Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. My new pet peeve - final

My new pet peeve - final

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questionannouncement
62 Posts 41 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Chris Maunder
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

    cheers Chris Maunder

    OriginalGriffO P J D M 30 Replies Last reply
    0
    • C Chris Maunder

      I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

      cheers Chris Maunder

      OriginalGriffO Offline
      OriginalGriffO Offline
      OriginalGriff
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Chris Maunder wrote:

      So which one's the final one?

      The one that's left when I've finished with the delete key...

      Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952) Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)

      "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
      "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

        Chris Maunder wrote:

        So which one's the final one?

        The one that's left when I've finished with the delete key...

        Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952) Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Chris Maunder
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Precisely!

        cheers Chris Maunder

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Maunder

          I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

          cheers Chris Maunder

          P Offline
          P Offline
          PIEBALDconsult
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          "Final?! Did you say 'final'? Nothing is final until we decide it is!"

          You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Maunder

            I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

            cheers Chris Maunder

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jorgen Andersson
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Put them into the repository, you'll get versioning for free.

            Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello[^]

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Maunder

              I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

              cheers Chris Maunder

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Duncan Edwards Jones
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Also - anyone emailing around a doc to multiple people for their updates - thus we have 20 new branches of "Business Plan (Draft) v1.2.docx" to merge back together...

              P W 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Maunder

                I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

                cheers Chris Maunder

                M Offline
                M Offline
                MacSpudster
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Well, I know this much ~ The final é in finalé is the finalé of finalé.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Duncan Edwards Jones

                  Also - anyone emailing around a doc to multiple people for their updates - thus we have 20 new branches of "Business Plan (Draft) v1.2.docx" to merge back together...

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Pualee
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Haha... I used to have to run around fetching signatures on pointless documents while the more senior programmers were implementing whatever they wanted. I would sort my list of signers by their job title (most important people last). I would fetch signatures from configuration management, software test, test engineering, QA (yes, we had 3 versions of testing), document control, the engineering head, the vp of ... blah blah blah. Anyway, all these people were above me. So the lower ones, who gave me revisions up front... I would implement the revision, bring it back, and then head to the next. Wouldn't you know it, by the time I get to the top, the lower guy is scowling at me because he has to sign it for the umpteenth time, and the only revisions he cared about (his) are gone. I say I'm just doing my job and if he don't sign I'll have to go to the higher ups. ;P I didn't have many friends there. :laugh:

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jorgen Andersson

                    Put them into the repository, you'll get versioning for free.

                    Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello[^]

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dan Neely
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Before my PM fell in love with Sharepoint (and to be fair, it is easier for non-technical users) we versioned all our office/etc documents with the same tool we used for source control. Diffing was basically a no-go at that time; but we did have proper version history.

                    Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris Maunder

                      I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

                      cheers Chris Maunder

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      devenv exe
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      At my current work place, we have databases named like below on the same instance of SQL Server 1. Database1 2. Database1 New 3. Database1 Current 4. Database1 Recent 5. Database1 Latest 6. Database1 Real For some reason, no one wants to delete any of them.

                      "Coming soon"

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris Maunder

                        I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

                        cheers Chris Maunder

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Almost as bad as putting "new" to indicate that this is a new version.

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Almost as bad as putting "new" to indicate that this is a new version.

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          chriselst
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          We have live servers with new at the front of the name. I hate to think what we'll have if they need replacing again.

                          Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Duncan Edwards Jones

                            Also - anyone emailing around a doc to multiple people for their updates - thus we have 20 new branches of "Business Plan (Draft) v1.2.docx" to merge back together...

                            W Offline
                            W Offline
                            W Balboos GHB
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            No version control problems - give them a Wiki. Let them fight it out amongst themselves.

                            "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                            "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

                            "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                            G 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Chris Maunder

                              I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

                              cheers Chris Maunder

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              S Houghtelin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Reminds me off all those Cher FINAL TOUR! tours.

                              It was broke, so I fixed it.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Chris Maunder

                                I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

                                cheers Chris Maunder

                                K Offline
                                K Offline
                                Kschuler
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                The one with the most recent maintenance date.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C Chris Maunder

                                  I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

                                  cheers Chris Maunder

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  CPallini
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Same here, with 'latest'.

                                  THESE PEOPLE REALLY BOTHER ME!! How can they know what you should do without knowing what you want done?!?! -- C++ FQA Lite

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C Chris Maunder

                                    I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

                                    cheers Chris Maunder

                                    N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Nish Nishant
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    The one with the most recent last modified date?

                                    Regards, Nish


                                    Latest article: Using the Microsoft Azure Storage Client Library for C++ Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Chris Maunder

                                      I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

                                      cheers Chris Maunder

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      JimmyRopes
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      If more than one person will be working on the document simultaneously then source control (like SVN) is the best option. For documents you are working on that others are not contributing to try the following naming convention. It works for me. document20140103.docx document20140131.docx document20140206.docx document20140223.docx document20140316.docx You will always know the latest and greatest version of the document. Well at least the latest version. :cool:

                                      **_Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.

                                      I would agree with you but then we both would be wrong._**
                                      The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                                      I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Nish Nishant

                                        The one with the most recent last modified date?

                                        Regards, Nish


                                        Latest article: Using the Microsoft Azure Storage Client Library for C++ Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

                                        C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        Chris Maunder
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        You'd think. Except it isn't. You've had merge conflicts before, right? Same deal.

                                        cheers Chris Maunder

                                        N B 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C Chris Maunder

                                          I'm organising some documents and I've realised I have a new pet peeve: putting "Final" in a document name to indicate that it's the final version. In itself this isn't awful. What's awful is: document.docx document - final.docx document - final - DG-comments.docx document - FINAL.docx So which one's the final one? This is why documents need source control... [Edit: Just found:" Copy of Copy of document FINAL.docx". We have a winner!]

                                          cheers Chris Maunder

                                          E Offline
                                          E Offline
                                          Ennis Ray Lynch Jr
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Recently while sitting in at the end of a share point configuration provided by a vendor I noticed several copies of an SSRS report in the share. I asked what didn't you enable versioning? The attendees on my side looked perplexed and the "consultant" said, "Yes, I suppose we could have done that. You just can't win!

                                          Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost "All users always want Excel" --Ennis Lynch

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups