Why I like C++
-
I just deleted a very long response. Simple answer: Really, can't I? Why should I allow Mickeysoft (or anybody else) to lock me into their walled gardens? Why should I pay for the OS, the development environment and a modest 30% developer tax on top of that for the honor of being allowed to publish my work? Why should I work more to keep my code current than to expand it? And what makes you think that there are no alternatives? No, this time Mickeysoft has jumped the shark and nuked the fridge, all at the same time. I will rewrite my code only once more. To make certain that they can't do that to me again, no matter what crazy ideas they have next. Perhaps then I will see the day when a code module is actually reused instead of rewritten.
I reply to your message, although the answer applies to all comments. No, you can't. "C++" and ".NET Framework" are just not compatible terms to compare, therefore you can't "switch" from one to another. .NET Framework is an implementation of a specification which defines an Application Development Framework plus the humongous infrastructure which enables to run the framework itself plus applications written against it. C++ is a language specification consisting of 1250 pages of text (*) at least my copy does. Its up to vendors to implement this specification but here the parallels are over. I'd understand if somebody wrote "I am switching from .NET to Java" (which happens to be both language and AVR), or, to certain extent, "I am switching to native C++ development based on Qt". But in these cases, you are putting yourself in the similar position as before - you get dependent on somebody (**). Of course, you can write software based solely on C++ specification, but this is not really comparable to application development based on a infrastructure of the .NET Framework kind, not even comparable to writing software against an native C++ application development framework like Qt etc. (*) ...written by masochists (**) The "open source" arguments also apply to .NET specification for which an oss implementation exists
-
I have a couple of suggestions based on my experiences. Although you may think you got everything, it's more likely that you don't. Practice says more than theory. I remember myself that one day it hit me: "AHA!!!". It was like that, from one day to the other everything made sense. The problem is that it's very difficult to get to the "AHA!!!" moment, but I do know that the fastest way to get there is by having real world experiences. I don't think you should learn object oriented design through C++ as many of its little nuances can get in the way of learning the real deal which is object oriented design. I'd say to go with C# first if you want to learn OO design. Now, there are a few steps I'd suggest you to take: 1 - Read open source code of well designed OO applications. If you look around it shouldn't be hard to find. 2 - Design a real OO application, with its own domain model layer, with all objects that contain both data and behavior, completely separated from user interface or data access layer. You can get a lot of ideas from open source projects and design pattern books. Try creating an application for someone you know that run a small business, for free, as an experimental project. 3 - Publish the code so people can give you their opinion and point out where you went wrong and where you did right. Here is where the real learning will occur. 4 - Port your application to C++ Just an idea of what I believe is a good way to learn OO C++
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
Oh~It's amazing that so much experiences and thanks for sharing. As you said, it 's the directly way reading some open source code instead of book, I will have a try to find some in communities. It's sure thing that I will avoid the open source code without documents, it 's really nightmare, isn't it ? :-D For the 2nd tip, it 's out of my range, It might I am from a China... I have never thought about run a business, even it 's for free. But you are right. I must have a try. I will publish the code if everything is fine which I make a real project. Anyway, thanks! sincerely !
-
Oh~It's amazing that so much experiences and thanks for sharing. As you said, it 's the directly way reading some open source code instead of book, I will have a try to find some in communities. It's sure thing that I will avoid the open source code without documents, it 's really nightmare, isn't it ? :-D For the 2nd tip, it 's out of my range, It might I am from a China... I have never thought about run a business, even it 's for free. But you are right. I must have a try. I will publish the code if everything is fine which I make a real project. Anyway, thanks! sincerely !
You're welcome Martin. About the second point, I didn't actually meant that you should run a business, but develop and application help running a small business of someone you know
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
-
Oh~It's amazing that so much experiences and thanks for sharing. As you said, it 's the directly way reading some open source code instead of book, I will have a try to find some in communities. It's sure thing that I will avoid the open source code without documents, it 's really nightmare, isn't it ? :-D For the 2nd tip, it 's out of my range, It might I am from a China... I have never thought about run a business, even it 's for free. But you are right. I must have a try. I will publish the code if everything is fine which I make a real project. Anyway, thanks! sincerely !
You're welcome Martin. About the second point, I didn't actually meant that you should run a business, but develop and application help running a small business of someone you know
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
-
Don't worry. It's really a lot of things you get to hear about and it all must be very confusing. That's why I told you to start with understanding the intentions behind object orientation. The problem with all books, design patterns or libraries is, that they all solve problems you have not encountered yet. You can believe them or not, but simply using them as you are told will not help you understand more. Start writing a small C++ program and try to do it with as little help as possible. Try to rely on what you have learned so far and do things as you think they should be. To be honest, you will probably run into problems every step on the way and your solutions may not be the best. Yet. The good thing is, that each problem will be an opportunity to gain some experience by solving it yourself. At first this may be very frustrating, unless you keep in mind that this is just an excercise. Be proud of every victory, as small as they may be in the beginning, They will lead you to the things you must think about next and after a while books will become helpful again. Once you have understood a problem, you also have a chance to understand a solution.
Thank you for that! sincerely. You are 100% right about the intentions things. I should not study C++ for studying instead of real problem. Actually I encounter problems every day and I do my best to solve them. Even there are some problems I meet everyday but they are changed everyday, they are different. It means that my capacities get higher and higher day by day. It really make sense.
-
You're welcome Martin. About the second point, I didn't actually meant that you should run a business, but develop and application help running a small business of someone you know
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
I got the point.Thanks! The business can be various, right ? You mean the real requirement is much better.
-
For Martin Cheng: I would like to add that Points 2,3,4,5 are very, very important if you really want to get the most out of C++ and not fail later down the line. All of the points mentioned are aspects of "object oriented" analysis/design/programming and I would recommend learning this in parellel with C++ from good, well written, and proven sources. Booch, Yourdon, etc. and will almost certainly mean learning UML if you do not already know it depending on what books you pick up. A good design book, & the "patterns" books by the gang of four and martin fowler, are especially handy to understand heirarchies and what C++ gives you above C, but be prepared to criticise and ignore them completely in practice if need be. Finally, try desperately to get "real world" problems and practice, practice, practice. Small things like sorting algorithms, queueing mechanisms, even simple mutex controls, up to practical but low level tasks like neural net engines, file format conversion engines, etc (Concentrating on the core objects underneath the guis/cli). before you know it you will feel that nothing is impossible and nothing outside of your ability... It's a great language. go for it....
It's amazing suggestion I have to say! Everything including designation, programming skill, even testing and debugging skill are necessary in C++. It 's better to learn and use them in parallel, no doubt. I had just worked in new company for 5 months. Before that I have to say I jumped the jobs quite frequently and there were less exp in one field. I used to work in C, PHP, JS, embedded driver and etc. it 's embarrassed thing :(( The project of new company is about p2p media server, the arch is really huge! Many class, module, skill, library I have to know. First I attamp to make a UML diagram , is it useful for me ?
-
I have been turning away from .Net lately and looking for alternatives. I don't want to have to rewrite everything when a certain company heads into a different direction once more. My answer is C++. I always liked its flexibility to allow you to do very low level programming just as well as very high level programming. And today I stumbled over this video[^], in which Bjarne Stroustrup answers two simple questions. Now I know why I like C++ so much. Thanks, Bjarne.
Everybody does. Who wouldn't like something like this:" ^> ^args" That's nice . int main(array ^args){} (c++ visual studio 2010 ) The problem is that also CodeProject web engine doesn't want show this very nice code . :)
-
I got the point.Thanks! The business can be various, right ? You mean the real requirement is much better.
Martin.Cheng wrote:
The business can be various, right ?
Yes.
Martin.Cheng wrote:
You mean the real requirement is much better.
Exactly. Analyzing the business and its rules (which can get complex even in small business) can give you a better challenge than designing a zoo application (cat inherits from animal, etc). Try getting these rules an transforming them in objects with data and behavior as if they were the living business. These objects should survive on their own once you feed them data, so no business logic on the UI!
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
-
Martin.Cheng wrote:
The business can be various, right ?
Yes.
Martin.Cheng wrote:
You mean the real requirement is much better.
Exactly. Analyzing the business and its rules (which can get complex even in small business) can give you a better challenge than designing a zoo application (cat inherits from animal, etc). Try getting these rules an transforming them in objects with data and behavior as if they were the living business. These objects should survive on their own once you feed them data, so no business logic on the UI!
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
yep, yep, yep!!! Some words like yours just hit my mind. "The objects in the project is more likely the real thing in the world, the code is better".Hah, My English is not that good and I try to represent the line... ;P Whatever, your words are totally right, no doubt. BTW, should I spend some time to read some books like Design pattern and Software Engineering ?
-
yep, yep, yep!!! Some words like yours just hit my mind. "The objects in the project is more likely the real thing in the world, the code is better".Hah, My English is not that good and I try to represent the line... ;P Whatever, your words are totally right, no doubt. BTW, should I spend some time to read some books like Design pattern and Software Engineering ?
Martin.Cheng wrote:
BTW, should I spend some time to read some books like Design pattern and Software Engineering ?
This can never go wrong. I'd personally recommend these: Design-Patterns-Elements-Reusable-Object-Oriented[^] Code Complete[^] Architecting .net applications for the enterprise[^] have fun!
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
-
Martin.Cheng wrote:
BTW, should I spend some time to read some books like Design pattern and Software Engineering ?
This can never go wrong. I'd personally recommend these: Design-Patterns-Elements-Reusable-Object-Oriented[^] Code Complete[^] Architecting .net applications for the enterprise[^] have fun!
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
You are right that reading can never go wrong. ~I have to worry about my pool English...It's no doubt original books are pretty brilliant. Talking about the translation version... Whatever~ thanks for the replying. Sincerely Mo