Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Somebody out there who also has to work with Embarcadero C++ Builder?

Somebody out there who also has to work with Embarcadero C++ Builder?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
delphivisual-studioc++questionannouncement
16 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    I need to work a lot with C++ Builder and I like it a lot and I hate it lot of times a lot more; for me it (Embarcadero/former Borland) is the real case if a love hate. A long time before MS they introduced a nice visual form designer, with a very clever structure (VCL, visual component library), easy to understand, easy to handle and easy to extend. But meanwhile they are always about two “decades” behind the state of the technics. - Even today, with RAD Studio it is a hassle to e.g. use Unicode in the source file. - Also stability of the IDE in case of bigger projects is frustrating I have to admit, I know VS only for small projects, but it is much more comfortable and reliable. Anybody out there who also suffers under Embarcadero? [Edit] BTW I Need to work with "Embarcadero® C++Builder 10.1 Berlin Version 24.0.25048.9432" [/Edit]

    R Offline
    R Offline
    RedDk
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Here's how you find a list of gypsys who are still ridgeroaming the www ... but should be quite happy with VS later than 2010 ... https://www.codeproject.com/search.aspx?q=Embarcadero&sbo=qa&usfc=false&x=4&y=7 Sift through the names here and solicit directly.

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      I need to work a lot with C++ Builder and I like it a lot and I hate it lot of times a lot more; for me it (Embarcadero/former Borland) is the real case if a love hate. A long time before MS they introduced a nice visual form designer, with a very clever structure (VCL, visual component library), easy to understand, easy to handle and easy to extend. But meanwhile they are always about two “decades” behind the state of the technics. - Even today, with RAD Studio it is a hassle to e.g. use Unicode in the source file. - Also stability of the IDE in case of bigger projects is frustrating I have to admit, I know VS only for small projects, but it is much more comfortable and reliable. Anybody out there who also suffers under Embarcadero? [Edit] BTW I Need to work with "Embarcadero® C++Builder 10.1 Berlin Version 24.0.25048.9432" [/Edit]

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Munchies_Matt
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      0x01AA wrote:

      Embarcadero

      Not a ship I sail with I am afraid. :)

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R RedDk

        Here's how you find a list of gypsys who are still ridgeroaming the www ... but should be quite happy with VS later than 2010 ... https://www.codeproject.com/search.aspx?q=Embarcadero&sbo=qa&usfc=false&x=4&y=7 Sift through the names here and solicit directly.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Thank you :) :thumbsup:

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Munchies_Matt

          0x01AA wrote:

          Embarcadero

          Not a ship I sail with I am afraid. :)

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          It's not a ship anymore, it's just a bark :) Em_bark_adero :laugh:

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            It's not a ship anymore, it's just a bark :) Em_bark_adero :laugh:

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Munchies_Matt
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            Glad you got the pun! :)

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Munchies_Matt

              Glad you got the pun! :)

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              That was only a lucky shot ;P

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                That was only a lucky shot ;P

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Munchies_Matt
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                But fairly evident nontheless: barque - Recherche Google[^] :)

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Munchies_Matt

                  But fairly evident nontheless: barque - Recherche Google[^] :)

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  For me it's more "naufrage" [schiffbruch - Google-Suche](https://www.google.ch/search?q=schiffbruch&biw=1382&bih=686&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiN8a2qyeXRAhXHShQKHaE8DdwQ\_AUIBigB) :-D

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    For me it's more "naufrage" [schiffbruch - Google-Suche](https://www.google.ch/search?q=schiffbruch&biw=1382&bih=686&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiN8a2qyeXRAhXHShQKHaE8DdwQ\_AUIBigB) :-D

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Munchies_Matt
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    "schiffbruch" Ship breach? :) We have a skiff in English: schiffbruch - Google-Suche[^]

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G glennPattonPub

                      Not Emarcadero flavour but Borland Builder 2006, so close to .NET yet so far(?) Didn't really like it or see the need for it. It's just the guy who wrote the software kept using Borland...I really only used the DOS Turbo versions at College and Uni (and liked those). Having come from the VS Windos background to the Borland (or as I christen it Bob the) Builder. It was a step sideways, it always seemed to want you to do things the Pascal way... :sigh:

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      Quote:

                      Borland Builder 2006, so close to .NET yet so far(?)

                      But a decade before .net ;)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        I need to work a lot with C++ Builder and I like it a lot and I hate it lot of times a lot more; for me it (Embarcadero/former Borland) is the real case if a love hate. A long time before MS they introduced a nice visual form designer, with a very clever structure (VCL, visual component library), easy to understand, easy to handle and easy to extend. But meanwhile they are always about two “decades” behind the state of the technics. - Even today, with RAD Studio it is a hassle to e.g. use Unicode in the source file. - Also stability of the IDE in case of bigger projects is frustrating I have to admit, I know VS only for small projects, but it is much more comfortable and reliable. Anybody out there who also suffers under Embarcadero? [Edit] BTW I Need to work with "Embarcadero® C++Builder 10.1 Berlin Version 24.0.25048.9432" [/Edit]

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Joe Woodbury
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        I had to use it earlier this year and found it to be a big pile of junk. The crappy IDE aside, the compiler is horrible. Let's put it this way; I find it preferable to use Eclipse in CentOS 6. Now that's damning.

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Joe Woodbury

                          I had to use it earlier this year and found it to be a big pile of junk. The crappy IDE aside, the compiler is horrible. Let's put it this way; I find it preferable to use Eclipse in CentOS 6. Now that's damning.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          Quote:

                          The crappy IDE

                          I'm working with it since about 20 years, so I got used to it... As long as it starts up and does not abort abnormally, which happens too often :mad:

                          Quote:

                          the compiler is horrible

                          Yes indeed! But fortunately for about $140 JomiTech helps for this with TwineCompile which drastically decrease compile time (about factor 10). But the price includes also some new side effects and the increase of the chance that the IDE crashes :^)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups