Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Microsoft's principal products running on nearly 90 percent of the world's computers

Microsoft's principal products running on nearly 90 percent of the world's computers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
40 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Gittum

    http://www.cnet.com/news/microsoft-at-40-read-bill-gates-anniversary-email-to-employees/[^] Written there!

    G Offline
    G Offline
    GuyThiebaut
    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    The quality of grammar in the article pretty much spoke to me of the validity of the content: "Today, that company, Microsoft, has more than 125,000 employees, a sprawling 8-million-square-foot campus outside Seattle and its principal products running on nearly 90 percent of the world's computers. It's the third-most valuable company in the world, behind only oil giant Exxon Mobil and longtime competitor Apple." What is it with all those commas and hyphenated "8-million-square-foot" mumbo jumbo? The actual citation is from clickety[^]. The quote is about personal computers and not all computers." I am starting to think that CNET may be the Daily mail(British paper for those of limited intellect) of the IT world when it comes to journalism.

    “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

    ― Christopher Hitchens

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • W W Balboos GHB

      One thing we think about is observing the gibberish you used to post. Use real words. Capitalization and spelling are also appreciated. This place isn't for posting in text formats, and despite all the squawking, not for tweet-style, either. In other words, use words!

      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

      "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

      "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

      G Offline
      G Offline
      Gittum
      wrote on last edited by
      #30

      I got it! Now it's easy to get things automatically corrected!!! Gibberish Classification Algorithm[^]

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Nicholas Marty

        Yeah, my criticism was more aimed at the "regardless of quality" bit of your first response. I'm just saying quality involves a lot of things (and is probably also pretty subjective). When I have to consider which OS I want, I factor many things in. All of which contribute to the "quality": - Does it run on my hardware? (And is there driver support from the hardware vendors for this OS?) - Is it reasonably stable? (I can live with an occasional software or system crash, as long as it doesn't occur too often) - Can it run programs X, Y and Z that I already use and like to continue use? - Is it providing a similiar User Interface that I'm already used to, so I will feel at home soon enough? - Are there known and open security flaws, and if there are, will they be fixed? and so on. I want the OS that suits my needs best (or in other words "has in my opinion the highest quality"). You could conclude, that being the market-leader is a part of their quality as well ;)

        Eddy Vluggen wrote:

        No, that is impossible.

        In a hypotetical sense of course :laugh: And I think a completely bug-free OS IS possible. It just might not do anything (useful) at all ;)

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #31

        Nicholas Marty wrote:

        When I have to consider which OS I want, I factor many things in.

        Yeah, same list as I was thought in school, but that is not how the world works. There's no testing on stability, no stats to compare. If it runs Microsoft Office, then it is accepted. Bing, welcome Windows.

        Nicholas Marty wrote:

        Is it providing a similiar User Interface that I'm already used to, so I will feel at home soon enough?

        Yeah, it saves money if you don't have to re-educate the users, saves time, frustration - but marketing will tell you that no-one will buy it if it looks "old". See Win8 and its start-menu. See Vista and Aero.

        Nicholas Marty wrote:

        You could conclude, that being the market-leader is a part of their quality as well ;)

        No, I'll conclude that having a monopoly-position nearly guarantees a monopoly-position. Unless you're an IBM or Netscape, in which case even that is not enough to survive.

        Nicholas Marty wrote:

        And I think a completely bug-free OS IS possible.

        Only in theory. You'd need a bigger budget than NASA (already clear on that point it would not be commercial), and you would still not be able to prove that it does not contain bugs.

        Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G Gittum

          And what happens in future? Will there be any OS to compete with Windows and then change the scenario!!

          D Offline
          D Offline
          dandy72
          wrote on last edited by
          #32

          1997 called, they want their headline back.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            This is the wrong place for such questions. We don't have any psychics or crystal balls here. Only Crystal Reports sometimes.

            The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
            This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a fucking golf cart.
            "I don't know, extraterrestrial?" "You mean like from space?" "No, from Canada." If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.

            K Offline
            K Offline
            kmoorevs
            wrote on last edited by
            #33

            CDP1802 wrote:

            Only Crystal Reports sometimes.

            Oh my, thanks a lot for reminding me that I must revisit Hades and make a deal with the landlord in order to figure out the bare essential distributable libraries needed for CR XI through field definitions. This is not a programming question, merely an expression of disgust! :) Edit: There is a reason I reference the CrystalRuntime.Application object as 'crAp'! :laugh:

            "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Pete OHanlon

              I am informed that this is the year of the Linux Desktop.

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Joe Woodbury
              wrote on last edited by
              #34

              I think the Apple Watch is dumb, but I can all but guarantee it will sell more copies than the installed base of Linux on the Desktop within a month of its release.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Pete OHanlon

                I am informed that this is the year of the Linux Desktop.

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Simon ORiordan from UK
                wrote on last edited by
                #35

                It's been the year of the Linux desktop for me for the past 6 years; everytime I produce a reasonably straight doze machine somebody buys it from me. Most recently I bombed a W7 machine from ebay back to the stone age, with only 70G of free space(from 250 G disk) it was obviously a mule full of paedo stuff or simply another terrible case of windows bloat. Sold it at a profit. To nuns. In Yorkshire. You have been warned. :wtf:

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G GuyThiebaut

                  The quality of grammar in the article pretty much spoke to me of the validity of the content: "Today, that company, Microsoft, has more than 125,000 employees, a sprawling 8-million-square-foot campus outside Seattle and its principal products running on nearly 90 percent of the world's computers. It's the third-most valuable company in the world, behind only oil giant Exxon Mobil and longtime competitor Apple." What is it with all those commas and hyphenated "8-million-square-foot" mumbo jumbo? The actual citation is from clickety[^]. The quote is about personal computers and not all computers." I am starting to think that CNET may be the Daily mail(British paper for those of limited intellect) of the IT world when it comes to journalism.

                  “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

                  ― Christopher Hitchens

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Simon ORiordan from UK
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #36

                  Now now Guy, the Daily Moron carries all the news the other papers carry, just next to reams of shite about how 'hot' 12 Centigrade is, and Kim Arsedashian reports. Sometimes they even correct their grammar. Thing is, you have to pay for all the rest; they're better, but not money better. ;)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Amarnath S

                    Yes. Windows 11. Caveat: The future may not have as many 'computers' as mobile devices.

                    N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Nelson Kosta Souto
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #37

                    :-D

                    NKS

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G Gittum

                      And what happens in future? Will there be any OS to compete with Windows and then change the scenario!!

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      dannomanno
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #38

                      Not anytime soon. Windows/Office and other MS products continue to offer great value for the cost, are feature-rich, and quite challenging to compete against. I used to hate Windows 95 for giving me a blue screen and costing me hours of homework effort but looking back at it now...over all the years I've used Microsoft products, they've done an amazing job. If the Surface Pro 4 turns out to be as impressive as I'm expecting, I'll be buying yet another Windows machine. There is nothing wrong with that, the tech giants are competing in various new frontiers (search, mobile, office software, etc) and the consumers are winning!!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • G Gittum

                        And what happens in future? Will there be any OS to compete with Windows and then change the scenario!!

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        svella
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #39

                        That's only true if you restrict your definition of "computer" to the kind that Microsoft's principal products run on.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          We don't believe it.

                          Peter Wasser "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

                          H Offline
                          H Offline
                          hpcoder2
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #40

                          Exactly. Windows has been consistently less than 70% of visitors on all my websites for the last 10 years, dropping to about 50% in one year. It has picked up a bit recently. So am I lead to believe that the vast majority of non-windows users run Microsoft office, when its still not available for Linux, and wasn't available for many year on Apples OSes. What other MS software could fill the remainder? It doesn't make sense.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups