Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Programming Euphemisms

Programming Euphemisms

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
29 Posts 18 Posters 29 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jacquers

    Heard a nice one today: Explicitly Configured (hard-coded) :)

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jeremy Falcon
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Here's one... how about Optimized (finally fixed the damn thing from being a memory hog during the POC phase, removing old commented out code, etc.)

    Jeremy Falcon

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jeremy Falcon

      :laugh: Clearly, we've both seen the same kinda databases before.

      Jeremy Falcon

      C Offline
      C Offline
      CodeWraith
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Not only databases. It gets really sick when something like this appears in the code:

      (somecontrol.text = float.Parse(x) * float.Parse(y)).ToString();

      x and y are strings, of course. Th use of float.parse() can fail any time when the strings can't be parsed, no checks or a try/catch block. The text property of the control of course also serves as stringly typed storage for the calclated value. And that's only the beginning of the horrors in that ASP.Net web form.

      I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this. Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is

      J N J 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • C CodeWraith

        Not only databases. It gets really sick when something like this appears in the code:

        (somecontrol.text = float.Parse(x) * float.Parse(y)).ToString();

        x and y are strings, of course. Th use of float.parse() can fail any time when the strings can't be parsed, no checks or a try/catch block. The text property of the control of course also serves as stringly typed storage for the calclated value. And that's only the beginning of the horrors in that ASP.Net web form.

        I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this. Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jeremy Falcon
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        About the only logical explanation I can come up with is if they're using like a web service that only has strings for data. Outside of that... :wtf:

        Jeremy Falcon

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Jeremy Falcon

          About the only logical explanation I can come up with is if they're using like a web service that only has strings for data. Outside of that... :wtf:

          Jeremy Falcon

          C Offline
          C Offline
          CodeWraith
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          Some people never really get what types are all about. This particular guy would have been insulted after such unwarranted criticism. He was one of those who could recite every rule and convention there may be and believes that everything is well as long as these rules are observed. Who needs to think when some guru already has done that and packaged his wisdom in rules and conventions?

          I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this. Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C CodeWraith

            Some people never really get what types are all about. This particular guy would have been insulted after such unwarranted criticism. He was one of those who could recite every rule and convention there may be and believes that everything is well as long as these rules are observed. Who needs to think when some guru already has done that and packaged his wisdom in rules and conventions?

            I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this. Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jeremy Falcon
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Common sense ain't so common man.

            Jeremy Falcon

            C K I 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • J Jeremy Falcon

              Common sense ain't so common man.

              Jeremy Falcon

              C Offline
              C Offline
              CodeWraith
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              I have seen that before. In some companies it's the standard procedure to reduce the code monkeys to better typists and keep them in line with rules and conventions. What do you think happens when you try to give one of those poor guys room to think for themselves?

              I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this. Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C CodeWraith

                I have seen that before. In some companies it's the standard procedure to reduce the code monkeys to better typists and keep them in line with rules and conventions. What do you think happens when you try to give one of those poor guys room to think for themselves?

                I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this. Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Mycroft Holmes
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                CodeWraith wrote:

                What do you think happens when you try to give one of those poor guys room to think for themselves

                I have just heard the exact opposite - outsourced project to Hyderabad and the PM is bitching that the "developers" can't think for themselves and need to be spoon fed every decision. She now knows the difference between a developer and a code monkey.

                Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

                J I 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • M Mycroft Holmes

                  CodeWraith wrote:

                  What do you think happens when you try to give one of those poor guys room to think for themselves

                  I have just heard the exact opposite - outsourced project to Hyderabad and the PM is bitching that the "developers" can't think for themselves and need to be spoon fed every decision. She now knows the difference between a developer and a code monkey.

                  Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jeremy Falcon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Mycroft Holmes wrote:

                  She now knows the difference between a developer and a code monkey.

                  Yup. In my view a code monkey knows one thing and one thing only... code. <robot_voice>Must... compute... X... Y... Z</robot_voice> And has very little understanding about people, teams, being a good leader or a good follower, how to play poker, anything at all really besides just code.

                  Jeremy Falcon

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jacquers

                    Heard a nice one today: Explicitly Configured (hard-coded) :)

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Roger Wright
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    What character flaw drives some people to create new terms to describe things which are already perfectly well described by existing - and usually simpler - terms? Will Rogers never met me.

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C CodeWraith

                      Not only databases. It gets really sick when something like this appears in the code:

                      (somecontrol.text = float.Parse(x) * float.Parse(y)).ToString();

                      x and y are strings, of course. Th use of float.parse() can fail any time when the strings can't be parsed, no checks or a try/catch block. The text property of the control of course also serves as stringly typed storage for the calclated value. And that's only the beginning of the horrors in that ASP.Net web form.

                      I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this. Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Nathan Minier
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      I think I've worked with that guy. Or maybe there's just a bunch of them :sigh:

                      "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Roger Wright

                        What character flaw drives some people to create new terms to describe things which are already perfectly well described by existing - and usually simpler - terms? Will Rogers never met me.

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        MKJCP
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Misguided creativity and/or a need to be right and/or a need to sugar coat the truth?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Jacquers

                          Heard a nice one today: Explicitly Configured (hard-coded) :)

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Marc Clifton
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          Agile : no spec, no documentation, no schedule, bill until the customer/project runs out of money. Sprint : Work feverishly for a week, then move the uncompleted tasks back into the queue for a future sprint. Iterate by making tasks smaller and sprints longer. Stand-up : Group therapy -- feel good about what little you got done, feel enthusiastic about what grand things you plan on getting done, hug at the end. Scrum : same as a stand-up but more sweat from unbathed coders coming off their sprint, ra-ra enthusiasm from management, and project paraphernalia on display - mugs, T-shirts mainly. Marc

                          Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Nathan Minier

                            I think I've worked with that guy. Or maybe there's just a bunch of them :sigh:

                            "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            CodeWraith
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            There sure are more of them than we think. The poor guys have been used as code monkeys and stuffed full with rules and conventions. Then, when they finally invented something on their own, they are proud of their unique solution and don't waste any time on thinking about why nobody else does it quite this way. At least not until some wise guy comes along and declares the grand idea to be a code horror. Then they fall back to their old line of defense, which would be patterns, rules and conventions. If you don't break any rules, your solution can't possibly be bad.

                            I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this. Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Jeremy Falcon

                              Common sense ain't so common man.

                              Jeremy Falcon

                              K Offline
                              K Offline
                              KC CahabaGBA
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C CodeWraith

                                Almost as good as 'stringly typed' (when string is used as universal datatype for everything).

                                I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this. Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is

                                T Offline
                                T Offline
                                TNCaver
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                varchar(50), to be precise.

                                If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Mycroft Holmes

                                  CodeWraith wrote:

                                  What do you think happens when you try to give one of those poor guys room to think for themselves

                                  I have just heard the exact opposite - outsourced project to Hyderabad and the PM is bitching that the "developers" can't think for themselves and need to be spoon fed every decision. She now knows the difference between a developer and a code monkey.

                                  Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

                                  I Offline
                                  I Offline
                                  Is_VYFHD_in_use
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  "To a boy with a hammer, the whole world looks like a nail".

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J Jacquers

                                    Heard a nice one today: Explicitly Configured (hard-coded) :)

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    Timeline adjustment

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J Jeremy Falcon

                                      :laugh: Clearly, we've both seen the same kinda databases before.

                                      Jeremy Falcon

                                      I Offline
                                      I Offline
                                      irneb
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #24

                                      You mean those with the Json/XML/whatnot backing? As if they're "proud" to convert back-n-forth with this "stringly typed".

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J Jeremy Falcon

                                        Common sense ain't so common man.

                                        Jeremy Falcon

                                        I Offline
                                        I Offline
                                        irneb
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        Jeremy Falcon wrote:

                                        Common sense ain't so common man.

                                        Heard it a different way: Common sense ... the curse in disguise: Because if you have it, you're doomed to live with those that don't!

                                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • D Daniel Pfeffer

                                          I would say that the programmer who did that needs some percussive maintenance (AKA a slap upside the head). :)

                                          If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

                                          I Offline
                                          I Offline
                                          irneb
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          Over here it's called a "Stupid Stick".

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups