Book Recommendation
-
Which books would you recommend to someone who is novice to programming and have interest to dive in to the world of software development. I am specifically asking for .NET Technologies.
-
Which books would you recommend to someone who is novice to programming and have interest to dive in to the world of software development. I am specifically asking for .NET Technologies.
Ehsan Sajjad wrote:
I am specifically asking for .NET Technologies.
Too bad. I would have recommended the Harry Potter books, but wizardry is more useful in the javascript/jquery area... :doh:
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain -
Which books would you recommend to someone who is novice to programming and have interest to dive in to the world of software development. I am specifically asking for .NET Technologies.
Any of the Addison Wesley / Wrox / Microsoft Press C# books - they start simply, and build up to the complex stuff.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
Which books would you recommend to someone who is novice to programming and have interest to dive in to the world of software development. I am specifically asking for .NET Technologies.
This is not an answer, it is just a reflection... Is it this person that wants .NET or is it your idea? Personally I would recommend building programming knowledge on a solid foundation from the ground up. With a language that does not need specific frameworks and IDEs. I have seen even experienced Java coders with very vague understand of what a stack is, makes me a tad sad. But maybe that is just me. :cool:
... such stuff as dreams are made on
-
Which books would you recommend to someone who is novice to programming and have interest to dive in to the world of software development. I am specifically asking for .NET Technologies.
Not really beginners stuff, but the "C# in a nutshell" series from O'Reilly by Albahari is amongst my favourites: C# 7.0 in a Nutshell - About the Book[^]
-
This is not an answer, it is just a reflection... Is it this person that wants .NET or is it your idea? Personally I would recommend building programming knowledge on a solid foundation from the ground up. With a language that does not need specific frameworks and IDEs. I have seen even experienced Java coders with very vague understand of what a stack is, makes me a tad sad. But maybe that is just me. :cool:
... such stuff as dreams are made on
-
Not really beginners stuff, but the "C# in a nutshell" series from O'Reilly by Albahari is amongst my favourites: C# 7.0 in a Nutshell - About the Book[^]
That was in my mind too, but i thought it might look little complex to someone who is novice to programming
-
Which books would you recommend to someone who is novice to programming and have interest to dive in to the world of software development. I am specifically asking for .NET Technologies.
Google. It's free.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
Google. It's free.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013yes but for a student i would prefer him to first do some reading
-
That was in my mind too, but i thought it might look little complex to someone who is novice to programming
Then I suggest you follow some entry level course first (it should be possible to follow only slect courses at the local university without fully enrolling) because programming is first of all a forma mentis [literal: shape of the mind], a way to think, dissect and solve problems. It requires a lot of exercise and a bit of tutoring helps, epsecially with ome formal knowledge.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
-
This is not an answer, it is just a reflection... Is it this person that wants .NET or is it your idea? Personally I would recommend building programming knowledge on a solid foundation from the ground up. With a language that does not need specific frameworks and IDEs. I have seen even experienced Java coders with very vague understand of what a stack is, makes me a tad sad. But maybe that is just me. :cool:
... such stuff as dreams are made on
megaadam wrote:
This is not an answer, it is just a reflection...
He's a novice. I don't think he should START OUT with reflection. Surely, that can come later... ;P
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain -
Which books would you recommend to someone who is novice to programming and have interest to dive in to the world of software development. I am specifically asking for .NET Technologies.
Along with my previous suggestion of following some formal courses, if you can't or don't want and you are starting from zero following the self taught way, I suggest you Teach Yourself the C# Language in 21 Days, SAMS publishing. I do not have any experience with that specific book but at the time I used the VB6 edition. It is not the best way to learn and will yield only mediocre results without a more abstract knowledge of programming itself but I managed to learn how to program (very badly but usually getting the results I wanted) aged 14.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
-
This is not an answer, it is just a reflection... Is it this person that wants .NET or is it your idea? Personally I would recommend building programming knowledge on a solid foundation from the ground up. With a language that does not need specific frameworks and IDEs. I have seen even experienced Java coders with very vague understand of what a stack is, makes me a tad sad. But maybe that is just me. :cool:
... such stuff as dreams are made on
-
Which books would you recommend to someone who is novice to programming and have interest to dive in to the world of software development. I am specifically asking for .NET Technologies.
TutorialsPoint has some nice online tutorials, e.g. C# Tutorial[^] Bit dated, they use VS2010, but a good introduction to C#, they even have an online IDE to dabble in.
-
Which books would you recommend to someone who is novice to programming and have interest to dive in to the world of software development. I am specifically asking for .NET Technologies.
I personally found "CLR via C# 4th Edition" very helpfull.
"Coming soon"
-
I personally found "CLR via C# 4th Edition" very helpfull.
"Coming soon"
-
Along with my previous suggestion of following some formal courses, if you can't or don't want and you are starting from zero following the self taught way, I suggest you Teach Yourself the C# Language in 21 Days, SAMS publishing. I do not have any experience with that specific book but at the time I used the VB6 edition. It is not the best way to learn and will yield only mediocre results without a more abstract knowledge of programming itself but I managed to learn how to program (very badly but usually getting the results I wanted) aged 14.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
den2k88 wrote:
I managed to learn how to program (very badly but usually getting the results I wanted)
It's like that for all of us. You can't expect to code perfectly from the beginning. I have noticed that the quality of my code has improved steadily over the years as I have learnt new best code practices from every project I've been involved in.
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain -
den2k88 wrote:
I managed to learn how to program (very badly but usually getting the results I wanted)
It's like that for all of us. You can't expect to code perfectly from the beginning. I have noticed that the quality of my code has improved steadily over the years as I have learnt new best code practices from every project I've been involved in.
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark TwainAye but the difference in thought pattern I experienced from self taught to formally taught was amazing - so much that it later made me choose Computer Engineering instead of Computer Science due to the stronger focus on thought pattern and problem solving. Then I started working and my code and solutions improved dramatically over the years and are improving more and more with each project.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
-
Aye but the difference in thought pattern I experienced from self taught to formally taught was amazing - so much that it later made me choose Computer Engineering instead of Computer Science due to the stronger focus on thought pattern and problem solving. Then I started working and my code and solutions improved dramatically over the years and are improving more and more with each project.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
Cool. I think I've always had the correct thought pattern. For me, the code quality improvements have mostly come from knowing what can be done, how you do it in the best way, what functionality your chosen frameworks have to offer and what technologies to use. In the beginning, I would do something that may have worked, in a strange and complicated way simply because I didn't know that a better and easier way existed. The how-to knowledge comes from experience over time, but also from sharing ideas with your fellow collegues. Nobody knows everything about everything... :-D I shudder when I look at code I wrote 10 years ago (in the cases where I actually understand what it does and remember that it WAS in fact I who wrote it and not a five year old on drugs) :~
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain -
Not really beginners stuff, but the "C# in a nutshell" series from O'Reilly by Albahari is amongst my favourites: C# 7.0 in a Nutshell - About the Book[^]
I got quite a bit out "HeadFirst C#) while I was teaching myself C#. Head First C#, 3rd Edition - O'Reilly Media[^] I was already a proficient C/C++ programmer so I don't claim I was a total newb. My first C book was "The C Programming language" by Kernighan and Ritchie (original edition, yes I am pre-dirt). I am a huge fan of the Steve Oualline's work also. His Practical C Programming and Practical C++ Programming were very helpful to me in my progression. Horribly obsolete from a toolchain standpoint, but his explanations of the languages themselves (at least as they were in the 90's) are extremely clear and logical.
