says is that carrying 500kg is realistic. We don't even know if the stuff exists so creating 500kg is just as hard as creating a planet of it is just as hard at this point. :laugh:
Curvature of the Mind now with 3D
-
Err...
Quote:
"...you will only need 500 [exotic matter] kilograms to "send a 10-meter bubble (32.8 feet) at an effective velocity of 10c."
Pretty sure that no one is going to run down to Home Depot to pick that up.
Quote:
That means that we would be able to visit Gliese 581g—a planet similar to Earth 20 light years away from our planet—in two years. Two years is nothing. It took Magellan three years to circumnavigate around our home planet
Realistically though that has about as much chance as us just waiting for some helpful aliens to show up with a ready made space craft. Not to mention that the analogy to Magellan demonstrates a complete lack of information in the comparison. For example it ignores that Magellan wasn't hauling his own atmosphere along and he made quite a few stops along the way.
