Objective, but how subjective?
-
New here. Just curious about how: - A member gets designated as Professional, - A member gets awarded as MVP. Seeing individuals who have around 10,000 points having the "Professional" icon next to their names; whereas I see others having more than three times those points as ordinary members. Also, saw the recent episode involving an MVP. If someone aspires to become a Professional, and ultimately an MVP (perhaps a 5-year plan or 10-years?), is there a designated path (straightforward, difficult, involving quite some effort), for that? Saw this[^], and a few other pages, but not sure if I found something. If there is, please point out. Brings me back to the title - is there any element of subjectivity here?
Thanks for all your replies. So, a 'Professional' is one does not hide his/her contact details from CodeProject. However, regarding subjectivity for MVP, any comment? Because somehow got the feeling that the 'momentum' from previous years sometimes continues into someone retaining their MVP status. Am I correct?
-
Thanks for all your replies. So, a 'Professional' is one does not hide his/her contact details from CodeProject. However, regarding subjectivity for MVP, any comment? Because somehow got the feeling that the 'momentum' from previous years sometimes continues into someone retaining their MVP status. Am I correct?
No, it doesn't. Ultimately, it all comes down to activity. Last year, a couple of authors kept their MVP status despite not having posted anything new because their articles still saw a huge amount of activity. Their articles still added value - a lot of it, and so they were rightly awarded MVP.
-
No, it doesn't. Ultimately, it all comes down to activity. Last year, a couple of authors kept their MVP status despite not having posted anything new because their articles still saw a huge amount of activity. Their articles still added value - a lot of it, and so they were rightly awarded MVP.
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
Last year, a couple of authors kept their MVP status despite not having posted anything new
We changed it this year to enforce the rule that Article MVPs must have posted at least 3 articles in the previous year.
cheers Chris Maunder
-
New here. Just curious about how: - A member gets designated as Professional, - A member gets awarded as MVP. Seeing individuals who have around 10,000 points having the "Professional" icon next to their names; whereas I see others having more than three times those points as ordinary members. Also, saw the recent episode involving an MVP. If someone aspires to become a Professional, and ultimately an MVP (perhaps a 5-year plan or 10-years?), is there a designated path (straightforward, difficult, involving quite some effort), for that? Saw this[^], and a few other pages, but not sure if I found something. If there is, please point out. Brings me back to the title - is there any element of subjectivity here?
Other's have answered as to how members get Professional status. It's open to anyone. MVP status is awarded once a year and is based solely on the points accrued by a member from the previous year. The award is given to 40 people: 20 for their articles, 20 for their contributions to answering questions. For those awarded for their authoring, they must have posted at least 3 articles in the previous year.
cheers Chris Maunder
-
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
Last year, a couple of authors kept their MVP status despite not having posted anything new
We changed it this year to enforce the rule that Article MVPs must have posted at least 3 articles in the previous year.
cheers Chris Maunder
That's a shame - I admired the fact that we were awarding to people who were still giving even though they were no longer as active.
-
That's a shame - I admired the fact that we were awarding to people who were still giving even though they were no longer as active.
The issue is that I could still be in contention for MVP status yet I haven't posted anywhere near the level of stuff that some of our newer authors have. The other option was to only count points against articles posted in the last 2-3 years.
cheers Chris Maunder
-
The issue is that I could still be in contention for MVP status yet I haven't posted anywhere near the level of stuff that some of our newer authors have. The other option was to only count points against articles posted in the last 2-3 years.
cheers Chris Maunder
The other option, of course, is for the Maunder to come out of retirement and be an article machine again.
-
The other option, of course, is for the Maunder to come out of retirement and be an article machine again.
I feel I'm being baited :)
cheers Chris Maunder
-
I feel I'm being baited :)
cheers Chris Maunder
To quote Sammy Davis Jr. "Wood eye?"
-
Other's have answered as to how members get Professional status. It's open to anyone. MVP status is awarded once a year and is based solely on the points accrued by a member from the previous year. The award is given to 40 people: 20 for their articles, 20 for their contributions to answering questions. For those awarded for their authoring, they must have posted at least 3 articles in the previous year.
cheers Chris Maunder
Slightly off-topic but the staff and professional icons are a little too similar.
Regards, Nish
Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
Other's have answered as to how members get Professional status. It's open to anyone. MVP status is awarded once a year and is based solely on the points accrued by a member from the previous year. The award is given to 40 people: 20 for their articles, 20 for their contributions to answering questions. For those awarded for their authoring, they must have posted at least 3 articles in the previous year.
cheers Chris Maunder
-
Slightly off-topic but the staff and professional icons are a little too similar.
Regards, Nish
Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
Are you saying the staff aren't professional?
-
Are you saying the staff aren't professional?
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
Are you saying the staff aren't professional?
Well, if you are implying that someone here's using their staff in a professional manner, I am sure I'd like to be spared the details. :rolleyes:
Regards, Nish
Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
Feeling so honored (and humbled too!) to get a reply from Chris himself. Thanks Chris for this. :thumbsup:
He's posted over 30,000 messages here. One'd think that'd sorta lessen the impressiveness of his responses. Somehow he manages to keep his value high. :-D
Regards, Nish
Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
Are you saying the staff aren't professional?
Well, if you are implying that someone here's using their staff in a professional manner, I am sure I'd like to be spared the details. :rolleyes:
Regards, Nish
Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
It's that Mankini. It slips apparently.
-
Feeling so honored (and humbled too!) to get a reply from Chris himself. Thanks Chris for this. :thumbsup:
-
I disagree, he got an MVP this year again.
veni bibi saltavi
Yeah but you have to admit he does put in the effort, irritating as he may be he tends not to be outright rude, unlike some of us!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
Other's have answered as to how members get Professional status. It's open to anyone. MVP status is awarded once a year and is based solely on the points accrued by a member from the previous year. The award is given to 40 people: 20 for their articles, 20 for their contributions to answering questions. For those awarded for their authoring, they must have posted at least 3 articles in the previous year.
cheers Chris Maunder
Chris Maunder wrote:
is based solely on the points accrued by a member from the previous year
So good organisers do not have the possibility to be an MVP ? Article moderation or Q&A edition are also contributing a lot to the site content.
-
Chris Maunder wrote:
is based solely on the points accrued by a member from the previous year
So good organisers do not have the possibility to be an MVP ? Article moderation or Q&A edition are also contributing a lot to the site content.
Excellent point, and one I've been trying to decide how to tackle. My goal is to expand (dramatically) the ability of members to organise the content. Reorganising, re-tagging, re-editing, flagging etc. This would then result in more opportunities for points and bonuses and would then allow us to provide either an MVP or a new category of special status. Writing content is one thing, but surfacing the good stuff is really, really important.
cheers Chris Maunder
-
Excellent point, and one I've been trying to decide how to tackle. My goal is to expand (dramatically) the ability of members to organise the content. Reorganising, re-tagging, re-editing, flagging etc. This would then result in more opportunities for points and bonuses and would then allow us to provide either an MVP or a new category of special status. Writing content is one thing, but surfacing the good stuff is really, really important.
cheers Chris Maunder