Don't know why my question is closed
-
Brittle1618 wrote:
Lets see how many users answer the question.
Don't look at me - I know sod-all about Oracle! :laugh:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
but there must be thousands of CP users who know a lot about ORACLE. BTW I improved [^the question]. does it look a bit better now??
-
but there must be thousands of CP users who know a lot about ORACLE. BTW I improved [^the question]. does it look a bit better now??
Probably, but that doesn't mean they know the answer or even that they answer questions. It's got a lot more in it, and it makes sense to me - but I have no idea how to do it! :-D
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
-
SO is very, very cliquy. Whilst it can be good for answering very specific (black and white) type questions, it fails terribly on more discussion based, open-ended questions e.g. "What are the pros and cons of doing......." type questions. There is a definite elitism about SO that jars with me. I much prefer the convivial nature of CP. I find it a far broader church :)
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
There are a few CP users who would fit in very well over there! Mind you, they wouldn't go, because being "low on the totem pole" doesn't fit with their massive egos. :laugh:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
-
There are a few CP users who would fit in very well over there! Mind you, they wouldn't go, because being "low on the totem pole" doesn't fit with their massive egos. :laugh:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
And I know exactly who you mean too :laugh:
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
-
Probably, but that doesn't mean they know the answer or even that they answer questions. It's got a lot more in it, and it makes sense to me - but I have no idea how to do it! :-D
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
OriginalGriff wrote:
and it makes sense to me
Now thats more than enough for me :) Fingers crossed and waiting for the KIND person who gives me a solution ;P And guess what I already got a reply on the question by Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter, he suggested me to ask this to oracle.
-
Whatever you may think of the rules over here on CodeProject, they are a hundred times worse on StackOverflow. I've been flamed over there many times, sometimes even for just asking a question. I even got flamed for answering a question because someone didn't understand my answer so downvoted the answer. Don't take anything personally. Keep up the good work, keep being helpful and keep being a good citizen of CodeProject. Your input is appreciated and absolutely vital to this community :)
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
Perhaps I am out of step with everyone else, or perhaps the question has changed since it was down voted but I thought that it was fairly obvious what the questioner wanted. And, contrary to what Dominic Burford suggests, Stack Overflow provides a very good answer to a similarly worded question. See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14256417/word-automation-find-and-replace-not-including-text-boxes[^] (the solution is in C#, but could easily be converted to VBA).
-
I gave up on SO years ago: if you aren't part of the "ruling clique" then if you disagree with the establishment, your answers disappear. And sometimes the other answer magically changes to include what you said...strange that... :laugh:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
And that of course would never happen on CP? I had so many solutions deleted, because the questions were all of a sudden gone, I've essentially stopped bothering with answering any questions at all.
OriginalGriff wrote:
if you aren't part of the "ruling clique"
Nothing to say, no siree!
OriginalGriff wrote:
And sometimes the other answer magically changes to include what you said...strange that
Now that can't happen here, or can it? :rolleyes: :doh:
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
-
Thanks for the comment. I'm agree with you. If my question is not clear why they didn't check that with me, rather reporting and closing down? That's why I expect from a community people. :)
If you've never failed... You've never lived...
-
The following question closed by the admin Replace text in textbox with Find.Execute[^] Given reason is,
Hi CodingLover, Your question 'Replace text in textbox with Find.Execute' has been reported by Wes Aday, digimanus, Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov and has been closed, with the reason being given as This post is spam, abusive or otherwise inappropriate. If you wish to revise and reopen your article based on the feedback from these members then simply go to Replace text in textbox with Find.Execute and click the "Update my article" link. This will enable you to edit and update your article and will re-open your article for other members to enjoy.
First of all this not an article. It's a question. If my question is not clear it's better to clarify it. I like to see that, as a community, if it's not clear share the thoughts and get clarify from the original poster, rather closing it. In the community there can be people who are well experienced as well as nothing at all. :)
If you've never failed... You've never lived...
-
Just record a macro doing what you want and you'll see the code you need.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Actually I get it done by considering the content with all the shapes. Check for shapes and fill it with the content.
If you've never failed... You've never lived...
-
I looked-up you subject (replace text inside Word's shapes) and found a lot of ideas how to do it (simple Selection do not contain the shapes and not the text inside shapes)... You should do some Google, or reopen the question to let me (or others) to point you to the right direction...
Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
I already resolved it myself.
If you've never failed... You've never lived...
-
It's generic text. If you look at the question itself, it says:
Closed because the post is not clear, or is incomplete and has not been phrased in a way that allows it to be fully understood.. Reported by Wes Aday, digimanus on Sunday, August 16, 2015 7:35pm.
Which is a little more sensible. Personally, I don't like the "I don't understand this question, let's close it" attitude of some members - If you don't understand it, explain why and ask for clarification. Closing the question just kills any conversation, but...it feeds egos, and may give rep points to the reporters. I'd suggest that it would be better to raise this here: http://www.codeproject.com/suggestions.aspx[^] where the admins will see it.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
OriginalGriff wrote:
I don't like the "I don't understand this question, let's close it" attitude of some members
Totally agree. Looks like those guys didn't understand the question, or did not know the answer, and so thought it their best option to close it so people wiser than they are would not have a chance to answer the OP. Insane logic! :thumbsdown:
Regards, Nish
Website: www.voidnish.com Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
Thanks for the comment. Nothing personal at all. But without a discussion how I know that what is unclear to those reporters? Honestly I can't see anything unclear in my question, as I see :). And now I don't have a chance to improve my question too, since reporters just said it's not clear.
If you've never failed... You've never lived...
Your question was fine. Unfortunately, any site with public/volunteer moderation ends up at the receiving end of people's egos.
Regards, Nish
Website: www.voidnish.com Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
I already resolved it myself.
If you've never failed... You've never lived...
Glad to hear that. By the way, don't judge the entire site based on the actions of a few people. Lots of sensible folks here as well :-)
Regards, Nish
Website: www.voidnish.com Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
