Why Unit Test
-
You can't be sure enough that you're properly utilizing dynamic multidisciplinary channels to authoritatively cloudify end-to-end imperatives. Just saying.
Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.
Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra
Regards, Sander
I think we'd better run that up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes it.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
-
Never, ever test your code, that way you have more time to write rubbish!
veni bibi saltavi
Nagy Vilmos wrote:
Never, ever test your code, that way you have more time to write rubbish drink Gin!
FTFY! OT: How did the dentist go?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
-
Nagy Vilmos wrote:
Never, ever test your code, that way you have more time to write rubbish drink Gin!
FTFY! OT: How did the dentist go?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
Two deep rooted buggers removed with large pliers and 8 novacains
veni bibi saltavi
-
Two deep rooted buggers removed with large pliers and 8 novacains
veni bibi saltavi
And when does the dentist get out of intensive care?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
-
Member 11547329 wrote:
Is Unit Testing is most boring activity for Developer
Whenever I am bored doing programming, I ask myself, why can't the computer do this, which has led to some interesting tools over the years. I still don't see why we don't have tools that generate the unit tests for us. I mean, it really isn't that hard if we were only to apply ourselves to the problem. Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
-
Funny thing is, I don't even know what "_Unit tests_" are. :laugh: I did go to [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit\_testing) to learn something... Ended up yawning! :zzz: There was no challenge, just boring text... _[Lorem ipsum](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorem\_ipsum)_ sounds better than that.
The shit I complain about It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem ~! Firewall !~
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote:
Ended up yawning!
I hope my e-book[^] on the subject isn't a yawner! ;) Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
-
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote:
Ended up yawning!
I hope my e-book[^] on the subject isn't a yawner! ;) Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
I will try yawning enough before clicking on the link... ;) Thank you very much (have a +1 as thank you) for your e-book, Marc. I will give it a read thoroughly right away. :)
The shit I complain about It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem ~! Firewall !~
-
I will try yawning enough before clicking on the link... ;) Thank you very much (have a +1 as thank you) for your e-book, Marc. I will give it a read thoroughly right away. :)
The shit I complain about It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem ~! Firewall !~
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote:
Marc. I will give it a read thoroughly right away.
Heh, well, it's ok if you yawn through it too. But I would enjoy hearing your thoughts about it! Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
-
I test my unit frequently... :omg: Oh! You mean code! Ummm, yeah, I do that too. :-O
-
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote:
Ended up yawning!
I hope my e-book[^] on the subject isn't a yawner! ;) Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
-
Member 11547329 wrote:
Is Unit Testing is most boring activity for Developer
Whenever I am bored doing programming, I ask myself, why can't the computer do this, which has led to some interesting tools over the years. I still don't see why we don't have tools that generate the unit tests for us. I mean, it really isn't that hard if we were only to apply ourselves to the problem. Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
-
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
True, but I've never tried, as I expect to be disappointed. Have you tried it? Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
-
Boring beats staying up till 4:00am trying to fix a critical bug in production. /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
-
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
True, but I've never tried, as I expect to be disappointed. Have you tried it? Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
No, I haven't tried it. I've been building my unit tests manually so far. Admittedly, I don't test every method and property - just (what I deem to be) points of failure. /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
-
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote:
Ended up yawning!
I hope my e-book[^] on the subject isn't a yawner! ;) Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
Thanks for the link. It's always useful to read a different perspective on an important subject.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill
-
No, the most boring activity a developer can be involved in is a four hour meeting you have to attend, of which the last five minutes are relevant to your job. If you are lucky. And then ***someone*** will say "oh, just one other thing..." And that'll add another hour or two.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
You are absolutely right!
Behzad
-
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote:
Ended up yawning!
I hope my e-book[^] on the subject isn't a yawner! ;) Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
oh! Thank you! :) :thumbsup:
-
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
True, but I've never tried, as I expect to be disappointed. Have you tried it? Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
I haven't either; but it looks like it's just a test stub generator. You'd still have to do the hard work of writing any non-trivial setup code, and then actually writing meaningful test content. The one in VS08/10 was a major waste of time IMO; and it appears MS agrees with me since based on the comments there they yanked it from 2012. I've also played a bit with MS's automagic unit testing tool back around the New Year. While it fell well short of its "cover your legacy code in a single button click" hype; if you're writing readily testable code now it seemed like it might be able to generate good test coverage of it. Things like non-trivial state setup, logic in winform event handlers, or classes with tight coupling to the file system all defeated it; unfortunately my un-unit tested legacy .net code is riddled with those constructs making it mostly useless to me. (Even aside from only having MSDN pro - and the feature apparently being limited to the rebranded Premium tier.)
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt
