Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. What is Sign of 0?

What is Sign of 0?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questioncsharppythoncomfunctional
33 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

    Dear Mr. Clifton, Please stop belittling me. Signed, 0

    Read my (free) ebook Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly. Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles here on CodeProject.

    Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

    Regards, Sander

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Marc Clifton
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Sander Rossel wrote:

    Please stop belittling me.

    Dear Mr. Zero (or is it Mrs. Zero, there is some ambiguity here!), I'm sorry, I had no intention of being n-aught-y. In fact, you are very important! Without you, nothing could not be expressed mathematically. You fulfill a central role in mathematics as the additive identity of the integers, real numbers, and many other algebraic structures. And besides, you are at least 3756 years old, and in ancient Egypt you were given a designation that means "beautiful", which is much better than what the Babylonian's did, which was to represent you with a space, a blank, a nothing! Of course, the Greeks weren't sure about you -- how could nothing be something! Well, I know that you are something indeed, and certainly, based on your age, much wiser than I. Your humble servant, Marc

    Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project! Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny

    Sander RosselS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Marc Clifton

      Sander Rossel wrote:

      Please stop belittling me.

      Dear Mr. Zero (or is it Mrs. Zero, there is some ambiguity here!), I'm sorry, I had no intention of being n-aught-y. In fact, you are very important! Without you, nothing could not be expressed mathematically. You fulfill a central role in mathematics as the additive identity of the integers, real numbers, and many other algebraic structures. And besides, you are at least 3756 years old, and in ancient Egypt you were given a designation that means "beautiful", which is much better than what the Babylonian's did, which was to represent you with a space, a blank, a nothing! Of course, the Greeks weren't sure about you -- how could nothing be something! Well, I know that you are something indeed, and certainly, based on your age, much wiser than I. Your humble servant, Marc

      Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project! Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny

      Sander RosselS Offline
      Sander RosselS Offline
      Sander Rossel
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      Hah! It was I, Sander Rossel, disguised as 0 all along! You're my servant now :D Or was I 0 disguised as Sander...? Anyway, don't divide by me just in case :~

      Read my (free) ebook Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly. Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles here on CodeProject.

      Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

      Regards, Sander

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Marc Clifton

        In C#, Math.Sign(0) is 0. OK, that's one way to solve that. But I was amused by this comment in SO regarding why there isn't a Sign function in Python: > Indeed there was a patch which included sign() in math, but it wasn't accepted, because they didn't agree on what it should return in all the edge cases (+/-0, +/-nan, etc) Instead, they created copysign > math.copysign(x, y) Return x with the sign of y. On a platform that supports signed zeros, copysign(1.0, -0.0) returns -1.0. So if you do: math.copysign(15, -313) you get -15.0. Or more amusingly: math.copysign(0, -313) Answer: -0.0 Then try this: -0.0 < 0 Answer: False -0.0 == 0 Answer: True Anyways, I found that weird / interesting. How can 0 be negative? Thoughts, on this Monday morning? Marc

        Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project! Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny

        K Offline
        K Offline
        Kiriander
        wrote on last edited by
        #22

        Quite easy: lim(-1/x,x->INF) makes a negative 0. You have to understand that the limit 0 is an entirely different beast from the 0 you get in your wallet when you spend all your money.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P patbob

          The sign of 0? I thought everyone knew that was positive because of twos complement math. Of course, with IEEE floating point, -0.0 is representable, but allowing it would be inconsistent, and very, very confusing.

          We can program with only 1's, but if all you've got are zeros, you've got nothing.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Daniel Pfeffer
          wrote on last edited by
          #23

          patbob wrote:

          Of course, with IEEE floating point, -0.0 is representable, but allowing it would be inconsistent, and very, very confusing.

          Actually, negative zero is essential for correct solution of certain problems involving branch cuts for complex elementary functions. See W. Kahan's Branch Cuts for Complex Elementary Functions, or Much Ado About Nothing's Sign Bit[^]. Note that a reference to the final article is given on Kahan's home page, but I don't have access to that publication.

          If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P patbob

            The sign of 0? I thought everyone knew that was positive because of twos complement math. Of course, with IEEE floating point, -0.0 is representable, but allowing it would be inconsistent, and very, very confusing.

            We can program with only 1's, but if all you've got are zeros, you've got nothing.

            B Offline
            B Offline
            benf2
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            Typically, one takes the ones compliment and then increment to find the inverse, so that when the numbers added together is "0". So the inverse of 0 is 0. This means that -0 == 0. So, zero has the ability to have both signs.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • I Ian Shlasko

              I'd like to know how they represent -0 internally... I mean, either they're cutting one number off the max range of the numeric type (e.g. -127->127 instead of -128->127, so 11111111 could represent -0 instead of -1), and changing all of the low-level arithmetic to compensate (unlikely), or... They're wasting a whole byte on the sign, just so they can represent something that, 99.999% of the time, doesn't matter... If they're going to go that route, I think they should figure out 254 more ways to represent zero, just so they're not wasting bits :)

              Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
              Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Plamen Dragiyski
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              Ian Shlasko wrote:

              I'd like to know how they represent -0 internally...

              That's exactly where is the problem. I don't know C# (I'm currently a javascript programmer), but a Number is internally stored as IEEE754 floating point, which have a bit for sign. It is not an integer. Zero can be represented without the sign bit, therefore when sign bit is 0, you get +0.0, when it is 1, you get -0.0. It is just a bit interpretation problem. If you are interesting why -0.0 work as it is, there is very good mathematical theory for infinitesimals. But as a rule of a thumb, never use == on floating-point number. It returns false more often than you expect to.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Bassam Abdul Baki

                The Taurus would be the closest sign.

                Web - BM - RSS - Math - LinkedIn

                K Offline
                K Offline
                Kirk 10389821
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                Actually, I believe the correct answer is Gemini! (I know I married them)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Marc Clifton

                  In C#, Math.Sign(0) is 0. OK, that's one way to solve that. But I was amused by this comment in SO regarding why there isn't a Sign function in Python: > Indeed there was a patch which included sign() in math, but it wasn't accepted, because they didn't agree on what it should return in all the edge cases (+/-0, +/-nan, etc) Instead, they created copysign > math.copysign(x, y) Return x with the sign of y. On a platform that supports signed zeros, copysign(1.0, -0.0) returns -1.0. So if you do: math.copysign(15, -313) you get -15.0. Or more amusingly: math.copysign(0, -313) Answer: -0.0 Then try this: -0.0 < 0 Answer: False -0.0 == 0 Answer: True Anyways, I found that weird / interesting. How can 0 be negative? Thoughts, on this Monday morning? Marc

                  Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project! Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny

                  Y Offline
                  Y Offline
                  Ygnaiih
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  Damn you people. I started looking into this then I wrote the following: if (-0 == +0) { Console.WriteLine(Math.Sign(0)); } that was C# it returned 0 as expected. Now I am wondering if math is real.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K k5054

                    And in C printf("%f", -1.0 * 0.0) prints -0.000000 see Signed zero[^] (Wikipedia) Edit: should have read the rest of the thread before hitting post .. :(

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Member 10267903
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    Not only Python. Try it in SQL Server 2012:

                    declare @A as float;
                    declare @B as float;
                    declare @C as float;

                    set @A = 0.0;
                    set @B = -1.0;
                    set @C = @A * @B;

                    print @C;

                    or PHP:

                    $A = -1.0 * 0.0;
                    echo $A . "\n";

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Marc Clifton

                      In C#, Math.Sign(0) is 0. OK, that's one way to solve that. But I was amused by this comment in SO regarding why there isn't a Sign function in Python: > Indeed there was a patch which included sign() in math, but it wasn't accepted, because they didn't agree on what it should return in all the edge cases (+/-0, +/-nan, etc) Instead, they created copysign > math.copysign(x, y) Return x with the sign of y. On a platform that supports signed zeros, copysign(1.0, -0.0) returns -1.0. So if you do: math.copysign(15, -313) you get -15.0. Or more amusingly: math.copysign(0, -313) Answer: -0.0 Then try this: -0.0 < 0 Answer: False -0.0 == 0 Answer: True Anyways, I found that weird / interesting. How can 0 be negative? Thoughts, on this Monday morning? Marc

                      Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project! Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny

                      O Offline
                      O Offline
                      ormonds
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      If 0 represents the contents of my glass then zero is very definitely negative.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Marc Clifton

                        In C#, Math.Sign(0) is 0. OK, that's one way to solve that. But I was amused by this comment in SO regarding why there isn't a Sign function in Python: > Indeed there was a patch which included sign() in math, but it wasn't accepted, because they didn't agree on what it should return in all the edge cases (+/-0, +/-nan, etc) Instead, they created copysign > math.copysign(x, y) Return x with the sign of y. On a platform that supports signed zeros, copysign(1.0, -0.0) returns -1.0. So if you do: math.copysign(15, -313) you get -15.0. Or more amusingly: math.copysign(0, -313) Answer: -0.0 Then try this: -0.0 < 0 Answer: False -0.0 == 0 Answer: True Anyways, I found that weird / interesting. How can 0 be negative? Thoughts, on this Monday morning? Marc

                        Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project! Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Charles Programmer
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        I find 0.0 to be negative when it involves the quantity of money in my control. ;)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Marc Clifton

                          In C#, Math.Sign(0) is 0. OK, that's one way to solve that. But I was amused by this comment in SO regarding why there isn't a Sign function in Python: > Indeed there was a patch which included sign() in math, but it wasn't accepted, because they didn't agree on what it should return in all the edge cases (+/-0, +/-nan, etc) Instead, they created copysign > math.copysign(x, y) Return x with the sign of y. On a platform that supports signed zeros, copysign(1.0, -0.0) returns -1.0. So if you do: math.copysign(15, -313) you get -15.0. Or more amusingly: math.copysign(0, -313) Answer: -0.0 Then try this: -0.0 < 0 Answer: False -0.0 == 0 Answer: True Anyways, I found that weird / interesting. How can 0 be negative? Thoughts, on this Monday morning? Marc

                          Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project! Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          Charles Programmer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #31

                          I find 0.0 to be negative when it involves the quantity of money in my control. ;)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Matt T Heffron

                            But for which reason? Is it the parser in the compiler? Is it the output routine you used? (The VS debugger?) So I tried the following:

                              double a = -0.0;
                              Console.WriteLine("a = {0}, 1.0/a = {1}", a, 1.0 / a);
                              double b = double.Parse("-0.0");
                              Console.WriteLine("b = {0}, 1.0/b = {1}", b, 1.0 / b);
                              byte\[\] abytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(a);
                              Console.WriteLine("a bytes=" + string.Join(",", abytes.Select(z => z.ToString("X2"))));
                              byte\[\] bbytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(b);
                              Console.WriteLine("b bytes=" + string.Join(",", bbytes.Select(z => z.ToString("X2"))));
                            

                            The output was surprising:

                            a = 0, 1.0/a = -Infinity
                            b = 0, 1.0/b = Infinity
                            a bytes=00,00,00,00,00,00,00,80
                            b bytes=00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00

                            So the compiler handles the -0.0 correctly, but double.Parse doesn't and the output is converting the negative 0.0 to "0.0" with no sign.

                            "Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed." - G.K. Chesterton

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Chris SAS
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #32

                            Another trick for C#: use the Ceiling function.

                            static void Main(string[] args)
                            {
                            double a = Math.Ceiling(-0.1);
                            double b = 1 * 0;
                            double c = -1 * 0;
                            Console.WriteLine("a = Math.Ceiling(-0.1), a=" + a.ToString());

                             byte\[\] bytes;
                             bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(a);
                             Console.WriteLine("Bytes of a:");
                             Console.WriteLine(BitConverter.ToString(bytes));
                            
                             Console.WriteLine("b = 1 \* 0, b=" + b.ToString());
                             bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(b);
                             Console.WriteLine("Bytes of b:");
                             Console.WriteLine(BitConverter.ToString(bytes));
                            
                             Console.WriteLine("c = -1 \* 0, c=" + c.ToString());
                             bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(c);
                             Console.WriteLine("Bytes of c:");
                             Console.WriteLine(BitConverter.ToString(bytes));
                            

                            }

                            Output:

                            a = Math.Ceiling(-0.1), a=0
                            Bytes of a:
                            00-00-00-00-00-00-00-80
                            b = 1 * 0, b=0
                            Bytes of b:
                            00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
                            c = -1 * 0, c=0
                            Bytes of c:
                            00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00

                            I wrote about this some years ago for our SAS programming users (What's the difference between 0 and -0?[^]), as a similar IEEE 754 behavior exists there.

                            M 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Chris SAS

                              Another trick for C#: use the Ceiling function.

                              static void Main(string[] args)
                              {
                              double a = Math.Ceiling(-0.1);
                              double b = 1 * 0;
                              double c = -1 * 0;
                              Console.WriteLine("a = Math.Ceiling(-0.1), a=" + a.ToString());

                               byte\[\] bytes;
                               bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(a);
                               Console.WriteLine("Bytes of a:");
                               Console.WriteLine(BitConverter.ToString(bytes));
                              
                               Console.WriteLine("b = 1 \* 0, b=" + b.ToString());
                               bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(b);
                               Console.WriteLine("Bytes of b:");
                               Console.WriteLine(BitConverter.ToString(bytes));
                              
                               Console.WriteLine("c = -1 \* 0, c=" + c.ToString());
                               bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(c);
                               Console.WriteLine("Bytes of c:");
                               Console.WriteLine(BitConverter.ToString(bytes));
                              

                              }

                              Output:

                              a = Math.Ceiling(-0.1), a=0
                              Bytes of a:
                              00-00-00-00-00-00-00-80
                              b = 1 * 0, b=0
                              Bytes of b:
                              00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
                              c = -1 * 0, c=0
                              Bytes of c:
                              00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00

                              I wrote about this some years ago for our SAS programming users (What's the difference between 0 and -0?[^]), as a similar IEEE 754 behavior exists there.

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Matt T Heffron
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #33

                              The flaw in this is that b and c are both calculated as integer values (at compile time) then converted to double. Integer doesn't have a negative zero.

                              "Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed." - G.K. Chesterton

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups