Infinite Universe?
-
You seem to be dodging the question. ;)
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Assuming the Universe is infinite then the number of stars in said Universe must also be infinite and therefore the number of planets orbiting said stars, that can support human-like life, is infinite and therefore the chance of there being at least one other human-like civilisation is infinitely close to 1. Therefore, do you think they would all have developed a Windows 10 O/S?
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
Thats, just like Drakes equation, full of assumptions. And like Drake, you are being rather optimistic. We already know that there is no sign of intelligent life in the observable universe. So, we have to consider the possibility that we are living on the first planet with some form of life. ..in which case we could refer to Windows 10 as "the prime evil" :rolleyes:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
-
Richard Deeming wrote:
Since we can't even see beyond our "tiny" little 91 billion...
And this was actually my entire point. No way to know. Except, most "scientists" and mathematicians believe there is a limit to everything (energy) -- except philosophical debates. :) And if what you say is right then why so much confidence in what Stephen Hawking or Brian Greene or Michio Kaku say? I know as much as they do. :laugh:
raddevus wrote:
And if what you say is right then why so much confidence in what Stephen Hawking or Brian Greene or Michio Kaku say? I know as much as they do.
Yes, but they know some extremely long technical words they can use to explain it! :-D
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
raddevus wrote:
And if what you say is right then why so much confidence in what Stephen Hawking or Brian Greene or Michio Kaku say? I know as much as they do.
Yes, but they know some extremely long technical words they can use to explain it! :-D
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
RyanDev wrote:
Then where does it end and what's on the other side?
That was exactly the point I was driving at. And, I'm sure you are asking that question rhetorically. However, let us continue this line of thought. The fact that you cannot fathom what is on the other side does not preclude it and infinity is, of course, in a physical world, impossible. Here's your thought experiment to understand why infinity is impossible in a physical world. Thought Experiment Imagine you have a sidewalk that extends through your infinite Universe. You are walking on the sidewalk. Uh, it just continues forever? What would that mean? It's not possible. It's impossible since we know that even the energy (thus mass) is of a limited quantity in the Universe. Now, that gets you to a point where you absolutely must decide that the Universe (physical reality) has limitations. The hard part is that you will now have to confront that reality (few people do and fewer want to) and decide that you now know that physicality cannot be the only thing. Since the Universe cannot be infinite, there has to be an end somewhere. That means you must now contemplate what that means. :) Good discussion. And, I'm sure it's not done. :rolleyes:
raddevus wrote:
we know that even the energy (thus mass) is of a limited quantity in the Universe.
That is not known, unless you use the zero-energy universe hypothesis, but then it doesn't limit the amount of mass either since the net amount of energy is independent of the amount of stuff.
-
raddevus wrote:
And if what you say is right then why so much confidence in what Stephen Hawking or Brian Greene or Michio Kaku say? I know as much as they do.
Yes, but they know some extremely long technical words they can use to explain it! :-D
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
Supercalifragilisticoespialidoso?
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
raddevus wrote:
The Universe cannot be infinite
Then where does it end and what's on the other side?
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
The universe could be infinite... Or it could just loop on itself like a circle.. or the surface of a doughnut....
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
The universe could be infinite... Or it could just loop on itself like a circle.. or the surface of a doughnut....
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
Super Lloyd wrote:
or the surface of a doughnut....
So when we find the end of the universe the other side will be the counter of a bakery?
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
RyanDev wrote:
Then where does it end and what's on the other side?
That was exactly the point I was driving at. And, I'm sure you are asking that question rhetorically. However, let us continue this line of thought. The fact that you cannot fathom what is on the other side does not preclude it and infinity is, of course, in a physical world, impossible. Here's your thought experiment to understand why infinity is impossible in a physical world. Thought Experiment Imagine you have a sidewalk that extends through your infinite Universe. You are walking on the sidewalk. Uh, it just continues forever? What would that mean? It's not possible. It's impossible since we know that even the energy (thus mass) is of a limited quantity in the Universe. Now, that gets you to a point where you absolutely must decide that the Universe (physical reality) has limitations. The hard part is that you will now have to confront that reality (few people do and fewer want to) and decide that you now know that physicality cannot be the only thing. Since the Universe cannot be infinite, there has to be an end somewhere. That means you must now contemplate what that means. :) Good discussion. And, I'm sure it's not done. :rolleyes:
The inability to form an infinite sidewalk from a finite amount of matter doesn't prove the universe to be finite.
-
Supercalifragilisticoespialidoso?
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
If you say it loud enough, we won't notice that you spelt it wrong! :laugh:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
raddevus wrote:
science cannot deal with infinite.
The sum of all positive integer numbers from 1 to infinity is -1/12. Proven by science :)
F-ES Sitecore wrote:
The sum of all positive integer numbers from 1 to infinity is -1/12. Proven by science
When I was a kid, I wanted to see what the largest integer the PDP-11 could count to. Then I wondered what happened when you added 1 to that. It was amusing to discover that I then found the smallest negative number. Marc
Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
-
The inability to form an infinite sidewalk from a finite amount of matter doesn't prove the universe to be finite.
I know. I was providing something for you to walk on. The point is if you could travel faster than the speed of light toward the end of the Universe then at some point all energy would be exhausted (not from travel but from the limit naturally created by an end of energy and you'd be at the end of the Universe. A physical thing must have an end -- a physical thing without an end is only theoretical. That is why we call it physical and not metaphysical. And I'm not saying that only in theory does the Universe end, I'm saying in fact it does because it is a physical object (we physical objects know this and study this and have our existence in a physical Universe). The instant you say the Universe is otherwise is the same instant it becomes non-physical and my final point then is that "all bets are off". So, the Universe (as studied by Scientists,Philosophers and Mathematicians) is a physical beast and as such has a limit and so has an end. Now you've heard the end of this discussion. :) Since, I've decided I am right. Yes, I'm kidding, but I do think what I've said makes sense. The Universe, if physical -- and it is, must have a limit. And if it isn't physical, then we aren't either. :laugh:
-
raddevus wrote:
we know that even the energy (thus mass) is of a limited quantity in the Universe.
That is not known, unless you use the zero-energy universe hypothesis, but then it doesn't limit the amount of mass either since the net amount of energy is independent of the amount of stuff.
I'm saying something much more important here. I'm saying that the Universe is physical. If it isn't then we are talking about something that could even be an intelligence and then forget about understanding anything. I'm saying that since the Universe is physical and we are physical then it has a limit. An infinite anything instantly goes beyond physical and instantly becomes metaphysical and we cannot even hope to begin to study it. So, if we are going to believe in a mechanical Universe then it has a limit. If it has a limit then what is on the other sides? That is the real question. If it doesn't have a limit (if it were infinite) then it is not mechanical and physical.
-
Super Lloyd wrote:
or the surface of a doughnut....
So when we find the end of the universe the other side will be the counter of a bakery?
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Imagine you are an ant on the surface of the doughnut.... What do you find at the end of the doughnut? where is the end? what is the sound of one handed man clapping?
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
Imagine you are an ant on the surface of the doughnut.... What do you find at the end of the doughnut? where is the end? what is the sound of one handed man clapping?
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
Super Lloyd wrote:
Imagine you are an ant on the surface of the doughnut.... What do you find at the end of the doughnut?
I see empty space above the doughnut. But perception does not change reality in this case.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
I know. I was providing something for you to walk on. The point is if you could travel faster than the speed of light toward the end of the Universe then at some point all energy would be exhausted (not from travel but from the limit naturally created by an end of energy and you'd be at the end of the Universe. A physical thing must have an end -- a physical thing without an end is only theoretical. That is why we call it physical and not metaphysical. And I'm not saying that only in theory does the Universe end, I'm saying in fact it does because it is a physical object (we physical objects know this and study this and have our existence in a physical Universe). The instant you say the Universe is otherwise is the same instant it becomes non-physical and my final point then is that "all bets are off". So, the Universe (as studied by Scientists,Philosophers and Mathematicians) is a physical beast and as such has a limit and so has an end. Now you've heard the end of this discussion. :) Since, I've decided I am right. Yes, I'm kidding, but I do think what I've said makes sense. The Universe, if physical -- and it is, must have a limit. And if it isn't physical, then we aren't either. :laugh:
Let me see if I've understood your argument:
- We are physical;
- The universe is physical;
- We have a finite size;
- Therefore, the universe must have a finite size.
Is that an accurate summary? Because if it is, I could replace "finite size" with "bumhole", and the argument starts to look rather silly. :laugh:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
Imagine you are an ant on the surface of the doughnut.... What do you find at the end of the doughnut? where is the end? what is the sound of one handed man clapping?
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
Super Lloyd wrote:
what is the sound of one handed man clapping?
Piece of cake[^]! :-D
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
Thats, just like Drakes equation, full of assumptions. And like Drake, you are being rather optimistic. We already know that there is no sign of intelligent life in the observable universe. So, we have to consider the possibility that we are living on the first planet with some form of life. ..in which case we could refer to Windows 10 as "the prime evil" :rolleyes:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
-
Let me see if I've understood your argument:
- We are physical;
- The universe is physical;
- We have a finite size;
- Therefore, the universe must have a finite size.
Is that an accurate summary? Because if it is, I could replace "finite size" with "bumhole", and the argument starts to look rather silly. :laugh:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
No. I'm saying, The Universe is physical and mechanical, therefore finite. I believe that most of your major scientists believe this too. They speak of "almost" infinite but never infinite. I don't believe anyone other than school children actually believe in any physical object that is infinite. Infinite is just a concept, but not reality in the mechanical universe. All physical (non-philosophical conceptual) things have limits. That's all my point is.
-
I'm saying something much more important here. I'm saying that the Universe is physical. If it isn't then we are talking about something that could even be an intelligence and then forget about understanding anything. I'm saying that since the Universe is physical and we are physical then it has a limit. An infinite anything instantly goes beyond physical and instantly becomes metaphysical and we cannot even hope to begin to study it. So, if we are going to believe in a mechanical Universe then it has a limit. If it has a limit then what is on the other sides? That is the real question. If it doesn't have a limit (if it were infinite) then it is not mechanical and physical.
The rule is that measurable quantities cannot be infinite, but an infinite universe doesn't have a proper size let alone a measurable size. There is no contradiction here, an infinite universe can be physical. Whether talking about "the other side" even makes sense depends on the nature of the finiteness
