Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Adobe InDesign

Adobe InDesign

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
adobecsscomtutorialcode-review
14 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Rage

    So I was recently more or less forced to use Adobe InDesign - for a home project in which a publication has to be made, after the responsible for it had no time to finish it.:~ While the software in overall works quite good - I am experienced with Photoshop, so Adobe was generally speaking no new land to me, I am quite surprised that some most basic features are missing*. Basically, the software works by assembling blocs of texts or pictures, that you can link together and nicely place on your document page, the software assisting you a lot in that procedure. BUT you cannot split a text bloc :confused:. Use-case: You have a big chunk of text in a bloc, and want to split it in two so that you can arrange them differently on the page: not possible. You have to create another bloc, cut the text from the first bloc, paste it in the new one. I am still amazed that a software used by editing professionals, and who costs an eye, would lack such simple a feature. And this is by far not the only one. * And yes, they are missing, other are bithching about it, it is definitely not only me who don't know how to use the software and therefor *think* some features might be missing.

    Do not escape reality : improve reality !

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Indeed

    PooperPig - Coming Soon

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Maarten Kools

      You can link text frames. Just create a second frame, and link it to the first one. Any text overflow on the first frame will continue in the next. Check out this InDesign Help[^] page. That's what you mean, right?

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rage
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Yes, that's one workaround. I actually did not want them to be linked : linking, resizing, unlinking does work. But still more complicated than putting the caret where you want your text bloc to be split, and press something like ... "Split".

      Do not escape reality : improve reality !

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Rage

        So I was recently more or less forced to use Adobe InDesign - for a home project in which a publication has to be made, after the responsible for it had no time to finish it.:~ While the software in overall works quite good - I am experienced with Photoshop, so Adobe was generally speaking no new land to me, I am quite surprised that some most basic features are missing*. Basically, the software works by assembling blocs of texts or pictures, that you can link together and nicely place on your document page, the software assisting you a lot in that procedure. BUT you cannot split a text bloc :confused:. Use-case: You have a big chunk of text in a bloc, and want to split it in two so that you can arrange them differently on the page: not possible. You have to create another bloc, cut the text from the first bloc, paste it in the new one. I am still amazed that a software used by editing professionals, and who costs an eye, would lack such simple a feature. And this is by far not the only one. * And yes, they are missing, other are bithching about it, it is definitely not only me who don't know how to use the software and therefor *think* some features might be missing.

        Do not escape reality : improve reality !

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Amarnath S
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Well, Adobe is monitoring this Lounge, and this feature will come two versions hence. :-)

        N 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Indeed

          PooperPig - Coming Soon

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Rage
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          InDesignEd. I sense this is going to take us far.

          Do not escape reality : improve reality !

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Rage

            InDesignEd. I sense this is going to take us far.

            Do not escape reality : improve reality !

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Indubitably

            PooperPig - Coming Soon

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Indubitably

              PooperPig - Coming Soon

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Rage
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Adobetably. I like it, keep going.

              Do not escape reality : improve reality !

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Rage

                Adobetably. I like it, keep going.

                Do not escape reality : improve reality !

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                undoubtedly

                PooperPig - Coming Soon

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Amarnath S

                  Well, Adobe is monitoring this Lounge, and this feature will come two versions hence. :-)

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Nagy Vilmos
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Or if they get the time machine working, it'll be in the two previous versions.

                  veni bibi saltavi

                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Rage

                    So I was recently more or less forced to use Adobe InDesign - for a home project in which a publication has to be made, after the responsible for it had no time to finish it.:~ While the software in overall works quite good - I am experienced with Photoshop, so Adobe was generally speaking no new land to me, I am quite surprised that some most basic features are missing*. Basically, the software works by assembling blocs of texts or pictures, that you can link together and nicely place on your document page, the software assisting you a lot in that procedure. BUT you cannot split a text bloc :confused:. Use-case: You have a big chunk of text in a bloc, and want to split it in two so that you can arrange them differently on the page: not possible. You have to create another bloc, cut the text from the first bloc, paste it in the new one. I am still amazed that a software used by editing professionals, and who costs an eye, would lack such simple a feature. And this is by far not the only one. * And yes, they are missing, other are bithching about it, it is definitely not only me who don't know how to use the software and therefor *think* some features might be missing.

                    Do not escape reality : improve reality !

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mark_Wallace
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    If you think InDesign is bad, wait until you get a load of Illustrator. That damned program owes me at least a quarter of a head of hair.

                    I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Mark_Wallace

                      If you think InDesign is bad, wait until you get a load of Illustrator. That damned program owes me at least a quarter of a head of hair.

                      I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Rage
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Been there, suffered the same. Illustrator could rank not far from LotusNotes.

                      Do not escape reality : improve reality !

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Nagy Vilmos

                        Or if they get the time machine working, it'll be in the two previous versions.

                        veni bibi saltavi

                        A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Amarnath S
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        The did not get this working ... can the get the time machine to work?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Rage

                          So I was recently more or less forced to use Adobe InDesign - for a home project in which a publication has to be made, after the responsible for it had no time to finish it.:~ While the software in overall works quite good - I am experienced with Photoshop, so Adobe was generally speaking no new land to me, I am quite surprised that some most basic features are missing*. Basically, the software works by assembling blocs of texts or pictures, that you can link together and nicely place on your document page, the software assisting you a lot in that procedure. BUT you cannot split a text bloc :confused:. Use-case: You have a big chunk of text in a bloc, and want to split it in two so that you can arrange them differently on the page: not possible. You have to create another bloc, cut the text from the first bloc, paste it in the new one. I am still amazed that a software used by editing professionals, and who costs an eye, would lack such simple a feature. And this is by far not the only one. * And yes, they are missing, other are bithching about it, it is definitely not only me who don't know how to use the software and therefor *think* some features might be missing.

                          Do not escape reality : improve reality !

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          RedDk
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Matthew 25:14–30

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups