Ephemeral Loungers
-
Those who sign up, make a brief foray into the Lounge, post a bit and leave after a short period, bored or offended or getting a life. I bet there have been hundreds if not thousands of them. The permanent fixtures are few and far apart. Even fewer are those with less than four digit member IDs. Then there are the sock puppets. I would post under my real identity, but that is too risky nowadays. Though we theoretically have freedom of expression, even the most casual statement could be misconstrued and come back to bite you on the behind. Since what is released onto the internet can never be truely retracted, it is not worth the risk. I wonder how many members would be left if inactive accounts were wiped and members renumbered? (Remeber RENUM from the bad old days when editors couldn't move the caret location vertically? Like that) Around three times the online count, accounting for time zones? Maybe add another 50k for sporadic visitors?
-
Those who sign up, make a brief foray into the Lounge, post a bit and leave after a short period, bored or offended or getting a life. I bet there have been hundreds if not thousands of them. The permanent fixtures are few and far apart. Even fewer are those with less than four digit member IDs. Then there are the sock puppets. I would post under my real identity, but that is too risky nowadays. Though we theoretically have freedom of expression, even the most casual statement could be misconstrued and come back to bite you on the behind. Since what is released onto the internet can never be truely retracted, it is not worth the risk. I wonder how many members would be left if inactive accounts were wiped and members renumbered? (Remeber RENUM from the bad old days when editors couldn't move the caret location vertically? Like that) Around three times the online count, accounting for time zones? Maybe add another 50k for sporadic visitors?
S u n s h i n e wrote:
I would post under my real identity, but that is too risky nowadays.
I made the decision a while back to post under my real name. I do find myself thinking a little harder about what I post but that can't be a bad thing. The notion that you can say whatever you want is fine but just because you can doesn't mean you should. I'm sure I've made some contentious statements in the past and may well do so in the future but nothing I would be ashamed of or would be afraid to repeat. It's a choice, I suppose: hide behind a pseudonym and say whatever you want or use your real name and think about what you say. I prefer the latter.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me me, in pictures
-
Those who sign up, make a brief foray into the Lounge, post a bit and leave after a short period, bored or offended or getting a life. I bet there have been hundreds if not thousands of them. The permanent fixtures are few and far apart. Even fewer are those with less than four digit member IDs. Then there are the sock puppets. I would post under my real identity, but that is too risky nowadays. Though we theoretically have freedom of expression, even the most casual statement could be misconstrued and come back to bite you on the behind. Since what is released onto the internet can never be truely retracted, it is not worth the risk. I wonder how many members would be left if inactive accounts were wiped and members renumbered? (Remeber RENUM from the bad old days when editors couldn't move the caret location vertically? Like that) Around three times the online count, accounting for time zones? Maybe add another 50k for sporadic visitors?
S u n s h i n e wrote:
I wonder how many members would be left if inactive accounts were wiped
A thousand? Probably way less even.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
-
S u n s h i n e wrote:
I would post under my real identity, but that is too risky nowadays.
I made the decision a while back to post under my real name. I do find myself thinking a little harder about what I post but that can't be a bad thing. The notion that you can say whatever you want is fine but just because you can doesn't mean you should. I'm sure I've made some contentious statements in the past and may well do so in the future but nothing I would be ashamed of or would be afraid to repeat. It's a choice, I suppose: hide behind a pseudonym and say whatever you want or use your real name and think about what you say. I prefer the latter.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me me, in pictures
That's odd, you are just as offensive as when you were legal alien.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
-
Those who sign up, make a brief foray into the Lounge, post a bit and leave after a short period, bored or offended or getting a life. I bet there have been hundreds if not thousands of them. The permanent fixtures are few and far apart. Even fewer are those with less than four digit member IDs. Then there are the sock puppets. I would post under my real identity, but that is too risky nowadays. Though we theoretically have freedom of expression, even the most casual statement could be misconstrued and come back to bite you on the behind. Since what is released onto the internet can never be truely retracted, it is not worth the risk. I wonder how many members would be left if inactive accounts were wiped and members renumbered? (Remeber RENUM from the bad old days when editors couldn't move the caret location vertically? Like that) Around three times the online count, accounting for time zones? Maybe add another 50k for sporadic visitors?
And then there are those who use their real names and don't give a shit what people think.
Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever! Rich Tennant 5th Wave
-
S u n s h i n e wrote:
I would post under my real identity, but that is too risky nowadays.
I made the decision a while back to post under my real name. I do find myself thinking a little harder about what I post but that can't be a bad thing. The notion that you can say whatever you want is fine but just because you can doesn't mean you should. I'm sure I've made some contentious statements in the past and may well do so in the future but nothing I would be ashamed of or would be afraid to repeat. It's a choice, I suppose: hide behind a pseudonym and say whatever you want or use your real name and think about what you say. I prefer the latter.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me me, in pictures
-
Those who sign up, make a brief foray into the Lounge, post a bit and leave after a short period, bored or offended or getting a life. I bet there have been hundreds if not thousands of them. The permanent fixtures are few and far apart. Even fewer are those with less than four digit member IDs. Then there are the sock puppets. I would post under my real identity, but that is too risky nowadays. Though we theoretically have freedom of expression, even the most casual statement could be misconstrued and come back to bite you on the behind. Since what is released onto the internet can never be truely retracted, it is not worth the risk. I wonder how many members would be left if inactive accounts were wiped and members renumbered? (Remeber RENUM from the bad old days when editors couldn't move the caret location vertically? Like that) Around three times the online count, accounting for time zones? Maybe add another 50k for sporadic visitors?
Then there are those of us who don't give a shit but really want to make the big data bastards earn their money. The only reason I use a pseudonym is a vain attempt to limit their ability to link up meat and digital identity.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
Those who sign up, make a brief foray into the Lounge, post a bit and leave after a short period, bored or offended or getting a life. I bet there have been hundreds if not thousands of them. The permanent fixtures are few and far apart. Even fewer are those with less than four digit member IDs. Then there are the sock puppets. I would post under my real identity, but that is too risky nowadays. Though we theoretically have freedom of expression, even the most casual statement could be misconstrued and come back to bite you on the behind. Since what is released onto the internet can never be truely retracted, it is not worth the risk. I wonder how many members would be left if inactive accounts were wiped and members renumbered? (Remeber RENUM from the bad old days when editors couldn't move the caret location vertically? Like that) Around three times the online count, accounting for time zones? Maybe add another 50k for sporadic visitors?
Other than Chris, Uwe, and David, I don't recall any less-than-four digit members. I think most of them have died of old age, or have found more rewarding careers as gigolos. I post under my real name because all of my aliases are wanted by several different scary agencies.
Will Rogers never met me.
-
Those who sign up, make a brief foray into the Lounge, post a bit and leave after a short period, bored or offended or getting a life. I bet there have been hundreds if not thousands of them. The permanent fixtures are few and far apart. Even fewer are those with less than four digit member IDs. Then there are the sock puppets. I would post under my real identity, but that is too risky nowadays. Though we theoretically have freedom of expression, even the most casual statement could be misconstrued and come back to bite you on the behind. Since what is released onto the internet can never be truely retracted, it is not worth the risk. I wonder how many members would be left if inactive accounts were wiped and members renumbered? (Remeber RENUM from the bad old days when editors couldn't move the caret location vertically? Like that) Around three times the online count, accounting for time zones? Maybe add another 50k for sporadic visitors?
-
Those who sign up, make a brief foray into the Lounge, post a bit and leave after a short period, bored or offended or getting a life. I bet there have been hundreds if not thousands of them. The permanent fixtures are few and far apart. Even fewer are those with less than four digit member IDs. Then there are the sock puppets. I would post under my real identity, but that is too risky nowadays. Though we theoretically have freedom of expression, even the most casual statement could be misconstrued and come back to bite you on the behind. Since what is released onto the internet can never be truely retracted, it is not worth the risk. I wonder how many members would be left if inactive accounts were wiped and members renumbered? (Remeber RENUM from the bad old days when editors couldn't move the caret location vertically? Like that) Around three times the online count, accounting for time zones? Maybe add another 50k for sporadic visitors?
I don't post under my real identity because I don't want what I say to be censored by what I fear may happen in the future. If someone wanted to find out who I was it wouldn't be hard at all. There are some who seem to post under their real names, and I am astonished by what they post - I imagine them applying for a job with me; I'd google, find their posts and it would affect my judgment of them. Even those who post with a pseudonym who readily 'expose' their identities are naive IMHO. Take DD for example. Running for a place in local government - does he not realise the opposition will use what he posts in drunken nights to their advantage? Or MM - posting 4-letter-word drunken waffle is amusing to us regulars (generally!) but a potential employer?
-
S u n s h i n e wrote:
I wonder how many members would be left if inactive accounts were wiped
A thousand? Probably way less even.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
Since there are around 70K online right now, I think a thousand is a bit low.
-
Other than Chris, Uwe, and David, I don't recall any less-than-four digit members. I think most of them have died of old age, or have found more rewarding careers as gigolos. I post under my real name because all of my aliases are wanted by several different scary agencies.
Will Rogers never met me.
Roger Wright wrote:
I don't recall any less-than-four digit members.
42?
thatraja
-
And then there are those who use their real names and don't give a shit what people think.
Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever! Rich Tennant 5th Wave
-
Since there are around 70K online right now, I think a thousand is a bit low.
There might be, but the OP was about active users: 'make a brief foray into the Lounge'. I don't see 70k people posting here. If there were, every other post wouldn't be from Dave or Nagy otherwise.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
-
There might be, but the OP was about active users: 'make a brief foray into the Lounge'. I don't see 70k people posting here. If there were, every other post wouldn't be from Dave or Nagy otherwise.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
I see what you mean. In that case the number might be closer to 100. :)
-
I see what you mean. In that case the number might be closer to 100. :)
Yeah, add the few in SB1. In terms of 'community' it isn't massive. I am sure most just sign up, have a look, and move on. When was the last time 'fresh meat' came into the lounge for example? :)
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
-
Yeah, add the few in SB1. In terms of 'community' it isn't massive. I am sure most just sign up, have a look, and move on. When was the last time 'fresh meat' came into the lounge for example? :)
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
Munchies_Matt wrote:
'fresh meat' came into the lounge
You mean a non-sock puppet? :laugh:
-
Those who sign up, make a brief foray into the Lounge, post a bit and leave after a short period, bored or offended or getting a life. I bet there have been hundreds if not thousands of them. The permanent fixtures are few and far apart. Even fewer are those with less than four digit member IDs. Then there are the sock puppets. I would post under my real identity, but that is too risky nowadays. Though we theoretically have freedom of expression, even the most casual statement could be misconstrued and come back to bite you on the behind. Since what is released onto the internet can never be truely retracted, it is not worth the risk. I wonder how many members would be left if inactive accounts were wiped and members renumbered? (Remeber RENUM from the bad old days when editors couldn't move the caret location vertically? Like that) Around three times the online count, accounting for time zones? Maybe add another 50k for sporadic visitors?
I admit to being one of those "ephemeral" members, will try and change things going forward. But let's face it, there are those of us who are very busy (lack of a life comes to mind :laugh: ). And while we may not have time (or a bit of brain power) to spare for a reply, it does not mean we don't want to be part of this community, or that it isn't important to us. I get up at 5ish AM, grab a coffee, and start my day reading the various articles I get emailed - and the ones I enjoy the most are those from the CodeProject Daily News. It gets my mind engaged for the day ahead, and I feel connected with a community that "gets" me and what I do. In any case, I know too that a site such as this thrives when members contribute in any positive fashion, and I will do more to engage going forward...
-
That's odd, you are just as offensive as when you were legal alien.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
:laugh:
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me me, in pictures
-
There might be, but the OP was about active users: 'make a brief foray into the Lounge'. I don't see 70k people posting here. If there were, every other post wouldn't be from Dave or Nagy otherwise.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold