QI Facts
-
I'll just drop this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus[^] The guy that said that earth travels around the sun was from the church. I do agree with you that dogma and lack of intelligent thought/scientific reasoning is bad, but being religious does not implies that.
But from reading about Galileo much of his work was agreed from the Catholic church but they said that it couldn't conflict with people's religious beliefs. from what I read it implied that the church tried to suppress scientific advancements in its early years to safeguard its teachings. But I also believe that it didn't suppress science or intellectual advancement but very selective at the time due to its power what it released / agreed with.
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians. Help end the violence EAT BACON
-
That is why the word CURRENTLY is in there. I am doing a degree in evolutionary biology and know whereof I speak.
--------------------------------- Obscurum per obscurius. Ad astra per alas porci. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
-
But from reading about Galileo much of his work was agreed from the Catholic church but they said that it couldn't conflict with people's religious beliefs. from what I read it implied that the church tried to suppress scientific advancements in its early years to safeguard its teachings. But I also believe that it didn't suppress science or intellectual advancement but very selective at the time due to its power what it released / agreed with.
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians. Help end the violence EAT BACON
Yeah, church as a organization really tried to suppress scientific advancement. But religious people were capable of overcoming that suppression and laying the foundations of today's theories, that was my point, being religious does not automaticaly implies that the person has no capacity for scientific thinking.
-
-
The answer to my next question may determine that. How do you explain the vast multiplicity of life, its relative nearness of one species to another, and the universality of certain biological and biochemical functions even amongst very disparate genera? If not evolution, then what? Space Pixies and Magic Dust?
--------------------------------- Obscurum per obscurius. Ad astra per alas porci. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
Quote:
How do you explain the vast multiplicity of life, its relative nearness of one species to another, and the universality of certain biological and biochemical functions even amongst very disparate genera? If not evolution, then what? Space Pixies and Magic Dust?
It sounds like you are claiming that the fact that there is so much variety and yet so much in common means there can't be a creator? Is that what you are saying? If so, why? If there is a single creator why in the world would there not be similarities? If anything, your argument supports the notion of a creator.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
See Here for DT Article[^] Americans are one third of the mass of humanity? Possibly, I have seen some big people there. Half of British Adults don't believe in Evolution? Really? I didn't realise there were so many stupid people. Although a lot of them will be prepared to believe in a sky pixie or some other shite like that. Shark Bay in Australia is now called “Safety Beach”. So it is.[^] I shall not bother going there then. Had it been Shark Bay I would have gone but now the fluffy pussy brigade have taken over the Ocker Homeland I suppose it is just a matter of time before MM is wearing a tutu and sipping a pink gin.
--------------------------------- Obscurum per obscurius. Ad astra per alas porci. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
Dalek Dave wrote:
Americans are one third of the mass of humanity? Possibly, I have seen some big people there.
Not even close. For hand waving purposes I'm assuming an average person weight globally of 100lbs, 6bn total people, and 300m Americans. That'd require an average weight here of ~600lbs or ~300kg; that's into bed ridden and it's only a question of if they'll keel over with a heart attack tomorrow from their next dozen bacon cheese burgers or from terror when their feeder is 5 minutes late returning from McDeaths. That's clearly bullshit; and if America is leading the charge to morbid obesity most of the rest of the rich world is only a decade or so behind us in self indulgent destruction. Preemptive notice to obnoxious pedants: Significant figures.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt
-
Quote:
How do you explain the vast multiplicity of life, its relative nearness of one species to another, and the universality of certain biological and biochemical functions even amongst very disparate genera? If not evolution, then what? Space Pixies and Magic Dust?
It sounds like you are claiming that the fact that there is so much variety and yet so much in common means there can't be a creator? Is that what you are saying? If so, why? If there is a single creator why in the world would there not be similarities? If anything, your argument supports the notion of a creator.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3945863/Posting-rules-for-The-Lounge.aspx[^]
4. No politics (including enviro-politics[^]), no sex, no religion.
If you want to pursue that line of discussion, it belongs in the Soapbox, or possibly even the back room[^].
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
See Here for DT Article[^] Americans are one third of the mass of humanity? Possibly, I have seen some big people there. Half of British Adults don't believe in Evolution? Really? I didn't realise there were so many stupid people. Although a lot of them will be prepared to believe in a sky pixie or some other shite like that. Shark Bay in Australia is now called “Safety Beach”. So it is.[^] I shall not bother going there then. Had it been Shark Bay I would have gone but now the fluffy pussy brigade have taken over the Ocker Homeland I suppose it is just a matter of time before MM is wearing a tutu and sipping a pink gin.
--------------------------------- Obscurum per obscurius. Ad astra per alas porci. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
It's not the fact that scientist call it a theory (Which is is, otherwise it would be called the law of evolution; on a side not, I love watching a adamant evolutionist state, "Well it's pretty much a law" but that will be addressed later. It's not the holes in the theory (personally I think evolution is a pretty good theory as for what we have going) My problem with evolution, is that fundamentalist bigots are usually on the wrong side. Sure I expect the christian right to by fairly opposed but I have yet to meet an evolutionist who is wiling to concede that it is just a theory and they go to name calling fast. No offense DD but calling people stupid because they don't agree with you is bigotry [but only because of my limited vocabulary], (Yes, yes, I know it is pretty much a law) So my fundamental believe is not in evolution but that evolution fits into a larger puzzle and that only time will tell which it is.
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost "All users always want Excel" --Ennis Lynch
-
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3945863/Posting-rules-for-The-Lounge.aspx[^]
4. No politics (including enviro-politics[^]), no sex, no religion.
If you want to pursue that line of discussion, it belongs in the Soapbox, or possibly even the back room[^].
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
I agree, but I am confused as to why you made the comment to me instead of the OP who brought religion in from the beginning.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
RyanDev wrote:
the OP who brought religion in from the beginning
Where? :confused:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
RyanDev wrote:
the OP who brought religion in from the beginning
Where? :confused:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
Are you being serious or just trying to support Dave because he is "popular"?
Quote:
Although a lot of them will be prepared to believe in a sky pixie or some other shite like that.
Quote:
If not evolution, then what? Space Pixies and Magic Dust?
By the way, mentioning a creator is not bringing in religion.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
Half of British Adults don't believe in Evolution? Really? I didn't realise there were so many stupid people
Did you just use a fundamentalist style statement? To paraphrase what you wrote: You don't believe what I believe, therefore you are stupid. Dave, I thought you were more well spoken than that.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
S Houghtelin wrote:
You don't believe what I believe, therefore you are stupid.
If someone claimed that 1 + 1 = 3, would you respect their right to believe something that you don't, or would you laugh at them for being stupid? If someone tried to pass a law asserting that π is exactly 3.2, would you accept their belief, or laugh them out of court[^]? Unfortunately, most people who refuse to "believe" in evolution do so not because they have a better theory, but because it conflicts with their religious beliefs. And that's fine, until they start trying to claim that their religious beliefs have as much scientific credibility as evolution, and should be given equal billing in science lessons.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
It's not the fact that scientist call it a theory (Which is is, otherwise it would be called the law of evolution; on a side not, I love watching a adamant evolutionist state, "Well it's pretty much a law" but that will be addressed later. It's not the holes in the theory (personally I think evolution is a pretty good theory as for what we have going) My problem with evolution, is that fundamentalist bigots are usually on the wrong side. Sure I expect the christian right to by fairly opposed but I have yet to meet an evolutionist who is wiling to concede that it is just a theory and they go to name calling fast. No offense DD but calling people stupid because they don't agree with you is bigotry [but only because of my limited vocabulary], (Yes, yes, I know it is pretty much a law) So my fundamental believe is not in evolution but that evolution fits into a larger puzzle and that only time will tell which it is.
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost "All users always want Excel" --Ennis Lynch
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote:
it is just a theory
Every scientist will agree that evolution is a theory. However, the "theory" in "scientific theory" doesn't mean what you seem to think it means:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory[^]
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on knowledge that has been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
Are you being serious or just trying to support Dave because he is "popular"?
Quote:
Although a lot of them will be prepared to believe in a sky pixie or some other shite like that.
Quote:
If not evolution, then what? Space Pixies and Magic Dust?
By the way, mentioning a creator is not bringing in religion.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
OK, so if mentioning a creator is not bringing in religion, then how does mentioning sky pixies, space pixies or magic dust count as bringing in religion? Is there a "sky pixie / space pixie / magic dust" religion that I'm not aware of? And I'm not just supporting Dave because he's popular; with the exception of the Moon landings, I happen to agree with a lot of what he says. ;P
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
OK, so if mentioning a creator is not bringing in religion, then how does mentioning sky pixies, space pixies or magic dust count as bringing in religion? Is there a "sky pixie / space pixie / magic dust" religion that I'm not aware of? And I'm not just supporting Dave because he's popular; with the exception of the Moon landings, I happen to agree with a lot of what he says. ;P
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
Quote:
OK, so if mentioning a creator is not bringing in religion, then how does mentioning sky pixies, space pixies or magic dust count as bringing in religion? I
Sky pixies, space pixes, and magic dust are his way of "trying" to offend religion. A creator is not religion. Religion puts attributes and characteristics to a creator. Regardless, I don't see why you have no problem with his post, especially since he called people stupid for disagreeing with him, and have a problem with mine. Sure feels like favoritism. Not that I care, just saying.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Quote:
OK, so if mentioning a creator is not bringing in religion, then how does mentioning sky pixies, space pixies or magic dust count as bringing in religion? I
Sky pixies, space pixes, and magic dust are his way of "trying" to offend religion. A creator is not religion. Religion puts attributes and characteristics to a creator. Regardless, I don't see why you have no problem with his post, especially since he called people stupid for disagreeing with him, and have a problem with mine. Sure feels like favoritism. Not that I care, just saying.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
I don't have a problem with your post as such. I was just pointing out that if you're trying to start a debate on the relative merits of evolution vs religion, it doesn't belong in the Lounge. But then we seem to have digressed into a debate on whether this was already a religious debate, so I guess that defeated the purpose. :)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
See Here for DT Article[^] Americans are one third of the mass of humanity? Possibly, I have seen some big people there. Half of British Adults don't believe in Evolution? Really? I didn't realise there were so many stupid people. Although a lot of them will be prepared to believe in a sky pixie or some other shite like that. Shark Bay in Australia is now called “Safety Beach”. So it is.[^] I shall not bother going there then. Had it been Shark Bay I would have gone but now the fluffy pussy brigade have taken over the Ocker Homeland I suppose it is just a matter of time before MM is wearing a tutu and sipping a pink gin.
--------------------------------- Obscurum per obscurius. Ad astra per alas porci. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
-
I don't have a problem with your post as such. I was just pointing out that if you're trying to start a debate on the relative merits of evolution vs religion, it doesn't belong in the Lounge. But then we seem to have digressed into a debate on whether this was already a religious debate, so I guess that defeated the purpose. :)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
"The average woman spends 16 months of her life crying" I wonder if that includes the time as baby/child.
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
-
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote:
it is just a theory
Every scientist will agree that evolution is a theory. However, the "theory" in "scientific theory" doesn't mean what you seem to think it means:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory[^]
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on knowledge that has been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
Dont tell that to Dave :laugh:
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians. Help end the violence EAT BACON
