Assault weapons
-
Assault weapons need to be illegal, period. Let's at least start there. And no, it's not a slippery slope, at least I hope not.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The 2nd amendment is specifically about military style weapons. You go hunting with a gun, you go to war with arms. And militias go to war not hunting. And tell me, what article of the constitution gives the federal government the power to regulate guns or arms? I'll tell you, THERE ISN'T ONE, and the 2nd amendment expressly prohibits it.
-
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The 2nd amendment is specifically about military style weapons. You go hunting with a gun, you go to war with arms. And militias go to war not hunting. And tell me, what article of the constitution gives the federal government the power to regulate guns or arms? I'll tell you, THERE ISN'T ONE, and the 2nd amendment expressly prohibits it.
dlhale wrote:
about military style weapons.
Then based on your argument we should be all stocking up on jets, tanks, and drones, not wimpy little assault rifles.
dlhale wrote:
I'll tell you, THERE ISN'T ONE, and the 2nd amendment expressly prohibits it.
Thank you Captain Obvious. :rolleyes: :doh:
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
-
We had laws that allowed people to own guns. What's the difference? Oh right...constitutions can't be amended so the second amendment can't ever be undone :doh:
-
Not own guns... but rather bear arms. Consider the difference between a gun (sporting/hunting) and arms (military weapons). Just saying, you are redefining the Constitution for your own agenda and thinking that is not a slippery sloe. The same thing is being done with Freedom of Religion being redefined, and even Freedom of Speech - both of which are much more important to me. But I am not naive enough to think the whole issue isn't related.
Pualee wrote:
Not own guns... but rather bear arms. Consider the difference between a gun (sporting/hunting) and arms (military weapons).
No rather you are redefining it to yours. What was the difference when the Constitution was created? They were talking about the most up to date weapons that existed then. And that included the private ownership of cannons and gunships. Yes, Privateers Mattered | U.S. Naval Institute[^]
-
Define an assault weapon.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
den2k88 wrote:
Define an assault weapon.
Go into a store that sells a large selection. Ask for a recommendation for an assault weapon that one can own legally. They will be more than happy to provide a large choice of options for you to considered. However that is only what they carry so you might want to shop around. Also buy some magazines. You should be able to find a number that either are specifically about assault weapons or carry articles on them.
-
dlhale wrote:
about military style weapons.
Then based on your argument we should be all stocking up on jets, tanks, and drones, not wimpy little assault rifles.
dlhale wrote:
I'll tell you, THERE ISN'T ONE, and the 2nd amendment expressly prohibits it.
Thank you Captain Obvious. :rolleyes: :doh:
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
011111100010 wrote:
Then based on your argument we should be all stocking up on jets, tanks, and drones, not wimpy little assault rifles.
It was expected by the framers. The government could (maybe still can?) issue Letters of Marque to civilian owners of vessels, authorizing them to fight the enemy. The civilians were expected to already have, or get, all the materiel neccesary: cannons, powder, ammunition, etc. So, yeah, "military" arms in civilian hands was a thing until recently.
We won't sit down. We won't shut up. We won't go quietly away. YouTube, VidMe and My Mu[sic], Films and Windows Programs, etc. and FB
-
011111100010 wrote:
Then based on your argument we should be all stocking up on jets, tanks, and drones, not wimpy little assault rifles.
It was expected by the framers. The government could (maybe still can?) issue Letters of Marque to civilian owners of vessels, authorizing them to fight the enemy. The civilians were expected to already have, or get, all the materiel neccesary: cannons, powder, ammunition, etc. So, yeah, "military" arms in civilian hands was a thing until recently.
We won't sit down. We won't shut up. We won't go quietly away. YouTube, VidMe and My Mu[sic], Films and Windows Programs, etc. and FB
GenJerDan wrote:
So, yeah, "military" arms in civilian hands was a thing until recently.
How many tanks do you have? What about stealth bombers? Can I borrow one? :laugh: :laugh:
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
-
GenJerDan wrote:
So, yeah, "military" arms in civilian hands was a thing until recently.
How many tanks do you have? What about stealth bombers? Can I borrow one? :laugh: :laugh:
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
-
Stealth is way too expensive for me, as are tanks. Other people do have tanks, though. :p
We won't sit down. We won't shut up. We won't go quietly away. YouTube, VidMe and My Mu[sic], Films and Windows Programs, etc. and FB
-
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
There are in fact two ways to amend the Constitution
So there was no ignorance in my post ergo your first remark was kind of silly, no?
F-ES Sitecore wrote:
So there was no ignorance in my post
Didn't you say "...constitutions can't be amended so the second amendment can't ever be undone" or are you referring to a different post (where you are agreeing with John)?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles