Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. Why your F# evangelism isn't working

Why your F# evangelism isn't working

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
csharphtmlcomquestion
16 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Kent Sharkey

    Eric Sink[^]:

    I am writing this article not as an opponent of F#, but rather, as someone who hopes that F# will become a mainstream .NET language.

    Because it's F#?

    I Offline
    I Offline
    Ian Shlasko
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Obviously it's because F# is just G... And G is a stupid name for a language. At least C# = D-flat, which looks a little like Db, so it's a great language for database stuff. See? Completely logical (In no way whatsoever).

    Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
    Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

    R T 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • I Ian Shlasko

      Obviously it's because F# is just G... And G is a stupid name for a language. At least C# = D-flat, which looks a little like Db, so it's a great language for database stuff. See? Completely logical (In no way whatsoever).

      Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
      Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

      R Offline
      R Offline
      RUs123
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Hm, am I the C# evangelist then, as I use C# at my job, together with DB work and at home playing guitar in C# ? :-D Well one of them, the other one is Drop D, which is DD and has a different meaning :laugh:

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Marc Clifton

        I am seriously considering re-writing that web server code/article in F# just to see what it looks like. ;) Marc

        Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

        N Offline
        N Offline
        newton saber
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Marc Clifton wrote:

        in F# just to see what it looks like

        ANSWER Ugly!

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Ian Shlasko

          Obviously it's because F# is just G... And G is a stupid name for a language. At least C# = D-flat, which looks a little like Db, so it's a great language for database stuff. See? Completely logical (In no way whatsoever).

          Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
          Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

          T Offline
          T Offline
          Tom Clement
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          E# is F, but F# is G flat not G. (Sorry :))

          Tom Clement articles[^]

          I 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N newton saber

            Marc Clifton wrote:

            in F# just to see what it looks like

            ANSWER Ugly!

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Marc Clifton
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            newton.saber wrote:

            Ugly!

            Actually, what I've done in F# is really quite elegant. I think it all depends on who writes the code and how it's written. ;) Marc

            Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

            N 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Tom Clement

              E# is F, but F# is G flat not G. (Sorry :))

              Tom Clement articles[^]

              I Offline
              I Offline
              Ian Shlasko
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Bleh... That's what I get for trying to be clever today... Got woken up at 3am, so running on less sleep than usual... But G-flat is still a stupid name for a language :)

              Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
              Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Ian Shlasko

                Bleh... That's what I get for trying to be clever today... Got woken up at 3am, so running on less sleep than usual... But G-flat is still a stupid name for a language :)

                Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Tom Clement
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Couldn't agree more :)

                Tom Clement articles[^]

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Marc Clifton

                  newton.saber wrote:

                  Ugly!

                  Actually, what I've done in F# is really quite elegant. I think it all depends on who writes the code and how it's written. ;) Marc

                  Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  newton saber
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Marc Clifton wrote:

                  F# is really quite elegant

                  Prolly is. Sorry, I just couldn't resist. Functional languages just look so consarned ugly sometimes. :)

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N newton saber

                    Marc Clifton wrote:

                    F# is really quite elegant

                    Prolly is. Sorry, I just couldn't resist. Functional languages just look so consarned ugly sometimes. :)

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Marc Clifton
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    newton.saber wrote:

                    Functional languages just look so consarned ugly sometimes.

                    I agree -- there's a draw to making things as idiomatic and terse as possible, which only detracts from a language like F# expect for seasoned FP devs. I'll ping you when I publish the article on writing a web server from scratch, but with an F# implementation, and see what you think. Marc

                    Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

                    N 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Marc Clifton

                      newton.saber wrote:

                      Functional languages just look so consarned ugly sometimes.

                      I agree -- there's a draw to making things as idiomatic and terse as possible, which only detracts from a language like F# expect for seasoned FP devs. I'll ping you when I publish the article on writing a web server from scratch, but with an F# implementation, and see what you think. Marc

                      Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      newton saber
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Marc Clifton wrote:

                      with an F# implementation, and see what you think.

                      Sounds great. I am interested to see it. Thanks for including me.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups