Europe is a fool
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Their grand parents, or great grand parents countries.
They are not citizens of those nations and those nations have absolutely 0 responsibility to take them in.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
We don't force them into ghettos, they do that by their own choosing.
Yeah I know that, however it is an indirect side effect of the mentality you are presenting. In the US, we embrace the differing cultures into our community. This means, they often enjoy leaving their bubble world and living in a diverse community themselves. Propagating an idea that you will deport them to their grandparents country ensures they do not want to be your neighbor and will likely live in a secluded community which has the effects you are seeing.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Dont forget, the US is fundamentally segregated by race, creed and colour, so you probably dont notice this happening when muslims self segregate.
No we are not. Maybe in the communities you have visited, but this in not universal. The mid-west has little segregation and very rarely do you find "China" towns etc., because of this. That is not to say there are no Chinese in the midwest however as there are many and many of other race and religion.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
In Europe we dont have such divisions, so when one group does this it is very obvious.
This is a fallacy. You are in fact segregated, you just have fewer minorities than the US so they stand out even more. We have far more minorities here and let them integrate with other minorities and even enable it. For example, after Vietnam the US took in many Hmong refugees. The refugees were not grouped in communities but actually spread out all across the US.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
How strongly do US muslims adhere to their creed? Is it as strong as in Europe?
Not really sure actually. Same could be asked about XTians and really varies from family to family it seems. I have met many Muslims that are pretty open. Woman that do not wear the mandated clothing etc., and then I also see the family with the ladies in all black on a day when temps are exceeding triple digits (F of course).
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Is the US less tolerant than Europe of ext
> They are not citizens of those nations and those nations have absolutely 0 responsibility to take them in They regularly travelling to those countries, often to arranged marriages, or to family events. Theses countries have no problems with this [^] Their links and associations with those countries are very strong. Many maintain dual nationality. And we are already deporting UK pakistani criminals: Asian sex abusers to be stripped of UK citizenship and deported | The Independent[^] > In the US, we embrace the differing cultures into our community And you think we dont ion Europe? 1970s ska music - Recherche Google[^] Muslims chose to isolate themselves in Europe, forming ghettos of their own making. > This is a fallacy. You are in fact segregated The US is more racially segregated than Europe it would appear. Our 21st-century segregation: we're still divided by race | Reniqua Allen | Opinion | The Guardian[^] Let me refer you again to the late 1970s wave of Ska/Two Tone music that swept the UK and was a mix of black and white culture that grew up in the tower blocks and housing estates (projects you call them). This is very much not segregation. > you just have fewer minorities than the US You are wrong. France has a h
-
>What country on Earth is going to willingly home a fanatical ... Ah, you mean it wasnt Pakistan protecting Bin Laden? You need to wake up. Sorry, but you do. The west has a serious problem. The EU just let, and will continue to let, millions of young muslim men from all over africa and asia into Europe. The problems havent even started yet. The longer this goes on for and the longer it isnt dealt with the more violent the end will be. What I am suggesting is a fair and decent way to resolve the issue now.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Ah, you mean it wasnt Pakistan protecting Bin Laden?
I can't argue with you there, except Bin Laden wasn't a foot soldier he was a leader and founder of al-Qaeda and he didn't have British nationality, there is a difference. Had the non-British perpetrators of the London attacks at the weekend survived I am sure they would have been deported after serving there probably too short sentences.
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Ah, you mean it wasnt Pakistan protecting Bin Laden?
I can't argue with you there, except Bin Laden wasn't a foot soldier he was a leader and founder of al-Qaeda and he didn't have British nationality, there is a difference. Had the non-British perpetrators of the London attacks at the weekend survived I am sure they would have been deported after serving there probably too short sentences.
The Rotherham sex gangs are being deported, but they have dual nationality I believe. However, I am talking about the general deportation of muslims to their ancestral countries. They would return with whatever cash the sale of their UK assets raised, which would probably amount to quite a lot in their ancestral countries, and make them welcome. Many of them have maintained very strong links with their ancestral countries anyway, alot of girls are sent back to Pakistan to be married for example. This happens without any apparent problems vis a vis immigration or nationality issues. And we know Pakistan quite happily accommodates, even protects, foreign jihadis, so this element of UK society might actually be welcomed with open arms by Pakistan.
-
>What country on Earth is going to willingly home a fanatical ... Ah, you mean it wasnt Pakistan protecting Bin Laden? You need to wake up. Sorry, but you do. The west has a serious problem. The EU just let, and will continue to let, millions of young muslim men from all over africa and asia into Europe. The problems havent even started yet. The longer this goes on for and the longer it isnt dealt with the more violent the end will be. What I am suggesting is a fair and decent way to resolve the issue now.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Ah, you mean it wasn't Pakistan protecting Bin Laden?
Yes this is the fact that most liberals would deny from the core. The truth is Pakistan is sponsoring and providing safeguard to the most of the terrorists and menaces of underworld.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
The west has a serious problem.
Not only west but terrorism is an issue for entire world.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
The problems haven't even started yet. The longer this goes on for and the longer it isn't dealt with the more violent the end will be
History teaches this but again this is the fact that is on denial since long but yeah it will be accepted only when someone close to them will be hurt from this terrorism.
You can have all the tools in the world but if you don't genuinely believe in yourself, it's useless.
-
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
My ancestors came from the Isle of Lesbos.
So you're Lesbian?
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
-
Michael Martin wrote:
The bastard hasn't bought me a present for nearly 40 years.
But have you been good during those 40 years? :-\
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
RyanDev wrote:
But have you been good during those 40 years? :-\
I'm always true to my perception of good.
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
-
Are you surprised, when your fellow Aussies sing extremely rude songs about him[^]? :rolleyes:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
Richard Deeming wrote:
Are you surprised, when your fellow Aussies sing extremely rude songs about him[^]? :rolleyes:
Without even clicking, that is Kevin 'Bloody' Wilson and he's right, Santa Clause is a sunshine.
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Ah, you mean it wasn't Pakistan protecting Bin Laden?
Yes this is the fact that most liberals would deny from the core. The truth is Pakistan is sponsoring and providing safeguard to the most of the terrorists and menaces of underworld.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
The west has a serious problem.
Not only west but terrorism is an issue for entire world.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
The problems haven't even started yet. The longer this goes on for and the longer it isn't dealt with the more violent the end will be
History teaches this but again this is the fact that is on denial since long but yeah it will be accepted only when someone close to them will be hurt from this terrorism.
You can have all the tools in the world but if you don't genuinely believe in yourself, it's useless.
History does. Centuries ago we had to ban Catholics from holding any kind of office, lest they use their position to push their religion, and had to curtail the most extreme form of Protestantism. Britain doesnt like strong religion, it worries us, it portrays mental instability and childishness. We really need to deal with islam.
-
> The biggest problem with Europe is multiculturalism Not so. Black caribean culture blended perfectly well with white culture in the 70s and gave rise to a whole new form of music and youth movement, two tone, ska, etc. Indian culture is highly compatible with EUropean culture and has been for centuries. THe problem is islam. Just that. It is them. They dont want to integrate. They want to dominate, to take over, to subjugate. That isnt going to happen, believe me.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Not so. Black caribean culture blended perfectly well with white culture in the 70s and gave rise to a whole new form of music and youth movement, two tone, ska, etc. Indian culture is highly compatible with European culture and has been for centuries.
Nice observation, actually there are many countries and specific religious people blend harmoniously with the immigrant country or when they go for trade or business and accepts law & order of that particular country. Indian history is twisted by many historians from different rulers according to their own favor however one noticeable fact is when Britain invaded/rules India they didn't destroyed temples, razed idols, raped women and killed innocent* to the ground unlike every other Islamist invaders done "with cruelty". But after Independence if we compare both era then ofc. British rule was not as bad compare to those mogul rulers. I am not favoring one over other but trying to point out that its un-matched cruelty whenever any kind of Islamic terrorism overcome to anything. *with few exceptions.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
THe problem is islam. Just that. It is them. They dont want to integrate. They want to dominate, to take over, to subjugate.
I would slightly differ here, not everyone from Islam is same but those who quotes Quran for their hate speech and misguides innocent and make them terrorist are the real culprits.
You can have all the tools in the world but if you don't genuinely believe in yourself, it's useless.
-
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
My ancestors came from the Isle of Lesbos.
So you're Lesbian?
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
-
Richard Deeming wrote:
Or America. Let's not pretend it's purely a "third world" problem. 11 Years Old, a Mom, and Pushed to Marry Her Rapist in Florida - NYTimes.com[^]
Ah, I see your misconception here...
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill
:laugh:
Quote:
... more than 167,000 young people age 17 and under married in 38 states between 2000 and 2010 ... ... 12-year-old girls married in Alaska, Louisiana and South Carolina, while other states simply had categories of "14 and younger." Among the states with the highest rates of child marriages were Arkansas, Idaho and Kentucky. ... every state in America still allows underage girls to marry ... Twenty-seven states do not even set a minimum age by statute ... In New Hampshire, a girl scout ... learned that girls in her state could marry at 13. New Jersey lawmakers passed a bill that would make their state the first in the country to ban marriages of people under 18, but Gov. Chris Christie this month blocked the legislation. New York legislators are considering a bill ... to raise the age to 17, from the current minimum, 14.
I don't think you can put the blame entirely on "America's Wang" for this one.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
Richard Deeming wrote:
Are you surprised, when your fellow Aussies sing extremely rude songs about him[^]? :rolleyes:
Without even clicking, that is Kevin 'Bloody' Wilson and he's right, Santa Clause is a sunshine.
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
But did he meet you in the classroom back in 1963? :-D (Can't find a video link, but I'm sure you'll be able to guess the song?)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
Nuke Mecca and Medina and tell the Mozzies they can pray to a glass parking lot! Tell them "What goes around, comes around" and point to the innumerable shrines of other religions they have demolished, including, in the most recent past, the Bamiyan Buddha. Shut down all mosques. Impose a ban on assembly of Mozzies. Make sure you have butchers selling only pork in Muslim neighbourhoods. If they want civil rights when they are in a minority, they should be prepared to grant civil rights to others in countries where they are in a majority. Reciprocity. Otherwise known as payback. It is a bitch, I know.
I am not sure if its sarcasm or what but if I go by the each sentence then overall your post suggest tit for tat way to deal with this scenario. Well, it would be the right approach however keep in mind they have their own support in the name of "Human Rights" and "Terrorist do not have religion" In trying to do so they would come up with the term "Christian terrorism" or "Hindu terrorism" but of course there is no Islamic terrorism at all and thus send one on a back-foot if one try to teach same payback lesson.
Vivic wrote:
If they want civil rights when they are in a minority, they should be prepared to grant civil rights to others in countries where they are in a majority.
This is the height of hypocrisy by them that they wanted to enjoy freedom of liberal/secular nations however when it comes to their nation/religion everything becomes regressive towards minority.
You can have all the tools in the world but if you don't genuinely believe in yourself, it's useless.
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Not so. Black caribean culture blended perfectly well with white culture in the 70s and gave rise to a whole new form of music and youth movement, two tone, ska, etc. Indian culture is highly compatible with European culture and has been for centuries.
Nice observation, actually there are many countries and specific religious people blend harmoniously with the immigrant country or when they go for trade or business and accepts law & order of that particular country. Indian history is twisted by many historians from different rulers according to their own favor however one noticeable fact is when Britain invaded/rules India they didn't destroyed temples, razed idols, raped women and killed innocent* to the ground unlike every other Islamist invaders done "with cruelty". But after Independence if we compare both era then ofc. British rule was not as bad compare to those mogul rulers. I am not favoring one over other but trying to point out that its un-matched cruelty whenever any kind of Islamic terrorism overcome to anything. *with few exceptions.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
THe problem is islam. Just that. It is them. They dont want to integrate. They want to dominate, to take over, to subjugate.
I would slightly differ here, not everyone from Islam is same but those who quotes Quran for their hate speech and misguides innocent and make them terrorist are the real culprits.
You can have all the tools in the world but if you don't genuinely believe in yourself, it's useless.
As I have said before Britain's empire was not about imposing its culture on others, but about trade, so while the SPanish converted the americans into spanish speaking catholics the British didnt in India. In fact Britain picked up a lot of Indian culture. In the early days inter marriage was very common, and Indian fabrics and paterns became very popular. The Paisley pattern for example, is Indian. And as for food... Britain has had a love affair with Indian food for a long time, and it is part of British culture these days. >not everyone from Islam is same Yes, there are some 'good' muslims, but are they true muslims? If they dont want to kill apostates, gays, and infidels they cant be true muslims, because that is exactly what their book tells them to do. SO what I have proposed in the past, to muslims, is that in Europe they police themselves. The guy looked at me with a totally blank face, he had no idea what I meant. They have to create a European Islam, one that is compatible with western values, in exactly the same way the various christian churches have had to in order to survive. And it needs a central muslim authourity in Europe to dictate who is allowed to be an imam, what rules they are to follow, etc. If not, they have to leave. To remain causes both sides stress, so different are their views.
-
God be with the victims and their families. Hope you guys learn that you have really big fucking problems right now with no solutions in site, and your governments are to blame.
I don't know where you're from, but I assume that you have the same f***ing problems, too. And I also assume you're producing more greenhouse gases. Oops, I just farted.
I'm gonna build a wall around my cubical and make Mexico pay for it!
-
> They are not citizens of those nations and those nations have absolutely 0 responsibility to take them in They regularly travelling to those countries, often to arranged marriages, or to family events. Theses countries have no problems with this [^] Their links and associations with those countries are very strong. Many maintain dual nationality. And we are already deporting UK pakistani criminals: Asian sex abusers to be stripped of UK citizenship and deported | The Independent[^] > In the US, we embrace the differing cultures into our community And you think we dont ion Europe? 1970s ska music - Recherche Google[^] Muslims chose to isolate themselves in Europe, forming ghettos of their own making. > This is a fallacy. You are in fact segregated The US is more racially segregated than Europe it would appear. Our 21st-century segregation: we're still divided by race | Reniqua Allen | Opinion | The Guardian[^] Let me refer you again to the late 1970s wave of Ska/Two Tone music that swept the UK and was a mix of black and white culture that grew up in the tower blocks and housing estates (projects you call them). This is very much not segregation. > you just have fewer minorities than the US You are wrong. France has a h
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Many maintain dual nationality.
And that is the ONLY case where that works. Otherwise you can NOT ask a sovereign nation to take your criminals.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Muslims chose to isolate themselves in Europe, forming ghettos of their own making.
No. You think they were given a choice. If they are not given proper economic support to seek other living, they have no choice but to group into large communities.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
The US is more racially segregated than Europe it would appear. Our 21st-century segregation: we're still divided by race | Reniqua Allen | Opinion | The Guardian[^]
An opinion article claiming "we are still segregated" does not mean the US is more segregated than your minorities are.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
You are wrong. France has a high vietnamese population, as well as Senegalese, Ivory Coast, and Mali black population. The UK has high chinese and pakistani populations. Germany has high turkish populations.
This does not equate to more....
Munchies_Matt wrote:
The US has 0.8% muslim population.
False. It is 6% of the population. Not sure where you got that number from but a simple search will show you that your number is wrong.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Small in number, and only, according to your link, "only five to ten percent of all Arab immigrants were Muslim".
OMG dude, do you just constantly make crap up to make your argument???
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Many maintain dual nationality.
And that is the ONLY case where that works. Otherwise you can NOT ask a sovereign nation to take your criminals.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Muslims chose to isolate themselves in Europe, forming ghettos of their own making.
No. You think they were given a choice. If they are not given proper economic support to seek other living, they have no choice but to group into large communities.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
The US is more racially segregated than Europe it would appear. Our 21st-century segregation: we're still divided by race | Reniqua Allen | Opinion | The Guardian[^]
An opinion article claiming "we are still segregated" does not mean the US is more segregated than your minorities are.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
You are wrong. France has a high vietnamese population, as well as Senegalese, Ivory Coast, and Mali black population. The UK has high chinese and pakistani populations. Germany has high turkish populations.
This does not equate to more....
Munchies_Matt wrote:
The US has 0.8% muslim population.
False. It is 6% of the population. Not sure where you got that number from but a simple search will show you that your number is wrong.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Small in number, and only, according to your link, "only five to ten percent of all Arab immigrants were Muslim".
OMG dude, do you just constantly make crap up to make your argument???
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
>If they are not given proper economic support They get more of the state in benefits than any other group. Perhaps that is the problem, we should give them NO support then they might stand on their own two feet. > False. It is 6% Even this says 1% muslim population of the us - Recherche Google[^] >OMG dude, do you just constantly make crap up to make your argument From YOUR LINK! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Really, you have no idea what you are talking about. You dont know what the muslim population of the US or the content of links you give to support your argument.
-
>If they are not given proper economic support They get more of the state in benefits than any other group. Perhaps that is the problem, we should give them NO support then they might stand on their own two feet. > False. It is 6% Even this says 1% muslim population of the us - Recherche Google[^] >OMG dude, do you just constantly make crap up to make your argument From YOUR LINK! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Really, you have no idea what you are talking about. You dont know what the muslim population of the US or the content of links you give to support your argument.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
They get more of the state in benefits than any other group.
Seems like you just keep making stuff up.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
> False. It is 6% Even this says 1% muslim population of the us - Recherche Google[^]
I stand correctedc. I meant 6 mil which is the correct number. %s are pointless if your mass pop is different. [Portraits Of Ordinary Muslims - United States | Muslims | FRONTLINE | PBS](http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/muslims/portraits/us.html)
Munchies_Matt wrote:
You dont know what the muslim population of the US or the content of links you give to support your argument.
Yes I do. I used a symbol mistakenly. You, however are just spewing garbage.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
They get more of the state in benefits than any other group.
Seems like you just keep making stuff up.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
> False. It is 6% Even this says 1% muslim population of the us - Recherche Google[^]
I stand correctedc. I meant 6 mil which is the correct number. %s are pointless if your mass pop is different. [Portraits Of Ordinary Muslims - United States | Muslims | FRONTLINE | PBS](http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/muslims/portraits/us.html)
Munchies_Matt wrote:
You dont know what the muslim population of the US or the content of links you give to support your argument.
Yes I do. I used a symbol mistakenly. You, however are just spewing garbage.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
>Seems like you just keep making stuff up. Wrong again: UK: low income and ethnicity - The Poverty Site[^] "The proportion of people who live in low-income households is: 20% for White people. 30% for Indians and Black Caribbeans. 50% for Black Africans. 60% for Pakistanis. 70% for Bangladeshis." The last two are muslims. This is a give away: those of Indian origin, for instance, get 8% of their income from the state in the form of benefits, state pension and tax credits, those describing their ethnicity as Pakistani or Bangladeshi receive 29% of their income in various forms of state aid.[^] Hindus vs muslims. And you seriously think this is due to the actions in some way of white people? You have absoloutely no evidence whatsoever to support your ridiculous claim that white people are intentionally repressing muslims and forcing them to live in ghettos. You think the US is so much better because you dont have the violence we do in europe despite the fact that: 1) Your muslim population is tiny compared to europe 2) You havent had muslims in the US as long as europe in sizeable polulations 3) Because your muslim population is tiny they cant form ghettos Well wake up would you and stop any more coming in before they DO get big enough to form ghettos and start getting angry.
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
They get more of the state in benefits than any other group.
Seems like you just keep making stuff up.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
> False. It is 6% Even this says 1% muslim population of the us - Recherche Google[^]
I stand correctedc. I meant 6 mil which is the correct number. %s are pointless if your mass pop is different. [Portraits Of Ordinary Muslims - United States | Muslims | FRONTLINE | PBS](http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/muslims/portraits/us.html)
Munchies_Matt wrote:
You dont know what the muslim population of the US or the content of links you give to support your argument.
Yes I do. I used a symbol mistakenly. You, however are just spewing garbage.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
Family Security Matters[^] ""As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country it will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone...." Here is where it becomes interesting. Note throughout the exponential scale of Islamic influence as the percentage of Muslim population per country increases. Comments in square brackets are my corrective interjections. United States: 1.0 Australia: 1.5 Canada: 1.9 China: 1.0-2.0 Italy: 1.5 Norway: 1.8 "At 2% and 3% they [Muslims] begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs." Denmark: 2.0 Germany: 3.7 United Kingdom: 2.7 Spain: 4.0 Italy: 4.6 "From 5% on they [Muslims] exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal ("clean" by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves - along with threats for failure to comply (United States)." France: 8.0 Philippines: 5.0 Sweden: 5.0 Switzerland: 4.3 The Netherlands: 5.5 Trinidad & Tobago: 5.8 "At this point, they [Muslims] will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, or Islamic law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world. "When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris - car burning). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam, Denmark - Mohammed cartoons, murder of Theo van Gogh)." Guyana: 10.0 India: 13.4 Israel: 16.0 Kenya: 10.0 Russia: 10.0-15.0 The one anomaly in this set of statistics is Israel, which has not experienced uprisings and threats of violence. Its Arab or Muslim population enjoys equal political rights with Jewish Israelis. The suicide bombings and rocket attacks that have killed hundreds have been perpetrated by outsiders. "After reaching 20% [of a population] expect hair-trigger rioting, Jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning: Ethiopia: 32.8 "After 40% you will find widespread
