Program Compiled successfully, 0 errors
-
Member 11547329 wrote:
Most happiest moment for programmers
Microsoft took that moment away from me. Now, there is this demon called "Intellisense" that will tell me what I did wrong almost before I do it. I have become a slave to this demon, obsessed with extinguishing it's Cylon-like red eye that peers at me from underneath even the most trivial of mistakes. And now, when I compile my code, I now longer have that joy of "compiled successfully" because even the mere idea of a failing is no longer possible under that watchful eye. And where there can be no pain of failure, there can also be no joy of success. Microsoft, I rue the day you brought these demon out of the depths of the digital hell otherwise known as Redmond. You have taken away my reason to live! Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
-
Nope. That just leads you into a false sense of security. You still have to run it to make sure it isn't gonna puke all over your system, which definitely bumps up against the "It compiles - SHIP IT!" paradigm.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
Member 11547329 wrote:
Most happiest moment for programmers
Microsoft took that moment away from me. Now, there is this demon called "Intellisense" that will tell me what I did wrong almost before I do it. I have become a slave to this demon, obsessed with extinguishing it's Cylon-like red eye that peers at me from underneath even the most trivial of mistakes. And now, when I compile my code, I now longer have that joy of "compiled successfully" because even the mere idea of a failing is no longer possible under that watchful eye. And where there can be no pain of failure, there can also be no joy of success. Microsoft, I rue the day you brought these demon out of the depths of the digital hell otherwise known as Redmond. You have taken away my reason to live! Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
Yet another reason to roll your own IDE. :cool:
-
Compiles mean nothing. This compiles:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
int x = 10;
int y = 0;
int z = x / y;
}If it's not broken, fix it until it is
-
Member 11547329 wrote:
Most happiest moment for programmers
Microsoft took that moment away from me. Now, there is this demon called "Intellisense" that will tell me what I did wrong almost before I do it. I have become a slave to this demon, obsessed with extinguishing it's Cylon-like red eye that peers at me from underneath even the most trivial of mistakes. And now, when I compile my code, I now longer have that joy of "compiled successfully" because even the mere idea of a failing is no longer possible under that watchful eye. And where there can be no pain of failure, there can also be no joy of success. Microsoft, I rue the day you brought these demon out of the depths of the digital hell otherwise known as Redmond. You have taken away my reason to live! Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
Missed your meds again huh?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
-
Yet another reason to roll your own IDE. :cool:
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
Yet another reason to roll your own IDE.
Nah, if people want don't want Intellisense, they should use a command line. ;) Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
-
All that means is that it is broken in ways that the compiler can't detect, so it's time to bash your head against the harder-to-find errors.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Wrong. When it runs successfully and does what it's meant to do without errors.
#SupportHeForShe
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun Only 2 things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
-
Missed your meds again huh?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
Coder For Hire wrote:
Missed your meds again huh?
Actually, it's the meds that put me in these moods. (just kidding!) Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
-
0 syntax errors. Correcting logic errors is still up to you, however.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
-
I had that yesterday. Code still broke at runtime :sigh:
Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.
Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra
Regards, Sander
-
:) <= $
«To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"
-
Nope. "Payment received" is the happiest moment. :rolleyes:
I'd rather be phishing!
Agreed. Payment comes after post-installation testing by the client.
The difficult may take time, the impossible a little longer.
-
"0 Errors" is nothing - that's easy. "0 Errors, 0 Warnings" is better - but also pretty easy. Passing all tests and actually doing what you wanted it to? Now that's a good moment! (As is getting paid, as has been mentioned)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
-
Let's not forget zero code analysis errors, and zero style cop errors, and zero QA errors.
Get real - we'll never get zero QA errors here! :laugh:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
-
Get real - we'll never get zero QA errors here! :laugh:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
Wishful thinking, I know. ;P
-
Nope. "Payment received" is the happiest moment. :rolleyes:
I'd rather be phishing!
Debugging is the creative part. Successful Compiling is great, but I enjoy debugging a lot more. Debugging leads to better code as well as working code when you iterate through each debugging session. Creating the initial code is often a free flow of ideas when the algorithms and specifications are created. I treat programming like writing an article. I get the ideas down and assume I will be improving them iteratively. I don't like to over-think and block the code flow. This works well in a small group that can be creative. This would not work well for larger projects and larger groups, of course. I work in a small group with limited constraints on creativity. I try to stay object-oriented, concise, and well-documented. Coding should be fun and enjoyable. Maybe that is why I like small independent projects. Less structure, more fun!? I suspect I am like many Code project members. That is why I keep coming back to Code project and sites like stack overflow. Or maybe I just had too much coffee this morning.
"Courtesy is the product of a mature, disciplined mind ... ridicule is lack of the same - DPM"
