Impeach Bush!
-
I have a sight for you to go to: http://www.paddedwall.org/help[^] ------- signature starts "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 Please review the Legal Disclaimer in my bio. ------- signature ends
that is what the likes of u r used to do but . if u cannot provide a disscussion that worth wasting time in then get out of here and find a bar to die in it is very clear that you have alot of time for nothing GET OUT:mad::mad::mad:
-
Like it or not, he is the president of the world, at least he believes it himself. So that makes US court the court of the world. ;-)
OK, So answer Colins Questions: What are the exact crimes that he has commited? Do the US courts have jurisdiction over what they allege he has done? ""
-
Samer12 wrote: I think the crimes he makes every day by the hands of his right hand (Sharon) is very clear to all the people in the world I always thought it is the opposite - Bush is Sharon's right hand:)
Felix Gartsman wrote: Bush is Sharon's right hand This point of view opens interesting perspectives :-D;)
I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean,when you're going up against a crazed dictator,you wanna have your friends by your side. I realize it took more than 2 years before you guys pitched in against Hitler,but that was different. Everyone knew he had weapons
-
I don't get it President Bush is accused of Crimes Against Peace, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity. No crimes are greater threats to the Constitution of the United States, the United Nation Charter, the rule of law or the future of humanity. What are the exact crimes that he has commited? Do the US courts have jurisdiction over what they allege he has done? Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I'm guessing the concept of a 2 hour movie showing two guys eating a meal and talking struck them as 'foreign' Rob Manderson wrote:
Colin Davies wrote: What are the exact crimes that he has commited? He has killed many, many people in US (death penalty). He is accomplice of the crimes committed by Sharon. He will kill thousands of innocents in Iraq
-
Loyal Americans, here is the site you have been looking for: http:\\www.votetoimpeach.org[^] This is not a "web petition", it's the real thing. Contact your representative in Congress!
Well, ANSWER is a dubious organization at best, having funded some pretty immoral stuff in the past. However, I signed it. I want the guy out of office. But realistically, I suspect that nothing will come of this except: 1. getting onto some Homeland Security badguy list 2. getting reams of junk mail 3. getting spammed #1 I don't care about. #2 I feel bad about the trees, and #3 I can filter and ignore. Marc Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka
Microsoft deliberately adds arbitrary layers of complexity to make it difficult to deliver Windows features on non-Windows platforms--Microsoft's "Halloween files" -
Colin Davies wrote: What are the exact crimes that he has commited? He has killed many, many people in US (death penalty). He is accomplice of the crimes committed by Sharon. He will kill thousands of innocents in Iraq
Juan Carlos Cobas wrote: He will kill thousands of innocents in Iraq What a load of crap:mad:
$TeVe McLeNiThAn
-
Colin Davies wrote: What are the exact crimes that he has commited? He has killed many, many people in US (death penalty). He is accomplice of the crimes committed by Sharon. He will kill thousands of innocents in Iraq
Juan Carlos Cobas wrote: He has killed many, many people in US (death penalty). Name One Country in the world whose actions have not lead to someones death. As for the death penalty that is in the hands of the Juries in the US. Juan Carlos Cobas wrote: He is accomplice of the crimes committed by Sharon. And so are all the nations that signed UN Resolution 181 http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/un/res181.htm http://www.trumanlibrary.org/israel/find.htm http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study\_collections/israel/large/israel.htm Juan Carlos Cobas wrote: He will kill thousands of innocents in Iraq And what of the Hundreds of Thousands that have died because of the world doing nothing for the past 12 years. I do not claim that evidence of Terrorist involvment with Iraq justifies what is going on but I do not agree with your list of crimes. ""
-
I have a sight for you to go to: http://www.paddedwall.org/help[^] ------- signature starts "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 Please review the Legal Disclaimer in my bio. ------- signature ends
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: a sight for you Nice;) Very nice:laugh::laugh::laugh:
$TeVe McLeNiThAn
-
Juan Carlos Cobas wrote: He will kill thousands of innocents in Iraq What a load of crap:mad:
$TeVe McLeNiThAn
Steve McLenithan wrote: What a load of crap I know it hurts when the truth is said
-
Juan Carlos Cobas wrote: He has killed many, many people in US (death penalty). Name One Country in the world whose actions have not lead to someones death. As for the death penalty that is in the hands of the Juries in the US. Juan Carlos Cobas wrote: He is accomplice of the crimes committed by Sharon. And so are all the nations that signed UN Resolution 181 http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/un/res181.htm http://www.trumanlibrary.org/israel/find.htm http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study\_collections/israel/large/israel.htm Juan Carlos Cobas wrote: He will kill thousands of innocents in Iraq And what of the Hundreds of Thousands that have died because of the world doing nothing for the past 12 years. I do not claim that evidence of Terrorist involvment with Iraq justifies what is going on but I do not agree with your list of crimes. ""
Michael A. Barnhart wrote: Name One Country in the world whose actions have not lead to someones death. As for the death penalty that is in the hands of the Juries in the US. Name one CIVILIZED country where the death penalty is allowed Michael A. Barnhart wrote: And so are all the nations that signed UN Resolution 181 They are also accomplices, but Bush is Sharon's right hand
-
Felix Gartsman wrote: Bush is Sharon's right hand This point of view opens interesting perspectives :-D;)
I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean,when you're going up against a crazed dictator,you wanna have your friends by your side. I realize it took more than 2 years before you guys pitched in against Hitler,but that was different. Everyone knew he had weapons
ROFLMAO! :laugh: Anna :rose: www.annasplace.me.uk
"Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
- Marcia GraeschTrouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++
-
Loyal Americans, here is the site you have been looking for: http:\\www.votetoimpeach.org[^] This is not a "web petition", it's the real thing. Contact your representative in Congress!
-
Michael A. Barnhart wrote: Name One Country in the world whose actions have not lead to someones death. As for the death penalty that is in the hands of the Juries in the US. Name one CIVILIZED country where the death penalty is allowed Michael A. Barnhart wrote: And so are all the nations that signed UN Resolution 181 They are also accomplices, but Bush is Sharon's right hand
During 2001, at least 3,048 prisoners were executed in 31 countries and 5,265 people were sentenced to death in 69 countries. These figures include only cases known to Amnesty International; the true figures are certainly higher. In 2001, 90 per cent of all known executions took place in China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the USA. In China, the limited and incomplete records available to Amnesty International at the end of the year indicated that at least 2,468 people were executed, but the true figure was believed to be much higher. At least 139 executions were carried out in Iran. In Saudi Arabia, 79 executions were reported, but the total may have been much higher. Sixty-six people were executed in the USA. Overall, 1 of every 2,034,000 people were executed in the world. In China, 1 of every 519,000 people were executed. In Iran, 1 of every 446,000 people were executed. In Saudi Arabia, 1 of every 304,000 people were executed. In USA, 1 of every 4,484,000 people were executed. So, once again you have to ask yourself, do you really give a rats ass about the death penalty or are you just using it to mindlessly bash the USA. Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.
-
During 2001, at least 3,048 prisoners were executed in 31 countries and 5,265 people were sentenced to death in 69 countries. These figures include only cases known to Amnesty International; the true figures are certainly higher. In 2001, 90 per cent of all known executions took place in China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the USA. In China, the limited and incomplete records available to Amnesty International at the end of the year indicated that at least 2,468 people were executed, but the true figure was believed to be much higher. At least 139 executions were carried out in Iran. In Saudi Arabia, 79 executions were reported, but the total may have been much higher. Sixty-six people were executed in the USA. Overall, 1 of every 2,034,000 people were executed in the world. In China, 1 of every 519,000 people were executed. In Iran, 1 of every 446,000 people were executed. In Saudi Arabia, 1 of every 304,000 people were executed. In USA, 1 of every 4,484,000 people were executed. So, once again you have to ask yourself, do you really give a rats ass about the death penalty or are you just using it to mindlessly bash the USA. Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.
I was talking about civilized, democratic countries. China, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, ... are permanently violating human rights. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t have anything against US, only against G. Bush.
-
I don't get it President Bush is accused of Crimes Against Peace, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity. No crimes are greater threats to the Constitution of the United States, the United Nation Charter, the rule of law or the future of humanity. What are the exact crimes that he has commited? Do the US courts have jurisdiction over what they allege he has done? Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I'm guessing the concept of a 2 hour movie showing two guys eating a meal and talking struck them as 'foreign' Rob Manderson wrote:
The articles of impeachment are listed on the web site. I won't repeat them here. We impeached Clinton over lying about a blowjob. Surely Bush's rush to invade a country with no provocation is a more serious matter.
-
I was talking about civilized, democratic countries. China, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, ... are permanently violating human rights. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t have anything against US, only against G. Bush.
and you are a phuching idiot Mike
-
The articles of impeachment are listed on the web site. I won't repeat them here. We impeached Clinton over lying about a blowjob. Surely Bush's rush to invade a country with no provocation is a more serious matter.
Jim A. Johnson wrote: Surely Bush's rush to invade a country with no provocation is a more serious matter. backed by a majority of the House of Representatives and 99% of the Senate. Mike
-
and you are a phuching idiot Mike
Mike Gaskey wrote: and you are a phuching idiot Great words!
-
and you are a phuching idiot Mike
Mike Gaskey wrote: and you are a phuching idiot Why is it that when people can no longer support their position with facts (even lies if they believe them to be true) they resort to calling their opponent names. Do they believe that wins the debate? Why don't they simply stop responding so they don't make themselves look so foolish? :confused:
[
](http://www.canucks.com)Sonork 100.11743 Chicken Little "You're obviously a superstar." - Christian Graus about me - 12 Feb '03 Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
-
Mike Gaskey wrote: and you are a phuching idiot Why is it that when people can no longer support their position with facts (even lies if they believe them to be true) they resort to calling their opponent names. Do they believe that wins the debate? Why don't they simply stop responding so they don't make themselves look so foolish? :confused:
[
](http://www.canucks.com)Sonork 100.11743 Chicken Little "You're obviously a superstar." - Christian Graus about me - 12 Feb '03 Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
PJ Arends wrote: Why is it that when people can no longer support their position with facts (even lies if they believe them to be true) they resort to calling their opponent names. Do they believe that wins the debate? Why don't they simply stop responding so they don't make themselves look so foolish? If you bothered to follow the thread you would have seen that he responded to two sets of facts by essentially saying, "well, I just don't like Bush". There can be no debate in that set of circumstances so I simply posted my opinion. Mike
