Windows 95/98
-
If you had to develop a relatively simple application for Windows 95/98 what language, toolchain would you use? Thank you all.
dBase IV.
-
If you had to develop a relatively simple application for Windows 95/98 what language, toolchain would you use? Thank you all.
An abacus, pencil, paper, and smoke signals for network communications (TCP/SS with a wood based 7 layer stack)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt -
An abacus, pencil, paper, and smoke signals for network communications (TCP/SS with a wood based 7 layer stack)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
There is an application for that...[^]
Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
-
If you had to develop a relatively simple application for Windows 95/98 what language, toolchain would you use? Thank you all.
+1 for VB6, and good luck!
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver "When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey "just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy
-
If you had to develop a relatively simple application for Windows 95/98 what language, toolchain would you use? Thank you all.
A time machine!
Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.
Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra
Regards, Sander
-
If you had to develop a relatively simple application for Windows 95/98 what language, toolchain would you use? Thank you all.
Visual Basic 6 :thumbsup:
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
-
If you had to develop a relatively simple application for Windows 95/98 what language, toolchain would you use? Thank you all.
I would select a language that I know and choose an ancient toolset that supports Win9x. The newest Visual Studio that supports at least Win 98 is VS 2003. I'm not sure about Win 95 but it should work too. Otherwise you have to use version 6. Be prepared to setup a development system for those tools too. VS 2013 2003 may be only used with Win 7 with some dirty hacks.
-
If you had to develop a relatively simple application for Windows 95/98 what language, toolchain would you use? Thank you all.
-
If you had to develop a relatively simple application for Windows 95/98 what language, toolchain would you use? Thank you all.
My first question isn't what, but rather why?
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
-
An abacus, pencil, paper, and smoke signals for network communications (TCP/SS with a wood based 7 layer stack)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
-
If you had to develop a relatively simple application for Windows 95/98 what language, toolchain would you use? Thank you all.
I'm with Jorgen, why, what possible business reason could there be to justify building a new app on win95! Some options VB6 Turbo Pascal (delphi) MS Access - get the version for the windows version Of these I think Access would be the quickest if you know VBA at all. None of these will upgrade!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
Turbo Pascal?
IIRC, Turbo Pascal for Windows only produced 16-bit applications.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill
-
if you had a version of Visual Studio 6 around you might be able to get away with it
Both Visual C++ 6.0 and Visual Basic 6.0 will run on Windows 95 Visual C++: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/145669[^] Visual Basic: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/190775[^]
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill
-
I would select a language that I know and choose an ancient toolset that supports Win9x. The newest Visual Studio that supports at least Win 98 is VS 2003. I'm not sure about Win 95 but it should work too. Otherwise you have to use version 6. Be prepared to setup a development system for those tools too. VS 2013 2003 may be only used with Win 7 with some dirty hacks.
:confused: I use VS 2013 Community Edition on Windows 7 every day. I've also run VS 2015 in the same environment. If you are referring to building applications for the WinStore (or some such), I haven't tried it yet.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill
-
Thanks. Straightforward gui, file read, portable, deployment.
I would consider vbscript or jscript. They can both read files - GUI-wise it won't be easy but a scripting language will get you up and running quickly.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
-
:confused: I use VS 2013 Community Edition on Windows 7 every day. I've also run VS 2015 in the same environment. If you are referring to building applications for the WinStore (or some such), I haven't tried it yet.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill
Oops. It is a typo and should be 2003 like mentioned before. I will edit my post.
-
If you had to develop a relatively simple application for Windows 95/98 what language, toolchain would you use? Thank you all.
Franc Morales wrote:
what language, toolchain would you use?
Ancient Sumerian with stone tablets and chisels.
-
If you had to develop a relatively simple application for Windows 95/98 what language, toolchain would you use? Thank you all.
You might be able to dig up an old version of Watcom C . A lot of these oldies have gone open-source.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
If you had to develop a relatively simple application for Windows 95/98 what language, toolchain would you use? Thank you all.
Raw Win32 API, on C. Petzold's 'Programming Windows, 1996' on this[^] page was a nice book for this. Sample source code is referenced there. Any version of Visual Studio should work, I feel. For example, on my machine, this is the C compiler location and name: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\bin\cl.exe You need a makefile to do the compilation and linking.
-
I would select a language that I know and choose an ancient toolset that supports Win9x. The newest Visual Studio that supports at least Win 98 is VS 2003. I'm not sure about Win 95 but it should work too. Otherwise you have to use version 6. Be prepared to setup a development system for those tools too. VS 2013 2003 may be only used with Win 7 with some dirty hacks.
Jochen Arndt wrote:
VS 2013 2003 may be only used with Win 7 with some dirty hacks.
Hrmmm. The only issue I remember from the last time I installed it on my W7 system was that I had to explicitly use run as administrator to install the service pack. :doh:
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt
