Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Nice Letter

Nice Letter

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
learningcomquestion
133 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B BobJanova

    That is not even nearly what science is pursuing. Science assumes that everything is explicable without resorting to external agents, so it's incompatible with the interfering type of god that turns water into wine (or muon neutrinos into tau neutrinos :^) ), but it is entirely orthogonal to the concept of a supernatural god who sits outside the natural universe and doesn't observably affect it. That might seem like it's as good as not existing. But actually that's the entire concept of at least the Christian god: he won't show himself observably, you need Faith (always with a capital). The number of religious scientists shows that science and religion are compatible.

    A Offline
    A Offline
    Andrew Rissing
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    Oh, I whole heartedly believe that Science and religion can co-exist - my wife is a perfect example of such. But in my original statement, it was that Science is being used to try to disprove God, when frankly it has just the same ability to prove His existence as well. Hence, why the debate even exists. As for the origins of Science, originally it was to discern 'what' the world is or 'how' the world is, rather than what it is now, which is 'why' the world is. I'm referring to Science circa Newton.

    R L 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • A Andrew Rissing

      LabVIEWstuff wrote:

      now stop using condoms

      You're confusing Catholic dogma (which isn't Christianity), but current church 'rules' if you will.

      LabVIEWstuff wrote:

      tolerating homosexuals

      Actually, Christianity (if you're not talking to a extremist) is about hating sin, loving the person.

      LabVIEWstuff wrote:

      educating girls

      I can't even begin to think where this statement comes from. As the only religion I know of that doesn't support educating women, is definitely not Christianity.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      LabVIEWstuff
      wrote on last edited by
      #52

      OK, taking your points in order: I wasn't referring to a specific church's or religions dogma, I was using dogma in the generic sense as the set of rules layed down by any religion. But yes, the 'stop using condoms' bit was directed at the Catholic church. With regard to the 'tolerating homosexuals' point I wasn't referring to Chritianity either, but another religion altogether that has very definite views on the subject. Still, if the cap fits etc... As far as the 'educating girls' bit goes I can only assume you haven't seen the news about the Pakistani girl shot by the Taliban (and yes I know Taliban != Islam, it's just another example of people wanting to impose their view on others) for promoting education for girls? It's pretty big news in the UK. Andy B

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Z ZurdoDev

        He's the father of chemical warfare, so could be Taliban related.

        There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Colin Mullikin
        wrote on last edited by
        #53

        ryanb31 wrote:

        He's the father of chemical warfare

        I was hoping you either didn't know who he was, or wouldn't have the curiosity to read more of the page... :laugh:

        The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

        Z 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B BobJanova

          Religion makes good people still be good people. It makes bad people much, much worse, because it gives them some justifications to hang their bad deeds and words off – for example, the Taliban, sectarian groups in Ireland or Iraq, Christian slave traders or Sri Lankan separatists. (A strong non-deic ideology can do that too, e.g. Stalin.) A very few bad people become zealous converts and become good in some ways, though they're almost always intolerant about people who don't follow the religion they've picked (e.g. any number of gay-bashing American pastors). As a net effect, it's definitely negative.

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Andrew Rissing
          wrote on last edited by
          #54

          BobJanova wrote:

          As a net effect, it's definitely negative.

          This is where most people of faith (not just Christians) would argue you're wrong.

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Colin Mullikin

            ryanb31 wrote:

            He's the father of chemical warfare

            I was hoping you either didn't know who he was, or wouldn't have the curiosity to read more of the page... :laugh:

            The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

            Z Offline
            Z Offline
            ZurdoDev
            wrote on last edited by
            #55

            I think it was the next sentence after the one you referred too. But that was it. I wasn't interested enough to keep going. :)

            There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Andrew Rissing

              Oh, I whole heartedly believe that Science and religion can co-exist - my wife is a perfect example of such. But in my original statement, it was that Science is being used to try to disprove God, when frankly it has just the same ability to prove His existence as well. Hence, why the debate even exists. As for the origins of Science, originally it was to discern 'what' the world is or 'how' the world is, rather than what it is now, which is 'why' the world is. I'm referring to Science circa Newton.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              R Giskard Reventlov
              wrote on last edited by
              #56

              I think that you might find the Greeks might have had a hand in science as well. Science predates modern religions.

              "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

              A 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Andrew Rissing

                Actually, medicine was as a result of Christianity*. I think its funny how people don't realize that Science was originally the desire of Christians to find out more about the world that God had created. It was only recently that people started to pervert the pursuit of Science with the pursuit of proving God doesn't exist. :) *To elaborate on this as a few have replied regarding this, I believe medicine has been expanded via Christian influences. In the end, medicine today would not be where it is without the positive influences that Christians had on it.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                LabVIEWstuff
                wrote on last edited by
                #57

                Andrew Rissing wrote:

                medicine was as a result of Christianity

                Really? No pre-christian (or non-christian) societies ever used herbal remedies for anything, or could fix injuries? Andy B

                A 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L LabVIEWstuff

                  OK, taking your points in order: I wasn't referring to a specific church's or religions dogma, I was using dogma in the generic sense as the set of rules layed down by any religion. But yes, the 'stop using condoms' bit was directed at the Catholic church. With regard to the 'tolerating homosexuals' point I wasn't referring to Chritianity either, but another religion altogether that has very definite views on the subject. Still, if the cap fits etc... As far as the 'educating girls' bit goes I can only assume you haven't seen the news about the Pakistani girl shot by the Taliban (and yes I know Taliban != Islam, it's just another example of people wanting to impose their view on others) for promoting education for girls? It's pretty big news in the UK. Andy B

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Andrew Rissing
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #58

                  I have heard of the news yes, but I assumed your thread was in general about Christianity. So, pardon me. But in general, it seems you're taking the worst part of any group and generalizing it to the whole population. There will always be flawed people, inside of religion and out. People are just not perfect, so does that make humans in general something that should be eliminated? :)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R R Giskard Reventlov

                    I think that you might find the Greeks might have had a hand in science as well. Science predates modern religions.

                    "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Andrew Rissing
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #59

                    Yes, they did and, even then, they tried to understand the world. As for the original comment made above, many of the great early scientists were staunch professors of faith - their faith spurred their desire to explore and push boundaries.

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Z ZurdoDev

                      I think it was the next sentence after the one you referred too. But that was it. I wasn't interested enough to keep going. :)

                      There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Colin Mullikin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #60

                      I read an article about him that said he did all of that military research because of the anti-Semitism that was already present in Germany at that time. He felt like he needed to prove his allegiance to his country. He was also involved in the development of Zyklon B, originally a pesticide, which was then used by the Nazis in the Holocaust. But, I think if you only look at the numbers, the good from his research has outweighed the bad, but that still doesn't absolve him of his sins against humanity.

                      The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L LabVIEWstuff

                        Andrew Rissing wrote:

                        medicine was as a result of Christianity

                        Really? No pre-christian (or non-christian) societies ever used herbal remedies for anything, or could fix injuries? Andy B

                        A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Andrew Rissing
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #61

                        The first hospitals (formalized places of medicine) were founded by churches.

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Andrew Rissing

                          Yes, they did and, even then, they tried to understand the world. As for the original comment made above, many of the great early scientists were staunch professors of faith - their faith spurred their desire to explore and push boundaries.

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          R Giskard Reventlov
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #62

                          Some, not all. You can't actually quantify it.

                          "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                          A 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Andrew Rissing

                            BobJanova wrote:

                            As a net effect, it's definitely negative.

                            This is where most people of faith (not just Christians) would argue you're wrong.

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            BobJanova
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #63

                            They're hardly in a position to make an unbiased judgement, though. And considering how many of them would claim that it's only their particular religion that has the virtuous effects, it's quite clear it's just simple tribalism. Being outside all these groups makes it possible to look at them more dispassionately. To make a serious debate of this is Soapbox territory, and I don't like to go in there from work, so let's just agree to disagree at this point in the thread.

                            A T 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • N Nagy Vilmos

                              Dear Religion, This week I safely dropped a human being from space; you shot a 14 year old girl in the head for wanting an education. Yours, Science.


                              Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett

                              T Offline
                              T Offline
                              TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #64

                              Taliban is not a religion. It's a quasi-governmental terrorist group. Your post is more suited to the Soapbox.

                              If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
                              You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
                              Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R R Giskard Reventlov

                                Some, not all. You can't actually quantify it.

                                "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                                A Offline
                                A Offline
                                Andrew Rissing
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #65

                                Here's a good start[^]. :)

                                R 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Andrew Rissing

                                  The first hospitals (formalized places of medicine) were founded by churches.

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  LabVIEWstuff
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #66

                                  Indeed they were - ancient Egyptian temples, predating christianity by centuries :) .

                                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B BobJanova

                                    They're hardly in a position to make an unbiased judgement, though. And considering how many of them would claim that it's only their particular religion that has the virtuous effects, it's quite clear it's just simple tribalism. Being outside all these groups makes it possible to look at them more dispassionately. To make a serious debate of this is Soapbox territory, and I don't like to go in there from work, so let's just agree to disagree at this point in the thread.

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Andrew Rissing
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #67

                                    BobJanova wrote:

                                    Being outside all these groups makes it possible to look at them more dispassionately.

                                    I could argue both ways on that. Having not lived a faith filled life would make it hard to see why it would be beneficial at all.

                                    BobJanova wrote:

                                    so let's just agree to disagree at this point in the thread.

                                    Fine by me.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L LabVIEWstuff

                                      Indeed they were - ancient Egyptian temples, predating christianity by centuries :) .

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      Andrew Rissing
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #68

                                      And Vikings discovered America first...so? But in the end, the notion of a hospital was popularized and expanded via Christians.

                                      R L 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Andrew Rissing

                                        Here's a good start[^]. :)

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        R Giskard Reventlov
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #69

                                        13 with at least one who never believed in god? You'll have to do better than that.

                                        "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                                        A 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • B BobJanova

                                          They're hardly in a position to make an unbiased judgement, though. And considering how many of them would claim that it's only their particular religion that has the virtuous effects, it's quite clear it's just simple tribalism. Being outside all these groups makes it possible to look at them more dispassionately. To make a serious debate of this is Soapbox territory, and I don't like to go in there from work, so let's just agree to disagree at this point in the thread.

                                          T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #70

                                          BobJanova wrote:

                                          They're hardly in a position to make an unbiased judgement

                                          And neither are you. Just because you're outside those groups doesn't mean you aren't biased. You're just biased in a different direction.

                                          If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
                                          You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
                                          Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups