Requirement for down time?
-
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)
Could it be Task application? just synchronizing stuff for 44 secs every day?
if(this.signature != "") { MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature); } else { MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found"); }
-
Write it in VB?
But it needs to be functionally complete...
speramus in juniperus
-
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)
Oh, that project already made. they called it Vista...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is (V).
-
Oh, that project already made. they called it Vista...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is (V).
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote:
Oh, that project already made. they called it Vista...
know, it was called healthcare.gov
"Coming soon"
-
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)
My Campervan is a 1976 VW Type 2 Super Viking
-
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)
Marcus_2 wrote:
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time.
Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)This requirement is common in financial industry, service web sites, etc. But you don't usually agree on software but on service (SLA). 99.95% availability means you can be down 1.5 days per year. That's a lot of hours. Imagine Facebook doing that ( or Apollo 11 :~ ). If your company took the assignment it means they are either pretty sure of their capabilities or ... :suss:
-
Marcus_2 wrote:
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time.
Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)This requirement is common in financial industry, service web sites, etc. But you don't usually agree on software but on service (SLA). 99.95% availability means you can be down 1.5 days per year. That's a lot of hours. Imagine Facebook doing that ( or Apollo 11 :~ ). If your company took the assignment it means they are either pretty sure of their capabilities or ... :suss:
99.95% availability does, yes. He is talking about 99.95% down time!
-
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project... ;)
-
99.95% availability does, yes. He is talking about 99.95% down time!
OriginalGriff wrote:
He is talking about 99.95% down time!
Got me there. :doh: Lawyers.
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
He is talking about 99.95% down time!
Got me there. :doh: Lawyers.
Tomaž Štih wrote:
Lawyers.
Mind your language sir! A chap could take offence at being called one of those...
-
Tomaž Štih wrote:
Lawyers.
Mind your language sir! A chap could take offence at being called one of those...
Sheep *lover*? Is that okay?
speramus in juniperus
-
Sheep *lover*? Is that okay?
speramus in juniperus
Better than "lawyer" *ack!* *spit!*
-
Write it in VB?
Language in the lounge! :)
-
That was funny :-D
Cheers, विक्रम "We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread :doh:
