Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Common Core Subtraction

Common Core Subtraction

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
asp-nethelpdiscussion
45 Posts 27 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • realJSOPR Offline
    realJSOPR Offline
    realJSOP
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    In the U.S. we're currently suffering through "Common Core" teaching methods (I'll leave it to you to google "Common Core". Most of you remember the way we were taught to do subtraction:

    32
    -12
    ___
     20

    This is the way Common Core teaches the same problem:

    12 + 3  = 15
    15 + 5  = 20
    20 + 10 = 30
    30 + 2  = 32
        ____
         20

    I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :wtf: Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

    ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
    -----
    You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
    -----
    When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

    D R L M R 17 Replies Last reply
    0
    • realJSOPR realJSOP

      In the U.S. we're currently suffering through "Common Core" teaching methods (I'll leave it to you to google "Common Core". Most of you remember the way we were taught to do subtraction:

      32
      -12
      ___
       20

      This is the way Common Core teaches the same problem:

      12 + 3  = 15
      15 + 5  = 20
      20 + 10 = 30
      30 + 2  = 32
          ____
           20

      I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :wtf: Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

      ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
      -----
      You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
      -----
      When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Dalek Dave
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      It is almost as though they are deliberately enstupidising children.

      --------------------------------- Obscurum per obscurius. Ad astra per alas porci. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

      Z F Mike HankeyM 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • realJSOPR realJSOP

        In the U.S. we're currently suffering through "Common Core" teaching methods (I'll leave it to you to google "Common Core". Most of you remember the way we were taught to do subtraction:

        32
        -12
        ___
         20

        This is the way Common Core teaches the same problem:

        12 + 3  = 15
        15 + 5  = 20
        20 + 10 = 30
        30 + 2  = 32
            ____
             20

        I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :wtf: Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

        ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
        -----
        You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
        -----
        When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rage
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

        I understand how they got there

        I do not. How does this work ? And how does it scale to 156473-3 ?

        ~RaGE();

        I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus Entropy isn't what it used to.

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • realJSOPR realJSOP

          In the U.S. we're currently suffering through "Common Core" teaching methods (I'll leave it to you to google "Common Core". Most of you remember the way we were taught to do subtraction:

          32
          -12
          ___
           20

          This is the way Common Core teaches the same problem:

          12 + 3  = 15
          15 + 5  = 20
          20 + 10 = 30
          30 + 2  = 32
              ____
               20

          I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :wtf: Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

          ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
          -----
          You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
          -----
          When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Is this a real thing? It looks a lot like one of those math troll threads that occasionally appear on .. a certain site.

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Rage

            John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

            I understand how they got there

            I do not. How does this work ? And how does it scale to 156473-3 ?

            ~RaGE();

            I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus Entropy isn't what it used to.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jacquers
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            You count up from 12 to 32, using easy incremental steps 12 + 3 = 15, then 15 + 5 = 20, etc util you get to 32. So it could be done shorter as well: 12 + 8 = 20 20 + 10 = 30 30 + 2 = 32 ------------ 8 + 10 + 2 = 20

            C R 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • realJSOPR realJSOP

              In the U.S. we're currently suffering through "Common Core" teaching methods (I'll leave it to you to google "Common Core". Most of you remember the way we were taught to do subtraction:

              32
              -12
              ___
               20

              This is the way Common Core teaches the same problem:

              12 + 3  = 15
              15 + 5  = 20
              20 + 10 = 30
              30 + 2  = 32
                  ____
                   20

              I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :wtf: Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

              ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
              -----
              You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
              -----
              When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Marc Clifton
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              :wtf: I also just watched Vocabulary through paint chips[^] :omg: Marc

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Is this a real thing? It looks a lot like one of those math troll threads that occasionally appear on .. a certain site.

                M Offline
                M Offline
                MarkTJohnson
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                O Lordy yes, it is a real thing. My wife teaches the gifted in elementary and I have seen this stuff. I think it comes from Singapore or somewhere like that (I saw a book about the method and it had some far away country in the title). Little by little people are starting to question the value of it. Mercifully, my youngest is in the 8th grade and has only had a small sampling of the mathematical madness. I think it all comes from people trying to publish for their Ph.D.s. Create a "new and improved" math concept as your thesis.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • realJSOPR realJSOP

                  In the U.S. we're currently suffering through "Common Core" teaching methods (I'll leave it to you to google "Common Core". Most of you remember the way we were taught to do subtraction:

                  32
                  -12
                  ___
                   20

                  This is the way Common Core teaches the same problem:

                  12 + 3  = 15
                  15 + 5  = 20
                  20 + 10 = 30
                  30 + 2  = 32
                      ____
                       20

                  I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :wtf: Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

                  ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                  -----
                  You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                  -----
                  When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Ron Nicholson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  One of the guys at work was talking about this the other day. They are teaching his 6 year old to do math this way. Seems messed up. But with large numbers that is exactly how I do it in my head. There are probably better ways to do it though. All in all, seems really messed up to me.

                  Jack of all trades, master of none, though often times better than master of one.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • realJSOPR realJSOP

                    In the U.S. we're currently suffering through "Common Core" teaching methods (I'll leave it to you to google "Common Core". Most of you remember the way we were taught to do subtraction:

                    32
                    -12
                    ___
                     20

                    This is the way Common Core teaches the same problem:

                    12 + 3  = 15
                    15 + 5  = 20
                    20 + 10 = 30
                    30 + 2  = 32
                        ____
                         20

                    I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :wtf: Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

                    ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                    -----
                    You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                    -----
                    When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                    I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :WTF:
                     
                    Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

                    Side stepping my "Why is there an S added to Lego but missing from Maths rant" And just wait until they move on into programmer roles in the future. Just imagine the length and breadth of their algorithms and functions to accomodate their Common Core stuff. Luckily you'll be retired by then, I hope I am too or at least in another industry.

                    Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • realJSOPR realJSOP

                      In the U.S. we're currently suffering through "Common Core" teaching methods (I'll leave it to you to google "Common Core". Most of you remember the way we were taught to do subtraction:

                      32
                      -12
                      ___
                       20

                      This is the way Common Core teaches the same problem:

                      12 + 3  = 15
                      15 + 5  = 20
                      20 + 10 = 30
                      30 + 2  = 32
                          ____
                           20

                      I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :wtf: Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

                      ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                      -----
                      You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                      -----
                      When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                      F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fd9750
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Common sense says: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. That's what we got here: failure to apply common sense. "Old" style mathematics got a couple of guys on the moon, lots of stuff in space and all these computers/devices we like so much. That means at least some of the old style calculations got it right. Change for the sake of change is just plain stupid.

                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Jacquers

                        You count up from 12 to 32, using easy incremental steps 12 + 3 = 15, then 15 + 5 = 20, etc util you get to 32. So it could be done shorter as well: 12 + 8 = 20 20 + 10 = 30 30 + 2 = 32 ------------ 8 + 10 + 2 = 20

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        CBadger
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Jacquers wrote:

                        You count up from 12 to 32, using easy incremental steps

                        And what exactly is this "Incremental steps"? Who says you cannot count up from 12 to 32 like this? 12 + 20 = 32 » 32 - 20 = 12 or » 32 - 12 = 20 and as such 20 - 12 = 8 (How do I know that? Well take 32. 3 X 2 = 6 + 2 = 8) :rolleyes: I mean even easier still is take the original problem 32 - 12 = ? 3-1=2_ 2-2=_0 » 32 - 12 = 20 :wtf:

                        Loading signature... . . . Please Wait . . .

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Dalek Dave

                          It is almost as though they are deliberately enstupidising children.

                          --------------------------------- Obscurum per obscurius. Ad astra per alas porci. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

                          Z Offline
                          Z Offline
                          ZurdoDev
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Quote:

                          It is almost as though they are deliberately enstupidising children.

                          Good thing you are already educated.

                          There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • realJSOPR realJSOP

                            In the U.S. we're currently suffering through "Common Core" teaching methods (I'll leave it to you to google "Common Core". Most of you remember the way we were taught to do subtraction:

                            32
                            -12
                            ___
                             20

                            This is the way Common Core teaches the same problem:

                            12 + 3  = 15
                            15 + 5  = 20
                            20 + 10 = 30
                            30 + 2  = 32
                                ____
                                 20

                            I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :wtf: Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

                            ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                            -----
                            You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                            -----
                            When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                            Z Offline
                            Z Offline
                            ZurdoDev
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            I'm in the US and luckily they are not doing that where I live.

                            There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                            P 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dalek Dave

                              It is almost as though they are deliberately enstupidising children.

                              --------------------------------- Obscurum per obscurius. Ad astra per alas porci. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

                              F Offline
                              F Offline
                              Forogar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Quote:

                              enstupidising

                              This is my new word of the week. What? No, I don't care that it isn't a real word! It should be!

                              - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F fd9750

                                Common sense says: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. That's what we got here: failure to apply common sense. "Old" style mathematics got a couple of guys on the moon, lots of stuff in space and all these computers/devices we like so much. That means at least some of the old style calculations got it right. Change for the sake of change is just plain stupid.

                                B Offline
                                B Offline
                                Blue Waffler
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Filip Dossche wrote:

                                If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

                                You have seen the educational levels of the average American right?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                  In the U.S. we're currently suffering through "Common Core" teaching methods (I'll leave it to you to google "Common Core". Most of you remember the way we were taught to do subtraction:

                                  32
                                  -12
                                  ___
                                   20

                                  This is the way Common Core teaches the same problem:

                                  12 + 3  = 15
                                  15 + 5  = 20
                                  20 + 10 = 30
                                  30 + 2  = 32
                                      ____
                                       20

                                  I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :wtf: Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

                                  ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                  -----
                                  You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                  -----
                                  When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                                  F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  Forogar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  I think the idea is to move from the lower number to the larger number in small steps that are each easy to do: 3 + 5 = 8, 8 + 10 = 18, 18 + 2 = 20 Yay! There is the answer! The old way way was obviously way too complicated where you have to do: The "ones" column: 2 - 2 = 0 The "tens" column: 3 - 1 = 2 ...and then you wrote the "tens" answer followed by the "ones" answer to get 20 Yay! There is the answer! Of course, you could make it even easier by only incrementing the lower number by 1 until you reached the larger number and then counting how many times you had to do that. 20 Yes! That should be the new method! Much simpler! Or, for future programmers using nice round, easily remembered numbers:

                                  12 + 4 = 16
                                  16 + 8 = 24
                                  24 + 8 = 32
                                  ____
                                  20

                                  - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

                                  Z 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Z ZurdoDev

                                    I'm in the US and luckily they are not doing that where I live.

                                    There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    Pualee
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    It is determined largely by partisan political motivations. To keep it lounge-safe, I'll just say that where you are is a different political side than the national political side that is giving/taking money from local political bodies for accepting or rejecting this political agenda. There... I didn't argue about politics.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                      In the U.S. we're currently suffering through "Common Core" teaching methods (I'll leave it to you to google "Common Core". Most of you remember the way we were taught to do subtraction:

                                      32
                                      -12
                                      ___
                                       20

                                      This is the way Common Core teaches the same problem:

                                      12 + 3  = 15
                                      15 + 5  = 20
                                      20 + 10 = 30
                                      30 + 2  = 32
                                          ____
                                           20

                                      I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :wtf: Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

                                      ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                      -----
                                      You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                      -----
                                      When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Stryder_1
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      My son's going through this now and it's driving my wife crazy. I've reviewed it and I think I understand the "why" behind it. I've started thinking I look at numbers differently than her. Most Americans learn math by memorization - flash cards, repetitive tables, etc. They don't think about what the numbers actually mean. They are stuck as they have only memorized base 10. What happens when you need to understand base 2, 8, 16, 535? The majority of Americans can't figure those out. They never had flash cards for that. However, this is teaching kids early how to understand the value of the number outside of what they have memorized.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • F Forogar

                                        I think the idea is to move from the lower number to the larger number in small steps that are each easy to do: 3 + 5 = 8, 8 + 10 = 18, 18 + 2 = 20 Yay! There is the answer! The old way way was obviously way too complicated where you have to do: The "ones" column: 2 - 2 = 0 The "tens" column: 3 - 1 = 2 ...and then you wrote the "tens" answer followed by the "ones" answer to get 20 Yay! There is the answer! Of course, you could make it even easier by only incrementing the lower number by 1 until you reached the larger number and then counting how many times you had to do that. 20 Yes! That should be the new method! Much simpler! Or, for future programmers using nice round, easily remembered numbers:

                                        12 + 4 = 16
                                        16 + 8 = 24
                                        24 + 8 = 32
                                        ____
                                        20

                                        - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

                                        Z Offline
                                        Z Offline
                                        ZurdoDev
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Quote:

                                        Of course, you could make it even easier by only incrementing the lower number by 1 until you reached the larger number

                                        You can borrow my fingers if you need to. :)

                                        There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                                        F 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                          In the U.S. we're currently suffering through "Common Core" teaching methods (I'll leave it to you to google "Common Core". Most of you remember the way we were taught to do subtraction:

                                          32
                                          -12
                                          ___
                                           20

                                          This is the way Common Core teaches the same problem:

                                          12 + 3  = 15
                                          15 + 5  = 20
                                          20 + 10 = 30
                                          30 + 2  = 32
                                              ____
                                               20

                                          I understand how they got there, but I DON'T understand how that's a better way to do it. :wtf: Maybe it's because a minus sign promotes negative thoughts about math...

                                          ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                          -----
                                          You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                          -----
                                          When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          Dan Neely
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          The more things change the more they stay the same. Some of you who have small children may have perhaps been put in the embarrassing position of being unable to do your child's arithmetic homework because of the current revolution in mathematics teaching...[^]

                                          Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups