Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Friendly Fire always seems to be American

Friendly Fire always seems to be American

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
question
66 Posts 18 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K KaRl

    Whatever the air power, ground forces are needed to occupy the field, especially infantry troops. Air control eases the attack, but doesn't guarantee by itself the victory, IMHO.


    Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #50

    KaЯl wrote: ground forces are needed to occupy the field We may be going on the assumption (right or wrong) that once liberated the Iraqis won't need to be occupied. Whip some aid on them, help them rebuild and let them go. Mike Mullikin :beer:

    "I'm not calling you a liar but....I can't think of a way to finish that sentence." - Bart Simpson

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Doug Goulden

      Sean Reilly wrote: I was merely "taking the sense" as Maggie was wont to say I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the phrase, not to be ignorant .... Maggie ? Thatcher, Margaret Thatcher?:confused: Is this some kinda stump the American game?;) Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Sean Reilly
      wrote on last edited by
      #51

      LOL! Yes - Thatcher. Most of the "work" of British Government happens in committee meetings. Maggie would always chair the most important ones. It was a well know fact that at the end of the meeting, the Chair would "take the sense" of the meeting and this summarisation would essentially equate to policy moving forward. It was equally well known that Maggie's "sense" of the meeting was whatever she wanted it to be, regardless of what had really transpired. Of course, when I took the "sense" it was in a non-Maggie like manner, being a true Republican that I am (no - not a US Replublican, a Plato Republican actually [that should stump those who accuse me of "communism"]).

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Sean Reilly

        Apologist? For what exactly? Look, pointing out the inhuman lunacy of the Iraqi regime isn't exactly going to alter the fact that over the course of the last half-dozen or so conflicts that allied troops have been involved in, the overwhelming majority of "freindly fire" incidents have been perpetrated by US forces. Next you'll be dragging up Pol Pot as an example of "friendly fire". Human shields are not "friendly fire" in the military sense - as you well know, being an ex-military type!

        J Offline
        J Offline
        JoeSox
        wrote on last edited by
        #52

        Sean Reilly wrote: the overwhelming majority of "freindly fire" incidents have been perpetrated by US forces. Who has the most troops over there?:wtf: Man, this happens in war, show me a war this hasn't happened in, and I will show you a cover-up. If you think the Americans are doing it on purpose, your looney. Later,
        JoeSox
        www.joeswammi.com
        USN Veteran 94-98[^]

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Sean Reilly

          LOL! Yes - Thatcher. Most of the "work" of British Government happens in committee meetings. Maggie would always chair the most important ones. It was a well know fact that at the end of the meeting, the Chair would "take the sense" of the meeting and this summarisation would essentially equate to policy moving forward. It was equally well known that Maggie's "sense" of the meeting was whatever she wanted it to be, regardless of what had really transpired. Of course, when I took the "sense" it was in a non-Maggie like manner, being a true Republican that I am (no - not a US Replublican, a Plato Republican actually [that should stump those who accuse me of "communism"]).

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Doug Goulden
          wrote on last edited by
          #53

          Sean Reilly wrote: that should stump those who accuse me of "communism"]). I got it...... Not bad for a dumb American heh? So the question,if I have this right is where do you fall in the caste? I wanna be a philosopher-king, but I'm afraid I fall into the commoner caste. Plato the Republican Plato's Republic postulated a perfect aristocracy. It is divided into three castes; the commoners, the guardians, and the philosopher-kings. Their economics and ideologies fit their condition. The commoners compete in a Darwinian free-market environment, and thus provide the economic surplus needed to support the other two castes. The guardians are those who took, but did not pass, a ruling-class exam; they have police, army, and executive duties. The philosopher-kings are the best and the brightest; they run the system, and profit from it. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Doug Goulden

            Money, self interest, betrayal? Surely not the French? :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Paul Belikian
            wrote on last edited by
            #54

            Of course not...they just want a peace of the pie! ;P:-D:(:-D;):)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Sean Reilly

              I'm sure there is the odd incident where the side doing the firing isn't American, but I haven't heard of any. Is this trend due to the sheer prevalence of US forces and arms or due to a wider degree of incompetance? Even rated on a proportional basis, the Americans do seem to screw up a lot. Just goes to show - there's nothing more dangerous than a dumb user.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Marc Clifton
              wrote on last edited by
              #55

              No, no, no. It's not the American firing the missile that's screwing up. It's the geek the Army hired to write the software that GUIDES the missile that's screwing up. Users will always be dumb. That's why we spend most of our time writing software that protects them from themselves. It's just harder to protect yourself from the software engineer and HIS/HER mistakes. Marc Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
              Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
              Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka
              Microsoft deliberately adds arbitrary layers of complexity to make it difficult to deliver Windows features on non-Windows platforms--Microsoft's "Halloween files"

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K KaRl

                Paul Belikian wrote: Maybe it's because most of the 300,000 troops are American? Intersting point. How many Americans are in Iraq and how many of them are fighting troops "on the field" (ie not services, intendance, HQ..) ? US Army is known to have a lot of services to follow the battle core. During WW2, Marshall hoped to make 212 divisions with 8 millions men, but finally could only make 90 (+ the armoured divisions? can't remember), because of the inflation of the services. So I wonder how many troops the US really use. Even 300 000 men seem pretty a pretty low number to take and control such a big country.


                Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Richard Stringer
                wrote on last edited by
                #56

                KaЯl wrote: So I wonder how many troops the US really use. Even 300 000 men seem pretty a pretty low number to take and control such a big country Last estimate I heard was of about 325000 troops on the ground about 120000 are actual front line combat troops. Another interesting fact that must be worring Saddam just a bit ( if the despot is still capable of worring about anything ) is that our two elite army units - the 101'st Cav and the 82'd Airborne ( My old unit - and my fathers - and my sons ) are not yet , at least as far as published reports are concerned , fully deployeed. Maybe they are being held in reserve for the final push into Baghdad but who knows. Richard In Italy for thirty years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love; they had five hundred years of democracy and peace and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. Orson Welles

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Sean Reilly

                  I'm sure there is the odd incident where the side doing the firing isn't American, but I haven't heard of any. Is this trend due to the sheer prevalence of US forces and arms or due to a wider degree of incompetance? Even rated on a proportional basis, the Americans do seem to screw up a lot. Just goes to show - there's nothing more dangerous than a dumb user.

                  B Offline
                  B Offline
                  Brad Jennings
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #57

                  Sean Reilly wrote: Is this trend due to the sheer prevalence of US forces and arms or due to a wider degree of incompetance? Yeah, that's it, all Americans are retards. We're so stupid we have trouble feeding ourselves. Oh, by the way, thanks for spreading around the hate, we really needed it.:| Brad Jennings "if the golden arches shut shop, where else are the VB people going to get work." - Colin Davies

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jason Henderson

                    More anti-US crap out of Karl the commie. X|

                    Jason Henderson
                    "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

                    articles profile

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jan larsen
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #58

                    Sorry in advance, but I.. just... can't... ARGH.. RESIST!...: More communist scared bullshit from Jason the nazi. ;P "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Sean Reilly

                      I'm sure there is the odd incident where the side doing the firing isn't American, but I haven't heard of any. Is this trend due to the sheer prevalence of US forces and arms or due to a wider degree of incompetance? Even rated on a proportional basis, the Americans do seem to screw up a lot. Just goes to show - there's nothing more dangerous than a dumb user.

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Roger Wright
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #59

                      Sean Reilly wrote: this trend due to the sheer prevalence of US forces and arms Yes. If 90% of the activity is being performed by Americans, 90% of the errors will be attributable to American forces. The other participants will eventually make thier fair share of mistakes, and we'll hear about them in due time... Ancient man conquered his rivals with the jawbone of an ass; modern man uses the jawbone of a politician.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Paul Belikian

                        Well, the object of the war is not to take control of the country; it's to free the Iraqi people. ;P It's very interesting that France wants a huge part in rebuilding Iraq. I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that they will be losing billions in oil contracts if Saddam is out and the US/UK are in?

                        K Offline
                        K Offline
                        KaRl
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #60

                        Paul Belikian wrote: Well, the object of the war is not to take control of the country; it's to free the Iraqi people Yes, of course. It's famously known that if Iraq had no resource in Oil and Water, the US would have act the same as they did with NK China Pakistan Cuba...euh, could you give me a sample please? ;P Paul Belikian wrote: I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that they will be losing billions in oil contracts if Saddam is out and the US/UK are in? I think that french oil companies invest in Irak since the 20's, much before the installation of the Baath party by the CIA at the head of the iraqi state. so I don't see why they would have to stop, except by being ousted by american companies.


                        Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Doug Goulden

                          Karl I'm starting to think you are a war groupie, if I could read your website :wtf: I might be able to tell.:-D Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          KaRl
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #61

                          Doug Goulden wrote: I'm starting to think you are a war groupie I'm not an absolute pacifist if it's your point. Doug Goulden wrote: I could read your website A good reason to start to learn french ;)


                          Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            KaЯl wrote: ground forces are needed to occupy the field We may be going on the assumption (right or wrong) that once liberated the Iraqis won't need to be occupied. Whip some aid on them, help them rebuild and let them go. Mike Mullikin :beer:

                            "I'm not calling you a liar but....I can't think of a way to finish that sentence." - Bart Simpson

                            K Offline
                            K Offline
                            KaRl
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #62

                            When I said "occupy" I was referring to the presence on the battle field, not to the post-war administration, which is IMO a totally different problem.


                            Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P Paul Belikian

                              Well, the object of the war is not to take control of the country; it's to free the Iraqi people. ;P It's very interesting that France wants a huge part in rebuilding Iraq. I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that they will be losing billions in oil contracts if Saddam is out and the US/UK are in?

                              B Offline
                              B Offline
                              Brakanjan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #63

                              Paul Belikian wrote: and the US/UK are in aaag, finally the reason for the war. Thanks Paul.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J jan larsen

                                Sorry in advance, but I.. just... can't... ARGH.. RESIST!...: More communist scared bullshit from Jason the nazi. ;P "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jason Henderson
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #64

                                You're darn right I'm scared! Communism is something to be very scared about, IMO. BTW, I'm pretty far from being a Nazi. Closer to an anarchist than a nazi.

                                Jason Henderson
                                "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

                                articles profile

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • K KaRl

                                  Paul Belikian wrote: Well, the object of the war is not to take control of the country; it's to free the Iraqi people Yes, of course. It's famously known that if Iraq had no resource in Oil and Water, the US would have act the same as they did with NK China Pakistan Cuba...euh, could you give me a sample please? ;P Paul Belikian wrote: I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that they will be losing billions in oil contracts if Saddam is out and the US/UK are in? I think that french oil companies invest in Irak since the 20's, much before the installation of the Baath party by the CIA at the head of the iraqi state. so I don't see why they would have to stop, except by being ousted by american companies.


                                  Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                                  P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  Paul Belikian
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #65

                                  KaЯl wrote: It's famously known that if Iraq had no resource in Oil and Water, the US would have act the same as they did with NK China Pakistan Cuba...euh, could you give me a sample please? Uh, would Afghanistan be an appropriate example?

                                  K 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P Paul Belikian

                                    KaЯl wrote: It's famously known that if Iraq had no resource in Oil and Water, the US would have act the same as they did with NK China Pakistan Cuba...euh, could you give me a sample please? Uh, would Afghanistan be an appropriate example?

                                    K Offline
                                    K Offline
                                    KaRl
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #66

                                    Hum, no, the Taliban regim actually attacked the US first.


                                    Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups