Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Debate : Standard v Phillips (Allen, Torx)

Debate : Standard v Phillips (Allen, Torx)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
75 Posts 27 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R raddevus

    Here's the question up for debate:

    Debate

    Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

    Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

    R Offline
    R Offline
    R Giskard Reventlov
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    It's all about usage and aesthetics.

    Keep your friends close. Keep Kill your enemies closer. The End

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • realJSOPR realJSOP

      OriginalGriff wrote:

      including a number that are "tighten only"!

      I've only seen those on restroom stall doors. Ever since they started using those screws, my ability to add to my collection of restroom stall doors has pretty much stalled out.

      ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
      -----
      You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
      -----
      When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

      R Offline
      R Offline
      raddevus
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

      my ability to add to my collection of restroom stall doors

      :laugh:

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P PIEBALDconsult

        Please don't refer to it as "standard"; there is no such thing. Counterpoint: Precisely _because_ it can't be used with a power driver.

        R Offline
        R Offline
        raddevus
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Others get upset about calling them "flat head". Quick Tip: Know Your Screwdrivers (Hint: It's Not a "Flathead!") | Make:[^] :)

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • W W Balboos GHB

          I take out my Dremmel Moto-tool and cut a slot into all the stripped phillips, Torx, and Allen head screws so I can get the damn things out. That's why.

          Ravings en masse^

          "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

          "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

          R Offline
          R Offline
          raddevus
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          ah, yes, so stripping seems to be the issue. This is interesting, because that answer means that the makers are limiting you from doing things fast by adding slotted screws to their products. :rolleyes: I just think slotted screws are difficult to drive even when there is a pre-drilled hole and I use a manual screw driver -- because I get off balance with them because it is so difficult to apply even pressure as you turn a slotted screw.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

            Do you mean "Phillips", or "Posidrive"? They need different bits as the angles are different. Use the wrong one, and you will chew up the head every time... [^] Intersetignly, Posidrive was partial developed and is partly owned by ... Phillips. :laugh: There is also Torx, Allen, Robertson, ClutchDrive, and a wide range of oddball "security screws" - including a number that are "tighten only"! Slotted are cheaper to make, and are useful for "historic jobs" where they should match existing screws - except in my Mercedes where the battery is under the drivers feet and accessed via a slotted screw that opens with a coin...

            Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

            R Offline
            R Offline
            raddevus
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            OriginalGriff wrote:

            opens with a coin

            Finally, a good counterpoint on why a slotted screw might be nice. :thumbsup:

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Tim Carmichael

              The chain-tightener on my chain saw uses a 'slot' screw and I use a manual screw driver - much less chance of 'stripping' the screw and rendering a piece of equipment useless.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              raddevus
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Tim Carmichael wrote:

              less chance of 'stripping' the screw and rendering a piece of equipment useless

              That's a good point. Interesting too that they are used to limit the user's ability.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                Do you mean "Phillips", or "Posidrive"? They need different bits as the angles are different. Use the wrong one, and you will chew up the head every time... [^] Intersetignly, Posidrive was partial developed and is partly owned by ... Phillips. :laugh: There is also Torx, Allen, Robertson, ClutchDrive, and a wide range of oddball "security screws" - including a number that are "tighten only"! Slotted are cheaper to make, and are useful for "historic jobs" where they should match existing screws - except in my Mercedes where the battery is under the drivers feet and accessed via a slotted screw that opens with a coin...

                Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                R Offline
                R Offline
                raddevus
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                OriginalGriff wrote:

                Do you mean "Phillips", or "Posidrive"?

                I knew whatever I called phillips and slotted that someone would mention some other name. I did my best to look it up but it seems a lot of people refer to them as phillips. This is a good article / video: Quick Tip: Know Your Screwdrivers (Hint: It's Not a "Flathead!") | Make:[^]

                T 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R raddevus

                  Here's the question up for debate:

                  Debate

                  Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                  Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                  F Offline
                  F Offline
                  F ES Sitecore
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  That's why I always use Arthur's Head screws.

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F F ES Sitecore

                    That's why I always use Arthur's Head screws.

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    raddevus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    F-ES Sitecore wrote:

                    Arthur's Head screws

                    I'm a big King of Queens Fan but forgot about that one: Arthur invents a screwdriver - YouTube[^]

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R raddevus

                      Here's the question up for debate:

                      Debate

                      Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                      Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      dbrenth
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      When I was a kid, we undid screws with a "Standard" kitchen butter knife. Try doing that with one of those phillips-type screws. Even today, I have an amazingly hard time finding a phillips screwdriver in my home, but I know that standard screw will come out whether I have a screwdriver or not.

                      Brent

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R raddevus

                        Here's the question up for debate:

                        Debate

                        Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                        Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Rage
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        You nailed it.

                        Do not escape reality : improve reality !

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D dbrenth

                          When I was a kid, we undid screws with a "Standard" kitchen butter knife. Try doing that with one of those phillips-type screws. Even today, I have an amazingly hard time finding a phillips screwdriver in my home, but I know that standard screw will come out whether I have a screwdriver or not.

                          Brent

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          raddevus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          dbrenth wrote:

                          When I was a kid, we undid screws with a "Standard" kitchen butter knife.

                          I won't turn you in (this time), but I don't believe that is legal. Nor are you to refer to yourself as Engineer without the proper certification. :rolleyes:

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • W W Balboos GHB

                            I take out my Dremmel Moto-tool and cut a slot into all the stripped phillips, Torx, and Allen head screws so I can get the damn things out. That's why.

                            Ravings en masse^

                            "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                            "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            DRHuff
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            Use a Robertson screw. If you strip one of those you reaaaaally over-torqued it.

                            I'm pretty sure I would not like to live in a world in which I would never be offended. I am absolutely certain I don't want to live in a world in which you would never be offended. Freedom doesn't mean the absence of things you don't like. Dave

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R raddevus

                              Others get upset about calling them "flat head". Quick Tip: Know Your Screwdrivers (Hint: It's Not a "Flathead!") | Make:[^] :)

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              PIEBALDconsult
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              "(slotted screw)-driver" i.e. not "slotted-(screw driver)" It's all in the nuances.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R raddevus

                                Here's the question up for debate:

                                Debate

                                Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                                Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                RedDk
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                Simple. "Why would any modern product use a standard screw ... etc?" No modern product would use a standard screw. Any product using a standard screw is unevolved and neanderthalian. Natural selection, in it's most intelligent up- to-date form, socially darwinistic and all/etc, dictates that the evolution of the mind of the user enables this more informed buyer to make the right decision with respect to PURCHASING the engineered product that is more highly evolved. Economically, supply and demand takes over in this case. To do the math with respect to the genetic algorithm that generates the extinction of the standard screwdriver will be left to the high-minded developer who has the knowledge to implement it and test in realtime the actual blip on the radar which signals that event has really passed. In other words, extinction hasn't happened yet but venture capitalists will make sure that it does. Unless of course what you mean by "modern" is really some clock on some Roman soldiers villa wall.

                                P R 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • R RedDk

                                  Simple. "Why would any modern product use a standard screw ... etc?" No modern product would use a standard screw. Any product using a standard screw is unevolved and neanderthalian. Natural selection, in it's most intelligent up- to-date form, socially darwinistic and all/etc, dictates that the evolution of the mind of the user enables this more informed buyer to make the right decision with respect to PURCHASING the engineered product that is more highly evolved. Economically, supply and demand takes over in this case. To do the math with respect to the genetic algorithm that generates the extinction of the standard screwdriver will be left to the high-minded developer who has the knowledge to implement it and test in realtime the actual blip on the radar which signals that event has really passed. In other words, extinction hasn't happened yet but venture capitalists will make sure that it does. Unless of course what you mean by "modern" is really some clock on some Roman soldiers villa wall.

                                  P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  PIEBALDconsult
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #24

                                  Ergo, don't friggin' call it "standard"!

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R RedDk

                                    Simple. "Why would any modern product use a standard screw ... etc?" No modern product would use a standard screw. Any product using a standard screw is unevolved and neanderthalian. Natural selection, in it's most intelligent up- to-date form, socially darwinistic and all/etc, dictates that the evolution of the mind of the user enables this more informed buyer to make the right decision with respect to PURCHASING the engineered product that is more highly evolved. Economically, supply and demand takes over in this case. To do the math with respect to the genetic algorithm that generates the extinction of the standard screwdriver will be left to the high-minded developer who has the knowledge to implement it and test in realtime the actual blip on the radar which signals that event has really passed. In other words, extinction hasn't happened yet but venture capitalists will make sure that it does. Unless of course what you mean by "modern" is really some clock on some Roman soldiers villa wall.

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    raddevus
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #25

                                    I agree entirely and at least 95.2% (considering all standard deviation units). I believe this will fundamentally change AI in ways that haven't been foretold yet. No one can disagree.

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P PIEBALDconsult

                                      Ergo, don't friggin' call it "standard"!

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      raddevus
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #26

                                      PIEBALDconsult wrote:

                                      Ergo, don't friggin' call it "standard"!

                                      I believe his name is RedDk. :rolleyes:

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R raddevus

                                        I agree entirely and at least 95.2% (considering all standard deviation units). I believe this will fundamentally change AI in ways that haven't been foretold yet. No one can disagree.

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        RedDk
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #27

                                        "disagree" Ha! No matter when, there'll always be someone who'll disagree with you. Offer Geritol in copius doses and ... Bob's 'yer uncle.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          not forgetting hex, (and if you're smart you'll use wira bits for those).

                                          Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #28

                                          Lopatir wrote:

                                          not forgetting hex, (and if you're smart you'll use wira bits for those).

                                          As Griff said, Allen, the correct name for them.

                                          Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups