Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. Why your F# evangelism isn't working

Why your F# evangelism isn't working

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
csharphtmlcomquestion
16 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Kent Sharkey

    Eric Sink[^]:

    I am writing this article not as an opponent of F#, but rather, as someone who hopes that F# will become a mainstream .NET language.

    Because it's F#?

    T Offline
    T Offline
    Tom Clement
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    At first glance, I read that as: "Why your F****** evangelism isn't working" Guess the F# evangelism hasn't had the intended effect on me.

    Tom Clement articles[^]

    E 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Kent Sharkey

      Eric Sink[^]:

      I am writing this article not as an opponent of F#, but rather, as someone who hopes that F# will become a mainstream .NET language.

      Because it's F#?

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Marc Clifton
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      I am seriously considering re-writing that web server code/article in F# just to see what it looks like. ;) Marc

      Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Tom Clement

        At first glance, I read that as: "Why your F****** evangelism isn't working" Guess the F# evangelism hasn't had the intended effect on me.

        Tom Clement articles[^]

        E Offline
        E Offline
        Emiliano Musso
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        :-D

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Kent Sharkey

          Eric Sink[^]:

          I am writing this article not as an opponent of F#, but rather, as someone who hopes that F# will become a mainstream .NET language.

          Because it's F#?

          I Offline
          I Offline
          Ian Shlasko
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          Obviously it's because F# is just G... And G is a stupid name for a language. At least C# = D-flat, which looks a little like Db, so it's a great language for database stuff. See? Completely logical (In no way whatsoever).

          Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
          Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

          R T 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • I Ian Shlasko

            Obviously it's because F# is just G... And G is a stupid name for a language. At least C# = D-flat, which looks a little like Db, so it's a great language for database stuff. See? Completely logical (In no way whatsoever).

            Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
            Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

            R Offline
            R Offline
            RUs123
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            Hm, am I the C# evangelist then, as I use C# at my job, together with DB work and at home playing guitar in C# ? :-D Well one of them, the other one is Drop D, which is DD and has a different meaning :laugh:

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Marc Clifton

              I am seriously considering re-writing that web server code/article in F# just to see what it looks like. ;) Marc

              Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

              N Offline
              N Offline
              newton saber
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              Marc Clifton wrote:

              in F# just to see what it looks like

              ANSWER Ugly!

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Ian Shlasko

                Obviously it's because F# is just G... And G is a stupid name for a language. At least C# = D-flat, which looks a little like Db, so it's a great language for database stuff. See? Completely logical (In no way whatsoever).

                Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Tom Clement
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                E# is F, but F# is G flat not G. (Sorry :))

                Tom Clement articles[^]

                I 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N newton saber

                  Marc Clifton wrote:

                  in F# just to see what it looks like

                  ANSWER Ugly!

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Marc Clifton
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  newton.saber wrote:

                  Ugly!

                  Actually, what I've done in F# is really quite elegant. I think it all depends on who writes the code and how it's written. ;) Marc

                  Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

                  N 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T Tom Clement

                    E# is F, but F# is G flat not G. (Sorry :))

                    Tom Clement articles[^]

                    I Offline
                    I Offline
                    Ian Shlasko
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    Bleh... That's what I get for trying to be clever today... Got woken up at 3am, so running on less sleep than usual... But G-flat is still a stupid name for a language :)

                    Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                    Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • I Ian Shlasko

                      Bleh... That's what I get for trying to be clever today... Got woken up at 3am, so running on less sleep than usual... But G-flat is still a stupid name for a language :)

                      Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                      Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      Tom Clement
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      Couldn't agree more :)

                      Tom Clement articles[^]

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Marc Clifton

                        newton.saber wrote:

                        Ugly!

                        Actually, what I've done in F# is really quite elegant. I think it all depends on who writes the code and how it's written. ;) Marc

                        Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

                        N Offline
                        N Offline
                        newton saber
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        Marc Clifton wrote:

                        F# is really quite elegant

                        Prolly is. Sorry, I just couldn't resist. Functional languages just look so consarned ugly sometimes. :)

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N newton saber

                          Marc Clifton wrote:

                          F# is really quite elegant

                          Prolly is. Sorry, I just couldn't resist. Functional languages just look so consarned ugly sometimes. :)

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Marc Clifton
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          newton.saber wrote:

                          Functional languages just look so consarned ugly sometimes.

                          I agree -- there's a draw to making things as idiomatic and terse as possible, which only detracts from a language like F# expect for seasoned FP devs. I'll ping you when I publish the article on writing a web server from scratch, but with an F# implementation, and see what you think. Marc

                          Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

                          N 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Marc Clifton

                            newton.saber wrote:

                            Functional languages just look so consarned ugly sometimes.

                            I agree -- there's a draw to making things as idiomatic and terse as possible, which only detracts from a language like F# expect for seasoned FP devs. I'll ping you when I publish the article on writing a web server from scratch, but with an F# implementation, and see what you think. Marc

                            Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

                            N Offline
                            N Offline
                            newton saber
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            Marc Clifton wrote:

                            with an F# implementation, and see what you think.

                            Sounds great. I am interested to see it. Thanks for including me.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups