Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Texting while crossing the street in New Jersey gets you 15 days in jail and a $50 fine

Texting while crossing the street in New Jersey gets you 15 days in jail and a $50 fine

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comfunctionalquestionannouncement
23 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • W W Balboos GHB

    Each US State can (and does) have its own laws with respect to driving, highways speeds, and laws. NY State has been, allegedly, hot on this for years. In reality, however, the cops never do anything about it and in warm weather you can see half the people driving with their hand on their ear (maybe they just have an earache?). To show you that the Albert Einstein tagline I use, below, is ever true, they had to pass a separate law to make it illegal to text while driving. It seems, the phone-monkeys figure that if there was a need to get your attention away from the phone conversations, what was really intended was that you must also stop looking at the road whilst not paying attention. Problem #2: there are a lot of people affluent enough to not care about the fine and will, if necessary, to pay a lawyer to get them off for the times they might actually get caught. A risk, in their income bracket, they're willing to take as part of the cost of self-indulgence. My solution/version of the law would include impounding their phone as evidence, as well. Losing use of the phone would have a much greater impact than taking away their money.

    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

    "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

    "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

    OriginalGriffO Offline
    OriginalGriffO Offline
    OriginalGriff
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    In the UK it adds "points" to your licence. 12 points in (I think) 3 years, and you lose your licence for a while (and your mandatory car insurance skyrockets as a result). Still doesn't stop idiots...

    Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

    "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
    "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

      In the UK it adds "points" to your licence. 12 points in (I think) 3 years, and you lose your licence for a while (and your mandatory car insurance skyrockets as a result). Still doesn't stop idiots...

      Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

      R Offline
      R Offline
      regerteast
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      In the UK you need a license to walk? That's f****** retarded

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Marc Clifton

        article[^] Now, who's going to be the first to write an app that ties in your phone's GPS so it knows when you're about to cross a street? At least in New Jersey? :laugh: Marc

        Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dan Neely
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        I'm sure this will be applied in a completely fair and not abusive manor, and not used as an excuse to stop and search people of groups the police view as more likely to be violating some other laws.

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        :rolleyes:

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Marc Clifton

          article[^] Now, who's going to be the first to write an app that ties in your phone's GPS so it knows when you're about to cross a street? At least in New Jersey? :laugh: Marc

          Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mark_Wallace
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          I don't see anything that even resembles mention of statistical analysis of the causes of accidents -- i.e. if people doing this has not caused any harm to anyone, then why are they wasting time with it, instead of debating/voting on issues that genuinely affect people's safety? Is there a guillotine on a more important bill that someone is trying to sabotage?

          I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

          9 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

            Shorter than 6 weeks in hospital. And cheaper. And probably a little less painful.

            Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Mark_Wallace
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            But how many people have been injured whilst crossing a street at a legal time (i.e. when the little man made of lights says it's OK) because of this? If you cross at a legal time and someone hits you with his ridiculously dangerous mode of transport, it's his fault, not yours (and there are existing laws that cover that). The only instances of injuries quoted in the article were: 1. An idjit who was walking on the pavement, and fell into a hole which should have been barricaded for precisely this reason -- nothing to do with the new law, but plenty to do with road workers' Health & Safety regulations. 2. A worse idjit who walked around a railway-crossing barrier -- nothing to do with the new law, but plenty to do with existing ones. Damned if that's good reason for victimising people who are doing nothing wrong. What next? Laws against thinking whilst walking? How much of our taxes are earmarked for the Thought Police budget?

            I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Mark_Wallace

              But how many people have been injured whilst crossing a street at a legal time (i.e. when the little man made of lights says it's OK) because of this? If you cross at a legal time and someone hits you with his ridiculously dangerous mode of transport, it's his fault, not yours (and there are existing laws that cover that). The only instances of injuries quoted in the article were: 1. An idjit who was walking on the pavement, and fell into a hole which should have been barricaded for precisely this reason -- nothing to do with the new law, but plenty to do with road workers' Health & Safety regulations. 2. A worse idjit who walked around a railway-crossing barrier -- nothing to do with the new law, but plenty to do with existing ones. Damned if that's good reason for victimising people who are doing nothing wrong. What next? Laws against thinking whilst walking? How much of our taxes are earmarked for the Thought Police budget?

              I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Slacker007
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Mark_Wallace wrote:

              Laws against thinking whilst walking?

              Not unless your thoughts offend someone, then you must be punished. You musn't have thoughts that offend someone, while walking. Shirley there is a Monty Python skit in there somewhere. :)

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Mark_Wallace

                I don't see anything that even resembles mention of statistical analysis of the causes of accidents -- i.e. if people doing this has not caused any harm to anyone, then why are they wasting time with it, instead of debating/voting on issues that genuinely affect people's safety? Is there a guillotine on a more important bill that someone is trying to sabotage?

                I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                9 Offline
                9 Offline
                9082365
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                So you'd prefer to wait for someone to actually cause a pile up with multiple deaths and injuries before doing anything to prevent it occurring? As it is there had been an estimated 4000 deaths in the USA directly attributable to attention deficit caused by walking while texting by 2013. It is reasonable to assume that the trend has continued.

                I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 9 9082365

                  So you'd prefer to wait for someone to actually cause a pile up with multiple deaths and injuries before doing anything to prevent it occurring? As it is there had been an estimated 4000 deaths in the USA directly attributable to attention deficit caused by walking while texting by 2013. It is reasonable to assume that the trend has continued.

                  I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mark_Wallace
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  9082365 wrote:

                  there had been an estimated 4000 deaths in the USA directly attributable to attention deficit caused by walking while texting by 2013

                  Source, please.

                  I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                  9 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Slacker007

                    Mark_Wallace wrote:

                    Laws against thinking whilst walking?

                    Not unless your thoughts offend someone, then you must be punished. You musn't have thoughts that offend someone, while walking. Shirley there is a Monty Python skit in there somewhere. :)

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mark_Wallace
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Slacker007 wrote:

                    walking

                    I hope that wasn't a typo.

                    I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Marc Clifton

                      article[^] Now, who's going to be the first to write an app that ties in your phone's GPS so it knows when you're about to cross a street? At least in New Jersey? :laugh: Marc

                      Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      Kyle Moyer
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Strikes me as ineffective. Change it 15 days paid vacation and $50 award for running over a moron texting while crossing the street. Now that will solve your problem!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Mark_Wallace

                        9082365 wrote:

                        there had been an estimated 4000 deaths in the USA directly attributable to attention deficit caused by walking while texting by 2013

                        Source, please.

                        I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                        9 Offline
                        9 Offline
                        9082365
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        Report by lead researcher Dr. Beth Ebel, director of the Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center at the University of Washington in Seattle published in the journal Injury Prevention, December 2012.

                        I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                          W∴ Balboos wrote:

                          Expectations: as no one enforces the law with respect to drivers doing the same thing, it's likely empty legislation.

                          Depends on the country. The UK is fairly hot on it for drivers, with it now being £100 and 3 (of 12) points on your licence. That's if the Police spot you, and whole months go by without me seeing a cop car ... I don't text or even touch my phone while driving - I used to ride motorcycles all the time and am well aware how much a situation can change very, very quickly. Even a moment's inattention can result in an avoidable accident, so texting or phoning while driving is just stupid...

                          Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                          Sander RosselS Offline
                          Sander RosselS Offline
                          Sander Rossel
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          OriginalGriff wrote:

                          texting or phoning while driving is just stupid

                          Meanwhile I hear no one about the radio, or heater, that have been in cars for 10's of years and can be equally distracting!

                          Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

                          Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

                          Regards, Sander

                          OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                            OriginalGriff wrote:

                            texting or phoning while driving is just stupid

                            Meanwhile I hear no one about the radio, or heater, that have been in cars for 10's of years and can be equally distracting!

                            Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

                            Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

                            Regards, Sander

                            OriginalGriffO Offline
                            OriginalGriffO Offline
                            OriginalGriff
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            Heater isn't that distracting, and it serves two very useful purposes: i) it helps to demist the windows so drivers can see where they are going... 1) it keeps the extremities warm - which means clearer thinking, better reactions, less distraction, and faster physical movement. I used to ride motorcycles all year round, and heated gloves/grips made a HUGE difference! My left heated gloves failed in a blizzard one night, and by the time I got home I couldn't pull the clutch in! :laugh: And boy did it hurt getting the feeling back... :OMG: Radio can help too - it prevents white line fever, where the driver gets focused on the road and effectively falls into a trance, where they don't even notice other vehicles. It's a good idea to listen to something you don't like took much...

                            Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                            "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
                            "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

                            Sander RosselS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                              Heater isn't that distracting, and it serves two very useful purposes: i) it helps to demist the windows so drivers can see where they are going... 1) it keeps the extremities warm - which means clearer thinking, better reactions, less distraction, and faster physical movement. I used to ride motorcycles all year round, and heated gloves/grips made a HUGE difference! My left heated gloves failed in a blizzard one night, and by the time I got home I couldn't pull the clutch in! :laugh: And boy did it hurt getting the feeling back... :OMG: Radio can help too - it prevents white line fever, where the driver gets focused on the road and effectively falls into a trance, where they don't even notice other vehicles. It's a good idea to listen to something you don't like took much...

                              Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                              Sander RosselS Offline
                              Sander RosselS Offline
                              Sander Rossel
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              Maybe it's just me, but I always set the heater on HIGH (which is max) and low fan until the car is warmed up. I then put the fan on maximum blowing capacity (which always requires me to look up the correct button, but then I can just bash it a few times and it'll be max). After a while I warm up and then I want to put the fan on a low position, which DOES require me to look at it as I don't want to turn it off either! After that I need to find the temperature switch and switch it a couple of times (usually to 21 or 22 degrees, can't have it on x.5, as that's not a nice round number). All this time I'm dividing my attention between heater and road! This requires so much cognitive ability on my part that I can't really do this while in urban areas, it's just too dangerous! The alternative for me is to be cold or way too hot. I have a likewise problem with my radio, the song needs to be good (I really very much hate commercials, news, traffic reports, and weather, which are on at least once an hour (but mostly twice)...) and the alternatives must be explored. For long trips I really don't listen to the radio and I put up something from my iPod. I only put on the radio on short trips (about 15 minutes or less), at night, and on Fridays as at those times I can be pretty sure of 50 minutes non-stop good music. Yeah, and I don't like driving a car as it is without (very much first world) heating and radio problems :sigh:

                              Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

                              Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

                              Regards, Sander

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • 9 9082365

                                Report by lead researcher Dr. Beth Ebel, director of the Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center at the University of Washington in Seattle published in the journal Injury Prevention, December 2012.

                                I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mark_Wallace
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                I'm afraid she said nothing of the kind. She merely said that her "study" (watching a paltry 1,000 people cross the road at rush hour, on the way to work, when people are most distracted, anyway) concluded that only one in four people "followed the green cross code" to the letter. There are lots of "might"s and "may"s in her report, but no evidence that accidents have been caused by people texting whilst crossing at a legal time. The whole thing is utter bollocks. Who's making money from it? That's the question to ask.

                                I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups