There is no justice!
-
About the same amount of explosive force that might be produce by say a car bomb? Yeah we've seen how the poor innocent terrorists have used them? Why don't you feel bad for the poor people that are oppresed by Sadaam or his sons? What do you really care for the Iraqi people if you are so busy worrying about Sadaam? Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
Doug Goulden wrote: About the same amount of explosive force that might be produce by say a car bomb? Yeah we've seen how the poor innocent terrorists have used them? That's so true. Time for US to bomb the Palestine, as Israel is not doing the job properly. :| World Cup Cricket Final on March 23rd India vs Australia [^]
What is Cricket?[^] -
Kant wrote: On the othernote, good news for you. Worldcup Cricket will be over by this Sunday. woo hoo!:jig: but really I don't care about the cricket posts, I just ignore them:laugh::laugh: post as many as you guys wish, but it sure is fun teasing you guys/gals about it, just like David W and his Elmo games. Later,
JoeSox
www.joeswammi.com
It's not easy facin' up when your whole world is black
Rolling StonesJoeSox wrote: but really I don't care about the cricket posts, I just ignore them :| Anyway this war is making me nuts as lot of March madness games are getting replaced by WAR ON IRAQ live broadcasts.. X| World Cup Cricket Final on March 23rd India vs Australia [^]
What is Cricket?[^] -
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
You bio says your from Afghanistan, although I'm 99.9% sure thats not true. Anyway, just wait a few more days and we'll see that the number of civilian casualties will be very low compared to the Gulf War. BTW, I'm getting quite fed up with all of these wackos like you posting nonsense. So, I'll do my best to ignore the rest of your stupid messages.
Jason Henderson
"You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi -
Gary Kirkham wrote: The US didn't do this so they could, or knowing they would, gas the Kurds. Even after Saddam attacked the Kurds in 85 (??), why US didn't bomb the Iraq? :suss: World Cup Cricket Final on March 23rd India vs Australia [^]
What is Cricket?[^]Kant wrote: Even after Saddam attacked the Kurds in 85 I am pretty sure it was 1988, but that is nitpicking. I was responding to the notion that the US intentionally helped Iraq gas the Kurds...they did not. On a different note. Where I am from a Cricket is, both, something you use as fishing bait and a minor annoyance at night. ;P Gary Kirkham A working Program is one that has only unobserved bugs I thought I wanted a career, turns out I just wanted paychecks
-
Doug Goulden wrote: About the same amount of explosive force that might be produce by say a car bomb? Yeah we've seen how the poor innocent terrorists have used them? That's so true. Time for US to bomb the Palestine, as Israel is not doing the job properly. :| World Cup Cricket Final on March 23rd India vs Australia [^]
What is Cricket?[^]Kant wrote: Time for US to bomb the Palestine, as Israel is not doing the job properly No, thats not the point. People are quick to jump on the US for every single thing, real or imagined. My personal opinion about the Palestinians? Yassir Arafat screwed them when he didn't accept the deals that Clinton had managed to help negotiate. Sharon is a nut who doesn't care at all about peace, he just added fuel to the fire that Arafat set blaze to. The US should grab both of them by the scruff of the neck and bang their heads together. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
-
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
There is no database ! Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I'm guessing the concept of a 2 hour movie showing two guys eating a meal and talking struck them as 'foreign' Rob Manderson wrote:
-
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
abc wrote: If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. If he had nukes and it even looked like he would use them Iraq would be a big slab of glass by now. Richard In Italy for thirty years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love; they had five hundred years of democracy and peace and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. Orson Welles
-
JoeSox wrote: but really I don't care about the cricket posts, I just ignore them :| Anyway this war is making me nuts as lot of March madness games are getting replaced by WAR ON IRAQ live broadcasts.. X| World Cup Cricket Final on March 23rd India vs Australia [^]
What is Cricket?[^]Kant wrote: lot of March madness games are getting replaced by WAR ON IRAQ live broadcasts.. X| indeed :-D I bet if I watched cricket with some people and some :beer: I could get into it, but until that point I think my favorite sports are as follows 1) MLB 2) NFL 3) NHL 4) NBA 5) blah blah to late to remember the rest, warning! warning! caffeine levels low! I repeat, caffeine levels low!:zzz: Later,
JoeSox
www.joeswammi.com
It's not easy facin' up when your whole world is black
Rolling Stones -
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
Get real. Saddam is a tyrant and the sooner he's gone the sooner the people of Iraq will get the help and support they need to turn their country into one to be proud of. Anna :rose: Homepage | My life in tears
"Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
- Marcia GraeschTrouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++
-
Kant wrote: Time for US to bomb the Palestine, as Israel is not doing the job properly No, thats not the point. People are quick to jump on the US for every single thing, real or imagined. My personal opinion about the Palestinians? Yassir Arafat screwed them when he didn't accept the deals that Clinton had managed to help negotiate. Sharon is a nut who doesn't care at all about peace, he just added fuel to the fire that Arafat set blaze to. The US should grab both of them by the scruff of the neck and bang their heads together. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
Exactly. Anna :rose: Homepage | My life in tears
"Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
- Marcia GraeschTrouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++
-
Jim A. Johnson wrote: MOAB sounds like a WMD Oh definitly. I'm not say that one isn't. But USA has not used it yet, and may not have to. If/When it is used I would presume it would be on a large complex, and not in any kind of populated area. It would suffocate anyone in the area and level it quite extensively.
$TeVe McLeNiThAn
"But USA has not used it yet ..." No one is allowed to bomb USA because they haven't used the WMD they already got yet. Let me tell you, it is not invented to decorate the white house, and when they do decide to use it, it will be too late. On the other hand, lets bomb the hell out of Iraq, because even if the WMD they alleged to have is so weak, they might use it someday.
-
Kant wrote: Time for US to bomb the Palestine, as Israel is not doing the job properly No, thats not the point. People are quick to jump on the US for every single thing, real or imagined. My personal opinion about the Palestinians? Yassir Arafat screwed them when he didn't accept the deals that Clinton had managed to help negotiate. Sharon is a nut who doesn't care at all about peace, he just added fuel to the fire that Arafat set blaze to. The US should grab both of them by the scruff of the neck and bang their heads together. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
Doug Goulden wrote: Sharon is a nut who doesn't care at all about peace Color his hair black, put a small and silly mustache on him, dress him with a brown shirt, have him speak German and you'll see the picture I have of him in my mind. Needless to say, I don't like Sharon. :) Doug Goulden wrote: The US should grab both of them by the scruff of the neck and bang their heads together. Amen! Spread the word all the way to the White House will ya? :) The sooner the Israeli/Palestine conflict is over, the safer the middle east will be, and consequently the rest of the world too. -- Shine, enlighten me - shine Shine, awaken me - shine Shine for all your suffering - shine
-
abc wrote: The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. yes. that's probably true. but, there's a really good chance the UN or the US would have invaded a long time ago, if they thought Saddam was anywhere near getting nukes. -c
Image tools: ThumbNailer, Bobber, TIFFAssembler
Chris Losinger wrote: if they thought Saddam was anywhere near getting nukes Which leads to an interesting though; What if they knew he had nukes? The only reason why the cold war didn't heat up was the fact that both sides had nukes and none were willing to accept the consequences of nuclear war. Imagine a cold war with Iraq.. :wtf: -- Shine, enlighten me - shine Shine, awaken me - shine Shine for all your suffering - shine
-
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
abc wrote: The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon! Are you out of your fucking mind? :mad: -- Shine, enlighten me - shine Shine, awaken me - shine Shine for all your suffering - shine
-
You bio says your from Afghanistan, although I'm 99.9% sure thats not true. Anyway, just wait a few more days and we'll see that the number of civilian casualties will be very low compared to the Gulf War. BTW, I'm getting quite fed up with all of these wackos like you posting nonsense. So, I'll do my best to ignore the rest of your stupid messages.
Jason Henderson
"You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - GandhiJason Henderson wrote: BTW, I'm getting quite fed up with all of these wackos like you posting nonsense. The worst part is that if wackos like this have managed to figure out how to post messages on the Internet, they have most certainly figured out how to procreate. :~ Expect more nonsense in the future. :) -- Shine, enlighten me - shine Shine, awaken me - shine Shine for all your suffering - shine
-
abc wrote: Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? What do you mean by WMD? I think chemical, bio-logical and nuclear weapons come under that. As far as I know US haven't used them... abc wrote: The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. That's reason US attacking Iraq instead of North Korea. World Cup Cricket Final on March 23rd India vs Australia [^]
What is Cricket?[^] -
abc wrote: The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon! Are you out of your fucking mind? :mad: -- Shine, enlighten me - shine Shine, awaken me - shine Shine for all your suffering - shine
My statement has a sarcastic tone, in case you didn't notice. But it is also the sad truth. In the cold war years, the USA would never ever attempt such aggression because there is another power strong enough. Not that I would like to go back to the cold war years.
-
My statement has a sarcastic tone, in case you didn't notice. But it is also the sad truth. In the cold war years, the USA would never ever attempt such aggression because there is another power strong enough. Not that I would like to go back to the cold war years.
abc wrote: My statement has a sarcastic tone, in case you didn't notice. Well, this just proves my theory "In cyberspace nobody hears your sarcasm". :) I can agree with you that the US has a bit more room to be a bully now that the USSR is gone. That issue however, is best solved using diplomacy. Putting a loaded gun into every hand will only increase homicides. Replace the loaded gun with an atomic bomb and do the math yourself. Not a very nice QED huh? -- Shine, enlighten me - shine Shine, awaken me - shine Shine for all your suffering - shine
-
My statement has a sarcastic tone, in case you didn't notice. But it is also the sad truth. In the cold war years, the USA would never ever attempt such aggression because there is another power strong enough. Not that I would like to go back to the cold war years.
abc wrote: In the cold war years, the USA would never ever attempt such aggression because there is another power strong enough. Several answers to what you say here. 1) What do you call Korea? Aggression was not stopped, just done in moderation so people could be killed over a much longer time. I still consider Stalins Soviet Union one of the most evil governments in modern time and that is what the US was fighting for a long time. Also the source of the problems we have now. abc wrote: Not that I would like to go back to the cold war years. I can think of at least two times the world almost had a nuclear war. No I do not wish to go back either. ""
-
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
abc wrote: The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon! Well, I disagree. I think the world would be a much safer place if _every_ country would learn to respect the value of life and if the politicans wouldn't just care about their and their countries benefit (no matter the cost). That includes Saddam as well as George. Things that make me feel sad are that politicans don't learn from other senseless and brutal wars in the past. And not even 'civilized' western countries learn from it. Every reasonable person should say that WW1, WW2, Vietnam and so on are more than enough. But it doesn't seem like that. What I don't understand is: why are americans afraid of Iraqi attacks? Could they really have some long-distance bombers to fly over to U.S. and attack them? I don't believe it. And - also interesting: why is nobody afraid here in europe? You can talk to every person you want - nobody is afraid - and we're so much closer. Could it be that it is this _new_ american climate of fear? The movie Bowling for columbine was a good example for that. We don't understand your thoughts here in europe. Why do you have this climate of fear? Why is it so extreme? Another question: americans are more religious than europeans and all my american friends are more religious than I am. I could never want a person to be killed - and also not in a war. I could never arrange that with myself and religion. Why can so many americans do that, even if they are more religious? I asked my american friends... but I didn't get an answer. That makes me sad. Christian p.s. A last comment: American TV Stations like CNN, NBC and so on are broadcasting such a crap all the time. What a propaganda machine. Is it that why americans are so afraid? Is it that why so many normal americans change their mind about war on iraq these days? To the 'american news design group': Good work. You are successful. p.s. If anyone feels offended: I'm sorry, I only wanted to ask some things. And I can't get those things into my head. p.s. If you want to see some impressions from demonstrations in Munich, Germany today visit my website: http://www.liquidskys.de