Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Trump & Bannon

Trump & Bannon

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
comhelp
41 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Kevin Marois

    People across the US are protesting in response to Trump's election. Some folks are decrying the protests and telling the protesters to "get over it already. Trump won" What these folks fail to realize is that they're not protesting Trump because he won, but because of who he is. He is clearly divisive. He has made disparaging comments towards blacks, latinos, women, jews... to name a few. Now, he appoints Steve Bannon to his inncer circle. For those of you who don't know Bannon ran a Breitbart [^] which has published some pretty racist stuff. If you haven't taken the time to look it up - do so. So this appointment clearly shows that either Trump doesn't understand why half the country doesn't like him - or he doesn't care. He talks about being president for all the people, then makes decisions that alienates half of them. Not off to a good start.

    If it's not broken, fix it until it is. Everything makes sense in someone's mind. Ya can't fix stupid.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    Maybe he is one of the creatures you find at the bottom of the swamp?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • realJSOPR realJSOP

      People were rioting BEFORE Trump selected Bannon, so your claim is unjustified. They're rioting because Soros is paying them to do so.

      ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
      -----
      You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
      -----
      When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

      B Offline
      B Offline
      Babu4
      wrote on last edited by
      #31

      John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

      They're rioting because Soros is paying them to do so.

      It is devastating how this level of anti-semetic dialogue has become the new normal under Trump.

      realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Babu4

        John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

        They're rioting because Soros is paying them to do so.

        It is devastating how this level of anti-semetic dialogue has become the new normal under Trump.

        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOP
        wrote on last edited by
        #32

        How the actual f*ck is that anti-semetic? Proof Soros Is Behind Riots/Protests Against Donald Trump | www.independentsentinel.com[^]

        ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
        -----
        You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
        -----
        When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Kevin Marois wrote:

          You can't say on one hand "I want to be President for ALL the people", then take action that alienates half the people.

          So, which candidate do you think would have had 100% approval? And does this continue for each and every decision he's going to make?

          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dave Kreskowiak
          wrote on last edited by
          #33

          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

          So, which candidate do you think would have had 100% approval?

          None of the above. There is simply on such thing.

          A guide to posting questions on CodeProject

          Click this: Asking questions is a skill. Seriously, do it.
          Dave Kreskowiak

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Dave Kreskowiak

            Eddy Vluggen wrote:

            So, which candidate do you think would have had 100% approval?

            None of the above. There is simply on such thing.

            A guide to posting questions on CodeProject

            Click this: Asking questions is a skill. Seriously, do it.
            Dave Kreskowiak

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #34

            So, regardless of choice, some people would be 'alienated', since they would not agree with the choice made. Implies that no one could ever become president of 'all Americans'. I don't understand the argument, obviously.

            Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              So, regardless of choice, some people would be 'alienated', since they would not agree with the choice made. Implies that no one could ever become president of 'all Americans'. I don't understand the argument, obviously.

              Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Dave Kreskowiak
              wrote on last edited by
              #35

              Every politician says they want to be for "all Americans", knowing full well that it's impossible. The trick, for the winner, is figuring out how tolerant the dissenters will be. In Trumps case, he was so blatantly racist and misogynistic (among other things) during the campaign that he made it impossible for some dissenters to be accepting of him at all.

              A guide to posting questions on CodeProject

              Click this: Asking questions is a skill. Seriously, do it.
              Dave Kreskowiak

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Dave Kreskowiak

                Every politician says they want to be for "all Americans", knowing full well that it's impossible. The trick, for the winner, is figuring out how tolerant the dissenters will be. In Trumps case, he was so blatantly racist and misogynistic (among other things) during the campaign that he made it impossible for some dissenters to be accepting of him at all.

                A guide to posting questions on CodeProject

                Click this: Asking questions is a skill. Seriously, do it.
                Dave Kreskowiak

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #36

                Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

                In Trumps case, he was so blatantly racist and misogynistic (among other things) during the campaign that he made it impossible for some dissenters to be accepting of him at all.

                I didn't know they'd have to 'accept' him. Since when is that an issue? And why did you guys accept Bush jr, if you could simply 'not accept' him?

                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

                  In Trumps case, he was so blatantly racist and misogynistic (among other things) during the campaign that he made it impossible for some dissenters to be accepting of him at all.

                  I didn't know they'd have to 'accept' him. Since when is that an issue? And why did you guys accept Bush jr, if you could simply 'not accept' him?

                  Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  den2k88
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #37

                  If America survived 4 mandates of Bush family it can survive one or two of Trumps'.

                  DURA LEX, SED LEX GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani

                  N 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T Tim Carmichael

                    And Obama is a model of civility? His policies have angered people, too, but I don't recall them rioting.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #38

                    Tim Carmichael wrote:

                    And Obama is a model of civility? His policies have angered people, too, but I don't recall them rioting.

                    Did Obama ever appoint anyone to the cabinet that wrote articles encouraging racism and sexism?

                    Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D den2k88

                      If America survived 4 mandates of Bush family it can survive one or two of Trumps'.

                      DURA LEX, SED LEX GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Nathan Minier
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #39

                      Three, actually. Which is too bad, as George H.W. Bush was one of the best President's we've ever had. Pragmatic, smart, centrist, and flexible. That flexibility is why he lost re-election, the base was mad after reading his lips.

                      "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli

                      N 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Nathan Minier

                        Three, actually. Which is too bad, as George H.W. Bush was one of the best President's we've ever had. Pragmatic, smart, centrist, and flexible. That flexibility is why he lost re-election, the base was mad after reading his lips.

                        "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli

                        N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Nelek
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #40

                        Genetic is such a bitch... always jumping generations fully random. At least they got both superlatives in the family... one of the best, and one of the worst.

                        M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

                        N 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Nelek

                          Genetic is such a bitch... always jumping generations fully random. At least they got both superlatives in the family... one of the best, and one of the worst.

                          M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

                          N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Nathan Minier
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #41

                          Can't really argue there. I suspect every family has a "that guy", though.

                          "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups