64-bit apps
-
I'd say you are correct. In the case of the examples you give, there are no reason to switch to 64 bits.
I'd rather be phishing!
Maximilien wrote:
In the case of the examples you give, there are no reason to switch to 64 bits.
:confused: I certainly hope you are not implying there is no reason to switch to a 64 bit OS.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
Maximilien wrote:
In the case of the examples you give, there are no reason to switch to 64 bits.
:confused: I certainly hope you are not implying there is no reason to switch to a 64 bit OS.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
I did not say that; NOT ALL applications gain from being in 64bit. Other than having access to more memory, there is no real gain in performance. In the examples (irfanview, editplus, VS), there is no advantages to convert to 64 bits; they all are working on relatively small dataset. We are working on an engineering software, we work with 3D models and large datasets; and in the last couple of years, our clients were working with large datasets and we had no choice of switching to 64bit (with a lot of pain,sweat and swear due to very old legacy code).
I'd rather be phishing!
-
I'd say you are correct. In the case of the examples you give, there are no reason to switch to 64 bits.
I'd rather be phishing!
-
I'd say you are correct. In the case of the examples you give, there are no reason to switch to 64 bits.
I'd rather be phishing!
Running more programs.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello[^]
-
I did not say that; NOT ALL applications gain from being in 64bit. Other than having access to more memory, there is no real gain in performance. In the examples (irfanview, editplus, VS), there is no advantages to convert to 64 bits; they all are working on relatively small dataset. We are working on an engineering software, we work with 3D models and large datasets; and in the last couple of years, our clients were working with large datasets and we had no choice of switching to 64bit (with a lot of pain,sweat and swear due to very old legacy code).
I'd rather be phishing!
Maximilien wrote:
In the examples (irfanview, editplus, VS), there is no advantages to convert to 64 bits;
Other than the likelyhood of the developer running 3-6 instances while running/debugging applications that are also consuming resources.... :| Maybe that's just me though.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
Running more programs.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello[^]
Heck even debugging a single program that is intended to run on a 64 bit OS because it needs the extra memory. I failed to see his logic. The only people that should still be on 32 bit are those that refer to the internet as "That email thingy".
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
I did not say that; NOT ALL applications gain from being in 64bit. Other than having access to more memory, there is no real gain in performance. In the examples (irfanview, editplus, VS), there is no advantages to convert to 64 bits; they all are working on relatively small dataset. We are working on an engineering software, we work with 3D models and large datasets; and in the last couple of years, our clients were working with large datasets and we had no choice of switching to 64bit (with a lot of pain,sweat and swear due to very old legacy code).
I'd rather be phishing!
I'm not sure that's true. If you compile with x64 your program has more registers available. Also according to this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa384219%28v=vs.85%29.aspx[^] "WOW64 adds significant overhead if two or more instances of the same 32-bit application are running concurrently"
-
Heck even debugging a single program that is intended to run on a 64 bit OS because it needs the extra memory. I failed to see his logic. The only people that should still be on 32 bit are those that refer to the internet as "That email thingy".
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk[^] ;P
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk[^] ;P
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein:confused:
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
Would I be correct in saying that most Windows apps have no 64-bit version? I know this is true for Visual Studio, and it also seems to be the case for tools like editplus and irfanview.
Most .NET apps are 64 bits on 64 bits OS! :laugh:
My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
I'd say you are correct. In the case of the examples you give, there are no reason to switch to 64 bits.
I'd rather be phishing!
Benefits come from more than application itself. 64 bit virtual memory allows for OS to minimise swapping of memory but wow64 introduces a new overhead. Avoiding wow64 is a performance enhancer. http://www.ni.com/white-paper/5709/en/[^]
Peter Wasser "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
-
I'd say you are correct. In the case of the examples you give, there are no reason to switch to 64 bits.
I'd rather be phishing!
Maximilien wrote:
In the case of the examples you give, there are no reason to switch to 64 bits.
In my experience some of the image manipulation programs (like photoshop) seems twice as fast at startup and some operations when using 64-bit version on 64-bit OS. This is quite logical, since image manipulation require reading of pixels usually AARRGGBB format, which is 32-bit. If using aligned words, you can get twice as many pixels from memory in one op.
-
I'm not sure that's true. If you compile with x64 your program has more registers available. Also according to this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa384219%28v=vs.85%29.aspx[^] "WOW64 adds significant overhead if two or more instances of the same 32-bit application are running concurrently"
-
harold aptroot wrote:
on an Unobtainium processor
FTFY!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952) Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
-
harold aptroot wrote:
on an Unobtainium processor
FTFY!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952) Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
-
Would I be correct in saying that most Windows apps have no 64-bit version? I know this is true for Visual Studio, and it also seems to be the case for tools like editplus and irfanview.
All my windows apps are 64 bit
-
Would I be correct in saying that most Windows apps have no 64-bit version? I know this is true for Visual Studio, and it also seems to be the case for tools like editplus and irfanview.
When it comes to .net apps, there is an overhead when compiled as 64bit currently as the 64bit JIT compiler is optimized for services rather than applications. However the CLR team is currently re-writing all their compilers to a common bases that will improve the start up time for 64 bit .net apps.
-
I did not say that; NOT ALL applications gain from being in 64bit. Other than having access to more memory, there is no real gain in performance. In the examples (irfanview, editplus, VS), there is no advantages to convert to 64 bits; they all are working on relatively small dataset. We are working on an engineering software, we work with 3D models and large datasets; and in the last couple of years, our clients were working with large datasets and we had no choice of switching to 64bit (with a lot of pain,sweat and swear due to very old legacy code).
I'd rather be phishing!
That might be true for most users; but the 32bit nature of VS is causing problems for some large software projects. Mozilla's been bumping into memory limits with MS's 32bit linker for years. And while 64bit isn't a headline target for the VS team, a few years ago (vs2010 release???) when asked they blogged that they'd been making sure that each component they touched in development was made 64bit compatible when they were done along with whatever functional changes were responsible for it being updated in the first place. The intent was to get most of the way there organically so that wrapping up the remaining loose ends would be a reasonably sized task as part of a release as opposed to something that would consume all of their work for a few years.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt
-
I'd say you are correct. In the case of the examples you give, there are no reason to switch to 64 bits.
I'd rather be phishing!
ASLR[^] works much better for protecting a program against attack if it has a 64bit address space to work with than if it's limited to 32 bits.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt
-
Most .NET apps are 64 bits on 64 bits OS! :laugh:
My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
Only if they don't have any supporting libraries that tie into native code. I've got multiple solutions that I had to force to 32bit mode because of a single C++ lib dependency hidden in some other supporting component because MS doesn't have any way to either create dual 32/64bit native dlls or to bundle both with a .net solution and pick the right one automatically. :mad: :((
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt
