How Would You Handle This?
-
I am working on a hourly rate contract job with Company A that's going to run until the end of March. It's 40 hrs a week. I also just signed a fixed rate 6 month DOS to WPF conversion contract with Company B. The folks at company B have indicated that they would like me to put in 25-30 a week. It's remote so I can work on it whenever I want, however, they made it clear during negotiations that they would really like me to make this a priority and be available during the days. They have even said they wanted me to phase out the other job with Company A. They have started sending me meeting invites that conflict with this day job at Company A. I'm a contractor here, so I can take the day off, but I don't get paid for it. Thing is, the gig with Company A is 40 hours a week, and I get paid every other week. The gig with Company B is only 25-30 hours a week and I get paid at the end of each phase. I'm ok with the pay arrangements because I get both regular pay and a fat check at the end of each phase. Each phase runs 4-6 weeks. I like both gigs, and the people at both. I get alone well with all of them. But I need to communicate to the people at Company B that it's unreasonable to stop working for Company A for less hours and less frequent pay. How would you handle this? What would you say? Thanks
So you expect people in company B to work their hours to suit you? If you can't work to their hours, then how do you expect them to be able to impart things to you? You need to make a choice here.
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier
-
I am working on a hourly rate contract job with Company A that's going to run until the end of March. It's 40 hrs a week. I also just signed a fixed rate 6 month DOS to WPF conversion contract with Company B. The folks at company B have indicated that they would like me to put in 25-30 a week. It's remote so I can work on it whenever I want, however, they made it clear during negotiations that they would really like me to make this a priority and be available during the days. They have even said they wanted me to phase out the other job with Company A. They have started sending me meeting invites that conflict with this day job at Company A. I'm a contractor here, so I can take the day off, but I don't get paid for it. Thing is, the gig with Company A is 40 hours a week, and I get paid every other week. The gig with Company B is only 25-30 hours a week and I get paid at the end of each phase. I'm ok with the pay arrangements because I get both regular pay and a fat check at the end of each phase. Each phase runs 4-6 weeks. I like both gigs, and the people at both. I get alone well with all of them. But I need to communicate to the people at Company B that it's unreasonable to stop working for Company A for less hours and less frequent pay. How would you handle this? What would you say? Thanks
Company A is the priority. Tell Company B that. Inform them that you will be available from (and give a reasonable availability for meetings during work hours) but will perform the work at your own set schedule. Company B, already sounds unreasonable, since, after hiring you and knowing your situation, and committing you to a very unreasonable phased payment approach, they are also, now, demanding even more from you. I hope Company B is putting the money for your payment in escrow.
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. I also do Android Programming as I find it a refreshing break from the MS. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost
-
I am working on a hourly rate contract job with Company A that's going to run until the end of March. It's 40 hrs a week. I also just signed a fixed rate 6 month DOS to WPF conversion contract with Company B. The folks at company B have indicated that they would like me to put in 25-30 a week. It's remote so I can work on it whenever I want, however, they made it clear during negotiations that they would really like me to make this a priority and be available during the days. They have even said they wanted me to phase out the other job with Company A. They have started sending me meeting invites that conflict with this day job at Company A. I'm a contractor here, so I can take the day off, but I don't get paid for it. Thing is, the gig with Company A is 40 hours a week, and I get paid every other week. The gig with Company B is only 25-30 hours a week and I get paid at the end of each phase. I'm ok with the pay arrangements because I get both regular pay and a fat check at the end of each phase. Each phase runs 4-6 weeks. I like both gigs, and the people at both. I get alone well with all of them. But I need to communicate to the people at Company B that it's unreasonable to stop working for Company A for less hours and less frequent pay. How would you handle this? What would you say? Thanks
I would tell Company B that if they want you to give them priority, then they need to pay you 40 hrs/week with pay checks every 2 weeks. If they can't or won't do that, then what they need is a part time worker and that's what they already have. As my grandfather used to say: (in a thick German accent) "You can sh*t in one hand and 'want' in the other and see which hand fills up first." Now, if you want to keep both gigs going, then work out a compromise. Perhaps give them 1 set day per week for meetings you will attend. You know the situation better than anyone else, but those are the things I would consider.
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E. Comport Computing Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
-
I am working on a hourly rate contract job with Company A that's going to run until the end of March. It's 40 hrs a week. I also just signed a fixed rate 6 month DOS to WPF conversion contract with Company B. The folks at company B have indicated that they would like me to put in 25-30 a week. It's remote so I can work on it whenever I want, however, they made it clear during negotiations that they would really like me to make this a priority and be available during the days. They have even said they wanted me to phase out the other job with Company A. They have started sending me meeting invites that conflict with this day job at Company A. I'm a contractor here, so I can take the day off, but I don't get paid for it. Thing is, the gig with Company A is 40 hours a week, and I get paid every other week. The gig with Company B is only 25-30 hours a week and I get paid at the end of each phase. I'm ok with the pay arrangements because I get both regular pay and a fat check at the end of each phase. Each phase runs 4-6 weeks. I like both gigs, and the people at both. I get alone well with all of them. But I need to communicate to the people at Company B that it's unreasonable to stop working for Company A for less hours and less frequent pay. How would you handle this? What would you say? Thanks
Well, since the work with B is paid at the end of each phase (I'm assuming there's some sort of agreement on what the work is that makes up a phase) it seems that what is relevant is whether you get the work done by the scheduled date. However, if getting the work done does require interacting on a regular basis and working with other people's schedule, then you'll need to figure out how to accommodate their needs as part of your responsibility for the contract your engaged in. It does seem to me though that you should have, during the negotiations, clearly pointed out that you would not be able to accommodate their meeting schedule - this would have given them more information to make a decision about whether to work with you, and if they didn't budge, it would have made it clearer that you probably shouldn't have accepted the work. So in the end, one or the other needs to give or be renegotiated. Marc
Reverse Engineering Legacy Applications
How To Think Like a Functional Programmer
My Blog
Computational Types in C# and F# -
I am working on a hourly rate contract job with Company A that's going to run until the end of March. It's 40 hrs a week. I also just signed a fixed rate 6 month DOS to WPF conversion contract with Company B. The folks at company B have indicated that they would like me to put in 25-30 a week. It's remote so I can work on it whenever I want, however, they made it clear during negotiations that they would really like me to make this a priority and be available during the days. They have even said they wanted me to phase out the other job with Company A. They have started sending me meeting invites that conflict with this day job at Company A. I'm a contractor here, so I can take the day off, but I don't get paid for it. Thing is, the gig with Company A is 40 hours a week, and I get paid every other week. The gig with Company B is only 25-30 hours a week and I get paid at the end of each phase. I'm ok with the pay arrangements because I get both regular pay and a fat check at the end of each phase. Each phase runs 4-6 weeks. I like both gigs, and the people at both. I get alone well with all of them. But I need to communicate to the people at Company B that it's unreasonable to stop working for Company A for less hours and less frequent pay. How would you handle this? What would you say? Thanks
Did you tell company B that you were working for company A currently? If so they should realize and appreciate that you are still obligated to A. If not you might try cloning or dazzle them with bullshit cause you created a potential mess.
VS2010/Atmel Studio 6.0 ToDo Manager Extension
Version 3.0 now available. There is no place like 127.0.0.1 -
I am working on a hourly rate contract job with Company A that's going to run until the end of March. It's 40 hrs a week. I also just signed a fixed rate 6 month DOS to WPF conversion contract with Company B. The folks at company B have indicated that they would like me to put in 25-30 a week. It's remote so I can work on it whenever I want, however, they made it clear during negotiations that they would really like me to make this a priority and be available during the days. They have even said they wanted me to phase out the other job with Company A. They have started sending me meeting invites that conflict with this day job at Company A. I'm a contractor here, so I can take the day off, but I don't get paid for it. Thing is, the gig with Company A is 40 hours a week, and I get paid every other week. The gig with Company B is only 25-30 hours a week and I get paid at the end of each phase. I'm ok with the pay arrangements because I get both regular pay and a fat check at the end of each phase. Each phase runs 4-6 weeks. I like both gigs, and the people at both. I get alone well with all of them. But I need to communicate to the people at Company B that it's unreasonable to stop working for Company A for less hours and less frequent pay. How would you handle this? What would you say? Thanks
My questions would be: a) Did you inform Company B that you're currently working a contract full-time? b) If so, did they/you negotiate that you were going to be available after Company A's contract ended? c) Did Company B change their plans after the fact? d) Can you reschedule Company A to work at varying times, so that you can still satisfy both?
-
I am working on a hourly rate contract job with Company A that's going to run until the end of March. It's 40 hrs a week. I also just signed a fixed rate 6 month DOS to WPF conversion contract with Company B. The folks at company B have indicated that they would like me to put in 25-30 a week. It's remote so I can work on it whenever I want, however, they made it clear during negotiations that they would really like me to make this a priority and be available during the days. They have even said they wanted me to phase out the other job with Company A. They have started sending me meeting invites that conflict with this day job at Company A. I'm a contractor here, so I can take the day off, but I don't get paid for it. Thing is, the gig with Company A is 40 hours a week, and I get paid every other week. The gig with Company B is only 25-30 hours a week and I get paid at the end of each phase. I'm ok with the pay arrangements because I get both regular pay and a fat check at the end of each phase. Each phase runs 4-6 weeks. I like both gigs, and the people at both. I get alone well with all of them. But I need to communicate to the people at Company B that it's unreasonable to stop working for Company A for less hours and less frequent pay. How would you handle this? What would you say? Thanks
First, I hope you know what you're doing with a 70-hour work week, as most mortals can't possibly hope to handle it. Second, the situation is something you should have forseen when you signed with Company B, and you should have made it clear which hours you would and would not be available. If you've already agreed on the hours and they try to change it, you need to tell them that it requires a renegociation.
-
I am working on a hourly rate contract job with Company A that's going to run until the end of March. It's 40 hrs a week. I also just signed a fixed rate 6 month DOS to WPF conversion contract with Company B. The folks at company B have indicated that they would like me to put in 25-30 a week. It's remote so I can work on it whenever I want, however, they made it clear during negotiations that they would really like me to make this a priority and be available during the days. They have even said they wanted me to phase out the other job with Company A. They have started sending me meeting invites that conflict with this day job at Company A. I'm a contractor here, so I can take the day off, but I don't get paid for it. Thing is, the gig with Company A is 40 hours a week, and I get paid every other week. The gig with Company B is only 25-30 hours a week and I get paid at the end of each phase. I'm ok with the pay arrangements because I get both regular pay and a fat check at the end of each phase. Each phase runs 4-6 weeks. I like both gigs, and the people at both. I get alone well with all of them. But I need to communicate to the people at Company B that it's unreasonable to stop working for Company A for less hours and less frequent pay. How would you handle this? What would you say? Thanks
-
I am working on a hourly rate contract job with Company A that's going to run until the end of March. It's 40 hrs a week. I also just signed a fixed rate 6 month DOS to WPF conversion contract with Company B. The folks at company B have indicated that they would like me to put in 25-30 a week. It's remote so I can work on it whenever I want, however, they made it clear during negotiations that they would really like me to make this a priority and be available during the days. They have even said they wanted me to phase out the other job with Company A. They have started sending me meeting invites that conflict with this day job at Company A. I'm a contractor here, so I can take the day off, but I don't get paid for it. Thing is, the gig with Company A is 40 hours a week, and I get paid every other week. The gig with Company B is only 25-30 hours a week and I get paid at the end of each phase. I'm ok with the pay arrangements because I get both regular pay and a fat check at the end of each phase. Each phase runs 4-6 weeks. I like both gigs, and the people at both. I get alone well with all of them. But I need to communicate to the people at Company B that it's unreasonable to stop working for Company A for less hours and less frequent pay. How would you handle this? What would you say? Thanks
I would probably stick with working for just Company A. As the others have posted, 70 hour per week can be grueling. If you are up to working 70 hours a week and you can do it without getting burned out, it is your choice. I am not sure about Company B as they sound like they might be unreasonable.
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
-
So you expect people in company B to work their hours to suit you? If you can't work to their hours, then how do you expect them to be able to impart things to you? You need to make a choice here.
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
So you expect people in company B to work their hours to suit you?
Not sure how you came up with that, as I never said or implied that. This is a remote, task based project that I can work on at my leisure. They just prefer that I be available during the day. The whole reason for the post was that they now seem to be pushing me to give up my day job & do their project during the day. I want to find a tactful way to so no.
-
Company A is the priority. Tell Company B that. Inform them that you will be available from (and give a reasonable availability for meetings during work hours) but will perform the work at your own set schedule. Company B, already sounds unreasonable, since, after hiring you and knowing your situation, and committing you to a very unreasonable phased payment approach, they are also, now, demanding even more from you. I hope Company B is putting the money for your payment in escrow.
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. I also do Android Programming as I find it a refreshing break from the MS. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote:
and committing you to a very unreasonable phased payment approach
There's noting unreasonable at all about the pay approach. This is typical of fixed rate projects. You break it into phases, and at the end of each phase you invoice them & get paid.
-
My questions would be: a) Did you inform Company B that you're currently working a contract full-time? b) If so, did they/you negotiate that you were going to be available after Company A's contract ended? c) Did Company B change their plans after the fact? d) Can you reschedule Company A to work at varying times, so that you can still satisfy both?
a) yes b) yes c) I think that's what they're hoping for d) I asked, and they said now, as they have had 6 other contractors come in before me and got burned. When I asked, they came back the next day & said that they really like my work and are happy with me, but they want me in the office for the duration of the project.
-
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
So you expect people in company B to work their hours to suit you?
Not sure how you came up with that, as I never said or implied that. This is a remote, task based project that I can work on at my leisure. They just prefer that I be available during the day. The whole reason for the post was that they now seem to be pushing me to give up my day job & do their project during the day. I want to find a tactful way to so no.
zephaneas wrote:
Not sure how you came up with that, as I never said or implied that.
They are setting up meetings at times that are convenient to them. The only alternative, for them, is to have meetings that are convenient to you. There's an implication there that the times won't be convenient for them. And of course they'd prefer that you were available during the day - after all, that's most likely when they are available. Suppose they have questions; when do you think you should answer them?
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier
-
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote:
and committing you to a very unreasonable phased payment approach
There's noting unreasonable at all about the pay approach. This is typical of fixed rate projects. You break it into phases, and at the end of each phase you invoice them & get paid.
But I have thirty grand in unpaid invoices from before I learned better. That is almost a down payment on a nice sports car. Typical, btw, is in the eye of the beholder. I would require half up front, and then milestone payments. But then, I no longer do fixed projects. Not worth it.
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. I also do Android Programming as I find it a refreshing break from the MS. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost
-
Did you tell company B that you were working for company A currently? If so they should realize and appreciate that you are still obligated to A. If not you might try cloning or dazzle them with bullshit cause you created a potential mess.
VS2010/Atmel Studio 6.0 ToDo Manager Extension
Version 3.0 now available. There is no place like 127.0.0.1Mike Hankey wrote:
If not you might try cloning or dazzle them with bullsh*t cause you created a potential mess.
This gave me a good laugh. :thumbsup:
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
-
I am working on a hourly rate contract job with Company A that's going to run until the end of March. It's 40 hrs a week. I also just signed a fixed rate 6 month DOS to WPF conversion contract with Company B. The folks at company B have indicated that they would like me to put in 25-30 a week. It's remote so I can work on it whenever I want, however, they made it clear during negotiations that they would really like me to make this a priority and be available during the days. They have even said they wanted me to phase out the other job with Company A. They have started sending me meeting invites that conflict with this day job at Company A. I'm a contractor here, so I can take the day off, but I don't get paid for it. Thing is, the gig with Company A is 40 hours a week, and I get paid every other week. The gig with Company B is only 25-30 hours a week and I get paid at the end of each phase. I'm ok with the pay arrangements because I get both regular pay and a fat check at the end of each phase. Each phase runs 4-6 weeks. I like both gigs, and the people at both. I get alone well with all of them. But I need to communicate to the people at Company B that it's unreasonable to stop working for Company A for less hours and less frequent pay. How would you handle this? What would you say? Thanks
You're getting good advice here. Remember that this arrangement is a two way street, and they don't own you. Be professional, but don't be afraid to push back. Now, the OP has some stuff in it that worries me: indicated that they would like me to put in 25-30 a week. It's remote so I can work on it whenever I want, however, they made it clear during negotiations that they would really like me to make this a priority and be available during the days. They have even said they wanted me to phase out the other job with Company A. They have started sending me meeting invites that conflict with this day job at Company A. I'm a contractor here, so I can take the day off, but I don't get paid for it. Do you see the problem? What is in the contract? Who is your contract contact? You need to have a heart to heart right now to clarify the situation. As another has a grandfather who so eloquently phrased the situation... if they want you full time, and at their whim, that will cost more.
Charlie Gilley You're going to tell me what I want to know, or I'm going to beat you to death in your own house. "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
-
zephaneas wrote:
Not sure how you came up with that, as I never said or implied that.
They are setting up meetings at times that are convenient to them. The only alternative, for them, is to have meetings that are convenient to you. There's an implication there that the times won't be convenient for them. And of course they'd prefer that you were available during the day - after all, that's most likely when they are available. Suppose they have questions; when do you think you should answer them?
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier
-
But I have thirty grand in unpaid invoices from before I learned better. That is almost a down payment on a nice sports car. Typical, btw, is in the eye of the beholder. I would require half up front, and then milestone payments. But then, I no longer do fixed projects. Not worth it.
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. I also do Android Programming as I find it a refreshing break from the MS. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost
-
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
Suppose they have questions; when do you think you should answer them?
Um, when they ask? I didn't say I wasn't available during the day. I said I wouldn't be working their project during the day.
But by answering the questions for company B, you are short changing company A (and by answering questions for company B on company A's time, you are working on their project). Company A are paying you for your undivided attention. The point to remember here is that you are contracting for the company - this is a different relationship to being a software vendor. Also, what happens when the question that company B asks you necessitates a 2 hour design session where the details are fine tuned? Neither company A or company B are being unreasonable here. From what you posted, company B are happy to have a remote worker, which is fine, and they want that worker during office hours, which is entirely reasonable. I know you want to have your cake and eat it here, but it's pretty damn obvious you can't. If you can't provide the service to company B that they want (and this includes being available to them at times that are convenient to them) then you should let them know and let someone else take on the work for company B.
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier
-
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote:
and committing you to a very unreasonable phased payment approach
There's noting unreasonable at all about the pay approach. This is typical of fixed rate projects. You break it into phases, and at the end of each phase you invoice them & get paid.
Hi there I've been contracting for best part of twenty five years now and reached the conclusion many years ago you can only do one sizeable coding job at a time, if you are a dedicated ( read obsessed and fixated ) person you will be totally engrossed in *only one project* , I've heard of many *experts* but have never actually met one that impressed me, people supposedly working with me constantly answering their mobiles to other clients ( see where I'm going here ?) And just generally pissing people off and pleasing no one except themselves. Do one thing and do it properly , and don't be greedy - leave that to the pros - if you were one you wouldn't be asking your question here or anywhere else. I wish you luck
When the going gets weird the weird turn pro - Hunter S Thompson RIP
