Robots
-
More and more (and also perhaps because I follow some twitterer about the topic) I learn about the increasingly amazing abilities of today robots. They seem to get better ever faster (no surprise here, classical technology exponential curve). At any rate I keep wondering: how come that me, a professional developer, hasn't been exposed to robot programming? For how long is it going to be the exclusive realm of a select few? Will it ever democratize? Or how to become a roboticist? Where are there jobs for such?
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
More and more (and also perhaps because I follow some twitterer about the topic) I learn about the increasingly amazing abilities of today robots. They seem to get better ever faster (no surprise here, classical technology exponential curve). At any rate I keep wondering: how come that me, a professional developer, hasn't been exposed to robot programming? For how long is it going to be the exclusive realm of a select few? Will it ever democratize? Or how to become a roboticist? Where are there jobs for such?
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
It's not going to come to you; go get it.
-
It's not going to come to you; go get it.
Indeed! but.. I am a little lost on how to get to it! :-o Mmmm... maybe I should look at Uni stuff.. maybe they have robot course.. mm...
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
More and more (and also perhaps because I follow some twitterer about the topic) I learn about the increasingly amazing abilities of today robots. They seem to get better ever faster (no surprise here, classical technology exponential curve). At any rate I keep wondering: how come that me, a professional developer, hasn't been exposed to robot programming? For how long is it going to be the exclusive realm of a select few? Will it ever democratize? Or how to become a roboticist? Where are there jobs for such?
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
Look at the recent run of Dilbert comics in the past week... http://dilbert.com/strip/2015-10-07[^] ... and of course a Wally come backer a few days later ... http://dilbert.com/strip/2015-10-09[^]
"I've seen more information on a frickin' sticky note!" - Dave Kreskowiak
-
Look at the recent run of Dilbert comics in the past week... http://dilbert.com/strip/2015-10-07[^] ... and of course a Wally come backer a few days later ... http://dilbert.com/strip/2015-10-09[^]
"I've seen more information on a frickin' sticky note!" - Dave Kreskowiak
Great serie! I looked at the whole week! :D
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
More and more (and also perhaps because I follow some twitterer about the topic) I learn about the increasingly amazing abilities of today robots. They seem to get better ever faster (no surprise here, classical technology exponential curve). At any rate I keep wondering: how come that me, a professional developer, hasn't been exposed to robot programming? For how long is it going to be the exclusive realm of a select few? Will it ever democratize? Or how to become a roboticist? Where are there jobs for such?
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
It is not for the 'Select' few, it is for those have chosen to be or ended up in that field. If you are feeling left out, you could go and buy a basic robotics kits. :-) MS has a Robotics Developer Studio if you really want.......https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb648760.aspx[^] More on Wiki with compatible robots etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Robotics_Developer_Studio[^]
Dave Find Me On:Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn Folding Stats: Team CodeProject
-
More and more (and also perhaps because I follow some twitterer about the topic) I learn about the increasingly amazing abilities of today robots. They seem to get better ever faster (no surprise here, classical technology exponential curve). At any rate I keep wondering: how come that me, a professional developer, hasn't been exposed to robot programming? For how long is it going to be the exclusive realm of a select few? Will it ever democratize? Or how to become a roboticist? Where are there jobs for such?
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
I guess it depends on your interests and where/how you started programming - starting professionally in 'c', having a background in electronics (among other things), I'd likely be more into Arduino, Edison, Raspberry Pi and things I could do with them than someone who started with java - and Ive constantly followed the trends with the MCU's etc being used I dunno .. 'maybe' ;P These days, as pointed out in a recent discussion, you can run Yocto (Linux) on a Pi and then C#/Mono - so its not so hard for anyone to get started, except you have to learn (and I have to re-learn) interfacing through 'primitive' means to analog, digital inputs etc you're never to old to learn, and all of the MCU's have a getting started package - so wether you start by lighting up an LED or rotating a servo, get into it :-)
-
It is not for the 'Select' few, it is for those have chosen to be or ended up in that field. If you are feeling left out, you could go and buy a basic robotics kits. :-) MS has a Robotics Developer Studio if you really want.......https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb648760.aspx[^] More on Wiki with compatible robots etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Robotics_Developer_Studio[^]
Dave Find Me On:Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn Folding Stats: Team CodeProject
I do feel left out! :sigh: I was hoping programmers were bound to work on robots! :P
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
I guess it depends on your interests and where/how you started programming - starting professionally in 'c', having a background in electronics (among other things), I'd likely be more into Arduino, Edison, Raspberry Pi and things I could do with them than someone who started with java - and Ive constantly followed the trends with the MCU's etc being used I dunno .. 'maybe' ;P These days, as pointed out in a recent discussion, you can run Yocto (Linux) on a Pi and then C#/Mono - so its not so hard for anyone to get started, except you have to learn (and I have to re-learn) interfacing through 'primitive' means to analog, digital inputs etc you're never to old to learn, and all of the MCU's have a getting started package - so wether you start by lighting up an LED or rotating a servo, get into it :-)
I don't know what's useful to learn to work on robot... I guess I should look at job add and make a plan from there!! Well I did wrote my own neuron network in C#! ;P
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
More and more (and also perhaps because I follow some twitterer about the topic) I learn about the increasingly amazing abilities of today robots. They seem to get better ever faster (no surprise here, classical technology exponential curve). At any rate I keep wondering: how come that me, a professional developer, hasn't been exposed to robot programming? For how long is it going to be the exclusive realm of a select few? Will it ever democratize? Or how to become a roboticist? Where are there jobs for such?
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
I think one aspect has been the prohibitive costs of classic industrial robots. Think about all the amazing things programmers could do if we just had the ability to play with these! When it comes to more android like robots I think one aspect is because 1, people think its super complicated and 2, you need to work with a lot of hardware. You need components and then you need multiple parts to be able to build a more advanced robot, and to be able to do something you need to construct and program all these. Say you just want to build a simple walker you need to invest a lot of time to succeed here, then when you want to do something more you may have to reevaluate your design. But I think its easier if you take another approach, build more drone like robots with specific purposes. I for one would love to delve in to drone/robot development but I lack the time and focus at the moment. Got too many pure software projects I wish to do first. Sometime I plan on learning enough circuitry and electronics to be able to put together my own drones because I got a lot of ideas I wish to test out. One thing I wish to try is to use sensors/cameras to read the surrounding, input this in a 3d engine to create a virtual representation of the area and basically just use game ai and pathfinding to navigate around. Sadly there are too many things I lack knowledge wise atm to test my designs even thou I'm sure they would work if done correctly. :((
-
More and more (and also perhaps because I follow some twitterer about the topic) I learn about the increasingly amazing abilities of today robots. They seem to get better ever faster (no surprise here, classical technology exponential curve). At any rate I keep wondering: how come that me, a professional developer, hasn't been exposed to robot programming? For how long is it going to be the exclusive realm of a select few? Will it ever democratize? Or how to become a roboticist? Where are there jobs for such?
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
When I attended a Master's level course on Robotics at my institution in India in 1990, they taught us three things - Kinematics, Dynamics and Control of robots. IMHO, those remain pretty much the same, but today with more computational horsepower for those numerical operations. Path planning, inverse kinematics were some of the mini-projects I had worked on at that time.
-
I think one aspect has been the prohibitive costs of classic industrial robots. Think about all the amazing things programmers could do if we just had the ability to play with these! When it comes to more android like robots I think one aspect is because 1, people think its super complicated and 2, you need to work with a lot of hardware. You need components and then you need multiple parts to be able to build a more advanced robot, and to be able to do something you need to construct and program all these. Say you just want to build a simple walker you need to invest a lot of time to succeed here, then when you want to do something more you may have to reevaluate your design. But I think its easier if you take another approach, build more drone like robots with specific purposes. I for one would love to delve in to drone/robot development but I lack the time and focus at the moment. Got too many pure software projects I wish to do first. Sometime I plan on learning enough circuitry and electronics to be able to put together my own drones because I got a lot of ideas I wish to test out. One thing I wish to try is to use sensors/cameras to read the surrounding, input this in a 3d engine to create a virtual representation of the area and basically just use game ai and pathfinding to navigate around. Sadly there are too many things I lack knowledge wise atm to test my designs even thou I'm sure they would work if done correctly. :((
Member 11683251 wrote:
the amazing things programmers could do if we just had the ability to play with these!
I wonder why the idea of programmers playing with industrial robots sends a chill up and down my spine :)
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
-
I think one aspect has been the prohibitive costs of classic industrial robots. Think about all the amazing things programmers could do if we just had the ability to play with these! When it comes to more android like robots I think one aspect is because 1, people think its super complicated and 2, you need to work with a lot of hardware. You need components and then you need multiple parts to be able to build a more advanced robot, and to be able to do something you need to construct and program all these. Say you just want to build a simple walker you need to invest a lot of time to succeed here, then when you want to do something more you may have to reevaluate your design. But I think its easier if you take another approach, build more drone like robots with specific purposes. I for one would love to delve in to drone/robot development but I lack the time and focus at the moment. Got too many pure software projects I wish to do first. Sometime I plan on learning enough circuitry and electronics to be able to put together my own drones because I got a lot of ideas I wish to test out. One thing I wish to try is to use sensors/cameras to read the surrounding, input this in a 3d engine to create a virtual representation of the area and basically just use game ai and pathfinding to navigate around. Sadly there are too many things I lack knowledge wise atm to test my designs even thou I'm sure they would work if done correctly. :((
I am on the same wavelength!! :-D Yeah programming a drone movement & vision could be a good start!
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
When I attended a Master's level course on Robotics at my institution in India in 1990, they taught us three things - Kinematics, Dynamics and Control of robots. IMHO, those remain pretty much the same, but today with more computational horsepower for those numerical operations. Path planning, inverse kinematics were some of the mini-projects I had worked on at that time.
Interesting answer! Gonna investigate those topics! :) Are you working with robots today?
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
I am on the same wavelength!! :-D Yeah programming a drone movement & vision could be a good start!
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
Industrial vision systems for recognizing faults or position of manufactured parts are fairly accurate and some very quick, using something similar maybe with twin cameras and use to input in to a 3d engine. :) I recently tried 1234d catch by Autodesk and was surprised by the results, made a few 3d representations of a few of my childrens' toys. If you can extrapolate 3d information from a vision system or sensors and input in a 3d engine and merge with already existing data you can probably get some interesting results. What interests me a lot would also be the possibility to create temporary special information to compare with already known data to get the system to figure out its location after a restart or similar. Another step after you got the system up and running would be to have add probability/permanent information and allow the system to start to figure out if things are movable. You would probably have to add machine learning/ neural networking to do this but I can see a system like this have tremendous potential.
-
More and more (and also perhaps because I follow some twitterer about the topic) I learn about the increasingly amazing abilities of today robots. They seem to get better ever faster (no surprise here, classical technology exponential curve). At any rate I keep wondering: how come that me, a professional developer, hasn't been exposed to robot programming? For how long is it going to be the exclusive realm of a select few? Will it ever democratize? Or how to become a roboticist? Where are there jobs for such?
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
Problem is, a program can only program as good as it's written, there is no AI that would be able to learn by other programs to reprogram it self and get better :) Although, if we hit that point, we are basically pointless and the war with the machines will begin.
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
} -
More and more (and also perhaps because I follow some twitterer about the topic) I learn about the increasingly amazing abilities of today robots. They seem to get better ever faster (no surprise here, classical technology exponential curve). At any rate I keep wondering: how come that me, a professional developer, hasn't been exposed to robot programming? For how long is it going to be the exclusive realm of a select few? Will it ever democratize? Or how to become a roboticist? Where are there jobs for such?
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
I've been looking at secondary schools for my daughter this month, when we went round my old school* they had a computer lab for programming robots, in python iirc. *when I went to the school in the late 80s they had the most advanced computer lab in the county, a room full of Nimbus computers, we used to go in at lunch time and play snake on them.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
-
Indeed! but.. I am a little lost on how to get to it! :-o Mmmm... maybe I should look at Uni stuff.. maybe they have robot course.. mm...
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
Get some starter kits and a soldering iron and get cooking :-)
-
Interesting answer! Gonna investigate those topics! :) Are you working with robots today?
All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
Super Lloyd wrote:
Are you working with robots today?
No, never ever worked on robots after taking that course :-(
-
Member 11683251 wrote:
the amazing things programmers could do if we just had the ability to play with these!
I wonder why the idea of programmers playing with industrial robots sends a chill up and down my spine :)
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
Well, WHY optimize? JIT all the things! Open a StreamCoconutPineapple that manages a StreamFreshWater that includes the StreamBufferedFileCharWithLemon that owns the StreamChar to write a command on the RS-422. What does it mean there are strict timings to comply? How old-fashioned, the hardware should be AGILE!
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver "When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey