Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Nice Letter

Nice Letter

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
learningcomquestion
133 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R RugbyLeague

    They might sit and pick parasites off each other.

    Z Offline
    Z Offline
    ZurdoDev
    wrote on last edited by
    #37

    That's one way. :) having concern for or helping to improve the welfare and happiness of people.[^] We don't need science for that. Yes, it helps, but in no way are we dependent on science to help each other.

    There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Nagy Vilmos

      Dear Religion, This week I safely dropped a human being from space; you shot a 14 year old girl in the head for wanting an education. Yours, Science.


      Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #38

      Science at work: Opps[^] I'll never defend religion; however, I'll also refuse to believe that science is any more virtuous than the people who practice it. Turns out that religion and science have that in common.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Z ZurdoDev

        That's one way. :) having concern for or helping to improve the welfare and happiness of people.[^] We don't need science for that. Yes, it helps, but in no way are we dependent on science to help each other.

        There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

        R Offline
        R Offline
        RugbyLeague
        wrote on last edited by
        #39

        Empathy doesn't require religion.

        Z 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R RugbyLeague

          Empathy doesn't require religion.

          Z Offline
          Z Offline
          ZurdoDev
          wrote on last edited by
          #40

          True. But it is my experience that religion makes people better. I know all you hear in the news are about the fanatics but I believe religion makes people better and my statement was that religious people do more humanitarian efforts than science does.

          There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

          R B 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • A Andrew Rissing

            Actually, medicine was as a result of Christianity*. I think its funny how people don't realize that Science was originally the desire of Christians to find out more about the world that God had created. It was only recently that people started to pervert the pursuit of Science with the pursuit of proving God doesn't exist. :) *To elaborate on this as a few have replied regarding this, I believe medicine has been expanded via Christian influences. In the end, medicine today would not be where it is without the positive influences that Christians had on it.

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Dalek Dave
            wrote on last edited by
            #41

            Actually Chemistry was a result of greed. People wanting to turn Case Metals into Gold. The Alchemists became respectable. Not like Physicists, they are still very disreputable.

            --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]

            A 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Z ZurdoDev

              True. But it is my experience that religion makes people better. I know all you hear in the news are about the fanatics but I believe religion makes people better and my statement was that religious people do more humanitarian efforts than science does.

              There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              RugbyLeague
              wrote on last edited by
              #42

              I disagree about religion making people better. Good people do good things. Science enables humanitarian aid far more than religion does.

              Z 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R RugbyLeague

                I disagree about religion making people better. Good people do good things. Science enables humanitarian aid far more than religion does.

                Z Offline
                Z Offline
                ZurdoDev
                wrote on last edited by
                #43

                I disagree. You should get to know a lot more religious people. My experience is clearly very different than yours.

                There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Pete OHanlon

                  It must be true. Dan Brown said so. And Dan Brown is always right.

                  *pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington

                  "Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos

                  CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dave Kreskowiak
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #44

                  Dan Brown is not always right. It's Robert Langdon that's always right! ;)

                  A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
                  Dave Kreskowiak

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Dalek Dave

                    Actually Chemistry was a result of greed. People wanting to turn Case Metals into Gold. The Alchemists became respectable. Not like Physicists, they are still very disreputable.

                    --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Andrew Rissing
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #45

                    What about the other 80% of reputable scientists out there... :)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Z ZurdoDev

                      I disagree. You should get to know a lot more religious people. My experience is clearly very different than yours.

                      There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      RugbyLeague
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #46

                      The UK gives away billions in humanitarian aid, that isn't religion based. However the systems of government, the taxation systems, the surpluses which allow goods to be redistributed, the agricultural systems, the monetary systems, the logistics systems, the manufacturing systems etc are all science based. People have had empathy for far longer than anything we might recognise as religion has existed.

                      Z 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R RugbyLeague

                        The UK gives away billions in humanitarian aid, that isn't religion based. However the systems of government, the taxation systems, the surpluses which allow goods to be redistributed, the agricultural systems, the monetary systems, the logistics systems, the manufacturing systems etc are all science based. People have had empathy for far longer than anything we might recognise as religion has existed.

                        Z Offline
                        Z Offline
                        ZurdoDev
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #47

                        Quote:

                        People have had empathy for far longer than anything we might recognise as religion has existed.

                        Sort of true. Religion has always existed. But yes, people have always had empathy, and always will, regardless of science or religion.

                        There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Andrew Rissing

                          Actually, medicine was as a result of Christianity*. I think its funny how people don't realize that Science was originally the desire of Christians to find out more about the world that God had created. It was only recently that people started to pervert the pursuit of Science with the pursuit of proving God doesn't exist. :) *To elaborate on this as a few have replied regarding this, I believe medicine has been expanded via Christian influences. In the end, medicine today would not be where it is without the positive influences that Christians had on it.

                          B Offline
                          B Offline
                          BobJanova
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #48

                          That is not even nearly what science is pursuing. Science assumes that everything is explicable without resorting to external agents, so it's incompatible with the interfering type of god that turns water into wine (or muon neutrinos into tau neutrinos :^) ), but it is entirely orthogonal to the concept of a supernatural god who sits outside the natural universe and doesn't observably affect it. That might seem like it's as good as not existing. But actually that's the entire concept of at least the Christian god: he won't show himself observably, you need Faith (always with a capital). The number of religious scientists shows that science and religion are compatible.

                          A 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Z ZurdoDev

                            True. But it is my experience that religion makes people better. I know all you hear in the news are about the fanatics but I believe religion makes people better and my statement was that religious people do more humanitarian efforts than science does.

                            There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            BobJanova
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #49

                            Religion makes good people still be good people. It makes bad people much, much worse, because it gives them some justifications to hang their bad deeds and words off – for example, the Taliban, sectarian groups in Ireland or Iraq, Christian slave traders or Sri Lankan separatists. (A strong non-deic ideology can do that too, e.g. Stalin.) A very few bad people become zealous converts and become good in some ways, though they're almost always intolerant about people who don't follow the religion they've picked (e.g. any number of gay-bashing American pastors). As a net effect, it's definitely negative.

                            A 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Nagy Vilmos

                              Dear Religion, This week I safely dropped a human being from space; you shot a 14 year old girl in the head for wanting an education. Yours, Science.


                              Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #50

                              Why blame religion for the stupidity of people?

                              One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B BobJanova

                                That is not even nearly what science is pursuing. Science assumes that everything is explicable without resorting to external agents, so it's incompatible with the interfering type of god that turns water into wine (or muon neutrinos into tau neutrinos :^) ), but it is entirely orthogonal to the concept of a supernatural god who sits outside the natural universe and doesn't observably affect it. That might seem like it's as good as not existing. But actually that's the entire concept of at least the Christian god: he won't show himself observably, you need Faith (always with a capital). The number of religious scientists shows that science and religion are compatible.

                                A Offline
                                A Offline
                                Andrew Rissing
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #51

                                Oh, I whole heartedly believe that Science and religion can co-exist - my wife is a perfect example of such. But in my original statement, it was that Science is being used to try to disprove God, when frankly it has just the same ability to prove His existence as well. Hence, why the debate even exists. As for the origins of Science, originally it was to discern 'what' the world is or 'how' the world is, rather than what it is now, which is 'why' the world is. I'm referring to Science circa Newton.

                                R L 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • A Andrew Rissing

                                  LabVIEWstuff wrote:

                                  now stop using condoms

                                  You're confusing Catholic dogma (which isn't Christianity), but current church 'rules' if you will.

                                  LabVIEWstuff wrote:

                                  tolerating homosexuals

                                  Actually, Christianity (if you're not talking to a extremist) is about hating sin, loving the person.

                                  LabVIEWstuff wrote:

                                  educating girls

                                  I can't even begin to think where this statement comes from. As the only religion I know of that doesn't support educating women, is definitely not Christianity.

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  LabVIEWstuff
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #52

                                  OK, taking your points in order: I wasn't referring to a specific church's or religions dogma, I was using dogma in the generic sense as the set of rules layed down by any religion. But yes, the 'stop using condoms' bit was directed at the Catholic church. With regard to the 'tolerating homosexuals' point I wasn't referring to Chritianity either, but another religion altogether that has very definite views on the subject. Still, if the cap fits etc... As far as the 'educating girls' bit goes I can only assume you haven't seen the news about the Pakistani girl shot by the Taliban (and yes I know Taliban != Islam, it's just another example of people wanting to impose their view on others) for promoting education for girls? It's pretty big news in the UK. Andy B

                                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Z ZurdoDev

                                    He's the father of chemical warfare, so could be Taliban related.

                                    There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    Colin Mullikin
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #53

                                    ryanb31 wrote:

                                    He's the father of chemical warfare

                                    I was hoping you either didn't know who he was, or wouldn't have the curiosity to read more of the page... :laugh:

                                    The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

                                    Z 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B BobJanova

                                      Religion makes good people still be good people. It makes bad people much, much worse, because it gives them some justifications to hang their bad deeds and words off – for example, the Taliban, sectarian groups in Ireland or Iraq, Christian slave traders or Sri Lankan separatists. (A strong non-deic ideology can do that too, e.g. Stalin.) A very few bad people become zealous converts and become good in some ways, though they're almost always intolerant about people who don't follow the religion they've picked (e.g. any number of gay-bashing American pastors). As a net effect, it's definitely negative.

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      Andrew Rissing
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #54

                                      BobJanova wrote:

                                      As a net effect, it's definitely negative.

                                      This is where most people of faith (not just Christians) would argue you're wrong.

                                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C Colin Mullikin

                                        ryanb31 wrote:

                                        He's the father of chemical warfare

                                        I was hoping you either didn't know who he was, or wouldn't have the curiosity to read more of the page... :laugh:

                                        The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

                                        Z Offline
                                        Z Offline
                                        ZurdoDev
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #55

                                        I think it was the next sentence after the one you referred too. But that was it. I wasn't interested enough to keep going. :)

                                        There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Andrew Rissing

                                          Oh, I whole heartedly believe that Science and religion can co-exist - my wife is a perfect example of such. But in my original statement, it was that Science is being used to try to disprove God, when frankly it has just the same ability to prove His existence as well. Hence, why the debate even exists. As for the origins of Science, originally it was to discern 'what' the world is or 'how' the world is, rather than what it is now, which is 'why' the world is. I'm referring to Science circa Newton.

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          R Giskard Reventlov
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #56

                                          I think that you might find the Greeks might have had a hand in science as well. Science predates modern religions.

                                          "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                                          A 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups