Requirement for down time?
-
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)
Come on then, how will you guarantee no more 43 seconds runtime per day AND ensure all the other functionality is available?
speramus in juniperus
-
Come on then, how will you guarantee no more 43 seconds runtime per day AND ensure all the other functionality is available?
speramus in juniperus
Write it in VB?
-
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)
Man! You are going to have to work hard on that...have you considered a splash screen that takes 23 hours, 59 minutes and 16 seconds to finish loading, then close your app down 44 seconds later? But hard on the users though...they better learn to type real fast.
-
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)
Could it be Task application? just synchronizing stuff for 44 secs every day?
if(this.signature != "") { MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature); } else { MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found"); }
-
Write it in VB?
But it needs to be functionally complete...
speramus in juniperus
-
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)
Oh, that project already made. they called it Vista...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is (V).
-
Oh, that project already made. they called it Vista...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is (V).
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote:
Oh, that project already made. they called it Vista...
know, it was called healthcare.gov
"Coming soon"
-
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)
My Campervan is a 1976 VW Type 2 Super Viking
-
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)
Marcus_2 wrote:
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time.
Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)This requirement is common in financial industry, service web sites, etc. But you don't usually agree on software but on service (SLA). 99.95% availability means you can be down 1.5 days per year. That's a lot of hours. Imagine Facebook doing that ( or Apollo 11 :~ ). If your company took the assignment it means they are either pretty sure of their capabilities or ... :suss:
-
Marcus_2 wrote:
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time.
Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)This requirement is common in financial industry, service web sites, etc. But you don't usually agree on software but on service (SLA). 99.95% availability means you can be down 1.5 days per year. That's a lot of hours. Imagine Facebook doing that ( or Apollo 11 :~ ). If your company took the assignment it means they are either pretty sure of their capabilities or ... :suss:
99.95% availability does, yes. He is talking about 99.95% down time!
-
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)
-
99.95% availability does, yes. He is talking about 99.95% down time!
OriginalGriff wrote:
He is talking about 99.95% down time!
Got me there. :doh: Lawyers.
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
He is talking about 99.95% down time!
Got me there. :doh: Lawyers.
Tomaž Štih wrote:
Lawyers.
Mind your language sir! A chap could take offence at being called one of those...
-
Tomaž Štih wrote:
Lawyers.
Mind your language sir! A chap could take offence at being called one of those...
Sheep *lover*? Is that okay?
speramus in juniperus
-
Sheep *lover*? Is that okay?
speramus in juniperus
Better than "lawyer" *ack!* *spit!*
-
Write it in VB?
Language in the lounge! :)
-
That was funny :-D
Cheers, विक्रम "We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread :doh:
