Blackmail
-
Are these people tried before the family abode is destroyed? How is guilt determined? The word abbreviation is awfully long for what it means.
Of course not me is determying their guilt. The court do. And not ALL such houses were destroyed. Only those where families were in this or other way supporting suiciders, and of course it was documented (filmed for example). Just making a holiday meal and yelling "Go, Go" is called supporting as well. And this is one of the ways Israel is trying to fight with bomb-suiciders. I'm not sure this is an efficient way, since those families getting a lot of money (30-40 thousands dollars, which is a LOT in Palestine), so they really can afford buying a new house Philip Patrick Web-site: www.stpworks.com "Two beer or not two beer?" Shakesbeer
-
Philip Patrick wrote: All houses that were destroyed, had/belong to/used by/etc. terrorists and/or their families (only those who supported their sons/brothers/husbands in their "holy" war). I can understand your anger, as I can understand their :rose: Destroying relatives' house seems to me like a collective punishment, which is a deny of the human rights by punishing somebody for somebody else crimes. How do you see the arrival on the political scene of a palestinian prime minister? Do you think it may lead to peace?
Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop
Another example from real life. Note that I mentioned "supporting" before. So here is an example (not connected to Israel-Palestinian conflict). Imaging: John kills someone and John's friend knew all about what he is going to do and even said him "go for it" (documented). John was caught and what? You think John's friend will stay clear? But he didn't killed anybody! So why they are putting hi into prison too (punishing)? Philip Patrick Web-site: www.stpworks.com "Two beer or not two beer?" Shakesbeer
-
Of course not me is determying their guilt. The court do. And not ALL such houses were destroyed. Only those where families were in this or other way supporting suiciders, and of course it was documented (filmed for example). Just making a holiday meal and yelling "Go, Go" is called supporting as well. And this is one of the ways Israel is trying to fight with bomb-suiciders. I'm not sure this is an efficient way, since those families getting a lot of money (30-40 thousands dollars, which is a LOT in Palestine), so they really can afford buying a new house Philip Patrick Web-site: www.stpworks.com "Two beer or not two beer?" Shakesbeer
Philip Patrick wrote: The court do Cool. I was just curious. I didn't mean to imply that it was you picking an choosing. We get little coverage of the 'whole story' over here so I ask questions whenever I can. The word abbreviation is awfully long for what it means.
-
Another example from real life. Note that I mentioned "supporting" before. So here is an example (not connected to Israel-Palestinian conflict). Imaging: John kills someone and John's friend knew all about what he is going to do and even said him "go for it" (documented). John was caught and what? You think John's friend will stay clear? But he didn't killed anybody! So why they are putting hi into prison too (punishing)? Philip Patrick Web-site: www.stpworks.com "Two beer or not two beer?" Shakesbeer
John's friend chould be trialed for complicity, but should be considered innocent before the judgement. Are the destructions "automatic", or is there a trial before, with earing of both sides? We have very few details about this kind of things in the newspapers, thanks for enlighten me.
Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop
-
Well, if you stand in front of a moving bulldozer, you should expect to get hurt or killed if you don't move. I have no sympathy for stupid fucking people. I think her death merely improved the gene pool. Lastly, what about her "friends" that were standing there watching her get run over? Why didn't they pull the stupid bitch out of the way? ------- signature starts "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 Please review the Legal Disclaimer in my bio. ------- signature ends
-
Amazed nobody here brought this up, seems like sure fire material for us lot :-D Basically an Israeli bulldozer ran over and killed a human shield in Palestine the other day. What should not make any difference but obviously does was that the person killed was an American woman. Now I am pretty sure plenty of people have already been trampled by bulldozers over the last few years in that region. But now that it was an American woman the matter has claimed front page status here. The obvious thing happened as well as Palestinians are using it to show how barbaric and awful those nasty Israelis are. They see the potential of using that the victim was American. Anyway my wandering point is: A radio station last night was asking wether the death was "justified." Now death is rarely justified, but in my ever not so humble opinion this death was. The woman stood before a bulldozer. She was there as a human shield. She knew the consequences. She knew Israelis don't negotiate and don't fold to threats. To me it is blackmail. If Israel backs down and does not bulldoze the shack, subsequently killing the human shield, then every Tom, Dick and Sheila is going to rush off and be human sheilds to save the poor Palestinians because they see that their lives really are not in danger because the Israelis won't run you over to get to the house. But if Israel does go ahead, run over the human sheild and bulldoze the house then the anti-Israelis have ammo to show how barabaric the Israelis are. Just what the hell do the Israelis do (lets not go asking wether bulldozing shacks is proper or not ok, lets assume it is for this thread)?
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South AfricaMacbeth muttered: I am in blood / Stepped in so far, that should I wade no more, / Returning were as tedious as go o'er DavidW wrote: You are totally mad. Nice.
We Americans just look at as protecting the gene pool....... Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
-
Amazed nobody here brought this up, seems like sure fire material for us lot :-D Basically an Israeli bulldozer ran over and killed a human shield in Palestine the other day. What should not make any difference but obviously does was that the person killed was an American woman. Now I am pretty sure plenty of people have already been trampled by bulldozers over the last few years in that region. But now that it was an American woman the matter has claimed front page status here. The obvious thing happened as well as Palestinians are using it to show how barbaric and awful those nasty Israelis are. They see the potential of using that the victim was American. Anyway my wandering point is: A radio station last night was asking wether the death was "justified." Now death is rarely justified, but in my ever not so humble opinion this death was. The woman stood before a bulldozer. She was there as a human shield. She knew the consequences. She knew Israelis don't negotiate and don't fold to threats. To me it is blackmail. If Israel backs down and does not bulldoze the shack, subsequently killing the human shield, then every Tom, Dick and Sheila is going to rush off and be human sheilds to save the poor Palestinians because they see that their lives really are not in danger because the Israelis won't run you over to get to the house. But if Israel does go ahead, run over the human sheild and bulldoze the house then the anti-Israelis have ammo to show how barabaric the Israelis are. Just what the hell do the Israelis do (lets not go asking wether bulldozing shacks is proper or not ok, lets assume it is for this thread)?
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South AfricaMacbeth muttered: I am in blood / Stepped in so far, that should I wade no more, / Returning were as tedious as go o'er DavidW wrote: You are totally mad. Nice.
Shouldn't this be in the soapbox ? The tigress is here :-D
-
John's friend chould be trialed for complicity, but should be considered innocent before the judgement. Are the destructions "automatic", or is there a trial before, with earing of both sides? We have very few details about this kind of things in the newspapers, thanks for enlighten me.
Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop
KaЯl wrote: John's friend chould be trialed for complicity, but should be considered innocent before the judgement Well, that's not like things work in the world. John's friend is guilty as well, this what most courts will decide. KaЯl wrote: Are the destructions "automatic", or is there a trial before, with earing of both sides? Of course. Not army deciding which house to destroy, which not. Court do and in most cases houses won't be destroyed. Philip Patrick Web-site: www.stpworks.com "Two beer or not two beer?" Shakesbeer
-
KaЯl wrote: John's friend chould be trialed for complicity, but should be considered innocent before the judgement Well, that's not like things work in the world. John's friend is guilty as well, this what most courts will decide. KaЯl wrote: Are the destructions "automatic", or is there a trial before, with earing of both sides? Of course. Not army deciding which house to destroy, which not. Court do and in most cases houses won't be destroyed. Philip Patrick Web-site: www.stpworks.com "Two beer or not two beer?" Shakesbeer
Philip Patrick wrote: Well, that's not like things work in the world. John's friend is guilty as well, this what most courts will decide I think that, in fact, we agree here :) Philip Patrick wrote: Of course. Not army deciding which house to destroy, which not. Court do and in most cases houses won't be destroyed Thanks for the explanations :)
Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop
-
:rolleyes: So passive resistance is dead as a principal then? Gandhi would be turning in his grave were he not cremated... '--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Merrion Computing Ltd
Merrion wrote: So passive resistance is dead as a principal then? Gandhi would be turning in his grave were he not cremated... Well his ashes are probably swirling in the wind.
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South AfricaMacbeth muttered: I am in blood / Stepped in so far, that should I wade no more, / Returning were as tedious as go o'er DavidW wrote: You are totally mad. Nice.
-
Shouldn't this be in the soapbox ? The tigress is here :-D
Trollslayer wrote: Shouldn't this be in the soapbox ? I didn't think so. Was more moral, ethical etc. than political.
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South AfricaMacbeth muttered: I am in blood / Stepped in so far, that should I wade no more, / Returning were as tedious as go o'er DavidW wrote: You are totally mad. Nice.
