Clever use of HTML
-
No, you need to use the
<EM>tag !PIEBALDconsult wrote:
you need to use the
<EM>tag !I second that! So many web devs still using <i> tag. Even right here on little ol' CP. :(
-
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
you need to use the
<EM>tag !I second that! So many web devs still using <i> tag. Even right here on little ol' CP. :(
newton.saber wrote:
Even right here on little ol' CP
Whenever I try to use
<em>in an article it gets replaced. :mad: -
newton.saber wrote:
Even right here on little ol' CP
Whenever I try to use
<em>in an article it gets replaced. :mad:In the online editor? With the default config, it should be the other way round -
<i>should be replaced with<em>.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
In the online editor? With the default config, it should be the other way round -
<i>should be replaced with<em>.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
Richard Deeming wrote:
In the online editor?
No. I write in Notepad and email them.
Richard Deeming wrote:
<i>should be replaced with<em>.I've never seen that happen, but maybe I'll try to be more observant in the future.
-
Richard Deeming wrote:
In the online editor?
No. I write in Notepad and email them.
Richard Deeming wrote:
<i>should be replaced with<em>.I've never seen that happen, but maybe I'll try to be more observant in the future.
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
No. I write in Notepad and email them.
Ah - it's human hamster error then. :)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
No. I write in Notepad and email them.
Ah - it's human hamster error then. :)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
Possibly. I'm fairly sure they pass articles through a filter upon arrival that way.
-
No, you need to use the
<EM>tag ! -
"em" is way too verbose. Em prefer the good ol' "i".
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
You're imagining things. I thought
empredatedi. -
You're imagining things. I thought
empredatedi. -
em is preferred since HTML 4.01. ≪I> has been there since before CSS. All tags are suggestions to the renderer and as such the suggestion is EMphasis. ≪b> should be replaced with strong also.
-
em is preferred since HTML 4.01. ≪I> has been there since before CSS. All tags are suggestions to the renderer and as such the suggestion is EMphasis. ≪b> should be replaced with strong also.
You are all wrong. a
<span style="font-style: italic">is the way to go!! :laugh: -
No, you need to use the
<EM>tag ! -
em is preferred since HTML 4.01. ≪I> has been there since before CSS. All tags are suggestions to the renderer and as such the suggestion is EMphasis. ≪b> should be replaced with strong also.
-
You are all wrong. a
<span style="font-style: italic">is the way to go!! :laugh:Actually, I do agree with you. Styling should be in CSS.
-
The
<i>tag is actually more appropriate here, since it is still the element to be used for typographically italicized text i.e. text that is just in italic without any semantics to it whatsoever.<em>is meant to be used for emphasis/stressing.szukuro wrote:
<em>is meant to be used for emphasis/stressingExactly, and the browser should decide how to do that. Not every system can italicize; some may need to make the text blink instead. :-D
