Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Debate : Standard v Phillips (Allen, Torx)

Debate : Standard v Phillips (Allen, Torx)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
75 Posts 27 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Tim Carmichael

    The chain-tightener on my chain saw uses a 'slot' screw and I use a manual screw driver - much less chance of 'stripping' the screw and rendering a piece of equipment useless.

    R Offline
    R Offline
    raddevus
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Tim Carmichael wrote:

    less chance of 'stripping' the screw and rendering a piece of equipment useless

    That's a good point. Interesting too that they are used to limit the user's ability.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

      Do you mean "Phillips", or "Posidrive"? They need different bits as the angles are different. Use the wrong one, and you will chew up the head every time... [^] Intersetignly, Posidrive was partial developed and is partly owned by ... Phillips. :laugh: There is also Torx, Allen, Robertson, ClutchDrive, and a wide range of oddball "security screws" - including a number that are "tighten only"! Slotted are cheaper to make, and are useful for "historic jobs" where they should match existing screws - except in my Mercedes where the battery is under the drivers feet and accessed via a slotted screw that opens with a coin...

      Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

      R Offline
      R Offline
      raddevus
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      OriginalGriff wrote:

      Do you mean "Phillips", or "Posidrive"?

      I knew whatever I called phillips and slotted that someone would mention some other name. I did my best to look it up but it seems a lot of people refer to them as phillips. This is a good article / video: Quick Tip: Know Your Screwdrivers (Hint: It's Not a "Flathead!") | Make:[^]

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R raddevus

        Here's the question up for debate:

        Debate

        Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

        Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

        F Offline
        F Offline
        F ES Sitecore
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        That's why I always use Arthur's Head screws.

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F F ES Sitecore

          That's why I always use Arthur's Head screws.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          raddevus
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          F-ES Sitecore wrote:

          Arthur's Head screws

          I'm a big King of Queens Fan but forgot about that one: Arthur invents a screwdriver - YouTube[^]

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R raddevus

            Here's the question up for debate:

            Debate

            Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

            Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

            D Offline
            D Offline
            dbrenth
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            When I was a kid, we undid screws with a "Standard" kitchen butter knife. Try doing that with one of those phillips-type screws. Even today, I have an amazingly hard time finding a phillips screwdriver in my home, but I know that standard screw will come out whether I have a screwdriver or not.

            Brent

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R raddevus

              Here's the question up for debate:

              Debate

              Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

              Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Rage
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              You nailed it.

              Do not escape reality : improve reality !

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D dbrenth

                When I was a kid, we undid screws with a "Standard" kitchen butter knife. Try doing that with one of those phillips-type screws. Even today, I have an amazingly hard time finding a phillips screwdriver in my home, but I know that standard screw will come out whether I have a screwdriver or not.

                Brent

                R Offline
                R Offline
                raddevus
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                dbrenth wrote:

                When I was a kid, we undid screws with a "Standard" kitchen butter knife.

                I won't turn you in (this time), but I don't believe that is legal. Nor are you to refer to yourself as Engineer without the proper certification. :rolleyes:

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W W Balboos GHB

                  I take out my Dremmel Moto-tool and cut a slot into all the stripped phillips, Torx, and Allen head screws so I can get the damn things out. That's why.

                  Ravings en masse^

                  "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                  "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  DRHuff
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  Use a Robertson screw. If you strip one of those you reaaaaally over-torqued it.

                  I'm pretty sure I would not like to live in a world in which I would never be offended. I am absolutely certain I don't want to live in a world in which you would never be offended. Freedom doesn't mean the absence of things you don't like. Dave

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R raddevus

                    Others get upset about calling them "flat head". Quick Tip: Know Your Screwdrivers (Hint: It's Not a "Flathead!") | Make:[^] :)

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    PIEBALDconsult
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    "(slotted screw)-driver" i.e. not "slotted-(screw driver)" It's all in the nuances.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R raddevus

                      Here's the question up for debate:

                      Debate

                      Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                      Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      RedDk
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      Simple. "Why would any modern product use a standard screw ... etc?" No modern product would use a standard screw. Any product using a standard screw is unevolved and neanderthalian. Natural selection, in it's most intelligent up- to-date form, socially darwinistic and all/etc, dictates that the evolution of the mind of the user enables this more informed buyer to make the right decision with respect to PURCHASING the engineered product that is more highly evolved. Economically, supply and demand takes over in this case. To do the math with respect to the genetic algorithm that generates the extinction of the standard screwdriver will be left to the high-minded developer who has the knowledge to implement it and test in realtime the actual blip on the radar which signals that event has really passed. In other words, extinction hasn't happened yet but venture capitalists will make sure that it does. Unless of course what you mean by "modern" is really some clock on some Roman soldiers villa wall.

                      P R 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • R RedDk

                        Simple. "Why would any modern product use a standard screw ... etc?" No modern product would use a standard screw. Any product using a standard screw is unevolved and neanderthalian. Natural selection, in it's most intelligent up- to-date form, socially darwinistic and all/etc, dictates that the evolution of the mind of the user enables this more informed buyer to make the right decision with respect to PURCHASING the engineered product that is more highly evolved. Economically, supply and demand takes over in this case. To do the math with respect to the genetic algorithm that generates the extinction of the standard screwdriver will be left to the high-minded developer who has the knowledge to implement it and test in realtime the actual blip on the radar which signals that event has really passed. In other words, extinction hasn't happened yet but venture capitalists will make sure that it does. Unless of course what you mean by "modern" is really some clock on some Roman soldiers villa wall.

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        PIEBALDconsult
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        Ergo, don't friggin' call it "standard"!

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R RedDk

                          Simple. "Why would any modern product use a standard screw ... etc?" No modern product would use a standard screw. Any product using a standard screw is unevolved and neanderthalian. Natural selection, in it's most intelligent up- to-date form, socially darwinistic and all/etc, dictates that the evolution of the mind of the user enables this more informed buyer to make the right decision with respect to PURCHASING the engineered product that is more highly evolved. Economically, supply and demand takes over in this case. To do the math with respect to the genetic algorithm that generates the extinction of the standard screwdriver will be left to the high-minded developer who has the knowledge to implement it and test in realtime the actual blip on the radar which signals that event has really passed. In other words, extinction hasn't happened yet but venture capitalists will make sure that it does. Unless of course what you mean by "modern" is really some clock on some Roman soldiers villa wall.

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          raddevus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25

                          I agree entirely and at least 95.2% (considering all standard deviation units). I believe this will fundamentally change AI in ways that haven't been foretold yet. No one can disagree.

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P PIEBALDconsult

                            Ergo, don't friggin' call it "standard"!

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            raddevus
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #26

                            PIEBALDconsult wrote:

                            Ergo, don't friggin' call it "standard"!

                            I believe his name is RedDk. :rolleyes:

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R raddevus

                              I agree entirely and at least 95.2% (considering all standard deviation units). I believe this will fundamentally change AI in ways that haven't been foretold yet. No one can disagree.

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              RedDk
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #27

                              "disagree" Ha! No matter when, there'll always be someone who'll disagree with you. Offer Geritol in copius doses and ... Bob's 'yer uncle.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                not forgetting hex, (and if you're smart you'll use wira bits for those).

                                Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                Lopatir wrote:

                                not forgetting hex, (and if you're smart you'll use wira bits for those).

                                As Griff said, Allen, the correct name for them.

                                Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R raddevus

                                  Here's the question up for debate:

                                  Debate

                                  Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                                  Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  den2k88
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #29

                                  Slotted: easy to rebuild the slot in case it gets damaged. Philips: you can apply much more torque in case the srew gets stuck. The others: f*** them, their sons, their ancestors, their dogs and their teeth. Good as they may be you are certifiably 100% lacking the proper tool to disassemble them.

                                  GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R raddevus

                                    Here's the question up for debate:

                                    Debate

                                    Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                                    Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    AAC Tech
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #30

                                    Look, if you have ever tried a TRUE Robertson ALL the rest are painful. Note: Not to be confused with the inferior square heads. What is the difference? The taper which effectively locks the driver in to the screw head. When you think about it is so obviously the best way. Slots, Philips, etc. all chatter to some degree - even Allen keys. Even a cheaply made screw is held tightly because of the fundamental design - a taper.

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R raddevus

                                      Here's the question up for debate:

                                      Debate

                                      Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                                      Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      MKJCP
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #31

                                      As far as I can see, this debate hasn't nailed much down.

                                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A AAC Tech

                                        Look, if you have ever tried a TRUE Robertson ALL the rest are painful. Note: Not to be confused with the inferior square heads. What is the difference? The taper which effectively locks the driver in to the screw head. When you think about it is so obviously the best way. Slots, Philips, etc. all chatter to some degree - even Allen keys. Even a cheaply made screw is held tightly because of the fundamental design - a taper.

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        raddevus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #32

                                        AAC Tech wrote:

                                        if you have ever tried a TRUE Robertson ALL the rest are painful.

                                        Interesting. I looked up robertson screw and stumbled upon the wiki on screws. wow, there are so many! List of screw drives - Wikipedia[^]

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M MKJCP

                                          As far as I can see, this debate hasn't nailed much down.

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          raddevus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #33

                                          Yeah, I should've probably asked "what is the best mixer" because I've done nothing more than stir things up. :rolleyes:

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups